I just don't think I can sufficiently prove my BOP after that. What I proved is that it is more likely to not disappear until the present modes of transportation has been replaced, but I do not know the future.
It matters not the vehicle, but the product. I don't know or care how efficient your method is. As long as you deliver your message in a way that is convincing, no one cares what format to use. As long as you deliver a pack of bricks, no one cares if you are driving a Volvo truck or a broken Ape. I have no say over whether your method is on-point or not because I do not write it like that. However, to my knowledge, it is pretty convincing. Since this is more about sources than logical rhetorics, I suggest you consult Trent0405. He has loads of sources everywhere he goes.
I have proved twice that taking advantage of topics I don't know much about still can bring a win if I try hard enough. Plus since Fauxlaw is like 40 ELO ahead of me so I will gain more than I would lose.
"What would you say if I told you my name is Merriam Webster, I put the dictionary together?"
I will say, good job. No matter who you are you did one hell of a job putting accurate and explainable definitions together and many people trust it, to the point that I doubt that it was you.
Most debaters here waste one day or longer, so expect his argument later. I had RM(One of the most successful debaters) handing in his round one second before due.
I don't think that is what you mean.
You underestimated my power.
wtf
This is turning into "Money indeed brings happiness".
Mall is, so far, extremely brave, and I say it with no grains of salt. He will literally attempt to refute you no matter how strong yours are.
Bump for votes
https://youtu.be/2ZIpFytCSVc
Vote.
Like the kind where one guy proposed to use fetuses as money?
What if I don't use it? Like putting it in glass cabinet for show?
Are there exceptions
no.
"multiaccounting"?
I know that what you are saying could be correct, but for the sake of it, please have better formatting.
"Prove what I'm saying is TRUE, NOT FALSE, TRUEEEE."
Uh no. I don't think that is what you are supposed to do.
thank you.
Interested?
thank you for voting.
Thinkong robots. What are you even referring to?
Ppl still voting on this? Why?
?wot happened?
I just don't think I can sufficiently prove my BOP after that. What I proved is that it is more likely to not disappear until the present modes of transportation has been replaced, but I do not know the future.
“ Sometimes I read something so blatantly wrong I don't even know where to begin to refute it... this is one of those times.”
I had one of those occasions arguing with trolls. When that happens, you’ve got yourself a win.
Good point.
Nevertheless, if you just decapitate one's head while remaining their cells still complete, they are still dead.
Thank you for your vote.
No. His opponent isn't even trying.
"By the way, this is my first time doing this and debating, so my apologies if I am a complete noob."
Looks pretty good for an opening debate. You are not a noob.
yes
Lol
Don't worry. My argument won't come until like 1 day later.
looks like an ff to me.
"As a result, my arguments stand, and voters, please vote for PRO!"
Sorry. I was meant to type CON but whatever happend to my mind. I meant CON. I meant it.
If he loses, it means he already let the AI out of the box.
Anyone voting here? No!
I have debated many forfeiters and they just accept one debate then go off like this site didn't even exist.
yes
It is ironic, because no great achievements came out of this discussion.
Rap insults is different from classic ELA poetry. Shakespeare cannot win a rap battle with most rappers under normal conditions.
It matters not the vehicle, but the product. I don't know or care how efficient your method is. As long as you deliver your message in a way that is convincing, no one cares what format to use. As long as you deliver a pack of bricks, no one cares if you are driving a Volvo truck or a broken Ape. I have no say over whether your method is on-point or not because I do not write it like that. However, to my knowledge, it is pretty convincing. Since this is more about sources than logical rhetorics, I suggest you consult Trent0405. He has loads of sources everywhere he goes.
oh no
Also, if one day I go libright or I make a sustainable business, then I will change it to stonks.
Bop is Burden of proof.
However you have to present a sound theory that explains a flat earth though.
It is best to include objective sources, but if you got none then use personal examples.
It continues and the one that forfeits will lose conduct unless the other one does more.
I have proved twice that taking advantage of topics I don't know much about still can bring a win if I try hard enough. Plus since Fauxlaw is like 40 ELO ahead of me so I will gain more than I would lose.
"What would you say if I told you my name is Merriam Webster, I put the dictionary together?"
I will say, good job. No matter who you are you did one hell of a job putting accurate and explainable definitions together and many people trust it, to the point that I doubt that it was you.
R4 sources:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/ebhqXA-BmhlmKv5WVB3G44BKLJVeyj2S5vSvkZlL3AN_6Iincdp98ChLq_dO-OoyMtrws-uBX972hWXtj82_3FGCS0U8dEoACX3itCsZRXqPJ1rkfpCOPSn6lspdOT_ujKTmz7kDELANDO9h6ypjheXHPsqC3GnbZw
As different as they are, they have similarities. For example, sexual behavior for both, etc.
Most debaters here waste one day or longer, so expect his argument later. I had RM(One of the most successful debaters) handing in his round one second before due.