Best.Korea

Okay, so I find this video where woman cries for like 10 minutes because she got a compliment from someone.

And I can kinda relate to that.

I am not really good at responding to compliments.

I dont know if anyone else has that feeling when you get a compliment, you dont know what to say as a response, because it feels wrong to brag and confirm the compliment, but it also feels wrong to attack the person who gave you a compliment.

There are 4 laws of life and success:

1. Attack

2. Persistence

3. Change

4. Knowledge

This is the most basic and most important law. When you have a goal, you need to make an action and an idea, an attack to realize the goal and achieve success. Success usually wont come from no action. You need to attack with new ideas and new actions all the time.

Those people who are successful, most of them had many failures in life. However, what made them successful is that, unlike others, after failure, they didnt give up, but they kept attacking the obstacles with new ideas and actions to solve them and achieve success. It might take years or decades to achieve success, so being persistent is crucial.

Life is constant change and motion, thus your life needs to be filled with changes and new things which increase your knowledge and your attack as a result, contributing to further success. You need to be constantly in search for new and improved.

This is the most important part. Knowledge is key to making plans and successful attacks. Write down everything, every strategy you come up with. This causes your brain to be in constant production of new strategies, and causes constant increase in knowledge. Many people come up with lots of strategies, but they dont write them down and as a result they forget them and their knowledge is lost. By writing down your strategies, you increase your knowledge and prevent the loss of it. And because you have all that knowledge available, it helps your brain produce even more ideas as you have more knowledge available to produce ideas from.

Took me some time of search, but I finally found world conquest zvezda plot episode 13.

This is a very important anime for me, since it helped me overcome autism.

Science is very complicated, but I can make it simple.

I know many of you disagree with me about women giving birth early in life.

Most of you think that woman should give birth after age 22 or 25.

And as usual, most of you would be wrong.

"The researchers found that mothers over 40 had a 51 percent higher risk of having a child with autism than mothers 25 to 29, and a 77 percent higher risk than mothers under 25."

Basically, the longer woman waits to make babies and give birth, the more autistic retards she will give birth to as a result.

The whole idea that woman needs to wait for a decade to give birth just results in her reproductive abilities diminishing, her offspring more weak and more retarded, more incapable and with less abilities in life.

I know many of you will be offended by this, but be not offended by the truth as anyone who rejects truth becomes delusional.

I was watching some clips, and when nazis meet, it seems like they say "hi Hitler" and not "Hail Hitler".

Plus, it makes more sense to say "hi Hitler", so I am certain everyone misunderstood what they said, as its only logical to say "hi Hitler" when you meet Hitler.

The basic compoments of attack are:

This is the final stage of attack. It happens when you already have necessary manpower and basic or advanced weapons and will and strategy to carry out attack.

This is divided on 4 sections:

A. Building of strategy (through leadership's intelligence)

B. Building of weapons (by having both basic workers and those intelligent ones who develop advanced technology)

C. Building of manpower (increasing number of people in military)

D. Building of will (through leadership's guidance)

All of these are necessary to carry out attack with your military.

In military strategy, it is important to more than just build attack, but also to protect attack and protect those components which build attack, such as leadership which develops will and strategy, workers who support military, and military itself needs to be protected from being destroyed before it can attack.

So the basics are:

1. The attack

2. Building of attack

3. Protecting the attack and protecting the building of attack.

Some militaries in history have abandoned 3 and just went with attack and building of attack, such as those militaries which had no much military production to protect, usually guerilla militaries who focused on just attack and building of attack, without building protections of workers and factories and even abandoning the protection of bases, as same was unnecesarry due to nature of the strategy which was focused on attacking and building attack, and avoiding detection. 

Additionally, many small militaries abandon 3 because it tends to be unrealistic, as they lack technology to protect factories and workers from an attack of an advanced country, thus they focus on attack and building of attack alone.

Additionally, they often get weapons from other countries, which in a way negates their need to protect their own weapon producers.

After encountering some anarchs and putting their ideas to a fair and unbiased trial, what happened is that I realized how Empire can save money by introducing some anarchy into it.

For those against anarchy, when they say "I dont want any anarchy!",

I answer "Not even the world's tiniest bit of anarchy?"

Its obvious that government services such as courts, prisons and police, and public schools, are costing the government lots of money and they bring nothing good in return, neither for society neither for military, as people themselves can take care of criminals and of education.

