vote please. I do believe at the very least, that I have won "arguments" and "sources." I probably lost "S&G" due to a few typos; mechanically speaking, I am not good at typing.
Well saying it is unprovable is a way of saying it isn’t valid… but sure.
Maybe you should provide examples of specific things you think are unprovable.
Cause this far, your case has been that because different factions disagree, no claims are provable.
Again, taking that argument and applying it anywhere else, it gets exposed.
I also think it’s stupid that you’re saying that you’re not gonna bet on one side randomly getting it right. It’s not random as each side has different arguments, and even you could probably see that some are more reasonable than others, if God exists.
The first step is just to ask if the universe appears to be designed by a supreme being. Only after that do you start asking which god is God. You skipped the first step entirely, saw the disagreements in the second step, and then decided the first step was never worth it.
This is because, you really do (specifically, your thought process) confuse theism in general with specific theistic beliefs. And I pointed this out when I called out the false equivalency
I mean, we invented the word, did we not?
*Round 1
7 day voting yet 14 day argumentation is criminal
cashing in on a ff
FYI our community has moved to a new website
https://www.debatecraft.com/
Deport them all. Dirty slimebacks.
vote please. I do believe at the very least, that I have won "arguments" and "sources." I probably lost "S&G" due to a few typos; mechanically speaking, I am not good at typing.
If you think the dating pool is about dominance, you’re part of the problem.
🤷♂️ .
I found it. The greatest debate in DART history.
If the debate ended right now, who would you give the win to?
I procrastinated. Oh well. I’ll get it in round 5.
Even without I think my opponent is totally lost.
this one too plz
cash me out on this FF plz
See my R2
Well it was called off, but yeah, draw.
Who tf boosted ts
Bump
Well saying it is unprovable is a way of saying it isn’t valid… but sure.
Maybe you should provide examples of specific things you think are unprovable.
Cause this far, your case has been that because different factions disagree, no claims are provable.
Again, taking that argument and applying it anywhere else, it gets exposed.
I also think it’s stupid that you’re saying that you’re not gonna bet on one side randomly getting it right. It’s not random as each side has different arguments, and even you could probably see that some are more reasonable than others, if God exists.
The first step is just to ask if the universe appears to be designed by a supreme being. Only after that do you start asking which god is God. You skipped the first step entirely, saw the disagreements in the second step, and then decided the first step was never worth it.
This is because, you really do (specifically, your thought process) confuse theism in general with specific theistic beliefs. And I pointed this out when I called out the false equivalency
>“As I explained, I'm not specifically talking about whether theism is valid or not here.”
But also…
>“So it's clear that theists themselves have issues, in which case, atheism is the best solution:”
And,
>” 4. This lack of an epistemological framework among theist is a good argument for atheism itself. ”
The fact that you can’t even see how you’re contradicting yourself here is crazy.
I’m not strawmanning LOL
You just have no idea what ur talking about…I am understanding your points better than you do
3rd and final bump
Bump #2
Bump
Rd4 is your last chance here btw, if you don’t post anything worthwhile, no one’s gonna care about your Rd5
Round 1 arguments, I couldnt type it out fast enough. Started too late
Devil’s advocate
Bump
Why are we debating truisms
A “concede” button would be a good idea for the site yeah
Oof
Well since you commented here, care to vote?
Vote Pro!!
Btw I will confess that I was trying to rage bait you into admitting you’re below the legal age for smoking and drinking, for our other debate
Aight gg
Oh boy*
On boy. Tell ur son gl lol
Not tonight but ago ahead and accept
I can do tomorrow night
Bump for if anyone else wants accept
Con would still win even with the pfp changes
I swear bruh, there’s no way ur above the age of 14 lmao
lol. That was pathetic and timmyish
Wow Mikal is fast with it
Literally just make one argument. Doesn’t even have to be a good one
In other words, both of you try to take me down at the same time.
There are creative maps that make it work
Solid start for both sides
Should’ve set the character limit at 8888
(((Mods))) (((Censorship))) (((AdaptableRatman)))
I ain’t offended one bit I’m just wondering if you’re like 14 or some shit lol
Uhhhh good luck with this one