Total posts: 1,067
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
First, most people are inactive. Second, most people are stubborn anyway. It's going to take about the two days of time to get everyone to provide a screenshot of the like button, and even if we do, the person who liked the post can just say they were inactive and didn't know about the like controversy. We don't have enough proof even if they liked to lynch anyone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
If you think I'm suspicious, you're sadly misguided.
Created:
Posted in:
I disagree with all of this. #1 He questioned his logic multiple times as well as sought input from others, so that barely even qualifies as tunneling let alone acting like a madman.
Yeah, and he questioned it wrong. The logic is inherently flawed in nature. I am willing to bet the literal guy who liked it isn't mafia.
#2 You say it isn't getting us anywhere but it's the only thing we have to work with whereas everyone else (aside from me) has truly contributed nothing. The astute observations about having "little to go on" day phase 1 by one person after the other is maddening. We know there's not much to go on - we know we have to contrive reads based on having NOTHING to start with. We literally have to scrutinize if not outright fabricate reasons to pressure someone. Luna provided one. Maybe he is lying about his role, maybe not, but he's giving us something to analyze including his own affiliation.
When did he claim?
Which brings me to #3 in that I didn't realize Luna was asking us all to submit screen shots - and I will if we're going that route - but this request seems very pro town to me and your response seems very anti town. Even if it would take a long time, we have like 2 days left in the day phase and every player should be posting within that time. You seem very concerned about this. What info do you hope to get by pressuring Luna and why didn't you vote for him earlier?
Asking everyone to provide screenshots to prove that they didn't like the post which isn't even going to benefit town, which wastes town's time anyway. Lunatic's going off on a very thin line of logic that it's "fishy" to like someone's post. MAFIA WOULD NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THEY LIKE THE POST'S CONTENT. It doesn't make any sense.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Crocodile
Lynched the guy who was obviously trying to lynch other people and waste town's time by getting everybody to take screenshots.
Created:
Posted in:
vtl lunatic
Why are you so dead-on about lynching someone who liked your post? Are you tryna get a mislynch?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Crocodile
what the hell are we supposed to do then instead of doing this weird crap
Oh there's plenty of things to do, instead of wasting our time with something with no results
Created:
Posted in:
Lunatic is going off like a madman talking about someone liking the post, which is GETTING NOWHERE. It's gonna take forever to get everyone to provide screenshots, and even if we do, we DON'T KNOW that the person that liked the post is mafia (not enough for a lynch). I don't understand why we're wasting our time doing this weird crap.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I still don't understand why mafia would make it obvious that they liked the post. You claiming mafia is already weird.
Created:
Posted in:
Y'all are scumreading people because you think they liked your post? How do we know that you didn't like your own post? Liking a post and being mafia are two very different things.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Man just because we got eyes doesn't mean we're all mafia
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
No reads so far. The Lunatic gambit was weird asf, but can't say he's mafia solely based on that.
Created:
-->
@seldiora
Pro side to "RM ban was justified" is impossible to win.
It is completely possible to win.
But the argument I would've made would be a painful argument that would insult RM, which I frankly didn't want to do.
Created:
-->
@MisterChris
Thanks, MisterChris.
Contentions:
RESOLVED: Sometimes I like to copy MisterChris' arguments and then text them to someone random with no context.
What is a colloquialism?
Wikipedia defines:
"Colloquialism or colloquial language is the linguistic style used for casual communication. It is the most common functional style of speech, the idiom normally employed in conversation and other informal contexts.[1] Colloquialism is characterized by wide usage of interjections and other expressive devices; it makes use of non-specialist terminology, and has a rapidly changing lexicon. It can also be distinguished by its usage of formulations with incomplete logical and syntactic ordering.[2][3][4][5]
A specific instance of such language is termed a colloquialism. The most common term used in dictionaries to label such an expression is colloquial."
A specific instance of such language is termed a colloquialism. The most common term used in dictionaries to label such an expression is colloquial."
Contentions:
We can assume the user in this context did not mean pure, scientific random. It is quite obvious in this case, the user was stating a colloquialism, or and exaggeration of what the user actually does. Moreover, it would be quite wrong to assume the user was being serious. He uses slang terms like "text." The key thing here is the interpretation of the resolution, which was clearly written with colloquialisms.
Conclusion:
Since we can interpret the resolution, and it obviously did not mean pure random, rather a colloquial random, PRO can affirm the resolution.
Back to you, MisterChris
Created:
Sometimes I like to copy MisterChris' arguments and then text them to someone random with no context.
Makes em really confused
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@skittlez09
Who? You or your four multiaccounts?
Don't Sue Me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
I bet there's a reason you stay anonymous ;).
Don't sue me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Congratulations to Intelligence_06 proudly fighting back against the stereotype that all Asians are smart.
Don't sue me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
I don't think you understand, I am supposed to insult you, not feed you a roasted cat.
Don't sue me
Created:
Posted in:
Not gonna pretend I know a heck a lot of religion, I don't bother myself with that.
Really. And who forces them to not believe in God? The evidence of what? or Who?
The literal evidence.
It is an assumption. Presumption that leads you to such a point. The Evidence I would suggest is everywhere for the existence of God. And there is no Evidence which exists that suggests otherwise.
It is also an assumption that god exists.
When people struggle to see evidence and yet others see it everywhere - there is clearly something amiss. When I say evil is evidence for the existence of God and you say evil is evidence that God does not exist - then something is amiss. For you to say that therefore that since evil exists, that God does not is contradictory to the view that I take that says that since evil exists, so does God.
Are you calling atheists dumb?
Created:
Posted in:
Not busy anymore, finished what I was supposed to do
/in
kimchi rice balls
Created:
Posted in:
Like ludo said, an atheist doesn't choose not to believe god, they are forced not to believe god because the evidence to them points in that direction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
No offense taken, I'm really notorious as a debater for that.
VTL Speed
MisterChris provided justification why.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Oof gl then.
I could see speed being manipulative. Rn I'm really confused on who to lynch because both of you are possible scum candidates.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm comfortable with lynching pie, as he needs to study for that midterm of his and he's a villai
VTL Pie
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
The warren thing may be a gambit by oro, but it's probably trying to be a last minute lynch.
Pie being a villain is weird, but not enough to lynch.
You and croc don't seem like scum
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
He's a villain. But oromagi was not a villain so ye
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
I think the GRAMPS/role cop thing might've been a gambit by oro/warren to save oro
Yeah interesting thinking. I'm willing to bet warren is scum.
vtl warren
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Ok, I should've read it more carefully then
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I'm pretty sure Croc claimed vanilla townie
also, please claim
Created:
Posted in:
Currently if we select out of random who to lynch it will be a 3/5 chance, meaning more likely than not we will hit scum.
Speedrace (beneficial to town, but his scum play his identical to his town play in some cases)
Crocodile (terrible town play like regular)
ILikePie5 (not that active, but says he's taking midterms or something)
Warren42 (read speed)
MisterChris (scum play weird, doesn't seem like mafia)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
@warren42
@Speedrace
@MisterChris
@Crocodile
Both skittlez and me are confirmed not to be scum.
Three of us are scum. Therefore five of us will be on the suspect list:
Misterchris
Speedrace
Crocodile
ILikePie5
Warren42
I want to be hearing from ALL of you why you aren't scum.
Created:
Posted in:
1. BearMan, it's simple Bears are BEST.
2. whiteflame
3. Ragnar
4. oromagi
5. RationalMadman
6. blamonkey (never seen him debate, but read his debates which are convincing)
7. MisterChris
8. Speedrace
9. Jeff_Goldblum
10. Intel_06
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@seldiora
PF debates are from CNN I think.
I Can I BB argues about "weird" topics I don't think could be suitable for LD or CX, maybe PF though
Created: