ILikePie5

I'm curious, did either of you have me pegged as Mafia by the time Day 6 rolled around?

Calm down bro

Point is, the person with the name gets to decide, and Kamala says it’s Kah-muh-la, so that’s what it is. Anyone pronouncing it differently (on purpose or on accident) technically has it wrong.

I'm a little sad Hung Cao isn't closer in the polls.

It's a worthy attempt to try and understand the other side, but I think the explanation is simpler: Trump supporter's like Trump's personality/policies and don't like Kamala's personality/policies. Trump overpromises a lot, but they still prefer what he did in office to what Biden did in office, and that's their metric for measuring the candidates. And once people have figured out who they want in office, it becomes easy to cherry-pick parts of their personality to further justify it. In that way, they're not too different from other political factions (even though Trump insists that he's not a politician or whatever).

Joe Biden stepped aside. That was his choice and his choice alone.

Once he stepped aside there was no process in place nor time for a new primary vote, that's where the party rules take over and those rules were followed precisely.

Moreover, the outcome at that point which was most aligned with democracy would be the candidate who was on the ballot along with Joe Biden that the people had already voted for, and that's exactly who was "installed".

It couldn't have been handled by the Democratic party better. This is a stupid argument, you need to find a new one.

This is why Kamala tanked so hard with the undecided voter after the Fox interview. Every question about dealing with multiple circumstances the past 4 years was met with the same generic Orangeman bad answer in many different flavors. That kind of dodging and projection plays well with her cult base, but not normal people.

This is why Kamala tanked so hard with the undecided voter after the Fox interview. Every question about dealing with multiple circumstances the past 4 years was met with the same generic Orangeman bad answer in many different flavors. That kind of dodging and projection plays well with her cult base, but not normal people.

Is this the last ditch effort to increase Harris' chances of winning the election? Lol

People vote for Trump because he's the only viable choice to fix the fuck-ups of the Biden administration, obviously based on what he did in his first term and not if he lies or not. Voting for Kamala, on the other side, would be a vote for the continuation of the current disaster, or even worse. That is more evident given the last talk Biden and Obama had at Ethel Kennedy's funeral. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13971075/What-Biden-Obama-said-intense-moment-Ethel-Kennedys-funeral.html

The die is cast, there's no going back I'm afraid.

Well yeah, it does matter because she has a specific way she wants it to be pronounced, and if you are pronouncing it wrong just to prove a point, then you’re just being a jerk. 

So do you dispute that Trump is an authoritarian fascist, or are you just ok with voting for one?

Explain to me why it's scummy. If I was Mafia I could have just claimed bullet proof or something and we wouldn't be here. 

If I was Mafia, why on earth would I claim Miller out of all things? I'm not that intellectually lacking. 

Owen is the more obvious choice from where I'm sitting. It does feel like he has less information than he should as Mafia, though as was discussed, this could just be trying to fit in behaviorally. He's not the only one to do that this game, but he is the only one to claim Miller late after two people claimed Vanilla. I don't like it and I can see a world in which his behaviors are meant to give him cover.

If people have a better lynch choice, make it clear. I'm seeing some people targeting Pie and I'd like a clear case as to why.

The economy being great isn't an action so this answer has nothing to do with this thread.

It explains why millions of people believe Trump.

Yeah, and they’re idiots.

The premises that I started with are as follows:

1) A serious person is one who’s words should be taken seriously

2) President of the United States is a serious position

3) Serious positions should be filled by serious people

What this thread attempts to understand is whether there is a good faith reason why someone would act against these three premises. So far, nothing.

The double standard is pretending that Harris has a responsibility to offer serious solutions and proposals while Trump threatens to stick the military in radical left lunatics and we all shrug because nothing this man says matters.

Prove it.

If only you guys had evidence.

Yeah, that’s the whole point.

Since when is it a virtue for the person you’d elevate into the most powerful person on earth to be so unpredictable you have no idea what he’s going to do with that power?

Come back when you have an argument that’s relative to what I just said.

Yeah, and they’re idiots.

It was already growing, he didn’t do a damn thing.

Isn’t the right wing response to a particular segment of the population having less jobs that they need to get off their ass?

I agree, but this is your premise. If Trump shouldn’t be held responsible for the damage Covid did to the economy then neither should Biden.

You don’t get to have it both ways. Pick one.

Just reread. I just think it too retarded to claim Miller in that spot as a fake claim and his reasoning comes across as selfish town which seems to fit his meta. 

Pie's behavior last DP seems off to me. He wants to lynch Banana and when WF claims Vanilla and points out that he has similar wording in his PM, Pie backs out and is confused by the three mafia that was pointed out in the OP.

I just thought that was strange. Pie then pivots to Owen.

I'm fine with lynching one of those three. I do townread WF and Banana for their claims and Cerulean is hard town. However I admit you have been floating around and I will null read you for now. I can't really articulate it well, but I think Owen is town.

Just reread. I just think it too retarded to claim Miller in that spot as a fake claim and his reasoning comes across as selfish town which seems to fit his meta. 

He absolutely did. China was punishing him because of his tariffs. The low intellect scum (trumpers) can't see this.

Right, because that's how a serious presidential candidate get's their information, from the internet.

Then he's unserious.

You can't have it both ways. If he's serious, then we would take him seriously. By calling it a negotiating tactic you're saying that he's obviously not really going to do it, at which point it has no negotiating power.

This is a tired excuse by MAGA to just ignore what this man actually says and insert whatever virtue in him you decide to make up. But this particular example is even worse because the president has unilateral authority to impose tariffs so there's nothing to negotiate. At best, you can claim he's using these as a threat to push lawmakers into concessions, in which case you're literally arguing that he's threatening to take a wrecking ball to the economy if he doesn't get what he wants.

The economy being great isn't an action so this answer has nothing to do with this thread.

But to address it anyway, Trump didn't make the economy great. It had already been growing for the prior 7 years and when Trump came into office nothing changed, all we did was continue the same trajectory we were already on.

In fact we gained more jobs in the last three years under Obama than the first three years under Trump, so one could even argued things slowed down.

But what's really egregious here is to talk about how great things things were in the first three years but to just exclude the last one because it's inconvenient to your narrative. Again, you can’t have it both ways. Either we exclude Covid or we don’t. If we don’t, then his last year counts. If we do, then you don’t get to pretend Covid ended at noon on January 20th 2021 and everything that occurred as a result of the damage it caused is all Biden’s fault.

At this point, I think (some) people on the right are just pronouncing it wrong to show their political views. It's kinda funny to watch TBH, because it's not hard to get it right. She pronounces it just straight up, Kahm-uh-luh but because Trump has started doing it, some other republicans now (purposefully?) put an emphasis on the middle syllable, by saying Ka-MA-luh. I'm not saying all Republicans are a hive mind or whatever, I always hate when both sides use that insult. I'm just poking fun at some MAGA morons, though there are smart conservatives who are decent people and take the time to pronounce It right.

That being said, you were scum lol.

tbh Pie explained last game he didn't always policy lunch millers, last game was proof of why given I was Town.

So when a presidential candidate makes a claim in front of the entire nation alleging that a very specific group of people in a very specific place within the country are engaging in a very specific and heinous act (like eating the neighborhood's pets)... Is that hyperbole?

When a presidential candidate expresses that he believes his political opposition to be "the enemy from within" and that we should use the military against them, is this hyperbole?

When a presidential candidate says he's going to impose an across the board 20% tariff on all imported goods (something he would have the authority to do unilaterally), is that hyperbole?

What actions does a presidential candidate engage in (other than using words) that tells you what they plan to do if (re)elected?

See, this gives me pause. I don’t like his claim at all (a Miller and two Vanilla players, even if everyone else is a PR, is just absurd), but his tunnel on Banana and lack of information about her just doesn’t make sense for someone on a scum team.

I have this tendency to be lynched first dp, and as millers are policy lynch in lack of a better option, I thought it would be best to just keep my head down. And not die. Needless to say, think I learned a lesson.  

Why am I in your town block?

Sorry. I'm a little time crunched at the moment. 

I am the movie Baby Face, Miller. 

This is because the main character used seduction and morally questionable techniques, and seems like a generally bad person, but behind that she is an ultimately good person. 

By the way, I'm on mountain time and I'm unreachable during work hours. 

Is there a politician whose words you do take seriously?

Do you take the things Trump says seriously?

If Yes, well I have quite a few more questions for you.

If No (the typical MAGA response), then can you please explain how you square your belief that someone whose words are not to be taken seriously can be fit for the most serious job on earth?

Bonus question: if you don't take his words seriously then on what basis do you form any judgement about him?

What was even the point of all this?