BrotherDThomas's avatar

BrotherDThomas

A member since

3
3
7

Total posts: 2,140

Posted in:
Catholics Get Beaten
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

As usual when you clumsily enter a new topic, you don't address the main issue of said topic, but only to attack its author so as to hide behind your own inadequacies upon this forum.  

Here, let me help you out AGAIN, here is the topic of this thread, ready?

"Latest figures reveal that there are now more Muslims (1.8 billion) in the world than there are Catholics (1.2 billion)"

Now, try something new, address the topic in question and quit muddying up all the threads that you enter with nothing but rancor to the threads author, and by RUNNING AWAY from the topic. Okay?  Do you understand, or do I need to get my neighbors little "Tommy," the 4th grader, to explain this simple proposition to you like he did before?


.





Created:
0
Posted in:
Catholics Get Beaten
-->
@Salixes


.
Salixes,

YOUR QUOTE: "Latest figures reveal that there are now more Muslims (1.8 billion) in the world than there are Catholics (1.2 billion)"

Could this situation be from the fact that the Muslim rendition of their God Allah is the newest God on the block promising servant virgin females in Islam's heaven?  The comedy of errors still stands, that Allah is that same God as Yahweh and Jesus because the impetus of Allah is also from Abraham.


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Catholics Get Beaten
-->
@Salixes



Salixes,

YOUR QUESTIONABLE QUOTE: "When asked to comment, the Pope replied that he doesn't mind coming in a little behind."

Listen, I understand that the Hell bound Catholics have enough bad press of late because of their continuing pedophile problems, whereas your quote, whether you tripped upon your Freudian or not, should be addressed.

The quote in question: " ........ the Pope replied that he doesn't mind coming in a little behind" could be an inference towards the poor innocent little children that were brutally screwed by the Catholic priests over the many years, and where the Catholic Church covered up these horrific crimes in the name of Jesus.  What is even worse, is the fact that if these pedophile acts were done in the churches "Rectory," where the priest lives near the church, then this name of housing for the priest would be appropriate :(


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@rosends



Rosey,

YOUR MISGUIDED QUOTE: "You have your puppy situation and ask a Jew to pray. You have immediately called forth the Jewish concept of prayer."

Yes, the Jewish concept of prayer is praying to the brutal serial killer Yahweh God for their wants, period.  Conversely, the TRUE Christian is praying to Jesus, as Yahweh God incarnate, and the Muslim is praying to Allah, which is the same God as Yahweh and Jesus because the impetus of these Gods are all through Abraham.  

Since all of these Gods are the same God, and since all of these Gods posit DIFFERENT and CONTRADICTING renditions of how each God says to pray to their swallowers, whoops, I mean "followers," then  which one takes precedence?

Rosends, under the above circumstances, and you as a Jew, where do you get the authority to preach to Christians in how to pray?


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

We can still see that the forums pseudo-christian mascot ethang5 still hasn’t addressed Matthew 21:22 in relation to his ever so embarrassing main topic of Stupidity Experiment, whose title actually refers to ethang5 because unfortunately he is not astute enough to address the passage in question above, but to only RUN AWAY from it with 1st grader lame excuses by calling Jesus Matthew passage as SILLY AND SENSELESS (Post #40)!  

Here is the scenario that the pretend Christian ethang5 is avoiding like the plague for obvious reasons, and that is it takes his comical initial post and trashes it beyond recognition!!! LOL!!!:
JESUS STATED; “And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22) Using the key word: “believing,” that you will receive your prayer request in the name of Jesus, triggers the prayer in a direct and absolute manner, as none other than Jesus so states. This simply deduces to a Christian will receive their prayer without any spin doctoring to the contrary if they truly believe in getting the requested pray request and in Jesus, understood?  DO YOU WANT TO CALL JESUS A LIAR IN THIS RESPECT? NO? I didn't think so.

We can only assume that poor ethang5 was not successful in having his embarrassing thread herein removed by the moderators to save what credibility he has left within this forum.  Maybe Jesus had something to do with this action, where Jesus wants this thread relative to Matthew 21:22 to stay, to be shown in calling HIM a LIAR relative to ethang5's initial post!!!

.




Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5




ethang5,

Addressing your embarrassing post #73:

Shhhhhhhhhhh, its almost over for you.  Just accept this fact and let it happen. You will have peace in the end by not having to insidiously defend your bible ignorance all the time, okay?  Do you need a hospice service yet, or do you want further embarrassment directed towards you regarding your complete bible ignorance in your own pitiful thread?

If you want to use the term "self-aware," then I suggest that YOU use this term yourself because you hide by not commenting upon you misquoting Stephen and I as shown in my post #72 above.  To embarrassed to be "self-aware" on you breaking the rules again, where you have to remain silent upon this fact to try again to save face? Yeah, you are! LOL!!!

You are making it to easy for me. WAIT, maybe that is your ploy, where I will leave your biblical ignorance alone! NOT!  Jesus and I have a mission upon this forum to seek out pseudo-christians like you, and to show others what not to do in the name of Jesus the Christ!  


NEXT?


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,


Our poor weak-kneed pseudo-christian mascot ethang5 senses the end of what creditability he has left at DEBATEART, and to make it worse for him, it will be shown in his own thread! His doctoring of posts, where he puts your statements into posts directed to me, and vice versa as shown in my post #72 above, is just a little boy ploy I have seen over the years, where when the pseudo-christian like ethang5 is cornered because of their bible ignorance and stupidity relative to their own topic,  they use this insidious action to buy time in taking the embarrassing and glaring light off of them.

Jesus and I have seen all the excuses to not engage actual posts relative to the main topic, and what ethang5 is doing in his own thread is just another replay of the past engagements with pseudo-christians that I have had over the years that don't know their ass from a wild grape regarding the scriptures.


There are so many examples of ethang5 stepping in the proverbial poo within his own thread, that it is hard to which ones to pick out in showing him to be hypocritical and ignorant to the faith. One stands out though, which is the following:

ETHANG5 QUOTE POST #67 : “My bliss is in Jesus Christ.”

While his “bliss” is allegedly in Jesus, ethang5 turns around and slaps Jesus in the face and  says that Jesus’ exact words in the following passage, with defining said passage in my post #19, is SILLY AND SENSELESS!  “And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22)  This insolence towards Jesus above is found in ethang5’s post #40 within this thread.  


