Total posts: 4,833
-->
@Best.Korea
Thats your daughter, you ignorant billionaire retard.
Elon is a genius, but it doesn't take a genius to know that male offspring are sons.
They tell them that they consider them dead.
They call it "dead naming". They're the one saying the original person is dead.
Trans community will survive and grow even stronger.
Only so long as it's profitable for big pharma to keep mutilating people.
For all you know RFK is right about the food, they really are throwing off the hormones, and gender dysphoria will return to being extraordinarily rare as it was all previous human history.
Look at ancient Rome, ancient Greece, ancient Egypt. Every sexual orientation that exists today existed then but gender dysphoria did not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZZ
Nobody believes the press secretary anyways, so why not have fun with it.
Oh yea, they could give him double doses of testosterone before press conferences and then we could have fun watching him literally growl (like a wolf) at journalists who try to interrupt a rant.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
The debt can go live with jesus, that's where all the other wages of sin go.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Perfect outcome.Bobby Kennedy will “go wild on health”. Translation: “he’ll figure it all out because I don’t care”.
What this also means is that no one, not even Trump has any idea what his policies will look like
If you don't know what your plans are, neither can the enemy!
This is what we voted for, even his own supporters admit that they didn’t know what we would get out of him.
Just because we don't have a specific policy we're after (well I do, but I didn't vote for Trump to get those policies) doesn't mean we had no idea what we would get.
What we will get is a man they don't control. A man who won't lie to us because he clearly has no idea how to lie.
If you want to call it a policy, this is the supreme policy: Subdue the liars.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Months eh? So how about you post videos of the first and last time he speculated?He speculated on a conspiracy theoryHe spent months propagating the overt lie that it was all faked and that the parents of those kids were actors playing a role in a massive government conspiracy to take away everyone’s guns. He said this explicitly, it was not speculation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Trump has named Alex Jones as the press secretary. This is going to be a fun 4 yearsYeah, nothing like rewarding the guy who made a fortune off of exploiting the misery of parents who lost their children in a school shooting with a top job in the White House.
How is speculating about a false flag conspiracy "exploiting the misery of parents"?
People have a right to advance conspiracy theories about government behavior. If they didn't then how much money was raised off the "very fine people" hoax? (or the russia collusion hoax, or the bloodbath hoax, or the kyle rittenhouse hoax, or the Covington kid hoax, or the liz chenney execution hoax, etc... etc...) I see all the same elements there:
1.) Bad thing happened
2.) People spread false information about it
3.) Those people were paid
Created:
-->
@Vader
As a Libertarian who voted Trump, I think if there's one thing that I'd ban it would be porn. Porn has become such a plague to the youth and become way to accessible.
There are many things that are only plagues when a person has no goals or sense of significance.
Junk food, video games, light drugs (alcohol and marijuana), hook up culture, etc...
The availability of those things isn't the cause and the misguided and almost certainly futile attempt to eradicate them will not solve the problem. They need to stop being implicitly fed poisoned philosophy.... and maybe RFK's right that there is something in the food.
Porn when not used as crutch to avoid thinking about one's life is perfectly healthy.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
Is Matt Walsh a member of Trumps staff?I don't 'think he is, but I could be wrong.
Not yet, and I hope it stays that way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Britain was great once, and we have the name to prove it.But Today just like America we are a nation amongst a global internet community of other nations.
If things continue as they have been the USA will come only as a beggar or a thief to the world and that doesn't end well.
Things happen for a reason.
GB was the first republican revolution (Cromwell). GB was the epicenter of the first stock trading (long term investment model), see wealth of nations and East India Company; and GB was one of the original focuses of the industrial revolution.
Rule of law, long term investment, efficient production. Earlier and faster than others. The empire was a consequence not a cause.
You can't stop other nations from advancing (by copying your good ideas), but you can avoid committing suicide by abandoning those good ideas. The USA and to an extent the UK are failing at that simple task.
I also believe there are still vast improvements to be made in terms of government, wealth management, technology, and production chains.
And China can deliver. cheap goods.
So can we, if it wasn't for this titanic leech on our backs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I know he said he would, but now that he sits in glory the deep state will send out its tendrils to him.
