-->
@3RU7AL
That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You can argue all you like about it being non-distinguishable, but it is still there. It wouldn't matter if humanity was never here, the universe objectively existed. You are incorrect here.
Do FACTS have words?
Do FACTS have words?I don’t understand that question, so are you going to defend your claim or not?
That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You can argue all you like about it being non-distinguishable, but it is still there. It wouldn't matter if humanity was never here, the universe objectively existed. You are incorrect here.
Claim: WORDS are NOT OBJECTS.
Isn’t the word object a word?
Claim: FACTS are comprised of WORDS.
OBJECTIVE = OBJECT
those words there comprised of are objective
I can think of a plethora of abstract objective things such as mathematics,
an appreciable narrative does not in itself validate an internal data construct as a representation of an external reality.
In short, objective is subjective unless subject to a level of sensory certainty (perhaps)....Though an appreciable narrative does not in itself validate an internal data construct as a representation of an external reality.In fact, considering the nature of human function and process....I think that it is fair to say that we can never be 100% certain of anything.....Though our ability to be uncertain does offer us a high degree of confidence in our existence......I think therefore I am as it where.
WORDS are NOT OBJECTS.
Can you support the claim that objective means objects?
reality independent of the mind
...The definition does not say that, just because it includes objects doesn’t mean it’s limited to objects.
CONCEPTS ARE NOT "INDEPENDENT OF THE MIND".
...So what about science?
...No that’s the point, it’s an abstract concept independent of the mind making it inherently objective.
I don’t know, maybe I should turn that question back to you considering your making more claims then I am on the matter. Who is the genius human mind that’s responsible for science?
...No we don’t agree to that, me asking a question in regards to your belief doesn’t mean I agree to it, are you going to answer or not?
So, I'll ask you, in a world without human minds, where is your "science"?
So, I'll ask you, in a world without human minds, where is your "science"?I don’t know, again let me return a question back at you where is your science?