So naturally, applying anarchy in that part and abolishing courts, prisons, police, and public schools would reduce cost of government, creating progress and prosperity of the Empire!

With this new power, if embraced by the American Empire, will put that Empire way above Russia which has also already abolished prisons and sent prisoners as soldiers to fight in Ukraine.

May the might of the American Empire forever be praised!

This opening focuses on fast early attack.

So you go e4, then Bc4, then d3.

Then you play Nf3 and maybe do castling.

Then play Nc3, then move that knight to Ne2.

Try placing other bishop on e3.

This way, you have everything available for attack, as your bishop and knight can both attack opponent on f7 space where his king is.

In this case too, you want to place as much pieces as possible on one side, you also want to trade pieces and attack opponent's knights with your bishop so they cant move, such as playing Bb5 when opponent's knight is on c6.

If you think about it, there are only 3 options:

1. Punish criminal less than the harm he has done

2. Punish criminal equally to the harm he has done

3. Punish criminal more than the harm he has done.

If you punish criminal less than the harm he has done, then that means his victim got punished more than he did.

If you punish criminal equally to the harm he has done, then both victim and criminal are punished equally.

Only 3 ensures that criminal gets punished more than the victim, which seems that it does justice towards victim, as it shouldnt happen that victim suffers as much as criminal but rather criminal should suffer more.

Its okay if he doesnt accept, but its obvious there is some heat between us and RM is a smart man ;) and others may not see it at first, but the rap battle is the best way to solve whats happening between us.

So I propose

1 round

1000 characters

May pure skill decide the winner!

So I got the game as I was recommended to get it, and of course it offers you to play as many sides. I admit, I was tempted to pick Japan, but I figured for a first play its best that I play as a main character, so I picked to play as Hitler.

Right after game starts, there are so many buttons and its a bit difficult to find whats what until you get used to it.

Right away, I started building military, air force, bombers, tanks, ships...

I am still not sure how resources in game work, but apparently, game lets you pick to build military factories or civilian factories on each territory, but I built mostly military factories.

I kinda dislike the fact that it takes such a long time to declare war, but I guess thats realistic as it takes time to convince the public and build up justifications for war.

For a first time playing, the game is very confusing as it bombards you with too many buttons to click on, and it takes a long time to click on each to see what each does.

But so far it seems simple: build strong military, declare war, and conquer.

I am not sure how beneficial it is to build bombers so early in the game, as I think I have more bomber planes productions lined up than I have for anything else.

However, I like the game so far as despite being complicated, it also has simple elements to it and I dont think I can fail if I just focus on military.

I wanted to make a short list of main points of Imperialism, so here it is:

1. Conquer all enemies

2. Have a lust for battle

3. Attack the enemy to counter his attack

4. Create greatest attack possible using all resources and all strategies

5. Use full power in battle to destroy enemy quickly

6. Use surprise unexpected overwhelming attack on undefended position or least defended position

7. Destroy enemy's mind, destroy enemy's attack, or destroy enemy himself

8. Destroy enemy completely

9. Learn everything about everything

10. Know when to attack and where to attack, and when not to attack and where not to attack

I found Hitler's speech on invasion of Russia which was available on YouTube before, but now I can only find it on internet archive.

I think that historically, this speech is important, as it shows Hitler's thinking and it shows how Germans felt about Russia, and especially about Russia invading other countries.

I dont know if its due to vaccines so now the ones who werent supposed to naturally survive are surviving, or is it because of the education system designed to infect people with victim mentality, but today's people are mostly just vaginas and trolls.

So in a way, the society of warriors somehow got replaced by society of crybabies and victims, which I really must say is a serious downgrade and is a sign that humanity wont last long because all the basic survival skills such as survival mentality, courage and persistence have all been eradicated and now we have society where people are so sensitive and easy to mentally break and so easy to be tricked by politicians that I think society has undermined itself and can no longer be maintained but is just headed towards collapse since the amount of all disorders is increasing rapidly.

The rates of autism grow every year, and soon we will reach a point where almost no one is normal regular person, but instead everyone will have some disorder, and everyone will be a victim or think of himself that way.

This needs to stop, as you shouldnt try to be a victim as that is literally the weakest way of life you can possibly have.

Its shame that I was born in this society, since I assume that I am whats left from true warriors who arent afraid of battle and arent afraid to hurt people, and will never paint themselves as victims but always as attackers and conquerors, because real men dont just live, but they destroy.

My goal was to conquer the world, but now I am not sure if thats such a good idea, since world is filled with weakness and there is no way to fix it anymore as strong people were breeding with weak people which made all current offsprings weak, as the product of mixing weak and strong is never going to be a strong product but a weak product.

Only when two strong people breed is when you get strong offspring.

But I think because society abandoned traditional way of life, the breeding was uncontrolled and women after being given a choice but also forced into "1 man and 1 woman" type of marriages, what happened is that women chose inferior men such as rich men or guitar players, and strong men due to being limited to 1 woman couldnt outproduce inferior men who were now being born in large numbers due to vaccinations.

I dont see strong people anywhere anymore, so I am rather certain that all whats left in the world is weak men.

Even I was made weak and gay by society which allowed women to take valuable positions in society, by society which gave women ability to make decisions, and by being forced to live and make friends in a community which consists of nothing but weaknesses, disorders and victims.

I really cant see how will humanity survive at this point, as they have destroyed the strong and multiplied the weak. Now when weak have taken over, society will do a series of bad decisions which will eventually pile up and by mere number of disorders will make society unsustainable and it will all collapse under the weight which these weak people cannot carry.

Everyone knows that I oppose North Korea, but this song is really good as it is AI cover:

"Holding up the red flag

We advance to attack

With our rifles forward

We rush to assault

Guiding the ranks of ten millions

Is the image of the banner of Songun

Attack, attack, forward in the attack

That's the General's revolutionary way

Attack like lightning on Paektusan

Attack like the thunder on Jong Il peak

Attack, attack

This is a battle of attack

Even if mountains stand in our way,

They cant stop us

Even if hordes of powerful enemies come

They cant break our defenses

Countering them without stopping for a moment

That strategy is invincible

So after getting chickens, then I was faced with two options:

1. Feed them grains

2. Feed them scientifically made chicken feed which is much more expensive

Logically, in capitalism, you are supposed to reduce cost, however this particular case results in absurd contradiction to this traditional rule.

Chicken feed which is more expensive is also a complete food which improves egg's quality and number of eggs produced.

Now, most capitalists who are stupid beyond belief would go for a cheaper feeding option to reduce cost.

However, I went for chicken feed because I listened to my heart which says that chickens like chicken feed much more and are crazy about it, while they dislike grains such as wheat and are not much willing to eat them as quickly.

In just few days, what followed is that egg production increased from 3 eggs a day to 10 eggs a day, and many of my chickens started laying eggs.

While I was feeding them wheat, then their eggs were weak and tiny, and they often even ate their own eggs.

So I decided to take different meassures to improve situation.

By switching to a more expensive option of feeding them store bought chicken feed, then they not only stopped eating their own eggs, but the eggs got bigger too.

It seems that decreasing cost of production is not, as one might assume, always the best path.

Sometimes choosing a more expensive input option actually results in you having more output, where choosing less input equals more output.

So no, in Capitalism, it is not always logical to choose cheapest option or try everything to lower cost and it might even be bad for buisness.

Okay, so lets first put our premises together so we know what to do.

1. New users who are men hate being on this site because its full of men

2. Women run away from this site because its full of men who come after them, and they have no other women to talk to.

It seems that both premises are based on this site being full of men.

But thats not true.

Both premises are based on people saying they are male!

If 60% of current users change their profile to female, new users wont know and you will literally lure men to this site and women who come will feel safer too.

I call this operation:

"Special Tactical Strategy For Attracting Users And Women To DArt".

I expect from every DArt user who lacks basic human decency and self-respect to follow this strategy with me right now!

Countries should always try to expand their borders.

In fact, its stupid not to.

All great world powers constantly work to expand their influence far beyond their borders.

What also needs to be understood is that imperialism is actually self-defense in its true form.

Imperialism is different from being defensive in this way:

Imperialism = expand your power, increase the power of your attacks, attack first if necessary, destroy enemy's attacks and destroy enemy completely.

Being defensive = dont attack first, but wait to be attacked, try to stop attacks or dodge attacks or endure attacks and dont destroy enemy completely but just his attacks, and dont expand your power.

We see that being defensive has almost no benefits.

For example, North Korea was being defensive for 75 years, didnt attack anyone. 

Can we say that North Korea is an example of great military success?

Its greatest success came only after it became imperialist again and helped Russia with military supplies.

In return, it got great technology which turned it into a competent military.

All great countries, USA, Russia, Britain, China... have this in common: none are defensive.

In fact, their entire military strategy is based on controlling as much territory as possible.

They are by definition imperialists.

Imperialism is all about attrition, constant attacks, draining enemy, destroying his power and him completely.

There are no benefits to being defensive except maybe couple of people in the world having sympathy for you.

Libya was defensive and NATO countries destroyed it completely.

You can be defensive all you want, but world is a battle arena and imperialists end up being stronger in this arena.

Literally any area of life always rewards imperialism.

From sports to games, to finding girlfriend.

You have greatest chance of having a girlfriend if you ask greatest number of girls until one agrees.

Or you can be defensive and hope she approaches you, but the imperialist guy approaches her and takes her from you.

Imperialism in games is also very obvious.

I play Smite, and basically if you arent willing to make attacks, you are gonna lose every game.

Let me give you example.

In Smite, there are minions in buff camps.

These minions wont attack you first.

However, if you dont attack them, enemy will attack them and take the buff and you will lose advantage.

So not attacking those who dont attack you is stupid gameplay.

I found some really cool article about how to be cool.

I know some people struggle to make friends, so this should help them greatly.

To be cool:

Probably the most simple advice, but people will like you more if you dont judge them.

People who are always promoting themselves as better than others will get hated by others.

Nobody likes a needy person. In fact, the more you ask from others, the more burden you place on them and the more they will hate you.

Upset people arent cool. They just seem crazy. It would be better for them if they were more stable.

Cool people rarely react in a negative way. Hence the term "cool".

If you think like others, they will like you more because of how similar you are to them.

If you wonder if your behavior is correct, just observe if other people do what you do.

The more you make others laugh, the more happiness you give them and the more they like you.

Even if you are trying to be like others, always act like you dont care what anyone thinks.

If you help someone, they might like you more because you are useful to them and to them it feels like you like them and they can count on you.

If you have to battle because someone attacks you, focus on attack rather than on defense. Attack which succeeds is cooler than defense which succeeds, and attack which fails is still cooler than defense which fails.

You should never care if you might lose or if you are defeated. You shouldnt even talk about it or think about it. In fact, harming your position to harm enemy is very cool.

Cool people will often ignore instead of responding to attacks. In fact, ignoring attacks makes the attacker feel like he is not making an impact, as there is no reaction.

Cool people arent afraid to attack those who attack them. In fact, one of the characteristics of cool people is making attacks quickly.

People who ask too many questions arent cool. Just look at people who ask lots of questions. Do they seem cool? No.

I can see how North Korea copied Japan's militarism and called it "Songun" as a North Korean version of it.

But Japan is much more superior to North Korea in terms of being cool and having good songs, especially Imperial Japan.

I thought it just had Battotai and thats it, but now I see that Imperial Japan had lots of songs which are just awesome, so no wonder people wanted to fight for the Emperor.

I think Imperial Japan could have won WW2 if it didnt surrender, but it chose the more peaceful way to conquer world by anime.

It was a brilliant strategy approved by the Emperor.

Most people who grew up with educated parents are clueless about what they were given and how they were given it.

Thats because they dont know whats it like to grow up with uneducated parents.

Uneducated parents fail at reasoning and fail at having proper knowledge.

So their child doesnt have any valid starting knowledge to begin with, but is taught bunch of nonsense and false reasoning which screw him up later in life.

Most parents are uneducated and have no skills to educate.

However, AI will greatly help all children who have stupid, uneducated or retarded parents, and there are many of those cases.

Israel has killed much more more women and children in few months than Russia did in two years.

Israel is intentionally targeting schools, hospitals, homes, and civilians.

This does not come as a surprise to anyone who read history of Israel and decades of them abusing the Palestinian people, kicking them out from their homes, beating them up, and imprisoning them.

Anyone saying that Israel is justified in torturing and killing civilians is just a bad person out of touch with reality.

Israel has done everything it can to abuse civilians. It even denied them food and water.

Israel is committing crime after crime, yet the entire world just watches and no sanctions are being raised against Israel.

Here is a list of bad things:

1. Religion

2. Communism

3. God

4. Circumcision

5. Child birth

6. Cars

7. Meat industry

8. Smokers

9. Drug addicts

10. Alcohol addicts

11. Pedophobes

12. Homophobes

13. Transphobes

14. Trump

15. Joe Biden

16. Guns

17. Child spankers

18. Religious teaching

19. Compulsory education

20. Force

21. Non-acceptance

22. Narcissism

23. Wars

24. Hiding truth

25. Media

26. Electricity

27. Modern medicine

28. Scientific research

29. Factories

30. Farms

31. Animal cruelty

The words of the prophet are coming true

Sinner, what you gonna do 🔥🔥🔥

When mountains start falling down

And Sun no longer shines

The stars from the sky will be falling too

Sinner, what you gonna do 🔥🔥🔥

The Earth will begin to crumble, and rivers will all dry

The wrath of God is now coming too

Sinner, what you gonna do 🔥🔥🔥

When into the hell you are cast, and fire is burning through 🔥🔥🔥

Sinner, what you gonna do 🔥🔥🔥

When you are left at the bottom of hell

Crying too

Sinner, what you gonna do

🔥🔥🔥🔥🥵🔥🔥🔥🔥

I was wondering why there are so many stupid people in the world.

I figured if there was a reward for being smart and punishment for being stupid, people would try harder to be smart.

But what I discovered was a completely opposite case.

This society, as well as religious societies, punishes free thinking.

Karl Marx once said "We must doubt everything", which in reasoning means that we must doubt every premise, every evidence.

But this society literally teaches people opposite, that they should "think this way because someone says so".

Religious parents constantly make unproven assumptions in front of their children, and their children who are not capable of knowing what is unproven assumption get overburdened by assumptions and think they are true.

Any time children try to think on their own, parents jump in to correct them.

In fact, correcting children is the first mistake of many parents.

Logical thinking is a process in which pieces of puzzle are put together to form an answer.

But as soon as children try to think logically and try to find pieces of puzzle, parents jump in to correct them and give them instant "solution" to the puzzle.

So what do parents do? They prevent children from solving the puzzle through own thinking.

But it gets worse.

Children are mocked when being wrong.

The only way one can logically think is if he is not afraid of being wrong.

But this society literally punishes and mocks children any time they are wrong, which causes the following conclusion:

"To avoid being wrong and mocked, I must think less and just repeat what they tell me."

And that is the end of logical thinking in children.

Does society also punish empathy?

How do children lose empathy?

Empathy is, in simple words, ability to feel bad when someone suffers, and ability to feel good when someone is happy.

This simple definition of empathy is used to discover how society encourages opposite.

Parents are often happy when their children suffer, or dont feel bad when they hurt or mock their children.

So per definition, its opposite of empathy.

But it gets worse.

Parents often not only ignore how their child feels, therefore destroying the link of empathy between them,

but parents often teach their children to mock other children, get joy from pain, and hating someone else's success.

It comes often in common words where parents mock their children for not being as good as some other child.

So the message is:

"I should feel bad because someone is successful"

Or

"I should feel bad because someone is more successful than me"

Per definition, this is opposite of empathy, because the reason you feel bad is because someone else is happy.

Then this creates opposite reaction where you feel good when someone fails, you feel more justified because you were taught that people who are better are more justified and should feel good and now you are better than that person, so you get happiness from their pain.

You are not happy because you succeeded. You are happy because someone else didnt.

This essentially raises children who have the opposite of empathy.

They dont feel good when someone feels good and they dont feel bad when someone feels bad.

They feel good when someone feels bad. They feel bad when someone feels good or feels better than them.

And to seal the deal on empathy, society teaches the famous "they deserved it" to completely end any remaining empathy.

"They deserved it" is equal to saying "dont feel bad because they feel bad".

I bought chickens about 20 days ago and there was not one egg for that time.

Yesterday I finally found one.

Today I find two.

Apparently, chickens need some time to start laying eggs.

I made sure to speed up the process by putting hay in coop so they are warm, making sure they have enough sunlight by letting them out early and having them be out until dark, feeding them a variety of foods, from chicken feed to wheat to grass and weeds and hay...

I even let them out of fence so they walk around where ever they wanna go and so they search food themselves as well.

