Issac Newton like other Jesus freaks, made predicitions for begining of the end of world using book of Daniel
This vid explains the logic ---or lack thereof-- of how he arrived at 2060. --Go to 1:35-- The problem for all of those who used the Book of Daniel comments, --time, times and time and half '---- is what begin date to use is the real problem for all of them.
My original end-date-for-humanity prognostication calculations { see bottom of page } were 2015. Were now 8 years beyond that.
Ive gone with a give or take 50 years prognostication, ---1965 > 2065-- ergo, 2065 is added on maximum of 50 years, since were beyond 1965 and 2015.
Calculations for end-date-for-humanity is as follows.
Pi has to do with a cosmic ratio constant via a true/pure 2D circle { area } and its relation to its diameter { 2 radii (--) }
1} Pi-time { absolute/cosmic } is 66.4. How I arrived at that 66.4 is explained at bottom of page.
66.4 * 3 { 3 is triangulation aka to get a fix on a location, or my case, to get cosmic fix on time }, = 199.2 { I originally considered this to likened to mass as in Higgs boson gives mass to all particles } and took it to the 2nd power ---similar to e = mass * speed of radiation^2.
2} 199.2^2 = 39,680.64 { spherical area surface growth vertexial points on a sphere } = 39,680....... -- see 4 * Pi * radius^2 = surface area growth of a true 3D sphere ----
4} 39,680 * 186000 { speed-of-radiation } = 7,380,599,040
5} and that that resultant value { 7,380,599,040 } is coincidentally, very close to the numerical value of humans on Earth in 2015 { 7,379,797,139 },
7379797139 ---ebuc calculation factors---
7380599040 --actual human population estimate 2015--
----------------
.......and the differrence is 801,901, so not a reltively large value. Round to 1 millon if we want.
..."...The current population increase is estimated at 67 million people per year.".....
"population in the world is, as of 2022, growing at a rate of around 0.84% per year (down from 1.05% in 2020, 1.08% in 2019, 1.10% in 2018, and 1.12% in 2017). "..
.." Annual growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at around 2%. The rate of increase has nearly halved since then, and will continue to decline in the coming years."...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ok, so how to get to my given 66.4 as a Cosmic, Pi-time value.
Pi^4 { XYZ aka 3D + 1 of time } = 97.4 and we could stop there and say, hey that might be a cosmic Pi-time value.
However, consider the following:
Pi^3 { XYZ or abc } as 31.00 62 7 66......
note: in synergetics 31 is the total primary set of great circles for the maximum spherical, regular polyhedron, the 5-fold Icosa{20}hedron, and,
humans and some other animals have 31 bilateral { ergo 31 left and 31 right...62 see Pi^3 above } spinal nerves { left ~~~ < I > ~~~) right }
If we take the Pi^4 { XYZ + t } value 97.4 and subtract the 31.00 { XYZ/3D } value we get 66.4 as the t { Cosmic Absolute Time } value.
There is more, or alternative to this above scenario. First, the easy part as follows below, and I called it renormalization { likened to R. P Feynman and others }
1} Pi^4 / 4 i.e. divided by, = 24.35 22 7 27........ and we see here that the numerical 7 occur is the overall 7th position, just as is does with Pi^3 { 31.00 62 7 66... }
2} When XYZ is abc, as 3 diemensions meeting at corner of 90 degree, then small d is the fouth spatial dimension that is on 45 degree diagonal from the abc meeting corner, and the d is on trajectory twoward center of the cube, and it meets a 4th dimemsional cube, at it corner, inside the larger cube. Ok so no you know the basis of hyper-space dimensioning is just subdivision to smaller and smaller volumes withing the outer largest volume.
3} putting aside hyper-dimension, the small d, is a volumetric/body diagonal trajectory inside { invagination of a sort } a cube. So mathematically it is called a volumetric diagonal, yet they also call it a ' body ' diagonal, because it gives an internal somethingness to the otherwise surface-only cube. This is significant to me in other ways that are go off track from the above. My bad.