Something you may not know about airmax

If this is a joke, I don't find it funny and neither will most voters, it is a very irresponsible way to handle a homeless person seeking drugs and alcohol and perhaps is proof he is too laissez-faire.

In his benefit, his main opponent wants to not use the President's powers much at all. So we have two candidates (even hammer as a third) with vague af campaigns with regards to when they think it's correct for mods to discipline users.

I'd advise Airmax to make it clearer when he thinks it's right.

He did permanently ban me from DDO and wasn't always lenient to others either, so he does have beliefs surrounding discipline that aren't entirely laissez-faire.

Your perma ban was eventually lifted and you remained and posted on the site for months before we off

Not on RationalMadman which stayed banned (it got unbanned after DART began due to a glitch on Juggle's end that reset almost all banned user accounts to become accessible).

He just got lazy. I was officially still permanently banned and only lifting it several years later is still not laissez-faire.

This isn't about me, I am asking about others.

It's entirely inappropriate to ban somebody for their "mental safety", and it annoyed me that I've heard max say he was tempted to, to protect bornofgod. 

Maybe bornofgod should be banned for proselytizing,  but for his own safety is an absurd motive

Nothing you said there is true, least of all the 'only' but at the very least Airmax could say it himself. You are currently doing for Airmax what you said Athias was lame for doing for 3RU7AL.

It's entirely inappropriate to ban somebody for their "mental safety", and it annoyed me that I've heard max say he was tempted to, to protect bornofgod. 

Maybe bornofgod should be banned for proselytizing,  but for his own safety is an absurd motive

I don't recall asking you but as per usual you insert yourself and try to speak for Airmax.

I asked Airmax and only Airmax, don't be to Airmax what Athias is to 3RU7AL if you hypocritically condemn it at the same time.

I want Airmax himself to speak on whether he does or does not endorse your behaviour and treatment of myself and Pie in particular, during this election. It is important to voters sitting on the fence to use his replies to things like this to ascertain where he stands morally on matters that divide and destroy the community, which I firmly believe you have been doing throughout this election campaign process.

I have 0 care in the world what you reply to this, Lunatic. I will await Airmax to reply.

I think you misread that. 

He was memeing rm, not critiquing you lmfao. 

He can meme all he wants, in the end the toxicity stacks up, this is the same mod that banned me for stacked up poor conduct that was barely close to as bad as what Lunatic has done these past 2 weeks.

However, what he does isn't my concern, I am just reporting things that violate rules as that is the duty of any member of the website.

"RationalMadman's pride must be protected at all costs! Any and all who offend him shall be banned!"

@Rationalcrybaby

Oh I was banned for far less, I am used to inconsistent moderation though and as I said this is without a results-oriented mindset.

I see you violate rules, I click report. Whether you abuse me, Pie or another user or Jews in general. It is not of a concern to me.

If I say anymore it can be misconstrued as a threat of mod action. I am clicking report until you stop breaking the rules, whether by your own volition or the mods doing their diligent duty to protect site users from bullying.