I hope they start laying lots of eggs soon, because 3 per day just barely covers daily feeding expenses.

Lets first begin by perfect rules:

1. Do not cause pain

2. Do not cause destruction of life

3. Do not cause reduction in happiness

4. Do not cause reduction in freedom

5. Do not cause decrease in knowledge

These are perfect rules because they cannot contradict each other. They are most perfect rules to follow, as neither part of them contradicts the other.

Now lets move onto non-perfect rules:

1. It is good to reduce pain and not cause pain.

2. It is good to save lives and not cause destruction of lives.

3. It is good to increase happiness and not cause destruction of happiness.

4. It is good to increase freedom and not cause destruction of freedom.

5. It is good to increase knowledge and not cause reduction in knowledge.

These are non-perfect rules right now, because they contradict each other and one often excludes the other.

But if we unite them together, contradiction disappears:

"It is good to reduce pain and save lives and increase happiness and increase freedom and increase knowledge and not cause pain and not destroy lives and not destroy happiness and not destroy freedom and not destroy knowledge."

This is perfect rule, as it can only be applied when all of its parts are true, so there is no contradiction between them as they only apply when they all are true.

So this rule and first list of perfect rules can work together, because first rules tell what shouldnt be done while this one tells whats good to be done.

After reading few pages of Ayn Rand, I am certain now that I shouldnt be a consequentialist.

Now, I wouldnt say I am very certain, but here is what I think.

People have life, freedom, pain, happiness..

It shouldnt be violated to uphold someone else's rights.

If person has right to live, by logic you cannot kill him even if it saves 5 people.

If person has right to painless life, you cannot cause him pain even if causing him pain prevents pain of millions of other people.

Now, of course, there are exceptions, but it does sound like a fine rule to go for to achieve it in greatest possible level.

Now, there is a difference between not causing pain and preventing pain, as causing pain requires you to exist to cause it, so not causing pain just means not to add to pain, where preventing pain means to act to prevent it.

So this moral system is based on lack of action like  "dont cause pain". Its not based on preventing pain like "act to prevent pain".

You can not cause pain while not preventing any pain either.

Smokers literally tell their children

"You should never start smoking."

Then the question

"Why did you start smoking then?"

I even heard stories of smokers beating their children when they catch their children smoking.

And to make it even dumber, smokers often smoke in same room where their small children are, not only poisoning them but also increasing chances of addiction and health problems.

Whats even dumber is that children of smokers are more likely to be smokers themselves, but smokers still refuse to "quit smoking to decrease chances of their children smoking".

So smokers are bad.

But are they stupid?

The most common argument of smokers, when I point out that smoking is unhealthy, is them saying "There was this guy who smoked a lot and lived 100 years." and "I only smoke a little.".

The first claim is so stupid that it literally causes physical pain in my brain.

The second claim is usually a lie, because when smokers say they only smoke a little, they actually compare themselves to biggest smokers they know.

For example, if I smoke 40 smokes a day, but someone else smokes 80, then I "only smoke a little.".

If this proves anything, its that smoking literally kills some parts of your brain so in some cases you cannot even form an argument as the damage is that severe.

Now, I am currently having a debate about why World Conquest Zvezda Plot is the best anime.

"There was widespread support for animal welfare in Nazi Germany[1] (German: Tierschutz im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland) among the country's leadership. Adolf Hitler and his top officials took a variety of measures to ensure animals were protected.[2]

Several Nazis were environmentalists, and species protection and animal welfare were significant issues in the Nazi regime.[3] Heinrich Himmler made an effort to ban the hunting of animals.

[4] Hermann Göring was a professed animal lover and conservationist,[5] who, on instructions from Hitler, committed Germans who violated Nazi animal welfare laws to concentration camps.

In his private diaries, Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels described Hitler as a vegetarian whose hatred of the Jewish religion in large part stemmed from the ethical distinction this faith drew between the value of humans and the value of animals; Goebbels also mentions that Hitler planned to discourage slaughterhouses in the German Reich following the conclusion of World War II.[6]"

As for why Hitler invaded USSR, you can hear Hitler explain it here:

Long ago, I had a cat.

It had black and white colors.

It was male.

Whats interesting about this cat is that it was different from all other cats.

It didnt want to attack other cats. It didnt want to catch mice. It didnt want to attack anyone.

It was the most peaceful cat I have ever seen.

Yet his life was short.

It only lived for a year before getting hit by a car.

Cats which were much more aggressive and much more violent lived longer.

I havent had any water today, because being thirsty feels good.

Okay, so before we get into any debate, lets make it clear what I mean because I dont wanna run around in circles explaining what the topic is.

Homosexuality and pedophilia are sexual attractions.

However, they are not a choice.

Person cannot choose what to be attracted to.

Since they didnt choose it, something else had to create it.

Did God create sexual attractions? Sure he did, given that he designed our brain in the first place.

Then the obvious question: Why?

Why would God create homosexuality and pedophilia?

Like, what sparked up in God's mind to think "Yeah, this is a good idea."?

Since these attractions often motivate people to commit sin, and God created them, then God is literally motivating people to sin.

So one must really wonder if God is maybe evil.

I think its good not to cause pain to people.

My ideology changes a lot, so its hard for people to keep up.

Here are my general views right now:

Capitalism - good

Communism - bad

Abortion - bad

Religion - good

Gay - neutral

Trans surgery - neutral

Trump - good

Biden - bad

Russia - bad

Israel - bad

Ukraine - bad

Child marriage - bad

Veganism - bad

Vegetarianism - good

Porn - bad

Smoking - bad

Drugs - bad

Guns - bad

Accepting migrants - good

Government healthcare - bad

Maybe I forgot few, but I think this covers most of my political topics.

Now, I usually hate math, but I had to wonder.

If tarot gives 50% yes answers and 50% no answers, is it always correct 50% of the time?

Yea.

If some situation has 0% chance of happening, tarot will still give true answer 50% of the time and wrong answer 50% of the time.

For example, in theory, tarot yields 50 "yes" answers and 50 "no" answers out of 100 readings.

So if situation has 0% chance of being right and was always "no", the tarot would accurately guess "no" 50% of the time.

What if something only had 1% chance of happening?

Tarot would still have 50% chance of guessing if it will happen or not.

Tarot is magic, really. It is above science.

Please ask yes or no questions so tarot can answer them.

I have bunch of divination apps on my phone, including tarot, crystal ball, rune divination, horoscope...

I think its real, because it often gives me correct answers about my future, so in most cases I know what to expect.

You dont want to be upset, so why upset others?

OwO

I notice that I feel a sense of happiness when I see someone upset.

I often even start arguments on offensive topics just to upset people.

I am even ready to bring shame and failure to myself just to upset someone else.

I think its due to all those violent cartoons I watched as a kid.

The main premise of those cartoons was always in a sense of "When this character is hurt, I am very happy.".

I think some of that got copied in my brain, so I get pleasure when people are upset.

Narcissism definition:

"selfishness, involving a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a need for admiration, as characterizing a personality type"

Many science studies say that parents can alter their child's mind, even create partial copies of themselves.

Kinda like parents who lie a lot are more likely to produce children who lie a lot.

But there is also the opposite effect which is also harmful.

A child might be so hurt by his parent's lies that he tries to be as different from them as possible, becoming incapable to lie and being too honest, which is an evolutionary disadvantage.

Does narcissism work in same way?

If parents are narcissists, their children can also be narcissists, because people copy each other's behavior and children copy more than others.

But what is the opposite case? What is the case where child hates his parents so he tries to be furthest thing from a narcissist?

Instead of wanting for people to praise him, he goes the opposite way, he doesnt care for a praise, doesnt try to get it, he even hates praise, or he tries to avoid being praised, or does nothing to get praise.

This behavior might be harmful, because people are usually motivated by praise, and by ignoring praise, person might lose motivation in life.

From this, we see that negative parent's behavior can produce two possible negative outcomes:

1. Child copying negaive behavior

Or

2. Child going in other extreme and trying to create total opposite behavior that is also negative.

So every day, I go to pick some plants for chickens.

I feed them mostly grains and greens. 

I will also try feed them grass seeds once grass goes to seed.

But I noticed they look kinda bored, because every time they see me they run towards me because I always bring them some food or water.

But they often dont eat all the grains or greens or fruit, and I notice they lack entertainment.

So I read that chickens need entertainment, so I decided to get them toys like ladders and swing for chickens.

I think I am on the right path so far, because chickens are increasing in size and are growing really fast.