You ask this because whatever answer I give your gonna deem it as subjective (so predictable but I see right through it nice try though) so the objective route is to not give any advice.
Well of course it will be subjective.
Well of course it will be subjective.Well in that case that’s why I won’t give any.
I don't understand why you are subjectively attaching so much importance to objectivity.
Objectivity means having no preferences and without some preference, some foundational goals there is no reason to think of things as right or wrong at all. They just are or are not.
You’re literally starting a circle at this point because that’s essentially what nihilism is.
Well nihilists don’t believe in right or wrong so that shouldn’t be an issue.
Well neither of us is a nihilist so it doesn't matter
If we are to say you did the right thing we must first know what you are trying to accomplish. The goal. True or false?
right to have a goal.
Without a goal there is no right or wrong. Otherwise what are we even talking about?
You are essentially asking what goal does having a goal serve and the answer is literally every possible goal. Every goal us better served by holding it as a goal.
what goal does every possible goal serve?
You are essentially asking what goal does having a goal serve and the answer is literally every possible goal. Every goal us better served by holding it as a goal.
Nothing is right or wrong without a goal.
Nothing is right or wrong without a goal.Prove it.
Right or wrong without a goal would appear to exist in exactly the same way that alien abductions happen. In people's imagination only.
True because it’s objectively proven that certain actions produce a certain result but that’s a separate narrative from saying it’s right to have a goal.
No sir, now that’s not how this works, don’t think your slick and can twist the narrative to suit you. Your claiming that right and wrong exists through goals and I’m saying prove it, that’s not the same as telling you to prove something doesn’t exist.
You see having a goal to go with a moral premise is an axiom. It is one you accept, I accept, everybody accepts, literally every single moral premise has a "hidden" goal or intention behind it. This is because whenever you make a moral statement you are appealing to some intention or theory of right and wrong, which you can only have if something is the "best" and something is the "worst" that something which is "best" is your goal.
Mm, our DNA contains evolutionary mutations for surviving, such as cooperation
We care because we are DNA.That’s simply not true, not everybody cares.
At the very least, everybody cares about themselves, and if you care about yourself, then you ought to care about others. Its that simple.
