Total posts: 8,236
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Lol. Are we really getting to this level of nonsense? I see zero reason to care about some politician’s marriage. If you’re going to criticize, at least give an important criticism. This is frivolous.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
01101000 01110100 01110100 01110000 01110011 00111010 00101111 00101111 01110111 01110111 01110111 00101110 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110100 01110101 01100010 01100101 00101110 01100011 01101111 01101101 00101111 01110111 01100001 01110100 01100011 01101000 00111111 01110110 00111101 01101111 01001000 01100111 00110101 01010011 01001010 01011001 01010010 01001000 01000001 00110000
Created:
Posted in:
I don't think I want a like button on this site anymore.
For one, it takes a lot less effort to press the like button than to make a +1 post, and it takes considerably less time as well. Sure, it's all in small amounts, but I'm seeing a lot more likes on a single post than I ever saw on a single thread back on DDO, which indicates there are many people too lazy to type '+1' but not lazy enough to avoid clicking the like button. So +1 posts wouldn't be the problem people (my past self included) think they would be.
For another, the like button is ineffective at encouraging good posting. People with ideas and the want to express them will do so without a button. People who need a like button to motivate them to use their brains are not people who are going to have a smart take. They will type the bare minimum amount of word vomit needed to sound smart to some people and nothing else. On a site with so many opinions (many of them being strange ones) it can be hard to spot who's actually doing this until the button is removed and they stop posting, but there are definitely users who do this.
Finally, the like button can cause ratios. The like button as a function of quality control works well for YouTube videos (especially tutorials) and meme platforms, but on a site like this it only showcases how many people agree with you. As a result, people get unwarranted confidence in their stupid arguments because some people on the internet agreed with them. Meanwhile people get unwarranted despair in their decent arguments because no one agreed with them. This creates a user base whose logic can be summed up to being a giant appeal to the majority fallacy.
So congratulations. You've received your mild amount of dopamine from giving as well as receiving likes. For what? What pride is there in someone else agreeing with you? Who cares? If you do care, you're probably going to get mildly upset when you receive no likes or a ratio anyways. So why even bother then? Don't. Just post your actual ideas, and don't bother altering them just for likes.
Created:
I honestly cannot feel too bad for pedos who get beat in prison.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
That’s a strange way to get STD.
01000010 01110010 01110101 01101000 00101100 00100000 01110111 01100101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100101 01100001 01100011 01101000 00100000 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00101110 00100000 01010011 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110010 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101001 01100101 01101110 01100100 00100000 00101000 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110010 01100100 00101001 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01110111 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01101110 01100111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01101001 01101110 01100111 00101110 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100011 01110010 01101001 01101110 01100111 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101001 01100100 01100101 01100001 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01100010 01100101 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 00101110
Created:
Posted in:
idk
some girl I met in college had me take a sorting hat quiz and I got Ravenclaw tho
Created:
Posted in:
I did not bring my cartridge or DS into college. No updates until break.
Created:
-->
@3RU7AL
Easy. In essense, because of how different the two parts (and therefore, their procedures) are, the effects are different. FGM causes urination and menstration issues, and is also linked to pregnancy complications and diseases.
The drawbacks of FGM caused by...
Urination:
Slow and painful urnination, formation of stones if scar tissure blocks normal urinary pathways, UTIs,
The tearing of tissue during the procedure:
Anemia, gangrene, tetanus, necrotizing fasciitis, endometritis, extreme pain during intercourse
Menstration:
Painful mestration, hematocolpos, hematometra, extreme swelling
Childbirth:
Extremely agonizing pain during childbirth, third-degree laceration, excessive blood loss, the need to resuscitate the baby, stillborn births
It's pretty clear the removal of the foreskin and FGM are vastly different procedures in their method and results. Therefore, comparing the two is not optimal.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Yeah, its different. Just like when you hit a man everyone calls it a fight, and when you hit a woman everyone calls it abuse. Whatever woman does is justified. When she cries, she is caring. When a man cries, he is weak and should stop it and man up. So yes, its vastly different in a sense that one is done to a girl and the other to a boy.
