Vanilla Mafia DP 1

Author: Discipulus_Didicit

Posts

Total: 315
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
Whiteflame Remember that time when evil omgus'd disc for voting him?


Yeah he was town there too. I think you are putting too much stock in the OMGUS thing with him. 


ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
Where’s the “we (town)” lol.

He’s never clarified it before. Why would he clarify it now?
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
When has Evil ever said “we (town)” on any sentence before. He’s always just said we as Lunatic kindly pointed out for me in post 210.

Again the question is how to differentiate noob scum and town scum. This is the difference imo.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Here’s a better question for anyone: what are the characteristics of noob mafia. And how they similar/different to that of noob town?
There are rarely blanket scum tells. There are things that can be read as scummy, but you take behaviors and you cross apply them with a person's history and how they show themselves to act. Anti-town isn't the same as scummy. Poly's watching of GP was anti-town but not scummy in comedians mafia for example. greyparrot claiming dp1 every game is anti-town but not scummy. That same behavior cross applied to a different player who doesn't usually do those things makes it scummy; hence why mistercrhis was scummy in wylteds game.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
He said "we" twice in that post. The subcontext is obviously grouping and referring to the rest of the players as a collective town. Both town and scum pursuade the masses this way  
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
There are rarely blanket scum tells. There are things that can be read as scummy, but you take behaviors and you cross apply them with a person's history and how they show themselves to act.
Good - now let’s try this again. When has town Evil ever said “we(town)” in any phrase before.

Anti-town isn't the same as scummy. Poly's watching of GP was anti-town but not scummy in comedians mafia for example. greyparrot claiming dp1 every game is anti-town but not scummy. That same behavior cross applied to a different player who doesn't usually do those things makes it scummy; hence why mistercrhis was scummy in wylteds game.
Idc about this part it’s fluff.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
He said "we" twice in that post. The subcontext is obviously grouping and referring to the rest of the players as a collective town. Both town and scum pursuade the masses this way  
I don’t think you understand. Yes we both know he used be we. By itself it would be null.

But here he said “we (town) ….”

Where is the bolded part in any previous game as . It shows self consciousness here.
Polyglot
Polyglot's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 327
1
2
5
Polyglot's avatar
Polyglot
1
2
5
-->
@Lunatic
What Pie is referring to is that Evil felt the need to say “(town)” in addition to “we”. There was no need for Evil to emphasize that the “we” is “(town)”

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Good - now let’s try this again. When has town Evil ever said “we(town)” in any phrase before.
It's his third game and considering y our lucky to have more than 5 posts from him a day phase, I am sure there is a lot of firsts he will make as either affiliation. Even assuming you didn't just shoot your own argument in the foot since I pointed out he has used "we" before, this was a horrible argument. 

Idc about this part it’s fluff.
It's not fluff. Being Anti-town isn't being scummy. That's an extremely relevant point here, is people seem to be attacking the infrastructure of evil's argument's here on merit of how well spoken he is about pursuing omgus lynches, and not being able to back it up argumentatively. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Polyglot
What Pie is referring to is that Evil felt the need to say “(town)” in addition to “we”. There was no need for Evil to emphasize that the “we” is “(town)”
Yes exactly - I probably wasn’t being clear enough and that’s my b
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 6,344
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Lunatic
Dude, I’m starting to get sick of this. I’ve pointed out that my reasoning isn’t based on the OMGUS several times, but you keep pointing back to the Pokémon game as evidence that he does it as town. I know he does it as town. I’ve defended him over it in this game. My reasoning has nothing to do with the OMGUS. I don’t know how many times I can say this before you acknowledge it. As my point.

I think a lot of your defense of Evil just speaks to what you’d expect of him as scum, and I can’t jive with that. We’ve never seen him as scum. We don’t know how he’d behave as scum. He’s a noob, and I suspect he’ll make noob mistakes as scum. I don’t think he’ll behave at all optimally, whether it’s about pushing a lynch on better targets or being more active and exhibiting a stronger defense of his efforts as scum. Should he be doing those things if he is scum? Yes. Would I be surprised if he was scum and wasn’t doing those things? No, and I think there’s enough behavioral reasons that separate him from his previous performances in the last two games to actively sus him in this game. I think distinguishing elements are better indicators with someone like him. You don’t have to agree, but that’s how I see it.

At the moment, based on what I’ve read so far, I would not consider a lynch on Pie. Nothing he’s said stands out to me as scummy, though there are nitpicky elements. I don’t agree that the use of “we” in Evil’s post is a scum slip, but I also don’t see Pie pushing it this hard as an indicator of his alignment.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Polyglot
What Pie is referring to is that Evil felt the need to say “(town)” in addition to “we”. There was no need for Evil to emphasize that the “we” is “(town)”
I don't see how the addition of town makes any difference to the general argument. The subtext that "we" is town is pretty obvious, and he has used we before. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
It's his third game and considering y our lucky to have more than 5 posts from him a day phase, I am sure there is a lot of firsts he will make as either affiliation. Even assuming you didn't just shoot your own argument in the foot since I pointed out he has used "we" before, this was a horrible argument. 
Sure but everytime he’s used “we” by itself. Never has he felt to clarify that by adding (town) right after it. What changed? The answer is quite simple. Self-consciousness - it’s the sort of thing Wylted was harping on Poly last game about. 

My original post said this as well: “Town doesn’t have to clarify why they’re using “we” and “us.” Only scum worried about their image would use this - even more so from an inexperienced scum like Evil.

I was never on him for using we or us - this is a strawman. I was on him for clarifying it when he add (town) to it unlike previously.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
I don't see how the addition of town makes any difference to the general argument. The subtext that "we" is town is pretty obvious, and he has used we before. 
Because it’s different from his previous words as town and we have 3 games to tell that. Never has he clarified with (town). Noob mafia would be worried about their appearance and clarify it to sound townie. You can ask Wylted about that for more details.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
I don’t agree that the use of “we” in Evil’s post is a scum slip
This is a Lunatic strawman. That was never my argument in the first place.

I’m on Evil because he said “we(town)” when previously he’s always just said we. This is a clear detraction and the obvious reason why is that scum are more self conscious in their posts especially noob scum in this scenario.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Dude, I’m starting to get sick of this. I’ve pointed out that my reasoning isn’t based on the OMGUS several times, but you keep pointing back to the Pokémon game as evidence that he does it as town. I know he does it as town. I’ve defended him over it in this game. My reasoning has nothing to do with the OMGUS. I don’t know how many times I can say this before you acknowledge it. As my point.
First off, calm the fvck down. I am having this conversation with you assuming you are town, and want the best thing for town. Being open minded to having a civil discussion that opens into the possibility that you could be wrong in your assumption that evil is town isn't an attack on you and the goal isn't to make you feel like an idiot for being wrong, so there is no reason to be short with me unless you have motivations outside of hunting scum. I am adressing your arguments and also admitting they have merit to them, but think you are associating noob town tells or anti-town behavior with scum behavior. My purpose of highlighting times he has done similar things as town isn't to try and say you are wrong in a blanket, it's to get you to be open minded about these tells. I am not mis-representing you or saying these are your only argument. That you are getting "sick of this" makes me thing  you aren't looking at this objectively and seeing only what you want to see. 

I think a lot of your defense of Evil just speaks to what you’d expect of him as scum, and I can’t jive with that. We’ve never seen him as scum. We don’t know how he’d behave as scum. He’s a noob, and I suspect he’ll make noob mistakes as scum. I don’t think he’ll behave at all optimally, whether it’s about pushing a lynch on better targets or being more active and exhibiting a stronger defense of his efforts as scum. Should he be doing those things if he is scum? Yes. Would I be surprised if he was scum and wasn’t doing those things? No, and I think there’s enough behavioral reasons that separate him from his previous performances in the last two games to actively sus him in this game. I think distinguishing elements are better indicators with someone like him. You don’t have to agree, but that’s how I see it.
Most of my issue with buying evil as scum comes from my weariness at the wagon. I am trying to discern the legitimate reads from the illegitimate ones, and poly's, pies, and lebs ultimately feel weak. I know evil is an easy mislynch, because he's been mislynched 3 games in a rown now. If you notice in every single game he gets mislynched, scum are on his wagon every time. I am simply trying to learn from out mistakes of lynching him for this stuff in the past.

At the moment, based on what I’ve read so far, I would not consider a lynch on Pie. Nothing he’s said stands out to me as scummy, though there are nitpicky elements. I don’t agree that the use of “we” in Evil’s post is a scum slip, but I also don’t see Pie pushing it this hard as an indicator of his alignment.
Yeah but the timing of that quick swithc form town reading him was only 30 posts between. And the argument about pronouns seems to be his only real reason for that quick switch. If you think that it is a null tell as well that should stand out to you more. I know pie is feeding the confirmation bias into the evil lynch here, but it is something that should worry you more than it is I think... 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Wylted
You know the argument you used against Poly last game? It didn’t apply last game but it does apply this game with Evil’s usage of (town) right after “we.” Essentially he said “we(town)…”
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Sure but everytime he’s used “we” by itself. Never has he felt to clarify that by adding (town) right after it. What changed? The answer is quite simple. Self-consciousness - it’s the sort of thing Wylted was harping on Poly last game about. 

My original post said this as well: “Town doesn’t have to clarify why they’re using “we” and “us.” Only scum worried about their image would use this - even more so from an inexperienced scum like Evil.

I was never on him for using we or us - this is a strawman. I was on him for clarifying it when he add (town) to it unlike previously.

How does the inclusion of the obvious part (town) make this leap from a null tell to "oh he is super obviously scum flor clarifying that "we" meant town even though that was already super obvious?!
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
If Evil flips town then Lunatic is a good chance for scum. Just recall Fast Food Mafia when he was defending his partner Poly all day long.

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Because it’s different from his previous words as town and we have 3 games to tell that. Never has he clarified with (town). Noob mafia would be worried about their appearance and clarify it to sound townie. You can ask Wylted about that for more details.
The (town) in we is so obvious subtext. This is absolutely ridiculous lol. There is going to be a lot of first words he uses when he only posts 5 times a day phase and this is his third game. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
If Evil flips town then Lunatic is a good chance for scum. Just recall Fast Food Mafia when he was defending his partner Poly all day long.
Except for in that case poly was scum. You equating a scum defending scum situation to a scum defending town situation. Makes 0 sense. This is such an easy mislynch I could easily cede this argument at any point and hop onto it. Yet I am still pursuing the hardest fvcking lynch possible in trying to lynch you lol. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
How does the inclusion of the obvious part (town) make this leap from a null tell to "oh he is super obviously scum flor clarifying that "we" meant town even though that was already super obvious?!
Cause he has never done it before? It detracts from his behavior? That’s what game is based on right?You don’t have to agree with it, but it is clearly different than other games.

And scum are much more likely to include these things because of the perception townies get on them - again you can check put Wylted’s post last game.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
Except for in that case poly was scum. You equating a scum defending scum situation to a scum defending town situation. Makes 0 sense.
I never said you’d 100% be scum. I just said there was a good chance because I’m getting vibes from Fast Food

This is such an easy mislynch I could easily cede this argument at any point and hop onto it. Yet I am still pursuing the hardest fvcking lynch possible in trying to lynch you lol. 
You can keep trying. It’s not going to get anywhere. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Cause he has never done it before? It detracts from his behavior? That’s what game is based on right?You don’t have to agree with it, but it is clearly different than other games.

And scum are much more likely to include these things because of the perception townies get on them - again you can check put Wylted’s post last game.
I literally just went through every evil post. The only time he used "we" was one time in the pokemon game in that game I inked you. So yeah there is going to be a lot of firsts for everything. You admit that saying we is a null tell, but some how thing we included with obvious subtext of (town) suddenly makes this go from a null read to a full on scum read. That is such a wide leap that I can't see this as not being an oppertunistic af lynch. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 17,520
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Lunatic
The (town) in we is so obvious subtext. This is absolutely ridiculous lol. There is going to be a lot of first words he uses when he only posts 5 times a day phase and this is his third game. 
It’s the small pool of posts that makes it statistically significant lol. Previous times he didn’t include it. Why did he include it now? It’s a simple question.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 6,344
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Lunatic
Luna, if you think I’m upset that you’re challenging my view, then you’re not understanding my frustration. I’m annoyed (don’t need to calm down, I’m not angry) that you have consistently misrepresented the reasons why I have sussed Evil. I don’t mind if you challenge them, I’m up for that. I’m not particularly fond of being told that you’re challenging my view when you haven’t really touched it. I haven’t said the word “anti-town” once in all my posts, and it hasn’t been implied, either. I haven’t focused on noob tells. I’ve gone so far as to specifically reject both types of behavior as reads for him being scum, yet you keep returning to them. This is the issue because you keep bringing up reasoning that I’ve already explicitly agreed with as challenges to my way of thinking. That’s why I’m sick of seeing it, and it’s honestly making me less certain of you that you’re ignoring large swaths of my points.

And yes, part of the reason I’m interested in lynching him is that I think it will give us some insights into other people on his lynch. I agree that scum as pushed for mislynches on him before. I did just that in the Pokémon game. I’m willing to consider Pie much more deeply as a lynch coming off of this one, particularly if he flips town. But I’m not joining that wagon in this DP.

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@ILikePie5
I never said you’d 100% be scum. I just said there was a good chance because I’m getting vibes from Fast Food
Yeah but again this one liner doesn't respond to my argument. As usual. You are once again making it seem like you have a point while adressing nothing I've said. How does your statement that I am probably scum if evil flips town make any sense when the example you are using to substantiate that point is a game where I was scum defending scum?

You can keep trying. It’s not going to get anywhere. 
Again you just dismissed my point though because you got caught logically making 0 sense. You are suggesting I am scum here, and I pointed out that lynching you is the hardest route possible. If scum's goal is to mis-lynch I should be going for evil right now, not defending him. Your posturing about how this lynch is going no where just proves my point inadvertently lol 
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 6,344
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
I have seen your responses, I’ll get to them a bit later.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Luna, if you think I’m upset that you’re challenging my view, then you’re not understanding my frustration. I’m annoyed (don’t need to calm down, I’m not angry) that you have consistently misrepresented the reasons why I have sussed Evil. I don’t mind if you challenge them, I’m up for that. I’m not particularly fond of being told that you’re challenging my view when you haven’t really touched it. I haven’t said the word “anti-town” once in all my posts, and it hasn’t been implied, either. I haven’t focused on noob tells. I’ve gone so far as to specifically reject both types of behavior as reads for him being scum, yet you keep returning to them. This is the issue because you keep bringing up reasoning that I’ve already explicitly agreed with as challenges to my way of thinking. That’s why I’m sick of seeing it, and it’s honestly making me less certain of you that you’re ignoring large swaths of my points.
I am not mis-representing your point. I know what you arguments are, and I percieve them to something you don't view them to be. I think you are mis-placing ant-town behaviors as scummy behaviors. I know you don't agree that's what you are doing, but I am least logically explaining why I think you are getting it wrong. I am also admitting that I think you genuinely think you are right here, which is why I don't think it's scummy of you to do so. But frankly if you are unwilling to see things from a different point of view here I don't know what further can be gleaned from this part of the conversation. I am more interested in seeing what lynches we can accomplish together since we don't see eye to eye on the evil lynch. If you think that lynch is still possible and that is the only lynch you are willing to take dp1, then there is literally no point in responding to me further. If you are open to looking into one of pie, or poly then we have somethign to talk about. But the next part doesn't make it seem like that is an option, so I guess we are done here. 

And yes, part of the reason I’m interested in lynching him is that I think it will give us some insights into other people on his lynch. I agree that scum as pushed for mislynches on him before. I did just that in the Pokémon game. I’m willing to consider Pie much more deeply as a lynch coming off of this one, particularly if he flips town. But I’m not joining that wagon in this DP.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 10,423
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
If you are sold on the evil lynch you have to bank on getting another two votes. It's possible but not guaranteed. I will fight this lynch to the end because I think it's a mislynch, and I think pie is scum. If you think there is any merit to my read on pie or poly, please let us work together and obtain a lynch. If not I am also okay with a no lynch as an alternative to an evil lynch. If evil gets lynched its not the end of the world as long as people are willing to give pie's motives a serious reading into for next day phase. Poly's as well. I  imagine he is waiting around for a good moment to hammer, as he seems to appear when vote counts are posted.