What they cannot destroy they corrupt. This has been a great victory and a necessary first step but I am not confident that Trump will keep to the plan he sold us nor that he can win without lots of heeded advice from people like Elon, Ron Paul, Ramaswamy, Tulsi, and RFK.
We the voter no longer have any leverage on him. The only people who can offer him things are corrupt swamp monsters. They sabotaged his first term and they will do the same again if they can.
This is Trump's final test. He's either learned what game he's been playing or he hasn't.
Created:
Although Tulsi as secretary of defense also sounds good. She has military experience.
Created:
I saw on Fox News (no I was not watching it, a streamer was):
Potential Trump Cabinet Picks:
Ben Carson - Acceptable
Betsy Devos returning as secretary of education -NOOO! The only good department of education is a dead department of education. This should be vivek ramaswamy (unless you need him to take out the FBI).
Mike Pompeo - NOO!
Doug Burgum - no comment
Rubio as secretary of state - NOOOOOOOOO! This should go to Tulsi. Ugh Rubio is already in the senate, he should mind his own business.
RFK as either agriculture or health and human services - If you can't appoint him to both, have him give someone he trusts for the other position. Maybe that lady he had as his vice presidential pick.
This is not looking good :(
Created:
-->
@borz_kriffle
[borz_kriffle] If you meant the latter, do you genuinely believe that he would delay the case this long if he was innocent?[ADOL] There is more than one trumped up case, and if you're talking about delay tactics from his lawyers I genuinely think lawyers will do whatever they feel will serve their clients interest. When the problem is kangaroo courts convened to disrupt democracy there is every reason to think their position will be much better after there is no election to subvert as a motivation.
That didn't take long.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
THEY'RE TURNING THE PRESS ROOM GAY!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
In 4 years, you cannot say Biden has looked more happier and energetic than now.
I noticed that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
This is a pass we give to Trump and no one else.
"Trump is a witch who uses dark magic"
Hey it's fine with me if you and the rest just keep that hypothesis until 2028. One free win.
Created:
Posted in:
Trump said he is going to fire everybody in government that is registered as a Democrat.
Well that's a good start, but that would leave everybody in the government that isn't registered as a democrat.
The deep state can't keep being evil if we fire them all, and if we fire everybody then we'll get the deep staters in the wide net.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Oh he searched his soul and he has decided everybody else's soul is the problem. I can relate.You seriously have some soul searching to do
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
As far as I know when someone goes to vote he has to identify with an ID and his fingerprint, at least the later. I'm not sure how it is in the US but the electoral system is more robust when it uses the fingerprint to identify the voter.
In the US you need an address and a name and that's about it. If you use the mail balloting "system" (which they just made up as they went during covid) you can get a ballot sent to any address you want without ever having to show your face.
And why do you keep using it if it's not reliable? It doesnt make sense.
It makes sense if one political faction can block reform and knows that it's easier and safer for their side to cheat.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
It is a dark joke that the dead are voting, what is really referred to is election fraud.
Cheaters steal the identity of citizens but sometimes they make a mistake and steal the identity of a dead person.
That's why we have confirmed examples of dead people registering to vote and casting ballots.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Is there anything of relevance (to your absurd theory of the law) that he has not contested?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Uh, you do realize that while Obama was "helping" in 2016 they the deep state was infiltrating Trump's transition team right? Going to secret courts to get secret surveillance warrants based on lies?
It's the perfect illustration of the right-tribe vs the left-tribe of late. The left-tribe is led by the deep state and the deep state puts on a fake front pretending to be courteous and proper.
The right-tribe protests and even riots in the open. If Trump was willing to play like Obama there never would have been a chance to beat him in 2020 nor would any of those impeachments have gotten started. He would have blackmail material on all his enemies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZZ
You don't run for office when you have good ideas, you run for office when you know how to implement a popular idea.Why don't you run for office? You seem to have some good ideas.
Ideas can be shared, if you like an idea spread it. Maybe someday it will be popular enough and then it won't matter if I implement it or someone else does.
Created:
Posted in:
This is a repost from another website (a naughty forum). I felt I should post it here because I quote someone from this site. When I say "this website" I'm not talking about debateart.
I thought this would be the ideal time to make a point, what with the normally impenetrable derision characteristic of the internet scum bag being subdued by recent events. At least the scum bags suffering from TDS.
Right about now a lot of you will be complaining about all the hateful rhetoric and how scared everyone should be, but this is the perfect time to remind you that you have some scary (and despicable) pieces of shit on your side too. Did you call them out when you were riding high and thought you were on the right side of history?
A most useful example is something that has been a trigger issue of mine for a long time. Rape as a form of hexing. Wishing rape upon your enemies or those you find despicable.
Why? Well before this website existed I was debating people about the morality of bestiality. The psychology of the normal person in regards to bestiality is a complicated subject but suffice to say a lot of normies are disgusted and a certain subset of those disgusted people seemed to find some sort of vent in wishing rape upon myself and all zoosexuals.
It happened with such frequency that I concluded it was more than merely a random insult (not that it would be tolerable as such). One's first guess would be that it was some kind of an 'eye for an eye' thing. They think zoosexuals are rapists, and rapists should be raped.
After all certainly the most common example of people cheering prison rape is the rape of supposed pedophiles and it's pretty clear that many of the people cheering see some kind of poetic justice in it.
That doesn't explain everything though. You see in the case of zoosexuals the rape fantasizers were often quite particular about the rapist being an animal.
I can't recall the people fantasizing about the rape of pedophiles ever specifying that the rapist ought to be a child. There is something to that difference in terms of a tacit admission that animals are not like children, they have no 'innocence' to protect.
Still there is a final piece of the puzzle. Sometimes people fantasize about the rape of people by non-humans with no context of zoosexuality.
This was posted by someone called Sidewalker April 28th 2024 (emphasis bold added).
Key Takeaways:
- The halls will be filled with the sound of "The Donald" squealing like a pig.
- Rocky's new nickname for Trump will be "My Bitch".
- Trump learns to enjoy squealing like a pig for Rocky and his friends.
Thoughts?
Here the prison rape fantasy is combined with animal rape, as if to emphasize... what?
Dehumanization, that's the answer. Defilement, shame, defeat, etc...
The common denominator of all rape fantasizers is that they think its shameful to be raped. That there is some kind of cosmic justice which causes only those who deserve it to be raped, or at least those who deserved it to be raped more than others.
We don't have to look very hard at the history and diversity of human cultures to see this idea expressed. When I connected it to the honor killing of raped women I knew I had figured it out.
Now these people are not necessarily consciously aware of it, but in my opinion it is the only plausible reason these rape fantasizers could get an ounce of catharsis out of their fantasy; and they clearly do and they get more when they make it public and sneer and laugh at the victim.
From the time I realized this on it has always infuriated me. To give an analogy: It's OK to hate Hissene Habre, but when you throw the hard R in your insults you're saying something about yourself too.
=========
Isn't this all just people talking on the internet? Who cares?
Well the assertion that the internet is a fake world where no words matter was always stupid and it's getting stupider every year.
We're real people talking to real people, and worse we're often more honest than we are in person. If you want to know why politeness exists just imagine how quickly the punching would start if people acted in real life as they do online.
Prison rape is not just an abstract idea, it happens; and given that it's been a long time since the invention of the security camera one can only conclude that it's being allowed to happen.
The only reason it would be allowed to happen is these sick rape fantasizers. It truly is a slippery slope for the victims are not all zoosexuals and pedophiles (not that anyone deserves it).
The rape fantasizer will slide down the slope and start to imagine more and more enemies and those they find beneath them as valid targets for punishment by rape. There is perhaps nothing more corrosive to society than to imagine political disagreement to be a valid basis for torture and yet rape fantasizers have already and will continue to publicly interject the image of their political opponents being raped, not as some well intentioned warning or worse case prediction but as a implicit wish.
Some shitstains on this website have done this and some have done it to me, and they know who they are. I have given an example of someone doing it about a former president and presidential candidate.
These people are enabling a most inexcusable torture, they are doing it over reasons that would be insufficient to slap someone, and it is more than just talk:
Jason Galanis claims to have been sexually abused in prison. There is a strong implication that it was done in political retribution. I'm not a human lie detector but his acting is good enough to convince me.
A commentator I regularly follow commented on that story and I'd like to amplify what he said:
Welcome to the brave new world. It's not surprising. These things have happened forever. It appears that his story is... I don't know if he's trying to make that direct connection, but it appears so, that he's basically saying: When he decided to speak out and alert people to what was going on, providing evidence. The corrupt individuals in government, the "Biden crime family", whatever you want to call it, set out to retaliate against him to the point where he was sexually abused.
Because they know that's a form of torture, and it's colloquially... I mean it's a joke in the United States.
How horrifying is that?
That we live in a world where... in this country the left, they gloat, they laugh about it! That... these people will be raped in prison.
That's torture, but that's what communists do, they don't care about enlightenment values, they don't care about truth or honesty, they don't care about a functioning system. They care about power.
Unfortunately that's the world we're in. That's it. All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
I know that it isn't only the left-tribe that does this. I stopped listening to Stephen Crowder entirely because their "jokes" about prison rape were transparently wishful fantasies. The left, or more accurately the trump deranged are the only ones I have seen fantasize about it for random citizens and candidates for high office (accused of sexual crimes or not).
The Trump deranged are trying to normalize it in new contexts when it was abhorrent in the original one (of dehumanizing sexual deviants).
Tim Pool went on to say:
All I can say is: you better hope and pray and beg that people actually get out register people to vote, knock on doors, and come November create a red wave that eclipses all other elections and Trump wins.
That is more or less what happened. So Trump won't be getting raped in prison by animals as Sidewalker hoped. Nor will I be raped in prison for exercising my 1st amendment rights. But there are people who have already suffered assault and still rapists and those who delight in the idea of their enemies being raped.
Justice demands the villains pay dearly and the victimization stops. That requires more than prison reform. It requires that the scum who dare to openly fantasize about their enemies being raped are ostracized.
FYI I don't have the slightest interest of associating with anyone who is interested in permitting any rapes even to his or her worst enemy, similarly I have no interest in the advise or friendship of anyone who thinks playing dumb or letting it slide is in any way noble or appropriate. Obviously say your piece of that is how you feel but I will almost certainly ignore it.
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
Well one difference between revenge and justice is that justice requires that the people who suffer did something wrong whereas revenge is just fine with notions of "guilt by association".
I am not talking about guilt by association. We don't need to break the teeth of "the left" most of "the left" are clueless and think they're doing the right thing in supporting things.
The people who need to pay are the ones carrying out the orders and giving the orders, goose stepping to the lawfare and bashing down doors. These people are trained as police and lawyers. They swore oaths to uphold constitutions and laws. They swore to tell the truth and withhold nothing relevant.
Oaths they took, oaths they broke. That can't be forgiven.
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
This is the number one priority. I don't mean I am predicting it will be, I mean this is the most pressing issue in the nation.Can this be done with support of most of the nation?
No idea. Clearly the majority don't trust the deep state propaganda.
How can it be done to be perceived as justice and not revenge?
I would suggest that perception is less important than the result.
In a way we need it to be seen as revenge. The whole sordid episode needs to ring for a century as a reminder of what a nation of men and not laws looks like.
If the democrats truly believe Trump is a felon, then an assault like this would only likely create more problems and division.
What are they going to do, support measures in place to prevent lawfare?
They have made us watch for four years as they committed one atrocious mockery of justice after another. Yes most of them are suffering from a severe lack of truthful information, but there is no cure for that and thus no reason to take it into account. There are people like Double R who will gaslight you for hours in direct contradiction to the letter of the law, all precedent, and video evidence.
Those kinds of people literally can't be reasoned with, can't be compromised with, it's "never been punched" syndrome and the only solution is a bloody nose.
Created:
-->
@DavidAZZ
I would like to see the corrupt judges and prosecutors punished for the lawfare that they imposed on Trump
This is the number one priority. I don't mean I am predicting it will be, I mean this is the most pressing issue in the nation.
I just watched Dershowitz who suggested that Trump issue a unilateral ceasefire on the warfare.
No, you don't ceasefire when your unrepentant enemy was just driven back after being the aggressor. When these oathbreakers are spending 40-life in federal prison and federal cases are decided by nation-wide juries, then it will end. Then the lesson will be clear because the people who started it paid dearly.
If they get away with it, no lesson, and they will just try again as soon as they can.
Not an eye for an eye, a head for an eye. Push until your own supreme court picks stop you. Then the republic will be safer for the precedent. If were me, I would add up all the years of unjust jail, count the deaths (like babbit) as 100 years, and triple it. That's how many years they have to serve and I would not stop until they did.
Swat the homes of those who swatted roger stone. Drive it into their skulls that badges, and uniforms, and robes don't make them safe. They didn't give a shit about the presidential seal. They didn't give a shit about democracy. They didn't give a shit about justice. They gave no immunity and thus they deserve no immunity.
You can just pull a California, even if the supreme court tells you "no" you just twist some other law and pretend it's a whole new angle. The supreme court does nothing meanwhile your targets rot in jail.
I wouldn't just pardon the non-violent offenders, I would pardon the violent offenders. Where is the antifa who went to jail? No antifa was paid for their violence. I would use the same trick, have the pardoned J6 defendants "sue" the federal government and then your throw up your hands and settle for $10,000 a pop. Pay for it by removing the jobs of the pseudo-prosecutors who abducted them.
Every abuse must come back to bite them. Every single one.
*sigh* but it probably won't happen, because despite it all I doubt Trump and the people around him truly know what they've been fighting. Vivek seems closest, and RFK I trust the most to actually win. He sees their malice.
End the warsHow can this be done? Literally end the wars by keeping our business out of them or try to broker some peace deal in the conflict area?
US can definitely force a peace in Ukraine, but only if Putin believes Trump was willing to escalate.
First you need the compromise, and the compromise I would offer is local referendums in the don bas, crimea, all occupied areas of 'ukraine' and an equal amount of russian territory/population.
Referendums conducted by biometric block chain with international observers everywhere. If Russia's claims are true, they will keep the territory they claimed was being oppressed.
The compromise would also include the USA leaving NATO, creating strict laws against the puppeting that was going on in Ukraine by US agents, and realigning with Russia and India (India is already torn between Russia and USA). Europeans are big boys they can handle their own continent and the only thing the USA has done with them economically has been corrupt (for the last few decades).
Then you need the sticks. The stick for Ukraine is simple: we pull out, they collapse and all of Ukraine is annexed.
The stick for Putin needs to be escalation, and despite the rhetoric about nuclear war there is still much more the USA could do to win. The goal of the deep state has been to launder money, not win; and their "aid" reflects that.
If the USA isn't willing to credibly threaten escalation than there is nothing to do but leave Ukraine to its fate, which would be a peace of sorts.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I don't see a reason to make the gender explicit, but the kind of citizenship enfranchisement you see in starship troopers (the book) deserves some thought.
Again, I wouldn't make it general. It would be if anything a system with three body politics:
1.) General population, determine general moral application (all laws are applications of the base moral principles enshrined in the constitution)
2.) Wealth holders, determine public economic activity by coordinated donations
3.) The soldier-citizen population, final say on war and other public services where one must risk one's life.
So you want to go to war you need all three:
You need the general population to agree the war is moral. You need the wealth holders to be willing to pay for it. Finally you need the people who will actually risk their lives to consent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You should get 1 vote per tax tier then.
I mean that's moving in the same direction in some sense but it's not a good intermediate step.
I am not saying people with a lot of money should have power over other people. I'm saying other people shouldn't have power over people with money. What you suggest would simply create a dictatorship of the rich.
I am talking about society built on consent.
There is a fundamental difference between public economics and public morality. Today in the USA and in most countries they are shoved together in a diseased and unnatural bucket.
It's no different from when the state religion had clergy as a major part of the government and the government decided theology. There was no good reason for it and it led to a lot of bad things. Separation of church and state was a huge improvement in the American experiment and the next step is separation of public economics and government proper (public morality) i.e. the law.
Law is about regulating immoral behavior, defining it, limiting the scope of punishments.
That has absolutely nothing to do with building a bridge.
Yet the same body handles both and there is the presumption that the decision about whether to build a bridge (and who will pay for it) ought to be decided by the same body people and with the same influence as whether abortion is wrong or the homosexuals should be castrated (for example).
That presumption is wrong. It's wrong morally and it's wrong practically. The people who should decide whether the public needs a bridge is the public weighted by the amount of money they're willing to spend on a bridge. That answers both the question of "is it worth it?" and "who is going to pay for it?" at the same time and without coercion or the looming temptation to enslave the producers.
Imagine how that would look in recent controversies. It would be two separate questions:
1.) Does the USA condemn the invasion of Ukraine; that is a moral question. 1 person 1 vote.
2.) Will the USA send $200 billion (or whatever) to Ukraine in weapons to keep the war going? Put your money where your mouth is.
1.) Is a quarantine in response to covid moral? 1 person 1 vote. Obviously economic implications, but it's not spending money
2.) Who is going to pay for experimental super expensive vaccines for the whole nation? Put your money where your mouth is.
Without the ability to steal money government corruption would plummet. Most of the subversives are just there to steal our money and if they can't do that they won't bother with the lies that confuse and twist the moral questions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZZ
We even gave them right to vote.The vote of 90 IQ person counts same as vote of 160 IQ person.Entire ancient world would laugh at that, but today, it is reality.So a qualification is needed in order to vote? How about owning property? How about paying taxes? An IQ test would be good too. Or maybe the ability to know how the government works. We would weed out so many useful idiots out of the democrat party.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here, we haven't yet implemented the rules:
Must be currently alive
Must be a citizen
As I have laid out in many posts throughout my internet existence we can easily separate economic interest "votes" from ethical application votes through an extremely elegant rule:
The people with the money, choose how the money is spent. People cannot spend other people's money.
There ya go, fixed. Don't need to bring in property, intelligence, this or that. You want to influence public economics you have exactly as much power as your bank account balance and you don't need to threaten or take from anyone to do it.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh there are still plenty of paths to civil war. Only one out of like five has been eliminated.
The biggest threats remain and are more real than ever:
1.) They kill Trump after he apparently won, choose the president by congressional committee and choose someone who is obviously a deep state agent (like Liz Cheney)
2.) They refuse to count the electors
3.) They get insane judges to throw out ballots or allow more ballots rather than ordering a secure election
4.) They lock Trump up in a NY prison and refuse to allow him to leave, even to attend the inauguration.
Those are not the "four other ways" more like variants of "Trump apparently wins but TDS/Deepstate refuses to accept the popular mandate".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
I think it would be a mistake to try and explain this with trivia about the candidates characters. That analysis is old, tired, and a bad predictor.
Half the people who voted for Trump think his ego is too big and its kinda creepy how he marries people, divorces them, and then they stick around. It's like an informal harem.
Kamala wasn't the most charismatic, but it's "the economy stupid".
People engage when things aren't going well and when they engage they don't focus on character they see both parties as a whole and the cultural movements they represent (which is the appropriate way to judge).
Anyone who lies are so transparent would have had a hard time not being drowned by the wave. She tried to simultaneously claim credit for the last four years of "good", say she wouldn't do anything different from Biden WHILE claiming to be an agent of change.
Only the fully zombified would have failed to see through that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Maybe Kamala Harris could have won the election if the democrats had actually tried to win people over to their side by rational means
That's a "damned if you do damned if you don't" situation.
Like "If Hitler hadn't killed the jews Germany would have been better off"
Yea that's obviously true, but then he wouldn't be Hitler. If they had given me a rational honest person as an alternative and not destroyed the rule of law by trying to imprison political rivals I would have gone for him/her, but they left me no choice and they left the public no choice because of what they are.
So the better way to put this would be: Maybe if they had nominated RFK they could have won, but RFK is a threat to the deep state and the deep state controls the traditional press and still holds a few of the social media infinity stones.
So what you're really saying is: If they weren't an evil lying international warmongering conspiracy they could have won.
...and my comment on that is: Yes, I think that's right.
Created:
Posted in:
So the liars assume everyone else is lying, like DJT who said he had nothing to do with project 2025 and would veto a national ban.
...and project 2025 which basically said "traditional family values + clean the swamp" (and we know it was the second one that scared the straights).
Since the times of human sacrifice I don't think there has ever been a more obscene obsession with doing one particular kind of unnecessary violence.
"four months isn't enough! I need 8.9 months to decide!"
You'd think they had no idea there were alternative strategies to avoid pregnancy. Here is a reminder:
1.) Don't have sex of a particular kind. You can stick anything in any hole but the one that ejects gametes into the gamete containing hole.
2.) Use a condom + timing
3.) Use birth control + timing
4.) Use condom + birth control
If you break it down into the many forms of birth control including spermicides, pills for females, implants for females, etc... there are a lot more combinations.
*snaps fingers* are you listening?
It's like telling a child they can't have something. Then they want ONLY that thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@Best.Korea
Maybe next time the Democrats can get more support than the low IQ porn deviants.
As a high-IQ porn deviant they aren't going to get me.
(JK)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
He hasn't shown the slightest inclination to make "anti gay laws".while also attacking LGBT rights since there will be no legal way to stop Trump to enforce anti-gay laws like they have in Russia.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Better to make any law he wants than to twist any law in an excuse applied unequally (the modus operandi of the lawfare of the last four years)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Again, I know you're trolling... but you're not really a dictator if "the people" and "the senate" and "the courts" and "the house of the people's representatives" all "gave you power".
Kinda like saying "Stupid Melania, consenting to the pussy grabbing; now Trump can be a rapist with no opposition". Rapist is defined by the lack of consent, and so is dictator.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I've been hovering over my predictit bets...it's so silly I was nervous so I split my bet on the spread to win...and when it was clear it was going to be a major win...I couldn't dump my low position...I'm sitting here sweating the $425 I lost (the only bet I lost) out of 8 others I won netting me over 13k....Why do I do this to myself???? It's ok to make a mistake...it's ok...
Yea it's definitely OK.
A ratio like that is platinum in the investing world. Enjoy losing 30% of that to government money laundering :)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Not yet.
Although he can setup a fake office with "office of the president elect" and start negotiating with Putin and Zelensky in open def fiance of the Hatch act (Like Biden did).
After all it's a tradition that he's accused of every 'crime' Biden committed, may as well complete the pattern.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Well Fox called it, which is very good for the legitimacy battle even if they do bring in a bunch of fake ballots.
Created:
Posted in:
So here is an open question:
We all knew which states were swing states beforehand. More or less we knew it was:
GA, PA, MI, WI, AZ, MN (kinda)
Why is it that these states are EXACTLY the ones which have the lowest reporting rates. That is they are not only uncalled, but they are less defined than surrounding states.
For example PA as I am looking at it is 87% reporting. The surrounding states are:
NY 94%
OH 96%
WV 93%
MD 78%
NJ 90%
DE 90%
At the same time MI is at 57% WI is 83% MN is 63%. With the exception of SD there isn't a single neighboring state that is below 88%.
Why would swing states count votes slower? Surely counting speed at worst is proportional to population.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
It's not over till the 3:00 AM voters have their say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVrkRvS4Zds
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Even before the cheating became known to me it always annoyed me when they did things like that.It’s called for Trump. They’re expecting Trump’s numbers to go back up.
I mean it's 2 freaking hours, isn't there a bit of dignity in just waiting? They've been "expecting" for months and months.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Owen_T
We won't know anything until the water main breaks and the observers are told to leave by armed men.Thoughts on Georgia at this point?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Did they print the ballots at the polling location or was it centrally printed by the secretary of state? How can you tell who is part of what tribe? I worked as a democratic election judge for the precise purpose of getting the inside story.I highly doubt a county that is mostly Republican has Democrats working at the polling places as a majority.
Apparently the bug is that some ballots wouldn’t scan… which is why the voting period was extended. So there was a problem, and they are accommodating for said problem while working on fixing it.I wouldn’t say this damning evidence of anything.
Ballots being misprinted for in person day-of voting was exactly the attack vector used in Maricopa county (2022). There was a court case, one of the election officials lied to a judge (this is recorded), but the judge pretended it didn't happen. They knew that people would go home rather than fill out provisional ballots. Provisional ballots are a pain in the ass, if more than a couple people per hour need to fill one out there will quickly form a giant line. Plus counting provisional ballots is "up to the judges" in a way that directly cast ballots aren't. All those details written down, if they know they don't want to count the ballot they'll take any little thing as an excuse to reject it.
The ignorant have the luxury of giving the benefit of the doubt. I do not. You would not if you had been paying as much attention as I have been.
Created: