-->
@fauxlaw
Like I said, she me a gov't that follows its own rules unerringly. Go ahead and complain. I'm sure they'll listen. I've stopped.
Attempting to label all Trump supporters as "terrorists" is a dangerous precedent.
Like I said, she me a gov't that follows its own rules unerringly. Go ahead and complain. I'm sure they'll listen. I've stopped.
I'm not claiming anyone is a terrorist
The problem isn't the word, its a category, the problem is the connotation and criminal system.
Terrorist actually does mean a specific thing
Yes, I am 100% in favor of making ALL LYING ILLEGAL. But there has to a stipulation that the facts are verifiable.
"A person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims"
In Osama bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America",[3][4] he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indian oppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia,[4][5][6] US support of Israel,[7][8] and sanctions against Iraq.[9]
It's really not that hard to find... did you not think there were any?
"The activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power." I'd say that military and political aims are very intertwined.
Is Trump's twitter ever coming back? I miss him
The hypocrisy that often comes up from doing military acts on other nations is that "it only counts if someone does it to us" or "it was justified, what they did wasn't" or other things like that.
Who will stop Trump from creating his own online network, along with his own service provider?