Total posts: 2,613
-->
@Best.Korea
Would you say Yugi-oh was more of the mature version of Pokemon?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Do you see all sexualities except heterosexuality as wrong?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
Debate.org was where it was at.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
This author of this thread takes the stance that freedom is good by default.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Words are very important.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
That's why I said super greatly not talked about.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Super greatly not talked about huh.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Many think that they're the master of the dollar bill. They think the more they have of it, the bigger master they believe they are .
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Is freedom by default a good thing or is it neutral?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
The five reasons would be the person has shown or shows not to deliver on what one votes for.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
"OK, and this "pure harm" you are so worried about, that's what we want to understand. When I address someone the way they want to be addressed, there is no harm done, why is it harmful if you were to do it? "
It depends. Would I be telling the truth or a lie?
Are lies harmful?
Then my question was , how far do we continue to call something what it ain't? Is it until it's harmful?
Now we meaning you all that haven't thought about this,give it some thought.
"How exactly are you harmed by the act of addressing others the way they want to be addressed? "
It depends. Would I be telling the truth or a lie?
Are lies harmful?
"What makes you the "victim" of the pronouns transgender people prefer?"
Depends on how I or anybody was victimized. See I'm not going to generalize. My whole point is are we speaking truth?
Now to be truthful is supposed to be this most ethically right way to be , why?
Is it because of damage, eventual harm?
I think these questions haven't been thought about. We meaning those that do haven't looked that far into it. They're (more than one) caught up in the civil liberties and freedoms and pursuit of whatever may mean personal happiness in the moment. Just looking at this on the surface, nevermind beyond that.
Created:
Posted in:
Donald Trump is the greatest president.
Now what is great to you?
Who is great to you?
Which president was greater?
Created:
Posted in:
All these individuals have all this to say about this person, come on the thread.
Don't be embarrassed about yourself now. Don't worry about what others think.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
So saying 1 being different than 2 is not telling the truth according to what you're conveying.
One person is not different than more than one person.
In regards to what people want to be called, how far are we going to go into a delusion suppressing physical facts?
Do we just draw the line at the first sign of pure harm?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
You lead yourself at the end of the day .
Behind the dollar bill of course.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Hereeeee we go again. The best response you got. Folks when they can't counter, they just go off somewhere else.
I even demonstrated an example of what I'm talking about regarding the correct language used with numbers in language.
Why can't you , you, you be honest and just say "yeah I see your point"?
People around here talking about their low IQ . Yes drop down to an elementary level. Even grade students understand 1 and 2 are not the same.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Benjamin
The possibility to become a name. Build an empire.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I want to be correct and telling the truth in using certain language.
For example , one person , a male or female, is not a them or they. It's like saying one is the same as two.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Oh hopefully this is clearer to you. I want to be correct and telling the truth in using certain language.
For example , one person , a male or female, is not a them or they. It's like saying one is the same as two.
Want to be correct in the language, the language, the language, the language.
People are adding all these other social facets. My point has no interest, concern or relevancy to that.
Created:
Farewell to our fallen soldiers. You finally tapped out of the battle.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
I think you're saying cause and effect is not a sound basis to believe in a creator when the law of causality wasn't required before it was required.
Required now but not before. I realized this a while ago but people still use the argument.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Not to believe in it until proven.
You're saying not to believe based on the logical reasons.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Again, the best response this individual has. Gotta resort to some type of snarky response like that was supposed to rebut anything. It's because it's true.
We should be talking about president(s) that areeee "soooo much greater".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
This view of so called racism that Donald Trump supposedly has, I was just asking was it woven in his administration.
Apparently not.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
That's the best response this individual has folks.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Ohhhh the standard is other presidents that have supposedly been greater than Trump apparently are not great enough to win conversations to discuss their so much "more "greatness.
Think about it. I've done great things as a president according to those who count greatness for what it's worth that really means what it means.
Here's somebody else that has done things far from great according to those who count greatness for what it's worth that really means what it means.
They get more attention, more shine than my what's supposed to be "greater" term.
So this other somebody might as well be the greatest for what it's worth.
I hope many of you finally got the point.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
There's possibly error in the language and I aim to be correct in language.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
So no "racist" policies out of the Trump administration.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
"The Bible is neither pro-slavery nor anti-slavery. "
Then this statement you made should be retracted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
So he can never be a they. A she can never be a they.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
It does matter to me in the language we're using. We may have error here.
Created:
Posted in:
Does anybody else think this is a dumb topic?
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Is " he" singular and "they" plural?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Does it make sense or is it consistent that instead of "he" , he can be represented as they and them?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The contradictions are in the minds of people that don't understand scripture.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
It's circular. You didn't explain anything. You couldn't explain why it's good for me , anybody to do anything any ole kind of way because the desire is there.
Then it appears that you're conveying restraints so it's a pseudo liberty. If it has some restraints and that's one part of it that makes it good then complete liberty is not good by your indirect omission.
That's why I say re-evaluate. See you can tell when a position has been well thought out because the answers to the questions aren't shallow.
Then it appears that you're conveying restraints so it's a pseudo liberty. If it has some restraints and that's one part of it that makes it good then complete liberty is not good by your indirect omission.
That's why I say re-evaluate. See you can tell when a position has been well thought out because the answers to the questions aren't shallow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Oh you can consent to being a slave. Those that didn't consent took route to the north and underground railroad.
When you're obligated to pay something in order to live , that is bondage or enslavement.
Just because you don't have physical shackles and chains on doesn't mean your free. Many are not free mentally.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
So why aren't people talking more about Roosevelt versus Trump?
I don't have to explain Trump is great. People continue to talk about him versus others so apparently they were not greater.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
What "racist" policies came out of the Trump administration?
Before money existed, was there social order?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
So much for being a so called racist.
Created:
Posted in:
The transgender folks and whoever that makes their gender identity significant in this way emphasize the pronouns.
For instance a male may communicate that they're not to be addressed as him or himself.
Granted that male perceives themselves as wanting to be female.
Why do you think they request strictly to only be identified in third person as they and them?
What is the significance of that specifically?
Created:
Who disagrees?
Created:
Posted in:
Now what is great to you?
Who is great to you?
Which president was greater?
Created: