What does un-designed look like?

Author: vagabond ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 32
  • vagabond
    vagabond avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 277
    0
    1
    3
    vagabond avatar
    vagabond
    --> @EtrnlVw
    So you claim a rock is un-designed.
  • EtrnlVw
    EtrnlVw avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,569
    3
    3
    4
    EtrnlVw avatar
    EtrnlVw
    --> @vagabond
    First stick to what I actually write, not that I expect a Bullproof to do such a thing. A rock is a crumble of material so no I'm not claiming a "rock" is designed. However, solid planet material exists for the purpose of building planets. So yes, rock MATERIAL is included in the design of planets but rocks themselves are just rocks, pieces of broken planet material.
    ROCKS-
    "Rocks come from magma, which is the molten material found within the earth. When magma cools, either above or below the earth's surface, it crystallizes and forms the igneous rocks that can later be changed into metamorphic or sedimentary rocks."

    The question is not whether rocks were designed, the question is whether PLANETS were designed.

    Having fun Bully? lol, how can you stand yourself?

  • janesix
    janesix avatar
    Debates: 9
    Forum posts: 1,819
    3
    3
    3
    janesix avatar
    janesix
    --> @vagabond
    There is no such thing as "undesigned". 
  • keithprosser
    keithprosser avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 3,053
    2
    3
    3
    keithprosser avatar
    keithprosser
    --> @vagabond
    For fun, imagine there are three things on the ground - a stone, a watch and a snail - all about the same size.

    No doubt the stone was not designed and the watch was designed, so what does that imply about the snail?

    IMO, living things give every impression of being designed by a master craftsman. 

    But they weren't designed by a master craftsman - they evolved.

    I'm not even interested in debating the point  - there are 10 to the power 26 creation/evolution debates on the 'net already and lots of sites with better explanatory figures and graphics than I can put in post.
     
  • EtrnlVw
    EtrnlVw avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,569
    3
    3
    4
    EtrnlVw avatar
    EtrnlVw
    --> @keithprosser
    "They evolved" IS the design, that's what the formula required. Why do people not get that, and deny the design in the process of it? makes no sense. 
  • EtrnlVw
    EtrnlVw avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,569
    3
    3
    4
    EtrnlVw avatar
    EtrnlVw
    --> @keithprosser
    The Creator doesn't poof things into existence, there is a methodical plan and design through a lengthly process. Why deny a Creator of apparent design in the process of executing the design??
  • SkepticalOne
    SkepticalOne avatar
    Debates: 6
    Forum posts: 707
    3
    3
    6
    SkepticalOne avatar
    SkepticalOne
    --> @EtrnlVw
    V is asking by what criteria design is determined.  Without something "un-designed" to compare suspected designed things to, there can be no legitimate declaration of design ...or a designer.  In other words, Paley's watch can only be recognized as designed if the rock it is sitting on is not design.