I have always wondered what stupid people think about guns.
Then I read DoubleR's opinions on them.
I wonder no more, as now I know.
I used to wonder why right wingers believe the stupid things they do, till I realized a pattern of remarkable inability to comprehend words when those words conflict with their fantasy world view.
Case and point:
Question: Was that child who was shot to death killed by a gun or killed by another child?
Answer: That child who was shot to death was killed by another child.
Shall we ban all cars, because some children happen to walk behind their soccer mom's minivans and get ran over? I think not.
Your "protect the children!" outcry is as incoherent as it is nonsensical.
Nothing about my OP had anything to do with some "protect the children" message, nor did I state anything resembling the idea that if someone is killed by a gun then all guns should be banned. You have, as usual, made all of that up and are now pretending you're attacking my points. You aren't. You're having a whole conversation in your head.
The point of the question and of this thread is to address one very simple question; do we recognize that the presence of a dangerous product makes us less safe?
We do when it comes to literally everything else. If a toy was found to be involved in a flurry of choking incidents we would recall the toy. What we wouldn't do is blame all of the parents while pretending the toy had nothing to do with it.
But when it comes to guns suddenly this very basic common sense notion goes out the window. Suddenly then it's "guns don't kill people, people kill people". What a stupid retort.
What we do with this is an entirely different conversation. One I'm always willing to have with people who know how to read.