-->
@drafterman
thanks
I've been thinking about Budda's claim. At first I was skeptical. An innocent child is a fairly solid claim, but in a small game, a DP3 innocent child is right on the cusp. If he is banking the game could end before them, then it's a really ingenious, if risky claim. I think 2 maf is reasonable. Meaning 2 mislynches and 3 nks gives maf a win. That puts us at, potentially DP3 with one kill away from a maf win.I agree this is a stretch, and am not discounting the claim at the moment, but it is not a slam dunk claim as I would normally interpret it as.Right now, my chief FOS are Supa (for the unsolicited vanilla claim and reasons previously given) and Hammer (for reasons previously given).RM, unfortunately, is town which basically means I ignore him for the rest of the game.Earth and Danielle I don't have a read on yet.GP is GP and pretty much inscrutable to me.I'm waffling on Vaarka. On the one hand I see his actions as legitimate scum hunting, on the other I see it as casting a bunch of FOS to see what sticks and can whip up a wagon on.
Aren't you usually more... idk, aggressive when you play? I remember you typically being an aggressive playeror were you only like that when YYW is in the game
I'm waffling on Vaarka. On the one hand I see his actions as legitimate scum hunting, on the other I see it as casting a bunch of FOS to see what sticks and can whip up a wagon on.
The only thing giving me a town read is that he implied both Nolan and John were referenced in his character description. This suggests that Nolan and John are in the game, giving more credibility to Budda's claim. Supa also seemed to pick up on this and imply Budda is town. @Budda - do you agree with this?
than we should assume Supa is town, correct?
Conversely if Supa is scum, it would put a FOS on Budda. I'm not sure Budda would have "allowed" that poor scum play if they were on a team.
Well if it makes you feel better, I townread myself, and unless you're not confirmed DP3, I have to townread youThis is a good point. Did you see any town reads that i missed? Can't recall if he has TR'd anyone tbh
Once Budda claimed innocent child reveal DP3 I had to town read him, regardless of what I think. My emoji thing was half a joke and half "bro wtf stop overreacting to shit with emojis that's not normal", but I'm not gonna push against him or even think about lynching him unless a night action reveals him as guilty, or he doesn't get confirmed DP3.I also note that sometimes he starts off jokingly FOSing someone (Danielle is scum for watching TV, you're scum for using emojis) then develops that into a fullfledged FOS, as if he is testing the waters for an FOS on that person. But really, he's FOS'd 6 out of 9 people.
How am I not being "aggressive" here? I just posted 6 paragraphs of analysis including a slew of insults toward RM lol.
This is the kind of useless post that seems like (as drafterman said) you throwing out random comments and then seeing if any FOS' stick.
But yes, I am generally more aggressive when YYW plays. In Mafia and life in general, my harsh tone toward others is always in retaliation (not instigation). YYW is a scumbag when he plays, so I tend to respond in kind. RM is being douchey, but unlike YYW he seems genuinely dim so I do feel a little guilty by replying in kind. Oh well. I think it's best to just ignore him entirely for now.
No Town Reads. He's Scum Read just about everyone:#161 - Earth/Supa#192 - Rather lynch RM than nobody#214 - Budda/Supa#319 - Slight FOS on GP#325 - Danielle/Drafter#328 - More FOS on GPI also note that sometimes he starts off jokingly FOSing someone (Danielle is scum for watching TV, you're scum for using emojis) then develops that into a fullfledged FOS, as if he is testing the waters for an FOS on that person. But really, he's FOS'd 6 out of 9 people
My emoji thing was half a joke and half "bro wtf stop overreacting to shit with emojis that's not normal
Wait which post?Yeah, I'm not going to FOS for making a joke. But the thing is, you followed up that "joke" with a "yeah, but I'm serious about that" here in post #189. So you can't make a post that looks like a joke, then claim it's serious, then claim it's a joke again when it works against you. This is part of the FOS that is building up against you, it looks like you're trying to hedge your bets. No matter what anyone says, you have an "out."
Because when I see people going "haha lmao ECKS DEE" kinda shit, it usually sticks out as if you're trying to distract from a point someone made, or even discredit them. It seems like overreaction, and while one emoji every now and then is fine (unless it's the rolling eyes emoji), a whole bunch, especially in the same post, specifically where you're discrediting someone, seems like what I just described.Yeah, I'm not going to FOS for making a joke. But the thing is, you followed up that "joke" with a "yeah, but I'm serious about that" here in post #189. So you can't make a post that looks like a joke, then claim it's serious, then claim it's a joke again when it works against you. This is part of the FOS that is building up against you, it looks like you're trying to hedge your bets. No matter what anyone says, you have an "out."