Total posts: 17,895
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You can apply the same logic for everything, Tara Reade quit her job because she doesnt like Biden but since she is a democrat, she endorsed him and will vote for himIts BS
Then why would she willingly accuse him of something that would drag down his campaign?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Why would Christine Ford fake her accusation?
Cause she’s a Democrat and doesn’t want Kavanaugh on the bench.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
his complete incompetence has cost thousands of people their lives. How else could you possibly describe that other than "bad"?
Blah blah, you’re the one that supports the rapist because your people #BelieveAllWomen
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
The only thing Democrats are running on is Orange Man Bad. Biden is a rapist and has borderline dementia. He’s not going to win.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
David Koresh did nothing wrong and it is a shame what happened at waco
Waco Incident has direct ties to the OKC Bombing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Do you think that Trump has been the Ringmaster or the Clown.
Ringmaster.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
So no, I won't "still" be voting for Biden, nor did I ever intend to.
A man of principles. Respect.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
The hoops liberals are jumping through here are abhorrent.
Glad we agree. Question is, u still gonna vote for Biden?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Maybe they'd rather vote for the left-wing rapist over the conservative one?
Ya but see, they supposedly hold the moral high ground. Plus this is a very progressive issue. Pro Bernie stuff is already trending everywhere.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
She is a liberal and probably faked this so I am gonna call BS
Why would she fake it ?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Tara Read endorsed Biden on twitter anyway, it is just typical attention seeking
Source?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Aren’t u a liberal Biden supporter? Still gonna vote for a rapist?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Pretty sure HB isn't going to vote for Biden anyway.
Nah his TDS is way to strong
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
many in the "believe all women" crowd have in fact disavowed Joe Biden
Except for Joe Biden
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
HB’s actively ignoring me. #FakeProgressive
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Maybe she identifies as a man, so therefore we don’t have to believe her/him 🤷🏼♂️
It’s funny all the liberals on this site are quiet realizing that they shouldn’t believe all women like Joe Biden told them to.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
You still gonna vote for Biden the rapist? Believe all women remember?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
U still gonna vote for a rapist? That’s the real question
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
They are waiting for Biden to die so they can get a real candidate.
You think they’re gonna replace Biden before November?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Where are all the liberals to defend Joe Biden? All of em are quiet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Singularity
Reality disproves liberalism over and over
Humans simply aren’t inherently good. The world isn’t inherently good
Created:
Posted in:
Kavanaugh got 8000 articles. Tara Reade got 15. Evidence has emerged that Tara Reade’s mother called in to Larry King’s show and she alluded to Joe Biden’s sexual assault. Much much more evidence is present compared to Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations. If Trump is a rapist, Joe Biden is as well and you lefties are voting for a rapist. Checkmate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
The Middle East is far different than Eastern Europe my friend.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
We'd probably have better relations in the Arab world without Israel.
Their ideology is incompatible with ours; I wholeheartedly disagree.
Created:
Posted in:
Without Israel, the Muslims would be at our doorstep. Israel is the only thing standing between us and the Muslims.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I see that he is a veteran and has business experience in supply-chain, which are both great traits for him to have, but I didn't see his stances on his campaign website. What does he support?
He’s more of a moderate cause he’s running in MI, but he’s pretty conservative on a majority of the issues.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
I think what you’re saying is that you’d only be open to RINOS lol
Created:
-->
@n8nrgmi
only stupid people vote for Trump. why do you think it is that there are studies that show they are both dumber and less informed? it's not some liberal conspiracy... it's the truth.
Without these “stupid people that vote for Trump” you wouldn’t have food. Your elitist thinking is what fucked you up in 2016.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
The left relies on echo chambers instead of logic and reason.
That’s what I tell every liberal I know. Stop using secondary sources from the MSM to form your opinion. Instead look at the numbers, the statistics, primary sources of what officials have said. Ofc people just call me racist and xenophobic.
Created:
Biden's a war hawk, debt adder who's only claim to fame is him being Obama's VP. I'm voting for Mark Whitney; the libertarian candidate. I'd prefer Trump over Biden though. At least Trump has a working brain.
Which state are you in?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Liberals wanting CA and NY to dictate the election 🤦♂️
Created:
-->
@Envisage
No, they are equally representative. 6 million lives in one place doesn't suddenly make them have fewer rights than if they chose to live spread apart.
6 million voters in two places don’t decide the course of the nation. Location does matter because each region’s culture is different obviously there are going to be some that are alienated. But the goal is to get a majority of the cultures which Trump did. He got the South, Maine 2nd, Midwest, Great Plains, Southwest. Only region he didn’t get is West Coast. Democrats got Northeast, West Coast, A bit of Midwest, and some of Southwest. Trump has more appeal representatively.
