Gay Mafia DP1

Honestly... this only makes me more suspicious of you. I pushed back aggressively because I wanted to see how you would react. I find it strange you would drop it so quickly if you were suspicious of me, since you would get a similar response from either town or scum.

All I’m wondering is what was unclear to you from the guide and what did the AI say?

I obviously did not save what AI said, but I can recreate it easily.

I asked questions like:

"In forum mafia game, is scum and mafia the same?"

"In forum mafia game, how to win"

"In forum mafia game, how to figure out who is scum"

"In forum mafia, how many players are town"

"In forum mafia, how many players are scums"

"In forum mafia, what roles does town usually get" 

And many more. You asked for AI answers for this. Ok, wait a second and I will post it.

in forum mafia, how many are mafia

In a standard game of Forum Mafia, the number of mafia players can vary, but it is typically around 1/3 to 1/4 of the total player count. For example, if there are 10 players in the game, there could be 3-4 mafia members. The exact number depends on the specific rules of the game and can be adjusted to balance the game.

did Best.Korea ask you how to play forum mafia?

As an AI language model, I don't have access to information about specific interactions with individuals. However, I'm capable of explaining the rules and mechanics of Forum Mafia if that's what you're looking for.

This is not true. Mod confirmed you are a new player and I am not saying you are not a new player. Please reread what I said

Could you clarify what you meant, then?

For someone brand new to the game, this game is first a maths problem. For all the rest of us, it's solved. We know it's probably 6-2. We know it's never going to be 5-3. But BK doesn't. He would have known if he was mafia. I also really like the fact that it's earlier thinking he's outlining for us. He's not posting just to post. A new townie would have been thinking about that stuff at game start. If that's mafia, it's good. 

1. The whole "Idk what to do" thing in Post #6, only to be followed up by a lot of comments that look like he's pretty sure of himself (a new example of this contradiction is found every time they post).

2. The immediate town read of you in Post #7 based on your research. I'm not saying that announcing research is inherently scummy, but it's not inherently towny, either. It's not something that we can use to evaluate affiliation. At first, I said it was only slightly scummy because it could just be bad/inconsistent noob logic, but then they go on to call out the illogical parts of Lunatic's sus on you, and then assert in Post #56 that Lunatic is scum because his instant scumread (as B.K perceives it, more on this in a second) on you is irrational. Yet, they ignore how their instant townread on you would be just as irrational.

So it's not really that B.K's poor logic is the problem, it's the fact that they give so much thought to the idea of logic, EXCEPT when they make a conclusion. With that in mind, the fact that they instantly called you "town" and than instantly called the one person who disagreed "scum" reeks of buddying.

3. The whole "testing reactions" thing (as he claimed in Posts #54 and #61 looked legit to me for a bit, until I noticed how he did it. When he set up his "test" in Post #10, Lunatic didn't even respond to the vote itself (instead focusing on you), and yet by Post #19 they were already calling Lunatic "scum." While they gave a different reason than their "test" in Post #19, he makes it clear in Post #56 that Lunatic's focus on you in Post #13 was a failure of his "test."

Not to mention the fact that Lunatic didn't even say you were scum; he only said in Post #13 and reiterated in Post #29 that you COULD be scum, based on you being a noob. Was it dumb? Yes. But it wasn't outright saying you were scum, as B.K claimed.

It's completely unfair to test someone's reaction, and then say their lack of reaction is scummy, especially when the person conducting the test is exaggerating claims of "accusation." Again, one could chalk this up to poor logic, but for the same reason from earlier, I don't think that excuse holds up anymore. It's basically a test where Lunatic was damned if he did, damned if he didn't.

4. The idea in Posts #56 and #61 that Lunatic, Pie, and Supa are all somehow scum because they "baited" those three all into "uniting against" them. Ignoring the fact that they're basically claiming Pie and Supa also failed their "test," it is ridiculous to assert this game has 3 mafiosos, especially in Posts #65 and #69 after being told in Posts #62 and #68 how unfair a 5v3 would be. And of course, it's all to justify that idea that B.K somehow "baited" 3 players who made an observation that B.K might know a bit more than thought into failing his "test." It's all way too convenient. To me, it just looks like they're expanding their lynch pool.

Supa also claims wylted is playing tricks and that I am not a new player. Later, Supa claimed that he didnt say how I wasnt new. However, he did in post 37, 38 and 40.

Who do you actually FOS?

Is BK even a new member? Seems like they could be an alt. Also kinda strange. I'm hanged up on their theme post, while they also seemed to do some research. I'm leaning towards town, however.

Wylted in his OP said that BK is a noob and should be helped. By MOD CONFIRMATION, he is new to mafia