The concept of minimal consciousness has different levels and dimensions.
Varying degrees conscious-ness from most simple two masses, to Universe { may parts }, black holes { complex coding }, female woman being most complex biologic.
involves twoness, which is awareness of oneself and others.
Two parts of occcupied space. Read my lips/text as stated, and best to address what is state. Brain and finger, toe and moon, tomatoe and black hole, so on. Not complex to grasp to occupied space parts that have a third part as the line-of-relationship between the sense other with photon, sound etc. Read my lips/text as was presented post #92.
Fourness can be represented by a square,
Yes but seperate topic { geometry }. You may be doing the convoluting here above in latter.
from the four aspects in which to have consciousness, as I clearly laid out in post wh#92. Square is differrent topic of Meta-space geometry/pattern/shape.
Yes four-ness is best symbolism at fundamental levels of consideration, as systemic { operational } integrity.
Threeness can be represented by a triangle, which is a minimal geometric and integral structural set.
Yes at most fundamental levels of consideration in Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and in occupied space { ex 2x4's } as I thought I stated. ---maybe that was in seperate thread--- a house wall is made structurally stable via triangulation. Old news.
Cubical table salt is stabilized via the triangulations of atoms in faces of the cube.
Twoness is represented by a linear set and is the minimal meta-space or abstract concept.
Yes but clarity here. Meta-space is abstract, mind/intellect/concepts and ego.
Occupied space fundamentally cannot be less than the four aspects i mention in post #92. Read again my lips/text in that post, and none of those four is Meta-space.
You, I, we and others need to grasp these distinction between Meta-space and occupied space. All occupied space is complemented by Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts/shape/pattern/geometry etc.
Finite, occupied space Universe, composed of its many parts and lines--of-relationship { also a part } has its limits in various ways. Meta-space physical laws of absolute this or that, just complement the the occupied space. They do not govern Universe. This is how it IS , eternally. --humans have to get over it--
There is not Meta-space secret code as in a bilateral Meta-god, that created eternally existent { eternally transforming within the known absolute limits } Universe.
Same goes for the Meta-space, Cosmically Absolute Principles. i.e. they only complement the eternally existent occupied space Universe
Oneness is not considered a set.
One-ness as occupied space never ever exists. Occupied space is never less the systemic four-ness that, I laid-out clearly in post #92. Read my lips/text as presented in those regards and grasp them comprensively as the minimal operational set, that can ever exist.
Additionally, in hyper-space, the first dimension is represented by the 45-degree volumetric or body diagonal of a 90-degree cube.
Yeah, much of this I learned specifcally from Kaku's book in 90's Hyper-space. Old news for me. :--) and loved it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
C-tim , I have a thread around here, Cosmic Scenarios in personal catagory. And there is two three point 5, or foure cosmic scenarios Ive presented over last 20 years.
The first one was has the 2ndary symbolism like this { O|O } to represent what may happened --at ' entropic heat death ' ending and or begining of next B Bang cyclic transformation of occupied space Universe,when,
8 icosahedra bonded/valenced with 8 triangular faces of the
Vector Equlibrium { VE }ka cubo-octahedron, and it jittterbug as contraction to a flattened set of 8 triangles, with four congruently bonded/valenced, as seeingly one icosa hedra on each side of the flattened
VE { 8 seemingly as one } . See this
first LINK to grasp the jitterbugging transformations of the VE and here is the final
2nd LINK.
The VE transforms to at least exotic geometric shapes that ive been listing for 30 years.
The above is Euclidean based, ergo, their may exist a more conceptual curved geometry as spherical/spheres instead of the straight edge version I present.
The these early scenarios evolved, when I realised that, Fullers 87 - 73, primary great circles { 2D } defined by trajectory geodesic line, are 3D tori.
So basically the bilateral { O|O } ending-beginning of Universe cyclic transformations ---the really deep sleep ;--D--- except not Euclidean, not 2D great circles rather, now 3D great tori. The icosahedrons primary set is 31 great circles{ now 3D tori }. The icosahedron has a a left and right-skew version so actually primary set of 31 left-skes great circles { 3D tori } and 31 right-skew set of 31.
This is because if you look and the first LINK in the above, take note that when the VE contracts, its first phase of transformation to the semi-complete, icosaheron, can take place when the VE jitterrbugs left or right on conceptual axis. Understand? See that first LINK. This contraction left or right makes the icosahedron set of 120 potential right-triangles --in its 20 faces, skewed opposite from the left-skew axis contraction.
O|O is the four icosahedra on each side the line in the middle O | O is the VE flatttened as 8 triangles as seemingly one. Now 2nd LINK above only shows flattened set of four double-valenced triangles, however, if you build the Jbug model as Ive done maybe 8 of them, you can fold the those four into each as seemingly one triangle. Think of this like Hypers-space it helps you any.
If you want grasp more, go to that Cosmic Scenarios thread in Personal.