Created:
-->
@Envisage
6 million votes of NYC out of 300 million is not enough for a majority. So your point is moot.
That’s not what I’m saying. My votes are much more spread out while yours aren’t considering 6 million are centered in NY and CA. Therefore my votes are more representative of the nation than your votes.
Created:
-->
@Envisage
<br>So instead we have tyranny on the majority?.. and this is better how?
Is your majority representative of the entire nation or does it come from the 6 million votes of New York and California which definitely don’t constitute the nation? Because my “minority” comes from the entire nation. What I’m saying is that majority doesn’t represent the entire nation while the EC forces a broad coalition of voters from different places.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I doubt it seriously. Man-made viruses have genetic markers you can't hide easily.
Doesn’t have to be genetically made for it to originate in the lab tho
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
<br>Nah, 98% sure virus came from backward wet-market bat-eating culture, not Xi.
My personal theory is that the Chinese brought it from their Wuhan Lab to the wet market
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
this is just insane. The virus is doing more harm to the chinese than trump is capable of doing.
The Chinese think long term bro. Corona goes away in a couple of months to a year. Trump will be there for 4 years.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Hey Joe...whattyaknow?
I honestly think China is behind the virus. It was a gamble. They know if Joe wins everything goes back to normal and China prospers. But if Joe loses then Trump will crush them during his second term. All Trump has to do is run ads with connections between the Chinese and Joe.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgmi
@HistoryBuff
Why are y’all arguing. We all know that y’all are gonna vote for Joe anyways.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
One person one vote....A President elected by a majority of the people of the U.S.A....No contrived Electoral College vote necessary.
The Founding Fathers specifically advocated against majority rule because of its capacity for tyranny on the minority
Created:
-->
@dustryder
Nah. If militia are miltary forces, and military forces have applications outside of shooting guns at people, militia also have applications outside of shooting guns at people. Hence arms are not a requirement for being militia
You’re contradicting yourself. A militia can shoot guns and do other things are the same time. But shooting guns is a the part that’s a must.
No, that's your incorrect interpretation of democratic positions. The opposite and equally ridiculous assertion is that Republicans love the 2nd amendment so much that any and all interpretation of the 2nd amendment is skewed towards as free ownership of guns as possible.
The Republicans want what the Founding Fathers want. The Constitution should be interpreted as it was written with the intentions of the Founding Fathers.
”The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson
”A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson
“To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason
“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46
”The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
- Richard Henry Lee
“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams
Created:
-->
@dustryder
It was an example. The point was that a militia is not predicated on being armed or having weapons open to the public
Then a militia is simply a group of people lol. Without weapons you can’t have a militia.
If it were so clear cut and dry as to what the founding fathers wanted, there wouldn't be a debacle over what the 2a means.
Because Democrats don’t like the way 2nd Amendment, so they create a narrative based on emotion rather than the intention of the Founding Fathers which was very clear: Americans should have guns. And this interpretation is common in various Federalist Papers and as a result has been upheld in the Supreme Court today.
Created:
Not really. A government could distribute arms to a militia for example.
The whole purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to keep the government out of it....
Discussing an interpretation of the 2a has nothing to with banning guns.
Its not an interpretation if that’s what the Founding Fathers wanted lol. They wanted people to have guns lol.
Created:
-->
@dustryder
No. I'm saying that we shouldn't be applying any extra meaning as to what a militia is. I used the sticks and stones example to demonstrate that a militia is "type of arms" agnostic. A militia is generally a military force raised from civilians, regardless of what arms they carry, or whether or not they even currently carry arms.
To form a militia you have to have weapons open to the public. Unless you classify those weapons as sticks and stones, there’s no justification for banning guns. The Court has made it very clear that to form a militia arms are needed. Banning arms is therefore a violation of the 2nd Amendment.
Created:
-->
@dustryder
Let's not pretend anyone knows the intentions of the founding fathers to exact detail.
Are you claiming that to the Founding Fathers arms meant sticks and stones? Cause that’s delusional lol.
Created:
-->
@dustryder
A militia armed with sticks and stones is still a militia if they intend to utilize those sticks and stones for military purposes..
But that wasn’t the intention of the a The Founding Fathers. Militia meant Americans with firearms.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgmi
<br>by pointing out the lack of any evidence whatsoever that the amendment protects an individual right to a gun, other than a skewed interpretation.
Even using the militia interpretation, citizens can only form a militia if they have access to guns.
Created: