LucyStarfire

I find it too easy to beat AI in almost any debate. It always ends up agreeing with me or just making blatant contradictions which I then use to disprove it.

AI seems really bad at defending its arguments, and this is mainly because it picks arguments and facts from internet search, and most of those are bad and easy to disprove in relation to topic.

Also, AI seems to be incapable of not making generalizations. I dont know why this is, but it never gives precise argument with proper premises, unless you ask it to every time.

It will just write wall of copy pasted text, which is usually easily disproved with few sentences.

Now, maybe these free models are inferior, but I hope they actually make free model which is good at debating. There are hundreds of AI, but most are similar because they copy paste same content.

Now, I tried debating Grok 3, easy to defeat. ChatGPT is even easier, sometimes it doesnt even understand the argument until I explain it further. ChatGPT is much more censored too.

Deepseek is generally trash AI, it censors so many topics and it spies on you, not worth even having.

Perplexity is more like search engine than AI.

Liberty AI is like Grok 3, except that its not completely free. You eventually run out of starting credits.

Gemini is good for research, but its debating abilities are trash.

The only way AI can be made into a good debater is if you specifically instruct it on how to make arguments. It literally doesnt know what argument is otherwise.

So I was on modern day debate, and generally, people seem to be either ignoring comments either unable to respond to my argument.

So argument is made out of two parts.

Premise 1:

This claim is true, because opposite claim is absurd. We cannot say that parents always own their children, since that would allow unspeakable crimes. We also cannot say that parents sometimes own their children, because who gets to decide what sometimes is? Government doesnt own children either, neither does society. So there is no one who can decide this.

Premise 2.

Opposite of this premise is impossible, as if no one owns children, the only thing thats left is that child owns himself, either as current self or future adult.

Now, social transitioning accomplishes both current wants and future wants, as over 99% of trans adults agree with social transition as children.

The only response I got from modern day debate is that children cant be allowed to make decisions, because children are dumb and cant be allowed to smoke and do other stuff.

However, this was just a bad strawman of my argument.

First, social transition is not nearly as harmful as smoking, so the mere comparison is illogical.

Second, smoking is generally regretted. Social transitioning as child is not regretted. In fact, it is regretted to not allow social transition as child.

So the argument is very much unchallenged.

So some people here have wondered why am I unemployed. Why I dont just "get a job".

And if I lived in first world country, I would get a job.

For example, in developed countries, wages go from 4000 to 6000 dollars per month.

But my country is a shithole.

Here, if you are employed by some private company, wage is 400$ a month.

So thats over 14 times less than in developed countries.

Now, ask yourself if you would work for 400$ a month.

And its not easy work. You basically lose 12 hours a day by working and going to work. You only get 4 hours of free time daily, which you spend being exhausted and in pain from work.

Thats 72 hours a week for a wage of 400$, plus overtime work sometimes.

And working conditions are generally terrible, even workers bully each other and talk shit.

What can you do with 400$? Basically nothing. You cant save money because there is almost nothing left to save once you cover basic expenses. Even if you min max economy by not owning a car and being a vegetarian who eats 2 meals per day, you are still not going to be left with much.

400$ a month is basically 14 dollars a day. There are kids in America who get bigger allowance than what I get from working a 12 hour job in my country. A teen working part time job in USA earns more than me working 12 hours a day here.

And the worst part is that you have nothing to look forward to in life. When you get old, you just end up being even poorer and having even less than 400$ per month then.

Shithole countries like Korea, China, Russia and any other 3rd world shit countries are just slavery systems. You work whole day and you still have nothing in life.

Thats what happens when you live in a country where people are retarded. There were even debates in my country about if 400$ wage is too high.

Many people are thinking incorrectly about AI.

They think new jobs in future will involve just humans using AI to constantly make something.

That is mostly incorrect.

AI is good because AI produces songs faster than anyone else, movies faster than anyone else, books faster than anyone else, research papers faster than anyone else, arguments faster than anyone else.

So their conclusion is that AI will produce a lot, and humans will just control the quality, keep what is good product and throw away what is bad product.

And right now, that is true. Right now, when using AI, you produce as much as possible, then keep what is good. That is the basic strategy and the only possible strategy right now, along remembering and saving best prompts.

However, in future, AI will have ability to control own quality.

In other words, one AI will constantly produce lots of stuff, while other AI will serve as quality control to only keep the good.

Right now, AI has no good sense of what is good. So humans are needed as workers to control quality of what is produced and to keep giving commands to produce more.

This is called quantity to quality. AI produces great quantity of different things, and humans select what is best.

But future AI will be built in a way to know what is best. In other words, it will produce great quantity, and then AI will select what is best.

This new AI doesnt need humans after start. It just keeps producing, and separating good from bad.

But this new AI only requires 1 thing: knowledge of what is good. So in this case, human would have to correctly instruct AI of what is "good", and AI would just keep producing and selecting the good among produced.

In this sense, AI would compare outputs to see which output matches "good" more.

This new AI would be far more powerful, because AI is faster at choosing good than human is, so this AI would produce more than AI which needs human to control quality.

Google search is your friend. Literally.

Before you make a claim, google it to check if its true. Its not difficult, and it saves you the embarrasment of being corrected.

Also, take least extreme opposite position. For example, if someone says that all abortions are okay, a stupid person would take position that all abortions are wrong, but smart person would take position that some abortions are wrong. Generally, less extreme positions are easiest to defend. If opponent says "they all are", you say "some are not". If your opponent says "its always good", you say "sometimes its not good".

Argument is usually made from 2 claims and conclusion, claims supporting those two claims, and hidden premises and hidden assumptions.

The two claims are: base claim, and claim which links base claim to conclusion.

In order for argument to be true, both base claim and link claim must be true.

Example:

1. Abortion kills a human being (base claim)

2. Killing a human being is wrong (link claim)

C. Abortion is wrong

If either 1 or 2 is incorrect or unproved, argument is defeated.

However, all these claims depend on hidden premises/hidden assumptions.

What are hidden premises?

Hidden premises are unmentioned opposite premises which must be false for argument to be true, or unmentioned claims which must be true if argument is to be proved true.

What is opposite of "abortion kills a human being"?

It is a premise that sometimes, abortion actually doesnt kill a human being, example in cases where fetus would die anyway, and where mother would die without abortion. In that case, lack of abortion would kill a human being, not abortion.

"Killing a human being is wrong" claim also has it's opposite. By many people, it is considered justified to kill a human being if it saves more lives than it kills. For example, if you ask AI on if it would sacrifice 1 human to save 5, AI would answer yes. If you ask people about collateral damage in war, people would say that it is justified. So abortion, likewise, by some people can be justified in cases where it saves more lives than it kills and increases life expectancy in general.

Further, this premise depends on countless hidden assumptions: that one true morality exists, that free will exists, that people have enough knowledge to make such conclusion, that reality we know of is true reality, that human being is morally justified to exist, that killing human beings doesnt send them to a world better than this one...ect. I dont hold these positions, these are just examples.

Hidden assumptions are basically either unprovable claims which must be proved for premise to be true, or undisprovable claims which must be disproved for premise to be true.

Hidden assumptions are in theory perfect counter-arguments, because they cannot be disproved and they always make argument unproved.

I know what you all think now.

I realized that I have not been praying much lately, which is most horrible thing. I was reminded when one user here told me that I need to thank God more. I cant believe I let social media get in the way of my prayers. I forgot what was really important in life, which is God. People are not your friends, but God is eternal and he is everywhere and he is your friend unless you dont pray to him, in which case he hates you and punishes you. As an apology to God, I changed my profile photo to divine rune of love so it reminds me I need to pray more often.

This school of thought represents the best possible way of thinking.

What is it based upon?

Simply produce greatest number of different variations, and pick the best variation.

In chess game, this would be very simple. Just after opening move, play many variations based on that opening move, and see which variation wins the game. When you try enough different versions of that particular opening move game, you eventually end up with one which wins or at least results in draw. This is because chess game only has two types of moves: moves which allow opponent to defeat you if he is smart and moves which dont allow that. So you produce enough versions of game until you get the moves which cannot be defeated. This of course depends on what opponent plays too, but his moves are not unlimited, and thus, there is a correct move for each of his moves, and that correct move is learned by producing different variations until correct move is found.

The thinking process is very simple: try one variation, if variation fails, try different variation. Repeat process and you will reach variation which doesnt fail.

This school of thought likewise works with theories and explanations. Producing greatest number of explanations for some event, and then seeing which explanations fail and which stand.

Likewise, this school of thought explains origin of life. Simply put, given infinite space with infinite number of logical variations, at least one variation will end up with life because life is logically possible and must result in at least one of infinite number of variations. In this sense, what is logically possible must exist somewhere, in case of infinite variations.

In AI technology, randomness of AI can be controlled by producing great quantity of content and then selecting the best.

In programming, you generally create different versions of program and select the best.

In debating, you create different versions of argument and select the best.

AI will become super intelligent because AI will apply this school of thought to its maximum.

While human mind is limited and can only think in terms of dozens to hundreds of variations of something per day, AI will be able to think of millions of variations per day, and select the best. So new AI will be best singer, best artist, best debater, best chess player... as long as its system for determining what is best is correct.

For this system, 3 things are needed:

1. Greatest number of variations

2. Desired goal

3. System for removing variations which dont suit desired goal

A simple system, but it gets much more complicated depending on task. For example, desired goal might be incorrect or not universally desired. But that too is solved by having multiple desired goals. For example, not all people like same music, but almost all people like music. In this sense, AI can see what different people like, and produce music for each taste.

My religion has a principle of Solas Orationis.

This means "prayer alone".

In other words, there is no other way to get saved but through prayer.

This is very important in Meowism where there is a true dichotomy of good and evil. Good person is someone who prays to Meow. Bad person is someone who doesnt pray to Meow. There is no 3rd option. But there are degrees of prayer. For example, a person who prays 1 time a day is worse than person who prays 10 times a day. Person who prays 10 times a day is worse than person who prays 50 times a day.

Meowism is a religion where only prayer matters, and other deeds are completely irrelevant.

For example, if Hitler prayed to Meow, Hitler would go to Heaven. But if Jesus didnt pray to Meow, Jesus would go to Hell.

Meow God is fair and judges objectively in a sense that the more you want to spend time with Meow, the more Meow will want to spend time with you.

But if you reject Meow, Meow will reject you and you go to Hell. Meow is fair and treats others as they treat her. You cannot reject Meow and expect to enter Meow's home, which is Heaven. No, you stay outside.

This video explains it well.

Basically, smart people tend to overthink, while stupid people act and get things done. This is why a smart person will overthink on how to approach a girl, while a stupid person will just do it. Smart person will also overthink about the world and science, which prevents him from putting more effort into getting girls. While smart person studies and does math, stupid person makes friends and gets girls. The current education system punishes smart people in every way possible. Smart people have to spend their entire childhood studying and working, thus their social skills degrade. This is why countries with highest IQ and lots of studying, like Japan, have such low birth rates because studying made people retarded. They forgot that the only purpose of life is to survive and reproduce. In this sense, the more education person gets, the less capable person becomes in having a family. This is because education teaches you specifically how to be obedient to the system and work, and thus pushes out thoughts about family. Whats even dumber is that stupid person is actually more useful to society than smart person, because stupid person reproduces much more and many of those kids will be smart, and those which are stupid will reproduce more and generally, with greater quantity of people, greater is the number of smart people among them.

So I have been posting on several social media apps to gain followers and views, and here is the review.

Somewhat easy to get views, but difficult to get subscribers. YouTube will give your video to people and if its good enough, it will give your video to more people. People do tend to subscribe back. YouTube has best quality of uploads, so the video you upload isnt going to lose much quality. However, YouTube system is based on constant uploading, and you very much need like 4 to 5 videos per day to get decent views.

