I knew you would call this a votebomb, I even warned Whiteflame in advance to voting in this that you would probably throw a fit. Obviously it isn’t a vote bomb as I clearly spent 4 pages articulating both debaters arguments prior to outlining why I voted the way I did.
I gave conduct to Mikal because you started insulting Mikal and dissing him randomly in round 3, not to mention accusing him of lying. It’s a debate, it’s not that serious. Meanwhile Mikal was pretty professional towards you throughout the debate.
I have no stake in Christianity debates as an atheist. I genuinely would have voted you if you made the better arguments.
Its long standing, he's always got a new reason to think i'm hitler. The latest one is for getting him lynched in a mafia game. I am super evil because of that.
Looks like the debate is finished? I am not going to read through a finished debate just to opine on a continuing one in the comment section. Without having read the debate or any of the discussion I would say topically I agree with Con. But I also don't really care to get into it either atm. Also I wouldn't necessarily vote Con here just because I agreed with his side, it would have depended on who I thought made the better arguments.
Bringing up that your opponent has participated in other areas of the website seems pretty unnecessary and kind of weird. He basically forfeited two rounds, stalking him around the site is a bit unusual and unnecessary.
I knew you would call this a votebomb, I even warned Whiteflame in advance to voting in this that you would probably throw a fit. Obviously it isn’t a vote bomb as I clearly spent 4 pages articulating both debaters arguments prior to outlining why I voted the way I did.
I gave conduct to Mikal because you started insulting Mikal and dissing him randomly in round 3, not to mention accusing him of lying. It’s a debate, it’s not that serious. Meanwhile Mikal was pretty professional towards you throughout the debate.
I have no stake in Christianity debates as an atheist. I genuinely would have voted you if you made the better arguments.
Its long standing, he's always got a new reason to think i'm hitler. The latest one is for getting him lynched in a mafia game. I am super evil because of that.
Thats quite a slippery slope from the guy who claims to be abused because he gets voted off in a mafia game. lol
Meant to say rounds 2-4 will be for debate. lol
Yeah he’s still a better person than you AR lol
7 hours hmm might be a forfeit. Come on benji
dont forfeit!
Looks like the debate is finished? I am not going to read through a finished debate just to opine on a continuing one in the comment section. Without having read the debate or any of the discussion I would say topically I agree with Con. But I also don't really care to get into it either atm. Also I wouldn't necessarily vote Con here just because I agreed with his side, it would have depended on who I thought made the better arguments.
I'll keep an eye on this
Hey I can see the debate now!
I'll keep an eye on this and make sure to advertise this when its time to vote.
no prob
No problem. Both of you can message me with any debates you need voting on in the future and I'll do my best to vote before it expires.
My vote will be finished on this a bit later but before the deadline.
Thanks for the extensive feedback and analysis, wasn't expecting this much feedback! Appreciate it man.
Thanks for the vote!
I suppose you can vote however you want
Hai
thanks man :)
3 rounds of debate is doable for me
Does panic at the disco still count as rock and roll or only their old stuff lol?
which song?
Sure
5 rounds seems a bit exhaustive, and potentially very repetitive.
You can link the smule itself to save you time. Thats what I did with GCL.
https://www.debate.org/debates/Singing-Challenge/1/
Sounds good, looking forward to it. :)
Winner get's to compete on next season of america's got talent. Winner will also definitely by virt, but should be fun regardless. :)
We are all just a bunch of neck beards on the internet. Our opinions don't mean anything. My stance on God should be irrelevant to your belief.
Commenting on the debate, not the comments section.
Bringing up that your opponent has participated in other areas of the website seems pretty unnecessary and kind of weird. He basically forfeited two rounds, stalking him around the site is a bit unusual and unnecessary.