Ethang5's thread herein will be referred too many times at DEBATEART in the future as just another example of what a pseudo-christian looks as acts like in the name of Satan, instead of Jesus the Christ!


.





Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

Our pseudo-christian mascot ethang5, who wishes he never started this revealing thread showing his outright biblical ignorance and RUNAWAY tactics, and last but not least, BLATANTLY MISQUOTING US to try and save face. 


Ethang5 used my following statements below in my post #46 and stated it as your statements in his post #48 

“...what Jesus said about prayer in Matthew was silly and lacked sense???”

“Show me at least 5 examples of me not answering…”

If you weren’t so bible ignorant, we wouldn’t have to follow you around DEBATEART to correct you all the time!



Ethang5 used your following statements below in your post #47 and stated it as my statements in his post #50.

“Of course its your job to explain what YOUR OWN  THREAD is about.”

“It is not for anyone else to interpret YOUR words and the meaning behind them as garbled as they are.”



As if his biblical ignorance isn’t enough, ethang5 is violating the rules by misquoting us as shown below under item #3:

Etiquette Expectations [DRAFT]

Formatting Best Practices:

For actual debates, I highly suggest referencing the guide. However, for general forum use, just obey a few simple rules:
1   Space between things is useful if you wish to be legible,
2   Don’t bold and/or CAPITALIZE all of your text, and
3   Don’t misquote other users.

https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3507/etiquette-expectations-draft



I suggest that you flag this post and make up another one where he MISQUOTED you in other posts as well within this thread, to notify the moderator of this forum (drafterman) in explicitly showing how ethang5 is violating the rules once again. Whats new? Nothing!


Poor ol' ethang5, he cannot debate the topic of his own thread, but instead, has to put forth these child like smoke screens to hide his biblical ignorance and RUNAWAY tactics in the manner shown above. How sad. (


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

Ol' ethang5 is doctoring my posts #48 and #50 by putting your words into me saying them.  This is a godly sign that ethang5 has either lost his schizophrenia drugs, Satan has totally entered his soul, or he is secretly in admittance that he has lost reality in his own thread, and is now grasping for that last straw that isn't even there to begin with because we have pushed him over the top! LOL!!!

I've seen this happen with other pseudo-christians as well, and its not a pretty sight when the equally bible inept ethang5's of this world realize that they have brought a Boy Scout pocket-knife to a GUN FIGHT that we have easily provided in his behalf to show ethang5 in what he truly is, and that is a week-kneed milk sop RUNAWAY pseudo-christian in the name of Satan.  

Just watch it play out, he is in the final chapter of being a minion for Satan where he is probably trying to remove this embarrassing thread of his post haste so as not to have this chagrining thread record remain on DEBATEART!  Shhhhhhh, in my past experience, the end is always the most entertaining.  Pull up a chair and pour some 104 rye with 1 ice cube, and watch the demise of the character known as "Ethang5's credibility at DEBATEART. :(


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

Okay, since you don’t want to better yourself in taking the time to understand the English Language and where you want to continue to be bible ignorant, then I had a great idea!  So you will be comfortable with your current intellect, I have gotten my neighbors little boy Tommy to try and get through to you upon my post #19 that you continually RUN AWAY from for obvious reasons.

I am turning this over to little Tommy who is in the 4th grade, and he will speak to you at your level of intellect to hopefully make you understand post #19, okay?  Here he is …….



hi mr. ethang5, im Tommy, and Im homeskooled by my Christen parents Betty & mIKe.  Cince my parents r Chrisiitans and Im skooled at home with the Bible, i do not no much about the science thingy wjich is a part of ur topic, sorry.

But reading my neighbor Brother Ds post #19, their is no need for u to run from it all the time, where in context u made a boo boo in callen Jesuss words silly and censeless in Matthew abut prayer in ur post #40…. here it is again…JC god said…. “And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22) Ive shown this 2 my 3rd grader friends and they wonder why you run away from it becus its very simple to understand and equattes 2 ur topic of prayer spearment does it not? Yeah it does! hehehehe…..

See becus it says if you beleve that u will get ur prayer becus of believing in God Jesuss words, then u will get your prayer? see? Then u can test this verse by using your scary science thingy by trying it out, lik if a friend is dying, u pray that they will not die, and if they do die later, then u didn’t believe enough!!!!  
Even my brotherr Larry understands it very well becus he didnt have to RUNAWAY from this verse like u do all the time, wow, r u sure your a Christian?  Terriblle to be u, huh?   Arnt u worried that u will go to hell for beeing so stuped bout the bible, and then …………..  $(*!#@&+*& …..



Okay, thank you Tommy for your fine example of knowing more than the assumed adult ethang5 by NOT running away from Matthew 21:22 and explaining it in a 4th grade manner where hopefully ethang5 understood it better this time!

Ethang5, we  all hope that little Tommy’s explanation has set you free from your bible ignorance and where you will start to comprehend the English language better, Yes?


Like I stated in my post #46 to have this bereft thread of yours taken down, and pleading with the moderators if need be in having it removed, have you heard back from the mods yet in this matter, because at this time your comedy of errors is an embarrassing example of showing this forum AGAIN that you are the KING OF RUNNING AWAY from biblical axioms!   Talk to drafterman, he may be able to help you, okay?  


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5



.
Ethang5,

We can see in your post #48 that you are grasping for those proverbial straws once again in you trying to seek a way out of your exposed predicament of calling Jesus' words in Matthew regarding prayer silly and senseless!  Therefore, your homework for tonight is to look up the following statements that relate to your overbearing ignorance of the English language, and your biblical ignorance as well, and to learn in what said statements listed below means, understand? Sure you do.

1. DEDUCING TO THE IRREDUCIBLE PRIMARY 
2. BIBLE IGNORANCE
3. COMPREHENSION IN UNDERSTANDING OF STATEMENTS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Subsequent to looking up the definition of the statements above, then once again tip toe into your embarrassing and pitiful thread, of over a year and a half dry spell, to maybe have a modicum of knowledge now relative to your own topic, understood? This is because, do you think that we enjoy making you the outright bible fool relating to your main topic? NO, I for one do not because it gets tiring in having to correct you all the time at your embarrassing expense in your comical thread herein, and other threads as well, get it?  

Please help us out above with raising what intelligence you have left at this time to make the discusson meaningful for a change. This is the least that you can do for us, agreed? Jesus and I thank you in advance.


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

Can you see why poor ol' ethang5 only creates a thread of his own every year and a half?  It's because he thinks that we have forgotten his threads of the past that were just as embarrassing as this current one.  I have lost count within this thread alone in how many times he has RUN AWAY from posts directed towards him with some of the most child like responses ever seen on this forum.  The adage of "Stupid people don't know that they are stupid, because of the fact that they're stupid" holds so true with ethang5.

Ethang5 is who he pretends to be, and that is an intellectual of the Christian faith, that is, until we easily show otherwise at his expense again, and again, and again, and again and again.  


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5



.

ethang5,

YOUR AGAINST JESUS QUOTE !!!: “I understood it fine. It was just silly, plus, you repeat the silliness in every post of yours. I tossed it out because it lacked sense, not because I didn't understand it.”

My post #19 that you RAN AWAY from like a little girlie boy, was about Jesus stating the following: JESUS STATED; “And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22) 

Now, in your Satanic quote above you have the audacity to state that what Jesus said about prayer in Matthew was silly and lacked sense???!!!  Are you kidding?  Your true colors have been exposed once again as a minion of Satan here at DEBATEART for calling Jesus' words silly and senseless!

Listen, I can understand that your IQ level won’t allow you to comprehend the ramifications of what Jesus said, as I explained, so I’ll remember to hold back the intellectual discourse the next time to save you further embarrassment, okay? You’re welcome.


YOUR LAUGHABLE STEP IN POO QUOTE: “No. TS is a professional and has a life. Plus, He has nothing to do with me or my posts. Why you mention us to the other in your posts is just another example of your emptiness.”

Okay, therefore with your 3,465 posts, and not being a professional, then you obviously don’t have a life as well! Thank you for turning yourself in again. You make it too easy for us. LOL!


YOUR “I WON’T BE ABLE TO PROVE IT BECAUSE IT IS A LIE QUOTE: " No. You don't answer questions addressed to you, so I dismiss your fake sincerity."  

Show me at least 5 examples of me not answering your ever so weak posts.  If you cannot perform this duty, then once again, you are a liar and a RUNAWAY again. WAITING!



YOUR QUOTE STEPPING IN POO AGAIN: “See, unlike you, I have people who read my posts, and I have a responsibility to them to keep my posts fresh and entertaining.”

YES, and the astute that read your lame RUNAWAY posts hold you to the fire in easily refuting your outright biblical ignorance, like I have done many times, whereas you call this “Stalking.” If you weren’t so bible ignorant, we wouldn’t have to follow you around DEBATEART to correct you all the time!  Get it?  Therefore, learn the bible or forever be “followed around” because of your ignorance of same, it's just that simple. UNDERSTOOD?

 

Ethang5, listen, deep down you know that you wished you really didn't post this laughable thread of yours where you are taking a bath against logic 101, bible axioms, and just plain old embarrassment.   Therefore, why don't you try and contact the moderators to take this despicable example of your assumed intellect down and throw it in the trash where it belongs. The old adage of "out of sight, out of mind" would help you try and regain what composure you have left here at DEBATEART, okay?

I am sorry, but your modus operandi in your ever so comical and embarrassing thread herein still has you RUNNING AWAY to posts directed towards you with some of the lamest and child like excuses we've ever seen, therefore, you remain this animal because you wear the title so well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI7ni7zL8qU  RUN ETHANG5, RUN!


.








Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

YOUR TOTALLY BEREFT QUOTE: "Dee Dee, again, you had nothing to say so I just tossed your entire post out."

What part of my statement to you in my post #31 didn't you understand regarding that you always RUN AWAY:  Now, address my post #19 with absolutely no “Little Boy Excuses” to run away like Tradesecret did by remaining silent to my refutation to his post, because I have other discourse for you upon your Prayer Experiment Topic, do you understand? 

1. Was it the "No Little Boy Excuses part" that you can't help yourself from using?

2. Maybe it was the fact that Tradesecret remains in hiding part, and you don't want to join him for obvious reasons?

3. Was it the fact that my post #19 is way over your pay-grade because I actually used biblical axioms, where your only way out would have been to call Jesus a LIAR on what I proposed?!  Therefore, to save further embarrassment, you have to use another lame excuse and RUN AWAY AGAIN?

4. Was it the fact that you don't want to get banned again, therefore you can't address my post #19 because you couldn't help but to attack me as the messenger, instead of the topic as a smoke screen once again?

5. Was it because I told you I had many questions to bring forth on your topic, and you got SCARED again because only you can RUNAWAY so many times? 

I had a lot to say in my post #19 and subsequently regarding a prayer experiment and it included Jesus, so not only did you RUNAWAY from me
again, you ran way from Jesus' true words regarding your topic of this thread.  You must be so proud where Satan is smiling once again to your RUNAWAY MO!



DEBATEART, LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN ETHANG5 FROM NOW ON CANNOT DISCUSS TOPICS RELATIVE TO HIS OWN THREAD, WHERE HE HAS TO USE "LITTLE BOY EXCUSES" TO RUNAWAY FROM POSTS THAT ARE DIRECTED TOWARDS HIM, WHEREAS IT DEDUCES TO THE SIMPLE FACT THAT ETHANG5 IS WRITING CHECKS THAT HIS ASSUMED BIBLICAL INTELLIGENCE CANNOT CASH!  


ETHANG5 IS DONE WITHIN HIS OWN THREAD!  LAUGHABLE!



NEXT?


.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

It is beyond reason why ethang5 would want to start a thread to begin with because of how easily he is refuted in other threads. As I have stated in my post to him above, it is no wonder why he tip toes out very carefully by only bringing forth a few topic threads every year and a half.

This topic thread of his should be a reminder to him to take another year and a half from posting another thread because of the embarrassment that this one has given him again.

Unfortunately, some pseudo-christians like ethang5 never learn.  :(


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5




.ethang5,

YOUR POOR LITTLE BOY WHINY QUOTE: “Your running around the board stalking me, insisting that everything I do is bannable is hilarious”

Case in point, you attacked Miss Deb in your comedy of errors thread herein, by stating that she was “touched” which means crazy or insane, PERIOD!  Now, what were you banned for the last time? Yes, personal attacks! You have to do this act because it takes away the FACT that you can’t address questions posed to you, therefore, attack the messenger instead of their message.

Remember once again, I DO NOT WANT YOU BANNED because of the simple fact that I need you at DEBATEART Religion forum to show others in what a true pseudo-christian looks and acts like, and therefore do not let this happen to them!


YOUR TRULY EMBARRASSING QUOTE AGAIN: “Did your post mention the threads topic Dee Dee? D’oh!

For obvious reasons of your further embarrassment, you conveniently didn’t want to see my post #19 within your sophomoric thread, where I challenged you to discuss said post regarding a real prayer experiement.  Instead, you ran away from it as usual.  How long will you continue to RUN AWAY from it as the membership and Jesus watches?  Scared again of the outcome? LOL!!! 


Now we can see why you didn't want to post a thread of your own for over 1 and 1/2 years, it is because as explicitly shown, your threads go beyond embarrassment for you.  Instead of using your threads to discuss your topic, you use them to insult other members, to run away from their posts relative to your topic, and as shown, you continually remove one foot to insert the other at all times!  Priceless entertainment, but at your expense once again.


Now, address my post #19 with absolutely no “Little Boy Excuses” to run away like Tradesecret did by remaining silent to my refutation to his post, because I have other discourse for you upon your Prayer Experiment Topic, do you understand?

TO SAVE YOU TIME, BECAUSE YOU ARE GOING TO NEED EVERY MINUTE FROM NOW ON, HERE IS THE LINK WITHIN YOUR EMBARRASSING THREAD:


BEGIN:



.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen


.
Stephen,

Relating to your post #20, agreed.  We have both challenged him in your post #14, and in my post #19, so let's see if he can refute them this time, and not runaway in the eyes of Jesus (Hebrews 4:13) like he has done ad infinitum before.

The clock is ticking .......




Created:
0
Posted in:
The Answer Is Zero
-->
@ethang5


.
ethang5,

For the umpteenth time, you quote irrelevancy instead of grasping and discussing the topic at hand.  You stand out as a RUNAWAY so much, that we can't help but show this blatant fact. Then you wonder why you are called out upon your runaway modus operandi, where I do it in the name of Jesus because He states that you are to defend the faith in Titus 1:9, and in this case, you runaway from it again.

Why do you continue to slap the face of Jesus in this manner?


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Answer Is Zero
-->
@Salixes



.
Salixes,

Even though I am a TRUE Christian, I can't recall any scientific facts that have ever been disproven using religion? My fellow Christians try in vain to spin doctor away scientific fact all the time, but then the damn Hell bound Atheists defer to logic and reason, and therefore derail the Christians argument. Sad indeed, and what tests my faith all the time.  :(

.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

I have to easily agree with Stephen in the fact that your alleged experiment on prayer that you used was comical and irrational as well!  Where do you get this embarrassing material from, because it was not biblically vouchsafed in any way whatsoever!

Let me give you a godly REAL PRAYER EXPERIMENT, okay? Ready?

JESUS STATED; “And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22) Using the key word: “believing,” that you will receive your prayer request in the name of Jesus, triggers the prayer in a direct and absolute manner, as none other than Jesus so states. This simply deduces to a Christian will receive their prayer without any spin doctoring to the contrary if they truly believe in getting the requested pray request and in Jesus, understood?  DO YOU WANT TO CALL JESUS A LIAR IN THIS RESPECT? NO? I didn't think so.

Therefore, if a pseudo-christian like YOU does not get their prayer answered, then the onus is put upon them because they didn’t “believe enough.” How embarrassing it must be to the pseudo-christian to know that they didn't get their prayer answered because they didn't believe enough that they would, and in Jesus the Christ, which adds even more guilt upon them.

Seriously, I feel so honored in that I am testing you and engaging in your 3rd posted thread of your own in the last 1 and 1/2 years. Praise!


BEGIN DISCUSSION ON MY RELATIVE POST ABOVE:


Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull



.
Miss Deb,

Whether or not ethang5 was responsible for disgusted's ban is irrelative to you flagging his demeaning post to you.

This is a religious forum, and Christians are to act as if Jesus is watching them 24/7/365, of which, Jesus performs this godly act in Hebrews 4:13!


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Stephen



.
Stephen,

Your refutation is spot on, but at least give ethang5  credit for actually posting a thread of his own which is number 3 in the past 1 and 1/2 years, even though it goes severely wanting upon the subject at hand. Ethang5's posting a thread of his own is slowly improving in this respect, praise Jesus!


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull



.

Miss Debb,

In the name of Jesus, just REPORT and flag ethang5's #4 post. You are correct, enough is enough, whereas he hasn't learned from his last 2 week ban from doing the same thing.


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@Vader



.
SupaDudz,

YOUR QUOTE: "I say we settle this feud with a rap battle that is the biggest on the sites history. The winner will get site clout Team Christians versus Team Athiests"

Lets do it!  We will easily win because we have Jesus on our side, praise!


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Stupidity Experiment
-->
@ethang5


ethang5,

YOUR POST #4 THAT WILL GET YOU BANNED: "That you were "touched" is a thing not hard to guess looking at your posts."

As if you don't have enough embarrassment within this forum, you demean Debb BY INSULTING HER in a manner of her being "touched" which in an informal way means she is slightly insane or crazy, and you allegedly represent Jesus the Christ? NOT!

Don't you realize, like with me bible slapping Tradesecret, I need you in this forum to show how utterly ungodly you are as a pseudo-christian to prove that no Christian should act in the manner that you do, therefore I DO NOT WANT YOU BANNED, understand?

REPORTED


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
How Deluded Are Christians?
-->
@ethang5





.
ethang5,

AGAIN, Your post represents another of many where you do not address the main topic, but instead, you add nothing but irrelevancy as you RUN AWAY from it.  AGAIN, who appointed you to be the forums monitor in what is to be posted or not as the same and lame old crap?  Where do you get this authority?  It certainly wasn't from Jesus, because He adamantly says you are to defend the faith like I do (Titus 1:9), whereas you runaway from it ad infinitum.

If you can't engage with any topic on this forum, then why don't you remain silent, and the ones that can, let them discuss it without your embarrassment of clogging up the thread with your "Look at me being a monitor, because that is the only thing that I can do on this forum!"


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Why Society Rejects Religion
-->
@ethang5


.
ethang5,

Your post represents another of many where you do not address the main topic, but instead, you add nothing but irrelevancy as you RUN AWAY from it.  Who appointed you to be the forums history monitor, and what is to be posted or not in your opinion?  Where do you get this authority?  It certainly wasn't from Jesus, because He adamantly says you are to defend the faith like I do (Titus 1:9), whereas you, runaway from it ad infinitum.

If you can't engage with any topic on this forum, then why don't you remain silent, and the ones that can, let them discuss it without your lame posts clogging up the thread.

I suggest that when you start smelling sulfur, then acquire an asbestos suit because of where Jesus will be sending you, praise Jesus' revenge!

Created:
0
Posted in:
Should We Ban Religion?
-->
@Salixes



.
Religion should never be banned!  Case in point, look what Christianity has to offer, which is an afterlife with Jesus!  Who wouldn't want to walk around in our 1400 square mile Heaven with Jesus for eternity? Thank Jesus that Heaven's walls are approximately 60 feet tall, which will hopefully keep the Satanic Jehovah Witnesses out!  Another aspect of Heaven for men, is the fact that there will be absolutely no women in Heaven, praise Jesus for this situation since we had to put up with them while on each!

.


.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!
-->
@Mopac



.
Mopac,

YOUR HYPOCRITICAL QUOTE: "We don't share the same faith, Thomas. I do not recognize you."

Huh? But, you recognized me in this thread by stating: "The only topic/post Thomas has ever made that gave me a good laugh." Therefore, you can't have it both ways, get it?  Can you spell "HYPOCRITICAL IN THE EYES OF JESUS?"  Sure you can.  (Hebrews 4:13)  :(


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Should We Ban Religion?




As everyone can see for the umpteenth time, ethang5 enters another thread and does not, I repeat, does not address the main topic at hand, but only dribbles out irrelevancy as he runs away from it.  Poor ol' ethang5 is one of the most predictable members of this forum by always running away from topics because he can't begin to address them in kind.  

Now, watch ol' ethang5 come back and posit even more childish excuses of why he has to run from the astute members of this forum that actually have an IQ that is above 75 to post topics to begin with, whereas ethang5 can only dream about doing this himself.  Truly sad.  :(

.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!
-->
@zedvictor4



.
zedvictor4,

Yes, as if having belly buttons aren't embarrassing enough to Christianity in this Satanic painting in question, your notion that this couple representing Adam and Eve are of European origin, and that they are bare in the nether regions, makes it even worse.  A&E should represent a Hebrew looking descent since man was made in the image of Yahweh (Genesis 1:27), which was the Hebrew God ONLY, and of none other of the peoples upon the earth.

As if Christians don't get enough flak by accepting our faith in the 21st century, and then finding a painting like this only makes it worse.  :(


.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!
-->
@Mopac



.
Mopac,

YOUR UNGODLY QUOTE ONCE AGAIN: "The only topic/post Thomas has ever made that gave me a good laugh."

Why do you laugh at what was depicted in the painting? Don't you realize that the artist that painted this misrepresentation of Adam and Eve is making fun of our faith? Is that really something to laugh about?  Who's side are you on?!


.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!
-->
@Barney


.
Ragnar,

YOUR QUOTE: "I would say if TRUE CHRISTIANS should be offended by such paintings, in a manner similar to how TRUE MUSLIMS would be, is a debate worthy topic."

Obviously you are a TRUE Christian, and are disturbed by such a misrepresentation of our human beginnings as this artwork represents, yes? You know damn well that some Hell Bound Atheist painted Adam and Eve with belly buttons, and like zedvictor4 has pointed out, in a European appearance, notwithstanding, they are bare in the nether regions, just to show our faith as questionable and laughable! 

I feel that any debate upon this unfortunate topic would only make our Christian faith dig deeper holes, of which, would be very hard to get out of since you brought up the fact that the Muslim faith should be offended with this painting as much as Christians, therefore having to admit that their God Allah and our Jesus are one in the same and the ramifications thereof.

Why didn't you include the Hebrews as well in your comment?  It was their God Yahweh, that we eventually stole from them, that started this topic to begin with in the two Creation narratives that contradict each other.


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Proof That Jesus Still Exists
-->
@Salixes


.
What I am elated about is the  biblical fact that there will be no women in heaven, praise Jesus!  Jesus only knows that we had to put with women being a 2nd class citizen, as the Bible so states, while on earth, therefore, the superior man will finally have peace in heaven.

The reason there will be no 2nd class women in heaven is because of the following passage:
“When he opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.” (Revelations 8:1) 


.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!
-->
@Salixes



Salixes,

YOUR QUOTE: "You obviously take exception to the obvious connotation that Adam and Eve were born and not created."

On the contrary! A&E were created by our serial killer Yahweh God in Genesis through dirt and a rib. Therefore when Adam and Eve have belly buttons, they show them NOT created by Yahweh which is blasphemy to my faith!

Seth was procreated by their mother and father through incestual relations between Seth and his mother, where my Yahweh  wasn't smart enough to know that incest can cause severe birth defects. Of which in turn, Yahweh created to begin with because of Proverbs 16:23: Yahweh, not chance, decides what happens in human affairs; “The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the LORD.



.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Is Home Schooling Safe?
-->
@Salixes




.
Salixes,

At least "home schooling" keeps the innocent children away from Catholic Pedophile Priests in their "rectory" room, and where the Jehovah Witnesses are vying to take the Catholic faith away from being number one with their pedophile problems stemming from their Satanic "Two Witness Rule!" Praise!

.

Created:
0
Posted in:
The World's Most Unpopular Book



.
The reasoning of so many bibles being printed, is simply the fact that there're is approximately 325 Bible DIVISIONS of the faith that all need their correct interpretation of said bible!  As comically seen, even though they all contradict each other, each DIVISION of Christianity obviously has the correct interpretation. LOL!!!


.
Created:
0
Posted in:
The World's Most Unpopular Book
-->
@ethang5



.
Ethang5,

As usual, you do not address the main topic at hand, but you rather run away from it again with irrelevant posts.  Just once subsequent to your banning, try and address the main topic. Can you do it? Do you need help from Mopac?  Or, can you actually do it by yourself this time?

Your presence within this forum is so predictable, at your expense.


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Fellow Christans, I need your help on this demeaning matter towards our faith!



.
Please write to your Congressman in the hopes of getting a law passed that will eliminate any further Satanic paintings, or pictures, showing Adam and Eve with belly buttons for the obvious reasons relative to our Creation narrative.  This is sacrilege to our 6000 year old Creation Story, as shown within the scriptures from Adam to the present day!

It is embarrassing to have these belly buttons shown on Adam and Eve under the true conditions of our Jew God only Yahweh's Creation within the bible, because our Yahweh made man from dust, and Eve from Adam's rib, therefore there should be no belly buttons whatsoever,!

Look at this blasphemous picture below of Adam and Eve having belly buttons, how sickening can you get where this image is demeaning our faith and making a laughable mockery of it!

http://api.ning.com/files/*Q5xYpzaxCIJkkF*F6ZHWLL9RiBZjscaPJcRRxXfdFrP5b63A*rWV6sNf3oj6Vd5GJI2Z0JC7w*7ZEpMUbT1QjTs6R3EoLtuKdk409zeNC0_/one_detail.jpg

Thanking you in advance.


.


Created:
1
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@Tradesecret




Tradesecret,


YOUR VERY WEAK POST:  “As for not addressing the main topic, I directly refuted his topic with my response. The fact that this eludes your tiny little brain is unsurprising, but it is what it is.”

Barring the fact of your insult towards me which is against the rules of this forum that will get you banned, so, you think that by bringing your alleged humor into the discussion of this topic, by not really addressing said topic whatsoever in the first place, is acceptable? That is nothing but a cop out because you know you can’t discuss Salixes initial post, other than to run away from it in your perceived humor. How sad for you in this respect in not being able to defend the faith as Jesus promotes. (Titus 1:9) 



YOUR QUOTE REGARDING YOUR POSSIBLE BAN: “Imbecile! I count at least 6 times that you use God as God and don't refer to him by name.”

Barring you calling me an imbecile which is a personal attack, and against the rules where you can get banned, I have to use the term God in sentences as a comparison to show you how disrespectful you are by not using His NAME, get it? Huh? 



YOUR QUOTE: “If you knew the OT as you purport, then you would realise that there are many names of God and not just the couple you refer to.”

It matters NOT in how many names are in the Old Testament for the brutal serial killer Yahweh, which is the same God as Jesus, understood?  The only name that matters, and I repeat, the only name that is to be used in respect is Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost of the Triune Doctrine, or for short, Jesus, get it?  

Regarding those other names that you mention that are supposed to be of importance to get you out of your predicament,  when was the last time you used Alpha and the Omega when in discussion within this forum relating to Jesus?   :(



YOUR QUOTE AGREEING WITH ME: “The verses above do not tell us to use his name, but rather to ascribe glory to his name”

Uh, how do you ascribe glory to His name if you don’t use His name to begin with?!  Like you stated, is this statement ascribing glory to His name? “My God is ever loving and forgiving.” No it is not!  When using the word GOD as a title only, it is not ascribing glory to His NAME because it only remains a title of Jesus and not His NAME which is Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost, or simplified by just using the NAME of Jesus. UNDERSTAND?!  

As seen by the membership, you are having a very hard time in respecting Jesus true modus operandi within the scriptures, of which you may pay for upon Judgment Day!  Do you smell sulfur yet?



YOUR QUOTE SLAPPING JESUS IN THE FACE: “We pray to God as the God of all comfort to bring comfort to those who are suffering.”

Barring that you are not using our God's name of Jesus in prayer, I am sorry, but if you actually knew your bible, then praying to Jesus is not needed because He knows in what you need in the first place, whereas the act of prayer is seemingly demeaning to Jesus under this notion.

“Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.”  (Matthew 6:8)



YOUR REVEALING QUOTE: “Firstly, humanity is made in God's image. God is not made in man's image.”

IMAGE:  a representation or likeness of a person or thing, as in a drawing, painting, photograph, or sculpture

"God created mankind in his image; in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." (Genesis 1:27)

Thank you for agreeing with me in this proposition that I posited in another thread which proves that our Yahweh of the OT has the same bodies and “attachments” that we have as humans, praise!  Can you image in your mind that Yahweh has a penis under our agreeable circumstance? :)



YOUR UNFORTUNATE IGNORANT QUOTE UPON THE ISLAMIC FAITH NOT BEING RELATED TO ABRAHAM: “Islam is not descended from Abraham. Islam is one of the world's newest religions and commenced well after Christianity and the Jewish religion.”

I am sorry to inform you of the fact that Abraham is the father of the Arab people and the Islamic faith, as well as the Jewish people, and Christianity through himself and his two sons, Isaac and Ishmael. 

“Allah has told the truth. So follow the religion of Abraham, inclining toward truth; and he was not of the polytheists.” (Qur’an 3:95)

Abraham is credited with establishing both the sanctuary in Mecca known as the Kaaba and the practice of Islamic pilgrimage (Haj) to that site (Qur’an 22:26-27, Qur’an 3:96-97, Qur’an 2:125-129).

When it comes to the five pillars of Islam, the importance of the Prophet Abraham becomes even more evident.
The second pillar of Islam is Salah, the obligatory five daily prayers. Within these prayers, Muslims must ask Allah to send His blessings upon the Prophet Abraham 5 times a day, in virtually every time zone on this planet, asking God to send His blessings on Prophet Abraham in the course of his/her prayer.

The major Abrahamic religions in chronological order of founding are Judaism (the base of the other two religions) in the 7th century BCE, Christianity in the 1st century CE, and Islam in the 7th century CE.

It is not my intention to correct you upon this vital fact, whereas you will have to do your homework next time upon the simple Islamic faith’s origins. Therefore, Yahweh, Jesus, and Allah are the SAME GODS!  Find your apologetic books, quick! LOL!



YOUR STEPPING IN POO QUOTE RELATING TO ETHANG5 MOCKING ME: “Yet the fact that he mocks you is because you are worthy of being mocked.”

Within the same vein, should ethang5 now be mocking you because of your blatant faux pas regarding the Islamic faith above? Yes? OUCH!



TRADESECRET, WATCH YOUR PERSONAL ATTACKS UPON ME BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT YOU BANNED, OKAY? I NEED YOU ON THIS FORUM TO SHOW THE MEMBERSHIP IN WHAT A TRUE PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN LOOKS AND ACTS LIKE, AGREED? THANK YOU.

.











Created:
0
Posted in:
Denominationalism
-->
@Mopac



Mopac,

Why don't you call it for what it truly represents, and that is a "DIVISION" of the faith and not the insidious word "DENOMINATION!"
This is because, what our serial killer Jesus, as Yahweh God incarnate, said once within the scriptures, He did not mean for His HEBREW creation to take in many different and contradicting ways with a plethora of different DIVISIONS of the faith. GET IT?  Sure you do at your embarrassing expense again.

Its truly hard to believe that within DEBATEART'S Religion forum, there contains a bastion of so many different pseudo-christian DIVISIONS, where each DIVISION of the faith is the only true example of Christianity!  Laughable at best.


.

 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@Tradesecret



.
Tradesecret,

YOUR RUNAWAY FROM THE TOPIC QUOTE AGAIN: “My quote was revealing. It however was not a runaway quote. It demonstrated in humour the ridiculousness of the OP. That you missed the obvious humour, I suspect, reveals much about you. LOL!”

Barring your mispelled word of “humour,”it most certainly is a runaway quote because you did not, and I repeat, did not address the main topic other than to be allegedly humorous about it in the eyes of Jesus (Hebrews 4:13).  What this blatantly reveals about you is the fact at this time, you have the same modus operandi of your cohort in crime ethang5, where he runs away with non topic inane responses as well.



YOUR UNGODLY AND BIBLICAL IGNORANT QUOTE: “You don't get to command me to use a particular name for God. You are not my boss, elder, or as far as I can tell even a Christian.” 

With you slapping the face of Jesus in your Satanic quote above by not calling our God by name, then let it be known that you know more than Jesus’ inspired true words within the scriptures, to wit:

“Ascribe to the LORD the glory due TO HIS NAME; Worship the LORD in holy array” (Psalm 29:2).

"Ascribe to the LORD, O families of the nations, ascribe to the LORD glory and strength.. Ascribe to the LORD the glory due His NAME bring an offering and come before Him. Worship the LORD in the splendor of His holiness” ( 1 Chronicles 16:28-29)
The passages above state with specificity that you are to glorify the NAME of God, and NOT His title, do you understand this simple biblical fact? Then doing the simple 2nd grade math that hopefully you will understand, using the term “God” is a title, and NOT God’s true name, understood? Yes? Maybe?  Our God’s name is Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost, of the Triune Doctrine, and not His ‘title” of God, GET IT?



YOUR EQUALLY IGNORANT QUOTE: “In any event I will from time to time use various names for God. However, that is my choice and it my decision.”

If you want to know more than Jesus’ inspired words, as Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost God incarnate, where it is your decision to call Him whatever you want, then subsequent to your enlightenment of Psalm 29:2 and 1 Chronicles 16:28-29, where biblically do you get this authority? Please tell us without making yourself the further biblical fool! 

BEGIN:



YOU DIGGING YOURSELF DEEPER INTO A HOLE QUOTE: “I also think that the character of God and indeed anything about Him distinguishes Him from all the so called gods made in man's image.” 

Barring the biblical axiom that Jesus is God, and made in man’s image while on earth, where you should wipe the proverbial egg from your face at this time, then with your additional bible ignorant quote above, and since our God Jesus, of whom you disrespect, then I will have to perform the following to your future Devil Speak. This will be, when Jesus has the same historical Abrahamic foundation as the Islam God of Allah, in being the SAME GOD, I will refer to Allah when dealing with your over the top Christian ignorance to prove a point, at your laughable expense, of why you have to name our specific God from the others of this era! Your bible ignorance precludes that there is not other Gods that are worshipped at this time. Priceless ignorance. LOL! 

Furthermore, it is quite obvious that you attended ethang5’s school of “How to be totally Bible Ignorant,” and when needed, lay down “smoke screens” that will take one’s thinking away from the fact that you are not addressing the topic at hand, but rather running away from it. Jesus and I will not let you perform this ungodly act, understood? Yeah, you understand alright!



YOUR LAST REVEALING EMBARRASSING QUOTE:If you had only have learnt to apply that to yourself, then this response would not have been necessary.”

If you had only have learnt ….” Huh? WTF? Irrelative to Christianity, I can also see that you had the same inept English teacher as the totally bible inept ethang5, where your syntactical sentence structuring is abhorred! In turn, “this reveals much about you!” 

Like I have had to tell the equally bible ignorant ethang5, is that Jesus does not like dummies spreading the gospel with questionable English skills. Either get someone coherent that can write for you, or remain silent to save face. Thanking you in advance.


Tradesecret, you are dismissed at this time for you to try and regroup to save further embarrassment to the TRUE inspired words of Jesus that you fail to follow.



.

Created:
0
Posted in:
WHAT's the MOTIVATION?
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

YOUR UNGODLY QUOTE AGAIN: "But the site sustains the damage none-the-less."

Didn't I tell you many times with your bastardized English that Jesus does not want dummies representing His TRUE words, even though you are a pseudo-christian? Therefore, your hyphenated word of "none-the-less" is wrong! It does not need to be hyphenated because you ended the sentence with said word, which is poor syntactical sentence structuring to begin with. You hyphenate two or more words when they come before a noun they modify and act as a single idea! This is called a compound adjective, get it? When a compound adjective follows a noun, a hyphen is not necessary, understood?  :(






Created:
0
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@rosends


rosends,

Your dissertation upon prayer is nothing but gobbledygook Satanic Devil Speak! LOL What website did you retrieve this ungodly mess from?

Since you are HEBREW orthodox, and follow Yahweh God only, you're the last one to speak about prayer to Christians, understood?  Jesus, who you deny exists as Yahweh God incarnate in the Triune Doctrine, gave the Christian explicit knowledge about prayer and how it should work all the time.  Your definition slaps the Christian in the face by calling Jesus a LIAR relative to His prayer definition!

You represent what can happen when a HEBREW like you tries to tell Christians in what they are supposed to accept, when the two faiths are blatantly contradictory to each other!  H-E-L-L-O?   LOL! 

.




Created:
0
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@ethang5



ethang5,

Shhhhhhhhhh, you're done. This is because by viewing the many threads within this forum where you have run away from biblical axioms, why torture yourself any further by continuing to be the biblically ignorant fool that you are in front of everyone?  Therefore, may I suggest that you save yourself further embarrassment with Salixes thread upon "Does Prayer Work" and just follow your words, and remain silent, okay?

Just sit upon the sidelines like a good little puppy tethered to the porch where you belong, as you watch what you will never have, and that is you actually engaging in the topic at hand, understood? Yes? Maybe?

This link shows everyone in what you've become when confronted with bible axioms, where the only thing you can do, is to run away from them:

Created:
0
Posted in:
Infinite Set Theory Explains The Trinity
-->
@ethang5



ethang5,

YOUR QUOTE: "I would have been warned because I find mental illness fascinating? Warned by whom? And why is it against the rules to find mental illness fascinating?"

Your quote above was obviously meant for me, otherwise you wouldn't put this quote upon yourself, GET IT? Therefore calling one inane is against the rules and should be flagged, but I didn't because you have enough embarrassment within this forum, UNDERSTOOD?


Now, as usual, you have RUN AWAY from the topic of prayer, what's new in this respect? NOTHING!  You just keep running away because that is all you can do within this forum when topics are brought forth that you can no more address than you can walk on water in the summertime!

You are once again in what this url represents:

RUN ETHANG5, RUN, pick up those chicken feathers as you runaway again, don't leave that mess behind!  LOL!!!


.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Does Prayer Work?
-->
@Tradesecret



.
Tradesecret,

YOUR REVEALING RUNAWAY QUOTE TO THE TOPIC AT HAND, TAKING ETHANG5'S APPROACH: "Yes prayer works. I prayed that you would start another topic demonstrating your foolishness, and God answered my prayer. Thank you God. "

First thing, show respect to our God and actually use His given historical name, understood?  It is "Yahweh," the God of the Hebrews only, and if you follow the Trinity Doctrine, His name recognition is Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost, get it? This action helps in differentiating our God from the many others in the Bronze, Iron, and Middle Ages where they all existed. 

I'll use a favorite term that your equally bible ignorant cohort ethang5 uses when he can't discuss the topic at hand, but only to run away from it. This quote is; "If you have nothing to say, remain silent!"  This quote fits you perfectly.


.




Created:
0
Posted in:
Your biggest OBJECTIONS to Christianity
-->
@OntologicalSpider



.
OntologicalSpider,

1.  My biggest objection to Christianity is that Jesus was a serial killer as shown when He is Yahweh God incarnate in the Old and New Testaments by having His Triune Doctrine.

Jesus' most notable killing spree is obviously the Great Flood, where He drowned innocent zygotes, fetus' and babies as their mothers watched in horror as their babies gasped for their last breath before they brutally drowned.  What makes this scenario even worse for me, is the biblical fact that our Yahweh/Jesus/Ghost God was watching these precious little babies drowning a ghastly death! (Proverbs 15:3) Under this circumstance, it is very hard for me to call Jesus ever loving and forgiving like so many other Christians do. :(



2.  My second objection of Christianity is that the Bible explicitly shows women to be 2nd class citizens, whereas they are to be ruled by and to be in subjection of man. 

“Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.” (1 Timothy 2:11-15)

“It is better to live in a corner of the housetop than in a house shared with a quarrelsome wife.” (Proverbs 21:9)

“ But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ  and the head of the woman in man. For the man is not of the women; but the woman of the man.” (1Corinthians 11: 3,8) 

“I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare, whose heart is a trap and whose hands are chains. The man who pleases God will escape her, but the sinner she will ensnare.” (Ecclesiastes 7:26)


There are many more examples of women being 2nd class citizens within the scriptures, and any passages that say otherwise to the above examples are absolute contradictions, therefore when there are contradictions, there are lies, because both entities cannot be true at the same time, and to build our faith upon lies is not an option and is utterly irrational. :(


Awaiting your response to my two objections of Christianity, whereas I have many more to discuss.

Thanking you in advance.


.


Created:
0
Posted in:
God Loves His Children
-->
@ethang5


ethang5,

YOUR MISQUOTE ONCE AGAIN: " Your begging for attention, though pathetic, is endearing. What can I say, I have a soft spot for loons."

Next time, use the contraction "you're" instead of the wrong word "your" for the given sentence.  Jesus doesn't like His creation being dummies when spreading the gospel, understood?


YOUR REVEALING AND EMBARRASSING QUOTE: "You're so desperate, you're addressing me in your posts to others. Obsess much?"

You have forgotten once again that I mention you a lot because of your blatant biblical ignorance and runaway modus operandi, remember? How many times do I have to enlighten you upon this topic? Huh?  Since your runaway status, along with your bible ignorance is so prominent, you stand out, and therefore are to be brought up in discussion as the perfect example of being a pseudo-christian.  DO YOU UNDERSTAND?!


Now, go back into hiding again until I am ready once again to make you the continued runaway bible ignorant fool upon this forum!

You are dismissed at this time to try and regroup.

.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Infinite Set Theory Explains The Trinity
-->
@ethang5



.
ethang5,

In your post #33, you mentioned that you thought mental illness was fascinating!  Therefore, I obviously took that to mean you have mental illness in some way or another, because if you had meant your statement towards me, then you possibly would have been warned again of your misdeeds within this forum because the rules. 

Therefore, do you want to talk about your mental illness? Lest you forget, all you have to do is pray to Jesus and truly believe in Him and you will be granted your prayer requests of removing your mental illness. 

“And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, BELIEVING, ye shall receive.” (Matthew 21:22)  Key word: “believing,” which triggers the prayer in a direct absolute manner, as none other than Jesus so states.

There is a frightening drawback though, and that is when a pseudo-christian like you does not get their prayer answered, then the onus is put upon them because they obviously didn’t “believe” enough, which adds even more guilt upon you.

I wish you the best in this prayer scenario, and as Jesus stated, remember to pray in a closet and in secret, period! (Matthew 6:6)


Please let us know how it turns out, okay? We are always enlightened to hear that prayers were answered, praise Jesus!


.

Created:
0