3RU7AL

Yes I understand this, but what I believe many did not understand was that if they only put a number 1 choice they were splitting the vote.

Implanting some sort of chip into people's brains comes with this problem.

drugs don't cause crime

a lack of drugs causes crime

On a serious note, I have always thought that here in the UK we should make heroin available to addicts through prescription and that way you remove the drug related crime and destroy the market.

In more concrete terms, if the voters don't know how to use RCV it is simply a way to split the opposition vote.

what are your proposed solutions ?

Dunno - agreeing that there is a problem is a good first step; and perhaps not make the problem worse.so it makes me wonder

You would definitely have a crime wave when all those addicts are released and need money to feed their addiction and will do anything to get it.

it may be cheaper to keep them basically sedated (especially on fentanyl which is ridiculously cheap)

80% of inmates return to prison on new charges

You would definitely have a crime wave when all those addicts are released and need money to feed their addiction and will do anything to get it.

perhaps we should provide free opium and or heroin and or fentanyl to prison inmates

I think creating a prison full of addicts may just cause a few problems when they are released.

However, to live in a state of personal bliss would probably kill the incentive to achieve anything

There is a substantial list of disparities between whites and blacks. Educational attainment, unemployment, health, poverty, you name it - the list is as long as my arm.

There are two explanations for these disparities:

1.) Whites and Blacks are subject to different social conditions and constraints that lead to one being advantages over the other.

2.) Whites and blacks are subject to identical social conditions and constraints - but black people do worse because they’re not as good as whites.

(1) is white privilege. (2) is white supremacy.

Chinese privilege? Muslim privilege? Jewish privilege? Never heard of them.

Really? Do you happen to have the archive link for it? I remember Mikal winning it.

Here.

Nonetheless it is not possible to actually detect light with via ones ears, nose or skin.

Do blind people dream ?

Do you have any good literature on windmills being "not great" for the environment?

the first Alaska Native

Do you support mail-in ballots in Alaska?

Not when a biometric blockchain and early voting is an option.

3RU7AL should be defending ranked choice voting here....

Ranked choice voting. Peltola's campaign workers made it happen. As usual democrats change rules at the last minute to get power.

The electorate will adapt, this might actually let a libertarian in once people understand the trick.

I think something is only good or bad, when ends are identified, goals I mean.

It's theoretically possible and desirable that the human brain could be redesigned to remove its tribal elements.

The problem with removing tribal elements from the brain is that empathy is intrinsic to tribalism, so by removing tribalism you would be removing empathy, which would result in a society of psychopaths.

Not sure what you mean. Can you elaborate?

How Cana blind person agree how bright the sun is by virtue of being able to agree on the number of photons per square meter?

collected and compiled 325 years after the fact

A collection of eyewitness accounts of Jesus’s generation preserved however long are still eyewitness accounts.

They are certainly more reliable than pure speculation.

men want the right to decide who they work for, you know, with their bodies

But Abortion is performed on a woman’s body. Shouldn’t she have rights over her own body?

Lol, MSM today is saying Biden did not go far enough!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LZqI5B017g

Functionally speaking, what is morality?

It’s a collection of emotional responses we have to ours and others actions and interactions. 

Facts and evidence are verifiable independently

atheism and humanism, an implicit false equivalency fallacy 

Facts and evidence are verifiable independently

As you haven’t bothered to contest anything I’ve said:

Women want the right to decide over their own bodies and ovaries. That is why their movement is called Pro Choice.

Alternative Intelligence programmed by humans is not really intelligent, but merely a programmed device that can be controlled, predicted and exploited.

On what basis do you feel it needs a fifth, what is wrong with the previous four that you feel necessitates need writing another argument after you’ve ignored the previous four?

Idk if I agree. Just because someone believes something, that does not mean they are part of a cult. But I WOULD argue that most people are probably a member of a cult.

You simply took my argument wildly out of context in order to pretend I’m claiming something that no rational human being could possibly think I’m claiming. This is a massive straw man.

You say that a mother killing a child is not murder.

For a fourth time, this is an absurd, outrageous straw man that completely and totally misrepresents my argument by taking them so far out their clear and unambiguous context that no reasonable could have possible interpreted my comments in this way.

Women not only get pregnant but have to carry the baby, feed and nurture it for a while.

Whereas the man need only ejaculate into a women and most do prematurely. But the burden of parenting is disproportionate. Hence the double standards.

i agree, and this is why love is not considered "objective"

Science isn’t the only objective standard.

He also argues that the far-left and far-right are not brainwashed.

He assumes that "a job" means that work is bad, which is stupid. Humans are literally built for work. We do work all the time. We just don't necessarily do work that gives us money all the time.