Mall

Wow people are struggling to easily say they're a good person.

Well a GOOD step in the GOOD direction.

Just because you have no interest in a thread or can't get anything out of it, so be it.

I see many threads that lack substance including the ones  that get labeled as hot topics. But it's called freedom of speech and expression. I don't get anything out of it, so be it .

You're entitled to say what you say, ask the questions you ask.

How do you not get an increase of substance out of a topic thread when questions are being asked in that thread?

The questions are there to spark mindful, insightful substance and responses. It's not someone "blowing hot air" just because. It's not quote on quote to hear yourself talk. You spark intellectual conversation particularly posing questions to the public.

You see a topic you're not interested in , pass by , keep it moving like I do . One example is with this Trump centralization. There are greater things to discuss but I guess he is the greatest to interact over. But I don't make a topic thread over it .

Not everything will always be controversial or inflammatory.

This individual is communicating that the threads are lacking substance and yet offer no compensatory quality. 

This individual is communicating that the threads are lacking substance and yet offer no compensatory quality. 

What do you have that is "high " or "better" quality?

If you can provide none, well retract this .

You said organised religion which I take as organized religion. 

So there's no such thing as a separation of religion and state which I agree with. No such thing as separation of church (religion) and state.

But you said organized religion so whatever that is , fine.

Right your definition is very broad. Run into problems with that.

What is your definition of good ?

Well first I'm speaking in biblical terms. According to the bible, we're all sinners. Not just folks who went or go to prison.

Second, people who are not in prison haven't broken man's law but have broken those of the religious sector.

Gotta wrap your head around this.

You do have to exist because without existing at all , the reality of good doesn't exist either.

This is a common error you go into . You often take the stance because a lack of one thing exists, therefore it automatically means the other. 

It's not as thin as you make it. Just because I was found not guilty or a lack thereof to place a guilty charge doesn't automatically make me innocent.

In the secularist system, we're all good if we're not a Hitler, Bundy and Dahmer.

In the religious sector, we're all in the same boat.

Some may even or have turned on religion because the thought of any one of these individuals going to heaven is sickening. 

Not to mention anyone of their victims going to hell.

The unborn are not good. The unborn don't exist.

Speaking of hate, do you love all people?

You welcome to me something that don't exist. I'm welcomed to the present. I'm still wired to the past in multiple ways.

The secular view of mankind is there are those that are good people.

The religious side of things particularly biblically based, all people are sinners, no good.

Which system do you accept that makes you comfortable and feel good about yourself?

If you think so, why?

So it benefits the ancestors but not us is that right?

So that's Why you didn't answer the question.

It would be zero percent of the time. It wouldn't apply to "innocent" civilians. It would be murder otherwise or a murdered covered up.

You saying homosexuality benefits us is that right?

I never used the word ALL.  You assume all just because I say atheists. But all that means necessarily is plural, more than one.

STILL doesn't change the fact of atheists existing believing in god.

No disrespect but you're arguing ignorantly on this subject.

I don't know why you won't answer that question directly. I thought it was simple enough. Ok.

Legalized murder or justifiable homicide right.

So homosexuality is a disorder.

There you go.

Well that's what I'm talking about. Laveyan Satanists are atheists that believe in a god, a real one. So your homework is to look over the satanic bible, get informed on it thoroughly.

So homosexuality is a learned nurtured groomed behavior as opposed to it being natural, is that right?

Do you not know if you like to be a cyborg?

Just so this is coming off in a serious tone, would you like to be one if it meant saving your life?

Can you answer it that way?

Have you ever heard "no pain no gain"?

It's all systemic belief. The majority has more pull on their beliefs to be legislated than others. That's all that goes.

Perhaps one day you'll get amusement out of just proclaiming truth alone.

You're not interested in laveyan satanism so why we talking bout it?

You're not answering the question. Would you like to be a cyborg?

Well being you going that route, I'll respond this way. It's just like I said in the interview about giving advice. 

When it comes down to what you need or want, ask yourself what do you want to do, why, what's the plan and expected/desired result.

"Should abortion be legal?  Yes or no."

Depends on the votes.

List the good things about pain and its benefits.

Learning from the debate.

"Don't expect any politician to keep all of their promises."

Don't expect any promises to be kept.

Yes our "freedom". In the mean time while there's war, there's money cost. While's there's peace, there's money cost. Somebody has to be obligated to make it. 

Who makes it?

Us .

For who?

People of china.

Liberals don't think that's correct . At least not in capacity for what is best.

Has nothing to do with finding a woman. Regardless whether you like a certain food, your stomach and digestive system was made to consume it .

So women weren't made for women and men weren't made for men .

Then you agree the woman was made for the man .

Did you know there's really no such thing as separation of church and state?

Anton Lavey who was an atheist. I want you to look into it if you're really interested. If you don't know yourself, you'll be arguing out of ignorance which is foolish.

Would you like to be a cyborg?

Depends on the person but in general if you're not living very healthy gradually diminishing your life, having a standard of preserving life is in conflict.

People that do drugs and alcohol surely believe in not murdering but yet are doing something unjustified unto themselves and associate with others often doing the same not discouraging it. They're not discouraging themselves.

When you're not looking at this on a grand scale, you don't realize the inconsistency. You don't look at gradual diminishing akin to rapidly doing so.

I think back to this scene in Lean On Me where the Joe Clark character was telling the Sams character about smoking crack. You smoke crack, why not jump off this roof?

You want to kill yourself. Smoking crack kills your brain cells. He said why f*** around with it? Don't slow it up. Do it expeditiously and jump. The Sams character said he didn't want to kill himself.

People argue that people can live long without cancer. Perhaps there are outlier situations where the body can do a good job with battling it off. 

What is a scrote gazer?