Mharman

My session had ended.

Bro, if all town VtNL'd we'd end the DP on a no-lynch.

Careful... do't accidentally end to DP on a no lynch.

Willing to bet there are 3 scum... but some town PRs to compensate for the high scum-town ratio.

CODE: http://surviv.io/#ETO9

SPOILER: Prof. Oak probably gets with Ash Ketchum's mom

Hello everyone

All you wrote was "just a racist idiot". That's pretty easy to understand what that means. It means you have nothing useful to offer.

So you have anything to contribute to the conversation? No you don’t. Please leave.

James.

Government and culture are not the same thing. A secular government does not mean a secular culture.

 

And another thing: the founders did have Judeo-Christian values. I’m not assuming anything. But don’t take it from me; take it from the experts. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Founding-Fathers-Deism-and-Christianity-1272214

They founding fathers made it clear that they were Christian in many other documents. Are you honestly telling me that they decided that someone else created them else created them as they were making that document, only to change their minds and believe in God again after writing that document? You need to check your logic.

Role-blocked. By you. Vtl Disc

Back then the only Creator was God. So in using “creator”, they’d only be referring to God. Back then, “creator” was a synonym for “God”. In saying “creator”, they outright said “God”.

What is your patronus?

They emphasized natural rights, yes, but they believed those rights came from God.

Secular government, Judeo-Christian Culture

How about you read The Federalist

The founders were all Christian men, so it would be God. What other creator could it possibly be?

You should read the Constitution AND other documents by the founders.

You’ll find that they intended for a secular government by, of, and for the people, a people of Judeo-Christian culture.

You said it yourself. “Creator”.

What are you trying to argue here?

Examples?

RIP record attempt at most posts thread

I have summoned the fallen. Let's see if they will arise.

I summon thee

My gameplay session is over because my internet took a fresh dump.

Says "failed joining team"

Try my team: 

http://surviv.io/#UQ8m

New Code: dCOC

New Code: y1K9

PSxm is the new code

So you’re  telling me that our Christian founding fathers who believe our right came from God created a country whose values are based off of secularism? Something’s wrong with your logic here.

So let’s cut to the chase. You believe the Bible is anti-freedom, correct?

May we honor the fallen.

Drafterman

Buddamoose

Lunatic

Sui_Generis

Danielle

lmfao... and by that I mean I’m grinning behind a phone at night

lol $10 says bsh’s Patronus is a dildo

So? Honestly who cares if DF inflated his post count? Let him have his fun.

There is literally no difference between the two threads.

Why ruin the fun for other people when it isn’t hurting anyone else? All that the new resolution did was close the “record attempt at most posts” thread, among other thread.

RIP a relic of site history

Then what did you mean by that?

#SaveOurSpam

Vote no on question two

yeet before ban

Bump

Wait, the mods actually gave up on Wylted?

Bump to the top so more can see this

#SaveOurSpam is a hashtag I created in an effort to save spam threads from being locked.

The term “spam thread” can be applied to multiple types of threads, but for our purposes, a spam thread is a thread created to inflate post counts, for entertainment, and for fun. In these threads, users will post random things, or even have chill conversations.

I’ll give you a few reasons.

One of the first spam threads on this site was “Record attempt at most posts” a spam thread with the goal of becoming the biggest thread on the site. This thread was brought over from DDO. Being a reincarnation of a DDO relic, this thread has a lot of history in it. Even some of the smaller spam threads are smaller tokens of site history that future users can find and learn about, and maybe even contribute to.

Similarly, these threads contain site culture. To lock these threads would prevent users from making their stamp on site culture.

These threads are nice little things on the site, and many users like them, so why ruin it for us?

These threads are also fun. Why deny someone the fun of just chilling out?

Therse threads also serves as breaks when everything else on the site becomes monotonous or when someone needs a break from debating and playing mafia. Why should people not have these break threads?

Any time you increase site activity, it is likely a good thing, especially in this case.

Why would you want to lower site activity?

They're not hurting anyone or anything either, so why get rid of them?

There are two things you can do to help:

1. Spread the # SaveOurSpam hashtag 

2. Vote “NO” on question 2 of the recent MEEP

Thank you for your time.

#SaveOurSpam

Vote NO to Question 2 on the MEEP!

#SaveOurSpam

I hope this doesn’t discourage you from playing in future games. The thing is. You played far better in this game than you did in your first game. You’re getting better and are well on your way to becoming a really good player.

#SaveOurSpam

inflate before ban