You missed my point. Stupid bot.
Goodbye.
Created:
How does "someone else deciding what part of my body should be cut off against my will" makes it not involuntary servitude? What exactly is voluntary in me being forced to serve your tradition?
Wrong kind of servitude, bozo. Servitude, as in involuntary labor. You have your definitions mixed up. I'm starting to think you're a bot.
I see your knowledge about North Korea comes from american cartoons.
What are these then? I'll tell you: they're sources.
Says who? Bunny the sniper?
Says the CDC.
First, the STD part is nonsense. Baby is not going to get STD, circumcised or not.
I'm talking about they reach adulthood dumbass. A human would know that.
If circumcision is so healthy, surely then the people will live longer if circumcised? How is it then that top 10 countries in life expectancy have very low circumcision rates? While the bottom 10 countries with lowest life expectancy have circumcision rates of about 90%? There seems to be no correlation between mass circumcision and health.
Did I say anything about life exectancy? No. I was talking about STD and UTI rates, which you failed to address. Probably because your programming is something like 'if disease.x = false, then health = true... if health = true, then lifeexpectancy = greater'
You fail to recognize all of the other factors playing into health, because you lack human logic.
Masturbation helps to increase life expectancy. Do you agree that I should be able to come to your house every day and force you to masturbate, if I find that you are not doing it regularly? If I find that today you didnt masturbate or have sex, I should be able to come to your house and force you? And your sister too? And your mother? Masturbstion is healthy, so...why not? You think its justified to force people, so why shouldnt I be able to do the same to you?
Circumcision is not a sexual stimuation, so the comparison to masturbation doesn't work. Also, I'm not walking into a hospital demanding parents circumcise their kids lmao. You seem to think my recommendations are things that I think sould be law. You don't seem to understand nuance. I guess your programming ins't capable enough.
Also, I need to forbid you to eat meat and fast food because its unhealthy. From now on, you cant have anything that damages your health. Do you agree? Also, I might need to take away your car. Also, some of your income will be redirected to poor people to help their health.
Dang, I'd still have more freedom than a North Korean citizen. Jokes aside, there is no law mandating circumcision in America, and I'm not advocating for one either. Likewise, there is no law banning cars, or fast food; what little redisribution we have (by taxes) only keeps people dependent on it, and therefore less likely to make the lifestyle changes they need to make.
More information from cartoons?
Nope. UNICEF.
Circumcision damages the penis. There have even been cases where people lost the function of their penis completely.
Those cases are extremely rare. For the incredible majority of cases, all penile functions remain the same.
Cutting off a bit of your ear wont damage your hearing. Can I cut it off now? And your hair too so you dont have to wash it anymore? You dont need it. Also, if you have a daughter, sister or mother, can I cut off all of their hair too? They dont need it and having hair can cause health problems.
Does the benefits of either of those outweigh the costs? No, they don't.
How is it then that North Korean population grew faster than US population who has huge immigrations? Awkward.
How is it then that you're wrong? Because you are.
I see you are not familliar with what happens in US prisons.
In American prisons, inmates harm inmates, and the guards are tasked with breaking the fights up. Not good, I'll admit, but could be worse.
In North Korea, guards harm inmates, and no one cares to stop them. That is objectively worse.
Nice attempt at a deflection, though.
We have already seen that you like violating other peoples bodies. Plus, USA attacked like over 30 sovereign countries, killed millions of people, used chemical weapons on millions of civilians... Weird.
Not relevant to the topic, bot. North Korea bans people from leaving because they will if they are allowed to. In other words, they are afraid of their government, or recognize how bad it is.
I will never justify any wrong the US has committed. You, however, will justify or deny the wrongs of North Korea.
Here is only a small amount of those: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Massacres_committed_by_North_Korea
Apparently, the South Korea is regularly sending the propaganda papers over the North Korean borders. Those papers usually promise great wealth to those who defect. After having looked at some defectors youtube channels, it seems that they only care about money and have a mental power of a 10 year old.
Discrediting the suriviors. A classic authoritarian move. In reality, they have left for a variety of reasons. The posters only let them know a better place exists.
You hate those who leave your country. You would rather they stay in, and go to labor camps for their escape attempts. This means you support slavery. Why do you love slavery? Why do you like violationg people's freedom? When the prisoners are trapped, the female ones get raped. Why do you support rape?
Of course, this is all using your logic against you. Admit to yourself your logic is wrong, or that you are terrible, if your processor can handle it.
In theory, you can. However, there seems to be no historical evidence of that. You vote out one, another one comes who is equally bad.
There have been good and bad presidents and politicians throughout US history. You can also vote in a good one. Right now, however, I will admit we have a terrible president. The thing is, he's still better than lil' kimmy.
The chance to vote someone out is better than no voting at all. You won't care because you are programmed by North Korea, or are one of their agents. Or deranged. You are evil, and you cannot convince me otherwise, no matter what you say.
Goodbye.
Created:
-->
@3RU7AL
No. The two procedures are vastly different in practice. To comapre the two is ridiculous.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Not stuck. Just not caring to move.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
They cant decide about that. Not their body. Babys body doesnt belong to parents. It belongs only to baby. The opposite case would be slavery. In that case, I dont see why you oppose to dictatorship.
Losing a tiny flap of skin is far from being forced into involuntary servitude. If you want to see involuntary servitude, try wearing kimmy boy's goofy ass haircut. He'll imprison your family in a labor camp for stealing his look. I don't know why he has that cut in the first place. Mans got the minecraft steve.
No. It has no observable medical benefits for a baby.
Circumcised males have a lower UTI and STD rate over the course of their lifetime. It also prevents that nasty gunk from showing up. So nasty that I hate knowing about it. Still cleaner than North Korean water though.
"As for mutilation, it's a small flap of skin. You're not losing anything significant."Okay, can I cut off your ear? You will still have the other one, so no big deal.
Having both of your ears is helpful for hearing and balance. Speaking of balance, the North Korean diet is very balanced. No grains, no meat, no vegetables, no fruits, none of anything else! A nutritional value of 0 for every food group! Truly balanced!
Now, since you obviously like violating other peoples bodies, I dont think you have a right to speak against anyone on anything.
Speaking of violating people's bodies, you should talk to the prison guards in your country. They seem to be up to no good.
So far everything Kim family has done was supported by more than 90% of their population. You assume this is out of fear. No evidence for that. But when we look at history, its the US government who used fear to justify wars, bombarding, circumcisions, punishments, abuses of human rights, tortures...ect.
North Korea: A country with so much nationalist support that leaving the country is banned! Truly amazing! But defectors seem to say otherwise. I don't know why they escaped such a 'great' country. Maybe they just didn't like their daily prison camp torture.
But when we look at history, its the US government who used fear to justify wars, bombarding, circumcisions, punishments, abuses of human rights, tortures...ect.
Finally, we agree on something! Our government does suck! Good thing we can vote some of them out. Not a option in North Korea.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Nope. I just didn't care to think anything more than "frog."
Created:
-->
@Shila
Oh yeah, I forgot I ended that server cause I decided it wasn't needed. Also, I'm not sure what your point is, and chances are I won't care.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Optional? Sorry, could you explain to me how is it optional for a baby? Are you saying babies consent to have their penises cut and mutilated?Also, you say its not rape. Lets see: 1) nonconsensual 2) touching, cutting and penetration of genitals... yeah its rape.
Optional for parents to decide. Also, it's a medical procedure, not a sex act. As for mutilation, it's a small flap of skin. You're not losing anything significant.
Speaking of rape, have you heard of how women are treated in North Korean prisons?
Also, you seem to believe that North Korea is dictatorship. However, Kim family has approval rating of over 90% by their citizens. Compared to that, most US presidents dont even have 55%. Awkward.
This is because Americans have the freedom to criticize their politicians. In North Korea, you do not.
You might wanna tell your boss you're doing an awful job. Don't worry, rocket man kimmy will coddle you and say 'saranghaeyeong,' since he can say it and teenagers in North Korea can't. It's too South Korean of a phrase, apparently.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
You don't know what rape is then.
