Intelligence_06

Overall Con's arguments are more clear and to-the-point and explains more issues than Pro.

Args to Con.

The sources sufficiently explain their issues.

Sources tied.

Both arguments presentable and readable.

S&G tied.

Both debaters showed good conduct, no forfeits and respectful play.

Conduct tied.

Overall, I give the win to Con.

RFD: BoP on Pro

Pro r1:
1. School uniforms will reduce informal activities
2. School uniforms cost less
3. School uniforms will give students a sense of community
4. School uniforms will increase attendance rates

Con r1:
1. Student uniforms aren't necessary, and thus should not be enforced (Refutes Pro1 1, 3)
2. Student uniforms are still indeed costly (Refutes Pro1 2)
3. Students need to attend class regardless if there is uniform or not (Refutes Pro1 4)

Pro r2:
1. Uniforms solve the problem(Doesn't Refute Con1 1, due to that Pro needs to prove Uniforms should be mandatory, not just useful)
2. Uniforms are cheaper than normal clothes(Refutes Con1 2)
3. School image(Ideally dropped by Con, but still doesn't prove that it is necessary)
4. Academic improvement and normalization(Refutes Con1 3, consider other things are improved along with attendance)

Con r2:
1. There are indeed other solutions(Refutes Pro2 1,4)
2. School uniforms are still costly(Refutes Pro2 2)
3. Education is more important than imagery, and school uniform is not the most effective doing so(Refutes Pro2 3)

Pro r3:
1. It works(Doesn't refute Con2 1,3,4 due to that Pro needs to prove that it is THE BEST SOLUTION)
2. School gives uniforms(Doesn't refute Con2 2, due to that someone still has to spend the money)

Con r3
1. A variety of uniforms is hard to manage(Refutes Pro3 1)
2. Someone gotta spend that money(Refutes Pro3 2)
3. It is not the only solution that works, if it works(Refutes Pro3 1)

Try to make less spaces in the sources. People are less to read your sources consider they have to constantly scroll up n’ down.

here.

Pro's argument is basically that if the rich do a type of drug for pure entertainment, then that type of drug must be endorsed consider it will make yo rich.

The only judge is how good his arguments are. Oromagi can beat RM but that means not that RM is bad.

Well no. I have proven since I am literally in the top ten so even if I defeats him he wouldn't be considered "bad" because he could literally be 12th. and not trying

bump//

Can you use less space for the sources? Good God scrolling is painful on my touchpad.

Alright. Thank you.

What did you initially vote? I was wandering in poems and arts so I didn't see.

Nice.

It does. If not, then con will interpret it whatever he likes, which would lose you.

Please don't post until after I am done with r4. The more you post, the more Seldiora refutes, the more burden I have.

I will be done with R4 in less than 3 hours, so don't post until then. You have more than a day left.

Mall is winning against RM? No offense to either of the two but this is indeed a rare sighting.

So this IS 9spaceking

Not really. I think what it is is the overflow of disrespectful and non-serious users and subreddits. However, I think it is unfit for Dart consider it will probably make DART less serious connecting it to Reddit.

The score idea. Reddit is known to have an upvote and downvote function.

I suggest you don't post before my R4 is done.

I swear DART is turning into reddit, except the posts are debates.

No one should, but they could.

#TakeTheLikeButtonBack

For ideas, you could fit an entire word document in 100 character urls since they didn't limit document debates.

Don't break the Coc. Profiting for the self in any other way is fine.

People misclick all the time. That is why we need the mods. If there is none people will just report votes against them no matter how good or bad they are.

You know what’s up.

Challenge Accepted

Opinions?

The new voting format on the phone looks strange

bump

bump

You're welcome

This is so hard to debate. Like extremely hard. It is frying my brains lol.

I see no reason why this is a debating topic, but I see none why it should not be one. Curious to see how this one could go. This is all assumptions.

arguing about why you're bad. Now that is what I call non-traditional debating.

250 vote for gold medal.

Thanks

If I were you I'd keep it until it is good for a Kritik. You are revealing parts of your argument.

bump for votes

At least you can prove that art is not sacred, that is half of your bop

import DebateArt

argumentQuality = True

//If true it means this debate is good

if argumentQuality == True:
voteSuggest = True

else:
voteSuggest = False

https://40.media.tumblr.com/51435aa4dd7e8dff2717a94c382d7d89/tumblr_ntvfk8X5Ma1s2kojso1_500.jpg

If one with no God can win against one of God, then doesn't that mean I am more powerful than God? If so, why am I not motivated?

yes

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/Thin_Blue_Line_flag.svg/325px-Thin_Blue_Line_flag.svg.png

Nice arg bro

"It would be akin to playing chess, and calling the other player a genocidal racist for killing so many blacks (or vice versa)."

lol ha ha

You sure you are winnin'?

Yeah, holidays are religions. Beer bottles are cars. You should vote Con.

Idk, but it is better to just use English

It means compromise.