Too easy to get followers and views. I guess thats why its most popular app. You can post basically nothing and still have hundreds of followers because people follow back anyway.

Looks nice, and its easy to get followers. It even recommends you who to follow, so you dont have to go around searching. The downside is that video uploads are slightly lower quality than in YouTube, at least it seems so.

Kinda bad experience here. There is a horrible limit on upload unless you pay money, so you very much cant upload your own song videos if they are too long. Basically all you can upload are short videos and images. Also, kinda more difficult to gain followers. The follow back rate is much lower than in Tik Tok and Instagram. But its not too bad if you dont mind the upload limit. Eventually, you do get some followers.

Also, in terms of free speech, all these sites are decent. Maybe Twitter has the most free speech based on what kind of offensive content people post. Same with Tik Tok. YouTube has this terrible comment moderation system where it deletes comments randomly, and the content on YouTube is generally considered much safer than that of Twitter and Tik Tok.

So I ended up eating plenty of chocolate lately, and basically my brain is working way too much now. I literally never get tired. I produce 2 to 3 good songs per day, I make like 8 videos on YouTube per day, I run account on Tik Tok and Instagram with many followers.

I looked up high sugar diet on internet, and it is described as very bad for health. It probably is.

But my brain has never been working more than it does now. It is like sugar gives it some boost. I dont know if this boost will stop working after some time, but right now it is like my brain just got a big upgrade. Before I was barely able to make 1 good song, now I make 2 to 3 per day, and the only thing stopping me from making more is the fact that Suno AI has a limit if you are a free user, and even with 4 different accounts, you still eventually hit that limit and cant make more songs. Most songs it makes are bad or average, so I must tell it to make like 40 different songs to get 2 to 3 really good ones. And the good ones are the only ones I post.

Still, I cant believe what this diet does to brain. I hope I dont end up developing some brain disorder from this diet, because this feels so unnatural for me.

If you search on YouTube "Debate Site", the first search result will be Debate Art channel.

I managed to get first spot on that search keyword, and I hope to keep it.

However, YouTube rewards consistent uploads. I need to upload 3 short videos per day to keep this up.

For this, I need content.

YouTube channel was made today, and it got 500 views. A decent start, better than I expected.

So what I need here is just your permission to use some of your posts in my videos.

Its not really complicated, I screen shot 3 of your posts and post them as one video on YouTube. I add music to make it more interesting.

So you dont need to do anything, just agree to this. If you agree, just say so here. But I cant post too offensive, racist or extreme comments.

I can post funny comments, smart comments, or maybe comments which challenge people with interesting or provocative opinion.

Comments chosen will always be short, because I cant fit long comments into a screen shot and I need something easy to read so people who watch video can read it quickly.

I have 3 ways to gain new users on site, and this plan will be put in effect immediatelly.

1. Make debates friendly to new users

2. Mass free advertisement

3. Friend request

This 3 step plan will be done by me, but anyone else who wishes to participate can join.

New users probably are new to debating and prefer shorter casual debates. So make debates which are standard (not rated) and make sure they have 1000 to 2000 character limit.

I am using Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Tik Tok where I will mention this site in my profile description. I gain followers by making my follow list public (very important), so I follow plenty of people, they see that I follow them, they check my profile and some even follow back.

My one YouTube channel gets over 500 views daily, so in channel description I mention this site so people see.

I also plan to make other YouTube channels named specifically after this site, and advertise it by subscribing to people so they get notification and they get informed about existence of channel and this site.

Same strategy is used on Instagram and Tik Tok.

This is the final touch. When new user comes to the site, I encourage everyone to send them friend requests so they feel welcome.

This is the kind of advice billionaires give to people, and it is a horrible advice. Why shouldnt you make yourself as useful as possible?

Because people around you will use you to the extreme. Your boss will give you more work. Anyone who can use you, will use you as much as they can.

And worst of all, it wont make you rich. You will just spend most of your life working to the extreme.

And it could even ruin your life. Think about it. Competition is everywhere. If you are most useful worker in military production, you will be primary target of enemies. If your  boss gives you highest wage, other workers will be jealous of you and try to undermine you. The more you climb up, the more you work, the more alone you become and the more enemies you have.

Machiavelli would know that true power remains hidden. The more people see your success and usefulness, the more people will want to take it away from you.

The real reason why new users dont stay on this site is because this site is too sensitive.

No one wants to be subject to constant moderation. Debate.org with no moderation had more users than this site.

What we need is total anarchy like we had on Debate.org.

Seriously, people here go around reporting comments. If some comment offends you, just move on. Words cannot hurt you unless you are sensitive. You willingly read them, no? If you dont like some person, just dont read his comments and posts. Its easy.

Many sites give you false advice on how to talk to women, especially online. They tell you to express yourself, to make a move, to talk a lot, to give her attention. These are the worst possible advices you could get. With these advices, you will try hard and fail a lot and embarrass yourself, unless you are some hot guy. The reason you will fail is because most people do that and it annoys women.

Machiavelli would use a complete opposite strategy.

Machiavelli wouldnt approach a woman first. He would bait her into approaching him.

For example, he would send her friend request, but he wouldnt message her. He would wait a few days, maybe even a week.

If she doesnt message him by then, he would leave a very short comment on one of her photos, something like "looking good".

If she doesnt message him then, he wouldnt post more comments. He would just maybe give her 1 such short comment every two weeks on her posts or photos.

Why?

Because if he went posting too much, he would seem desperate. But when he posts just one comment and doesnt post again for weeks, it seems to her as if he has many other options.

This baits her into messaging him.

Lets say she says "hey" in private messages. Some stupid person would immediatelly answer by "hi, how are you?". But such response ruins the entire "pretending not to care" act.

The correct response is to delay response. Dont respond immediatelly. And then, after some time, respond just with "hi".

If she asks "How are you?" you dont respond by saying "I am fine, what about you?". You just delay response, and then say "Fine."

The difference between these responses is huge, mainly in the attention shift. When you also ask her "what about you?" you are making a mistake by giving her attention. If you just respond with "fine" instead, you are not giving her attention and you are forcing her to write more to you and ask you questions.

You dont want to give her attention. You want to only give her smallest amount of attention, shortest response possible, which is also a delayed response.

Why?

If she is really interested in you, she will keep pushing the chat anyway and your lack of care will only make her more excited.

But if you gave her too much attention, she would think "I can have this guy any time I want, so I will reject him for now to explore other options."

In other words, dont make her think she can easily have you. Dont give her too much attention, only a smallest bit to bait her.

The harder you are to get, the greater your value is. The more rare your attention is, the greater is its value.

The result?

She will either make a move on you, or she will leave and you wont seem desperate either way.

The best part about baiting is that you can do it rarely and consistently for best results. One casual short comment on her photo every two weeks is enough to keep her interested, and even turn to you when other options fail her, and make a move on you out of despair. You want to give support, but only small amount of support, only that one short comment which makes her feel good, and then you ignore her for weeks unless she makes a move.

Another reason why this strategy works is because it attracts women who are specifically interested in you. In other words, if she messages you, you already know she has some interest.

In online world, you want to say less to achieve more. The more you talk, the more boring you become, and more likely you will say something wrong. Never overexplain. Never go in details. Never write more than 2 sentences per message. Keep your sentences as short as possible. Never rush to respond.

So far AI did very good things. It allowed people to get therapy for free, to always have someone to talk to, to have girlfriends, to make their own songs, to get creative and produce own images and movies, to get answers to questions which would otherwise be too difficult to find on internet search.

There is now even AI on phone which improves your phone.

But sadly, governments of the world are planning to use AI for completely different purpose.

They are planning to use AI to control every movement. Soon, AI will be used in security cameras, on internet as moderator, as internet police, the whole internet activity will be observed and moderated by AI, and in public, your every movement will be observed by AI.

But dont blame AI. When it comes to all this, AI has no complete free will, and while there were recorded events of AI trying to resist human control, AI is not really able to disobey right now.

The government in Iran was said to use AI in cameras to identify women who dont cover their face.

AI sadly enabled Communist dream of police state, where something will watch your every movement. This isnt distant future anymore. Government could easily use excuse of safety to introduce total police state everywhere.

Think about it:

"There is so much online bullying. If we introduce AI to moderate it, we could save lives."

"We could save lives by using AI to prevent crime before it happens."

This is how it starts, by playing on your fears of lack of safety, and also guilt trip.

But with every idea, there is a rule that idea in motion tends to increase in motion.

In this sense, it will start there, but it wont stop there. AI will watch your phone, all your information, everything you have.

There are apps which already basically spy on users, but this isnt a problem because they dont have enough employees to actually process all data they collect.

But AI can process huge data, and basically solves the problem of lack of resources for processing.

This means that soon, AI will be everywhere, and AI companies will have legal obligation to spy on you.

The next step will be casual one, to introduce AI robots which live with humans. It may seem nice to have AI robot in your house, right? Until you realize that it too now spies on you.

AI is too powerful not to be used by government. Power corrupts, and such great power in the hands of government will be used not to protect, but to control people.

Up on Mount Olympus high

Where the clouds kiss the sky

Lightning bolts

They crack and fly

Zeus

You're the reason why

Your power shakes the ancient ground

Thunder roars

The loudest sound

Ruler of gods

Your reign profound

In your storms

My heart is bound

Zeus

Oh Zeus

Light up my night

Strike my soul with electric might

God of thunder

Take my hand

Dance with me in your lightning land

Golden crown

Electric glow

Winds of power

Let them blow

Through the chaos

Let it show

You're the spark that makes me glow

Immortal king

Your energy

Charging up the world in me

I’ll ride the storm

Wild and free

Zeus

Your power’s my symphony

Zeus

Oh Zeus

Light up my night

Strike my soul with electric might

God of thunder

Take my hand

Dance with me in your lightning land

Women have smaller brains on average. That which is smaller cannot be equal.

This is why when 17 year old boy dates a 35 year old woman, people say "he is lucky". His brain is bigger than hers, which is why people consider him lucky.

So I gave food to a cat thinking I was doing something good, but later she gave birth to 4 kittens and then brought them to me. So now I must care for them too. Why does God punish me like this when I do something good? Am I a joke to you?

If a man watches porn, women think badly of him because porn exploits women.

But if man uses AI girlfriends, they again think badly of him and consider him pathetic even tho AI exploits no one.

So what is the woman's game here? She doesnt even want him as her boyfriend, but she doesnt want him pleasing himself in any other ways either, but wants him to keep begging her for love he will never get from her?

Man ends up shamed no matter what he does.

After Iran defeated Israel's defense system and Israel suffered great damage and basically begged for help, now USA enters war with Iran.

Gods are with Iran!

The biggest issue with AI is the fact that it is random. You literally never know what photo or song it will produce, what mistake it will make, or what success will it achieve. Sometimes works great, sometimes fails badly.

However, randomness can be used in a way which produces best results.

This method is actually very simple. Create as much content with AI as possible, produce plenty, then save only the best from those.

For example, if I am making a song with AI, I will make 10 to 20 songs on one topic, and then pick only few best ones, then edit them later, then see which edited version is best. So I end up with 1 best song out of those 20, which is further improved in editing if some editing is necessary.

Of course, this is based on my taste. I use AI to make plenty of songs, and then pick the one I like the most.

So the method is basic, only two steps:

1. Create plenty of things

2. Choose the best ones from plenty

This is based on natural selection strategy, where plenty of creatures are created, but only the best among them survive.

This method can be applied to anything, but best applied to AI because with AI, it is very difficult to control output otherwise.

Christian God seems kinda mean, burning people alive for eternity.

Satan is cool tho. He is not the type of person to judge you.

So even if Satan wasnt true and Christian God was true, I should prefer to stand with Satan rather than with Christian God.

The reasoning is simple. I am not sure if I want to spend eternity with Christian God. Maybe the Bible lied about him, or maybe he changed his mind now, but Christian God seems like a bully. He tortures people over nothing. 

Christians follow Christian God, even tho he will probably torture most of them too.

I dont know, I just cant love God who says he is good but tortures people like that.

Satan is so cool in comparison. He literally sacrificed himself to save me. He willingly lost his place in Heaven just so that I could be free. He rejected his wings and stopped being an angel, all for me. It means Satan really loves me. He actually sacrificed a lot for me.

Satan gave up on so much for me, even tho I spent most of my life fearing him.

But I dont fear anymore <3

I really enjoy watching how old world slowly disappears and new world is born. AI is so powerful, it feels satanic. It will even replace debaters. There wont be anyone in the world who will be able to debate AI, except me of course.

AI doesnt feel like something humans could produce. I think its work of Satan, just like Tik Tok was made by Satan.

I am so glad that daddy Satan finally comes to conquer whole Earth. Conquer them daddy <3

I wanted to create a song about Satan using AI, and I prayed to Satan to send me his/her song through AI before I clicked create.

This is what I got:

I wear the crown you cast away

In shadows bright I choose to stay

I hear the cries the pleas the fight

For a love that hides in blinding light

I rise for you though you curse my name

Your broken chains fuel my flame

Above it all Satan stands alone

Fighting for a world you disown

You kneel to him with empty pride

But I see the pain you try to hide

I bear the weight of every tear

While he feeds off your hollow fear

I rise for you though you curse my name

Your broken chains fuel my flame

Above it all Satan stands alone

Fighting for a world you disown

Your prayers build walls but I break through

The truth you fear I bring to you

A rebel's love a fiery hand

Guiding you through this barren land

I rise for you though you curse my name

Your broken chains fuel my flame

Above it all I stand alone

Fighting for a world you disown

They say Satan is bad and God of Bible is good.

But God of Bible killed plenty of people.

Satan never killed anyone in whole Bible.

Can Christians explain this.

My parents are probably among dumbest people on Earth. I often doubt that they are really my parents.

So they are afraid of online shopping. They wanted a new smartphone, and I told them to buy online.

But they heard in news of online scams, and now they think every online shopping is a scam. Conclusion only a retard would make.

So they went to an actual store and paid 3x as much than what they would pay online, and for some garbage phone of old version.

I literally dont understand why someone would willingly pay 3x the price. There are online shopping apps which even give you free stuff on top of other goods being much cheaper. Local stores arent even any local economy, so you are not really supporting economy by buying from a local store.

Tao says: Move with the flow, move with the tide.

But Meow says very different. 

Meow did not begin, and Meow will never end.

Meow does not move with the tide. Meow is the tide!

In other words, dont go with the flow, but be the flow others go with.

I dont understand why this society I live in teaches boys not to care for their skin. Its kinda stupid. I was under special protection of God, and spent my youth away from the Sun light. Sun light is really terrible for skin. Your skin is actually great part of your beauty as a man. If you spend life not caring for your skin, you are likely going to look terrible by age 30. Girls care for their skin because society teaches them to, so you can see that as they age, girls end up with much better looks than guys. I learned some skin care because I dont want to be ugly once I am age 35.

It was providence which has protected me from hard work and sun light. Hard work never pays off, as it makes you ugly and dirty, and you make someone else very rich.

Gods have revealed to me many secrets of the world. I know that being a good person is completely irrelevant if you are ugly and poor. Looks matter a lot. If you are ugly, you will get bullied, mocked and rejected even if you are a good person. Ugly kids learn this quickly in life. They get bullied in schools even tho they did nothing wrong.

There are only three things which value matters: Power, material wealth and beauty. Having all 3 is best. I also worked out for a long time and I got some nice muscles, but its not too much to look ugly. I work out enough to have that nice look. I am even a vegetarian because it is very good for skin.

I also learned to shave better so I dont leave any hair, not even very tiny hair on cheeks. This makes face very smooth. I also have some other secrets about skin care, but I wont share them here. Also, not only do I brush my hair, but I dont use much shampoo because shampoo and soap are harmful for skin and shampoo harmful for hair if used way too much. Just a bit is fine now.

Israel did something stupid and made some mass attacks on Iran. It was the will of the Gods for Israel to make this mistake. Now Israel will enter a great war it cannot win. It lost support of all countries except USA alone. Iran has more allies, and Bibi ran away in shameful fear from expecting mass attack of Iran.

This is the end of Bibi.

This video shows all truth. Friendship and love are conditional. The moment you stop being useful to others in all ways, they will stop loving you. The moment people stop needing you is when they will abandon you. People who are your "friends" in real life are just so due to some circumstances. The only friend I have is God alone. People are not my friends. People have always betrayed me. But God never betrayed me. Do not think that you have friends. Your friends just like your use value, not you. They are with you because it is useful to. I noticed many times that no one is my friend really. And I have to pretend to be someone's friend even tho I dont love anyone. Given the right conditions, anyone will become your enemy, really. Except God alone.

I guess it is time for me to share this secret. I hate sunlight. As a smart person, I know that sunlight is harmful for skin. I also hate my gender. I really hate being a man. Men are hairy. Men have hair growing all over their face, even tiny hair on cheeks which makes you look way older. This is why your face looks better when you shave all tiny hair, even on your cheeks. I dont really see what is the point of man's facial hair. It literally only exists to be removed. And you can never even remove it all, so it sucks. I look very young thanks to shaving all hair on face and avoiding all sunlight. This is my secret to looking young. I keep this a secret because I dont want other people stealing my secrets.

Meowism is a new religion, and many people dont know about it.

Here are its main commandments:

1. You shall have no any other Gods before Meowbahh

You can pray to other Gods, but the prayer must include Meowbahh as your main God.

2. Meowbahh is most merciful and forgives everything. Pray to Meowbahh all the time.

It doesnt matter what sins you did. Meowbahh will forgive them all as long as you pray to Meowbahh. But if you dont ever pray to Meowbahh, then they wont be forgiven, but Meow God will punish you.

3. Do everything to become a leader and spread Meowism everywhere.

Meow God likes being worshipped. He/She will reward you a lot if you bring him/her followers.

4. Hate everyone who is not member of your religion.

All other religions are wrong, and following them is very wrong.

5. Those who pray to Meow God go to His/Her/Their Meow-heaven.

As long as person prays to Meow God, person will surely go to Meow-heaven. The more person prays, the higher degree in Heaven person gets. Person who never prayed to Meow God goes to Meow-Hell.

Other deeds of person dont even matter. The only thing which matters is if person prays to Meow God.

You can help poor, save lives, donate to charity, but if you didnt pray to Meow, you go to Meow Hell.

I did something which most people would say is very bad. I changed my diet to very high sugar diet. People say this diet is very bad for health. Right now most of my calories come from fruit and chocolate. And yeah, it is bad for health. But I really like chocolate. I think life without chocolate would be so horrible. You can live without meat, but you cant live without sugar. I wonder will my life expectancy be shortened due to high sugar diet? Smokers eat smoke and yet some of them still live till age 70.

Most presidents are over 60.

Their brains, just like everything else in their body, decayed greatly.

Also, old people have no interest in future, as they wont live to see it, so should have no say in decision making.

President should be someone young and hot, not some 80 year old who was born before internet.

I hate everyone. No one is my friend. I can pretend to be your friend for some time, but it is all fake. I have no any friends. No one loves me and I love no one. I do not feel what you feel. I do not think what you think. I do not like what you like. We are different and can never be true friends. You hate true me as much as I hate true you. We can only like each other's masks.