Also, the procedure is optional, unlike voting for Kim Jong-Un in North Korea.
Created:
Right to self determination with masses being the masters of everything in their society is the central idea of Kim Jong Ils Juche Socialism.
Nothing says self-determination like living under a dictator!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
idk man I was just thinking about frogs at the time
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Like the purple dinosaur? Ya, I can take him
Pie caught in 4K
down horrendous man
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Every illegal immigrant and their mom will claim asylum to try to get in. You think they're just going to leave if their appeal gets rejected? And how many of them have actually applied for asylum? Many of these people are here knowing they're going to get rejected or that they're not going to apply. At that point, it's premeditated crime, so we might as well call a spade a spade.
Meanwhile, we have many people applying for green cards outside of the US and their process is being slowed down because we're trying to process green card decisions for people who crossed the border before applying, many of whom will get rejected and will refuse to honor the ruling.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
If you think this failed, you missed the point. Politicians make rulings from DC. They don't often care about the issues voters deal with; they would rather use their partisan lines. The stunt asks the question "How can the American public be expected to care for illegal immigrants when the wealthiest politicians refuse to do so?"
So far, it's pretty clear that politicians are out of touch and outright hypocrites on this issue. While feel-good stories about community donations may seem to let them off the hook, they really don't. It only shows politicians are more than willing to let the citizens do the charity alone, without writing a check themselves. And this ignores even bigger questions. Where is this compassion when our own people can't afford food? And what about the legal immigrants? Will these donations last, and how many more migrants are coming now that we've accepted some? We can't care for all of them, no matter how generous we get. We should give prioirty to our own citizens, be it by birth or legal immigration.
Created:
Posted in:
I only will only buy Overwatch 2 if public lobbies are casual.
I am not making the same mistake I made playing Fortnite. I quit that game after 2 years of playing because public lobbies became so incredibly sweaty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
Sometimes.
There's not really much more to say here. Sometimes someone is objectively right when I am objectively wrong, and so I change my opinion on the issue because I can't find anything to debunk their argument.
Created:
This is a series I've been wanting to do for a while, but now that I've decided to go to college after 2 gap years, it think this would be a good (and fun) way to practice my writing skills. Especially since my declared major is in Journalism. Maybe I should opt for a concentration in Sports Media. Anyways, I hope this turns out to be a good read. Also, this is all in humor.
The field of 16 drivers for the NASCAR playoffs has been set. Among them are drivers who have been class acts all season. They rarely show unjustified anger, and all of them have proven their skills... or just got lucky enough (more on that later).
This list is not about them. It's about having a laugh at the most irritating drivers (and others) on the circuit of NASCAR. Call it salt, and you'd be correct. I really don't care. With out further ado, here is my NASCAR Black Flag List:
1. Cody Ware
Quite possibly the biggest example of nepotism in NASCAR, Cody Ware proves time and time again that with enough money, even your dreams can come true! Why yes little Timmy, you can be a star! Just win a championship in the small overseas Asian Le Mans Series where you were uncontested for the championship in your division that year, and you too, can kickstart your NASCAR career! Just ask his dad, Rick Ware, owner of Cody Ware's No. 51 for Rick Ware Racing!
Since joining NASCAR, Cody Ware's performance has been putrid in all three of NASCAR's National Divisions (Trucks, Xfinity, and Cup). With an average career finish of 30.9 in the Cup Series, you'd think he should drop back down to the Truck Series, where he has an much more impressive average finish of... 23.1. Okay, so maybe that won't make too much of a difference. But hey, at least he got his first career Top 10 in The Coke Zero Sugar 400 at Daytona last weekend! He's improving! Gee, it only took 28 of the 37 cars in the field wrecking out of contention... plate racing, amirite?
The only other notable thing Ware has accomplished this season was attracting the ire of a championship contender at Bristol, when he chased down Chase Elliot under caution to show displeasure after he got loose because he ran out of tal- er, got spun out by Elliot. Yeah. That's totally what happened. That's being said, it'll be difficult to get all sides of the story since Elliot might not remember it. He didn't remember who Ware was, after all! You'd think it's because Ware rarely sees Elliot on the track, but I have a counterpoint to prove Elliot's memory loss issues once and for all: He laps Ware several times a week! How could he NOT know who Ware is?!
Ya know, personally I wonder if this whole racing thing for Ware is just a front for Nurtec ODT to sell more migraine pills. He certainly is causing headaches for the other drivers and fans! I know it's bit of an unfounded conspiracy theory, but I'm sure it'll catch on quicker than Ware is on the track.
2. Ross Chastain
The son of a watermelon farmer and one of his watermelons, Ross Chastain is a driver who hit the Cup Series full-time (kinda) in 2018 driving the No. 15 for Premium Motorsports, with which he acheived less than premium results. Chastain failed to score a Top 15 until 2019, when he got a Top 10 at the Daytona 500 after 29 of the 40 cars in the field wrecked out of contention... plate racing, amirite (again)?
After dropping back down to Xfinity in 2020, his fortunes would improve when a dying Chip Ganassi Racing picked him up for a full time ride in 2021 to drive their No. 42 car. With this oppurtunity, Chastain finally got to run at front of the pack every once in a while, where he finally had plenty of opportunities! To wreck out the actual contenders and make every driver around him angry, that is. At the end of the season, Chastain finished 20th in points, Top 3 in most enemies made, and 1st in the I-got-cut-by-Chip-Ganassi-Racing-and-all-I-got-was-this-lousy-t-shirt award. The corresponding trophy Chastain got for his award was: You guessed it! A lousy t-shirt! NOTE: Still more fashionable than Chastain's t-shaped beard.
Fast foward to the present, and Chastain is finally a contender! He scored two wins! By wrecking everyone in front of him out, that is. Now, you might be asking, just who is "everyone?" Well, by "everyone" I mean Ryan Blaney, Kyle Busch, Denny Hamlin, AJ Allmendinger, Alex Bowman, Chase Elliot, Martin Truex Jr, Christopher Bell, Bubba Wallace, Kyle Larson, Kurt Busch, Autin Dillon, Erik Jones, and track boundaries. There's probably others, but I'm confident I've spent more time researching this than Chastain has spent racing cleanly. If there's any good news, it sounds like the other drivers are going to pay back Chastain during the playoffs. I am eagerly waiting for the longest YouTuber-level apology Chastain has ever given once it happens.
3. The NASCAR Playoffs
NASCAR as an organization, seems to be comitted to making and defending the worst decisions imaginable. From the 1969 Talledega 500 to the 2022 Coke Zero 400, NASCAR has seen some bad races over the years; In addition, from Jeff Gordon in 2004 to Martin Truex Jr in 2022, drivers have been screwed over by poor format decisions from NASCAR. I would say Bill France Sr. would be rolling his grave, but this seems par for the course for the organization he created. Legend has it, the ghost of France Sr. is still crushing driver unions in the afterlife. Thankfully for him, he doesn't have to deal with the ghost of Lee Roy Yarbrough.
Back to more recent times, the second least competitively fair era in NASCAR began in 2004, after it was decided that drivers like 2003 champion Matt Kenseth can't just walk in and completely outclass most of the field on a weekly basis to win championships. "No, no, no! Bad 1-win driver! Why couldn't you have been more like the 8-win Ryan Newman and have 7 DNFs!" said Brain France after some drinks and pills, probably.
In the Chase era drivers had to be "ACTUALLY GOOD"... for only the last 10 races of a season. So, what does one expect from a system where you only need to be merely decent for the first 26 races of a season? Exploitation, of course! Most notably, 7-time champion Jimmie Johnson would use the regular season as more of a "tune-up" for the Chase by driving at a relaxed pace. While the Chase created artificial exitement for a short amount of time, it would prove to make the sport even less exiting than the average Indy road course wreck-fest. After Johnson captured his sixth championship in 2013, NASCAR decided to drasically emphasise what they believed was the single most important skill a driver needed: Being lucky.
The actual least competitivly fair era began in 2014 when NASCAR introduced the Playoffs. This system revolved around the last 10 races like before; however, the difference was that those 10 races were splits up into four rounds with the first 3 being races each, culminating in a 'winner take all' season finale. This resulted in a system about as reliable as the single-lug wheel. Drivers nowadays frequently have great seasons only to have one bad race mid-playoffs and get screwed. "What's that Carl Edwards? You had a league best average finish of 7.2 and got wrecked out in the final race of the season? I guess that means you're only the fourth best driver!" said Brian France two years before getting arrested for DUI, probably.
Most recently, NASCAR added playoffs points and stage racing (with its own points), creating a motorsport so convoluted they needed a celebrity ad campaign for their system. Personally I think Jim France should've been the guy presenting the system. Nothing makes the public understand what your system is about quite like showcasing the geriatric man behind it all! Unfortunately for us, NASCAR seems to value their public image more than things like good officiating, so we got 4-time Grammy winner Keith Urban to spoonfeed the system to us. Hey NASCAR, since you've shown you can spend money on celebrities, can you spend some money on a car that absorbes impact better? No? Ah, well then. Godspeed in your concussion recovery, Kurt Busch! I hope NASCAR's virtue signaling will help other drivers avoid the same injuries!
Serving Pit Road Penalties to avoid being Black Flagged: Bubba Wallace, Kyle Busch, Joey Logano, Next Gen Car, Single Lug Tire, Rain Tires, and Chase Elliot fans.
Created:
"Guys gravity doesn't exist, weight is what's pulling all these objects down!"
Created:
Posted in:
The ability to change the email address linked to my account. I signed up for this site with a high school email years ago.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I likely won't. I'm trying college again this fall; I leave for campus in less than a week.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Gee, that's a good way to start a beneficial conversation!
Created:
1. No
2. No
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I might try it out. It'll be in starting in September, right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Because the last one ended with only a few people even bothering. Admittedly I lost interest in the middle of it last time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
@ILikePie5
We've done it before, but I'd be down
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I would call that Libertarian left. Doesn’t matter too much though.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I agree. Sources should be a part of the argument, not its own category. Conduct doesn’t matter in the matter of winning a debate (although it is appreciated), and Spelling and Grammar is not a huge issue as long as it’s legible.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
There’s still a strong leftist presence here. Benjamin, Oromagi, FLRW, Double_R, Castin, Lady3Keys, Danielle, TheWeakerEdge, Speedrace, others, etc.
If the right holds a majority here, it isn’t a huge one. And if this is concerning to you, invite some people you think would be good for the site over. Heck, do it even if it’s not a concern.
If the right holds a majority here, it isn’t a huge one. And if this is concerning to you, invite some people you think would be good for the site over. Heck, do it even if it’s not a concern.
As for me, I’m not going to use any appeal to majority arguments. They’re incorrect and easy to call out.
The only thing I could see being an issue is ratios on the site, but honestly who the heck cares about the number of likes? To me all the button does is (somewhat) prevent users from posting ‘+1’ posts.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
@Athias
@SirAnonymous
@ComputerNerd
@That2User
Try this one out :)
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Until then, I’ll see if I can get people to join this one.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I’ve been posting from vacation all week. I can try to start mine as soon as I get back.
Created:
Posted in:
Current Mafia:
N/A
Signups:
RationalMadman - Well-known Autistic Spectrum people
In the Hopper:
Speedrace - MCU Disney+ Shows Mafia
Mharman - Indie Games Mafia
On Hold:
Wylted - World Series of Poker (WSOP) Mafia
Supa - Kanye West Discography Mafia
Earth - Not another weebshit mafia game/Skyrim(Player choice)
Created:
In.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Aight. Your turn. Unless you need me to go ahead.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Speedrace isn’t ready yet, so you’re up. If you need more time as well, let me know and I’ll go.
Created:
Posted in:
Current Mafia:
N/A
Signups:
N/A
In the Hopper:
Speedrace - MCU Disney+ Shows Mafia
RationalMadman - Well-known Autistic Spectrum people
Mharman - Indie Games Mafia
On Hold:
Earth - Not another weebshit mafia game/Skyrim(Player choice)
Created: