Total posts: 2,897
Posted in:
I really don't understand the stubbornness in town here. If Speed is TOWN, we lynch Coal by POE. This is simple stuff. There's the possibility that Pie is lying about his role but we can engage with that come tomorrow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mandrakel
*cough cough*
Collectively, communist states killed as many as 100 million people, more than all other repressive regimes combined during the same time period. By far the biggest toll arose from communist efforts to collectivize agriculture and eliminate independent property-owning peasants. In China alone, Mao Zedong’s Great Leap Forward led to a man-made famine in which as many as 45 million people perished – the single biggest episode of mass murder in all of world history. In the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin’s collectivization – which served as a model for similar efforts in China and elsewhere – took some 6 to 10 million lives. Mass famines occurred in many other communist regimes, ranging from North Korea to Ethiopia. In each of these cases, communist rulers were well aware that their policies were causing mass death, and in each they persisted nonetheless, often because they considered the extermination of “Kulak” peasants a feature rather than a bug.
And while it is often said that Hitler was a Christian, the Nuremberg documents clearly reveal the heart of this ruthless man who believed in social Darwinism and had devised plans to completely eliminate Christianity after the Third Reich was firmly established. He wanted to use religion to subvert it for his own political purposes, but he had rejected his Catholic heritage long before. What should be of concern to every atheist is that Hitler thought he could best succeed if he eliminated the Church’s influence on politics. He promised not to persecute Catholics if the Catholic Church agreed to stay out of politics. However, many Protestants could not accept Hitler’s claim to be a German Messiah or submit to an absolute allegiance to the German State, and many Protestants and Catholics were put into Concentration Camps along with the Jews for their resistance to the Führer.
Hitler’s view of the Master Race was highly influenced by both Nietzschean Philosophy and modern, Darwinian evolutionary view of science.
Views on religionMain article: Religious views of Adolf HitlerHitler was born to a practising Catholic mother and an anticlerical father; after leaving home Hitler never again attended Mass or received the sacraments.[379][380][381] Speer states that Hitler railed against the church to his political associates and though he never officially left it, he had no attachment to it.[382] He adds that Hitler felt that in the absence of organised religion, people would turn to mysticism, which he considered regressive.[382] According to Speer, Hitler believed that Japanese religious beliefs or Islam would have been a more suitable religion for Germans than Christianity, with its "meekness and flabbiness".[383]Historian John S. Conway states that Hitler was fundamentally opposed to the Christian churches.[384] According to Bullock, Hitler did not believe in God, was anticlerical, and held Christian ethics in contempt because they contravened his preferred view of "survival of the fittest".[385] He favoured aspects of Protestantism that suited his own views, and adopted some elements of the Catholic Church's hierarchical organisation, liturgy, and phraseology.[386]Hitler viewed the church as an important politically conservative influence on society,[387] and he adopted a strategic relationship with it that "suited his immediate political purposes".[384] In public, Hitler often praised Christian heritage and German Christian culture, though professing a belief in an "Aryan Jesus" who fought against the Jews.[388] Any pro-Christian public rhetoric contradicted his private statements, which described Christianity as "absurdity"[389] and nonsense founded on lies.[390]According to a US Office of Strategic Services (OSS) report, "The Nazi Master Plan", Hitler planned to destroy the influence of Christian churches within the Reich.[391][392] His eventual goal was the total elimination of Christianity.[393] This goal informed Hitler's movement early on, but he saw it as inexpedient to publicly express this extreme position.[394] According to Bullock, Hitler wanted to wait until after the war before executing this plan.[395]Speer wrote that Hitler had a negative view of Himmler's and Alfred Rosenberg's mystical notions and Himmler's attempt to mythologise the SS. Hitler was more pragmatic, and his ambitions centred on more practical concerns.[396][397]
Don't start petty games you can't win.
Created:
Posted in:
Ok. Speed is my pick. Here is why.
It's between Speed and Coal.
With Coal we have the following to work from:
- he claims an obscure role, something I hadn't even heard of until this point and something that did not even make Drafter's list. I feel this adds to the authenticity of his claim, even despite the next bullet
- he claims a TOWN roleblocker. Roleblocker is typically a SCUM role but the above point plus the fact that, as SCUM, I would avoid claiming TOWN roleblocker at all costs helps me believe him.
- his role is confirmed with WF's testimony, albeit his reasoning behind blocking WF is shady to say the least.
With Speed:
- complete absence. Speed was SCUM last game, and this was his tactic more or less.
- although I have not seen the series, WF (if anyone here knows about FT, he does) charges Speed with a sus claim:
"The Hider role feels a little off for her character, and Levy's just a much less likely character to be in the mix here than the other two. That may be at least somewhat influenced by the lack of justification, and I'd still like to see that from Speed."
- Lunatic's role brings balance into question a bit. Hider + Passive Protector + several investigative roles?
Regardless, if I'm wrong, we can simply lynch Coal tomorrow.
VTL Speed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Yes I used it in 13 Reasons Why for Zach Dempsey
OK. It's rare enough to where I'm actually inclined to believe Coal for the time being, but if Speed flips TOWN Coal is no doubt the lynch.
Have to go back to class but after school I'll post more in depth thoughts
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
I find it humorous that anyone would think that the possibility of interpretation is anything but a problem for any faith with competing sects and competing interpretations. Unless you can somehow demonstrate conclusively that you are correct and your interpretation are correct and all other possible interpretations are incorrect I have no choice but to take the text at its word and the words used are ALL THINGS.
Ah, yes. And I suppose we should do away with all belief systems now. As you say, how can anyone's interpretation of anything be verified completely?
Fortunately, that includes doing away with your belief system of ignoring context, reason, and grammatical conventions.
You see my point I hope. Nothing can be verified completely. We can verify things beyond reasonable doubt, and corroborating this verse with the rest of the Bible (heck, even the verses surrounding it) yield enough evidence to back up my interpretation beyond reasonable doubt.
What's ironic is that the tactic you fall upon is self-refuting: if no interpretation is able to be demonstrated conclusively, what grounds do we have for adopting yours?
Moreover, can you completely verify your interpretation that my interpretation is unverifiable?
If you make your standard complete verification you are left with an incoherent worldview.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
Stuff continues to happen. That would seem to suggest that all things are not yet accomplished.
So when I say "Babe Ruth was a good player back in his day" you believe Babe Ruth existed for 24 hours sometime in the 20th century? This is what happens when you ignore context and grammatical norms.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
until all things are accomplished.
Here is your crucial phrase. You realize that Jesus' death was what accomplished the new Covenant, correct? Realize also that this verse you pulled was Jesus speaking of his "fulfillment" of the law, or the achievement of what God intended for the original Mosaic Law to be: a temporary Law to precede and point to the New Covenant.
Jesus introduces the New Covenant, ratified with His shed blood (Luke 22:20), but the New Covenant does not destroy the Law; it completes the Law. The sacrifices the Hebrew children had to offer every day were not somehow nullified by the death of Christ; they found their fulfillment in His death. We no longer bake bread, sprinkle it with frankincense, and arrange it on a table in a temple (Leviticus 24:5–7). Instead, we look to the Bread of Life, Jesus Christ (John 6:51). The table of showbread was but a picture of what was to come; it is no longer part of our worship today, but it remains part of the foundation upon which our faith is built (Ephesians 2:20).
If you object to this, I'm not really sure what to say to you. I find it humorous when athiests tell Christians how to interpret their own Holy Book.
Created:
Posted in:
You know the case against theism is bad when athiests devolve (ha get it?) the discussion into who would score better on an IQ test.
Created:
Posted in:
I agree with most of TOWN's conclusions that the lynch falls between Coal and Speed.
I must ask, has DRUNK shown up in previous games in DART/DDO? I could not find it on Drafterman's list.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
Please break down to me why I should be SCUM read.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
Drunk makes someone drive them home. It's a night-action blocking role.
So, basically just roleblocker?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
The weird thing is Oro's belief that me & Earth were both town.
Uhhhhh... you realize that if this is weird, and Earth is TOWN, then you're implicating yourself as SCUM? why?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
I am Cana Alberona. While in some cases I am outgoing, the vast majority of the time I am drunk ... infamous for my high alcohol tolerance. Because I am drunk all the time, I am the Drunk. I select someone to drive me home in the night phase.
I've never heard of this role, please explain
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
Whether you agree with New Testament ethics is another matter completely, and one that would no doubt require some scholarly research on my part to debate properly. I have read well on the Old Testament, but am comparatively ignorant on some New Testament matters
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
Yes, we are "released from the law" but Jesus affirms the moral importance of all the commandments for believers except the lawful requirement to rest on the Sabbath. It's not what saves you nor is it part of the new covenant and that's not what I'm saying. God commanded Israel to uphold certain commands as part of the old covenant. Some are issues of basic morality that obviously stay true for modern day Christians in order to be moral servants of God (don't murder, duh.). Others are just issues of ceremony and legality, which no longer apply. The New Testament is very explicit that ceremony and legality do not apply to the modern Christian but that the issues of morality do. No Christian should be lying, stealing, murdering. It's not what saves them, but it is a matter of importance to be obedient to God. If Scripture is inerrant and what it says important, than those moral virtues being mentioned do mean a lot even if they aren't part of the "New Covenant."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
There is another way to look at it too: https://jdgreear.com/why-dont-we-follow-all-of-the-old-testament-laws/
If you're interested
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Theweakeredge
You can. Unless they are repeated in the New Testament, which they are (Except for not working on the Sabbath).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mandrakel
may sound cynical however I suspect that Christians who still believe in creation and not the Flood or Seven Days do so because they have been caught out by what we have found out factually in recent times.The more facts we establish, the more these people will be forced into the corner each time they shed their errant beliefs.In any case it is pretty well game, set and match so far as evolution goes which pretty well puts the kibosh on anything to do with creation.
- existing theories always change in light of new information, and that goes for the religious as well as the naturalistic. For one of many examples, in recent history, the majority of athiests believed in the Steady State Theory to avoid the reality that the universe must have had a beginning. Most athiests have had to alter their beliefs in light of a plethora of evidence that suggests otherwise.
- On that note, there is a good argument that science doesn't challenge theism so much as bring positive evidence for theism (I can get into this evidence but I believe you've heard the arguments). Even if you don't believe that positive evidence, this undercuts your theory that OEC is simply based on a "god of the gaps".
- most scientific study throughout history was conducted by, yes, Christians. There are always those who stick stubbornly to tradition in every era, but this is not exclusive to Christianity nor is it representative of some sort of fundamental conflict between scientific progress and religion.
- there are more than a few Christians who took the Genesis account non-literally before Old Earth Theory even arose.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mandrakel
YEC = Young Earth Creationism.
OEC= Old Earth Creationism
There are many Christians who believe in the old Earth and do not take such accounts (7 Day Creation and the Flood) literally, but they are still "Creationists" in the sense that they believe God created
Created:
Posted in:
I could explain to you the difference between the old covenant with Israel and the new and why God's commands were the way they were but I don't believe you have any interest in learning.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm with Pie. If we have it down between 3 players for SCUM with Dreamer, we need full claims from all of them.
Question for those more familiar with Supa's modding: is Supa the type to give a shit that he re-used the same PR for the same character?
Created:
I am about to be dethroned 😔
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
As we're 23 pages in, I'm OK with hammering Earth. We'll go from there.
VTL Earth.
Created:
Posted in:
OK. DP is still going. I have something to share. Supa responded to my question:
"You lose your role once you go into 2v1. I forget if that's LYLO or MYLOOr 3v2"
Created:
Posted in:
OK. I'm all caught up now.
Earth's lynch is an acceptable outcome. I hope after 549 posts we hit the right person... lol.
I'll go silent now.
Created:
Posted in:
Page 17... RM is getting rather aggressive with his language. I assume this is a symptom of him realizing he's pretty much TOWN confirmed (successfully CC'd a COP DP1, takes balls if he's SCUM to say the least)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I wouldnt totally dismiss that MC is bad town. I think noob town is more appropriate but yeah check out thw game just before this one... Led a near mislynch on me dp1 and was wrong all through the rest of the game and detracted from scum lynches even though both scum were top reads by most townies.
you led a near mislynch of Oro DP1 that was so obviously bad that it made sense to lynch you. Not my fault.
I was not "wrong throughout all the rest of the game," and I certainly did NOT "distract from scum lynches," I was the one person REFOCUSING TOWN throughout that game to Supa. In that scenario that was the best we were gonna get. Speed's innocence was clear with the innocent result from Oro. The game was sealed for SCUM with Oro's flipping as COP.
The fact TOWN is turning on me now under the reasoning of my being a bad player or being SCUM is laughable. TOWN is fucked if this lynch first ask questions later mindset doesn't go soon, because trust me, the one thing SCUM want is a TOWN that relies only on scattered behavioral reads (that may or may not be legit), especially if the SCUM are skilled players.
Created:
Posted in:
Of all the lynches proposed other than the one on FT, Earth makes the most sense. If we didn't lynch FT, Earth would be my choice.
- the read of his laziness contributes but isn't a large factor
- his claim of Miller right after 2 COP claims is convenient as hell.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
Explain yourself. To my "untrained eye" it just looks like you're throwing accusations in hopes for a lynch. You need to go in more depth. Keeping a FOS on youExplain in detail your thought process behind this post.
Throughout this game, I've just seen FT & others jump from wagon to wagon, accusation to accusation, and not give any substantial reasoning other than scattered statements based off of ambiguous quotes that come off to me as innocent most times. What's worse is that he has ZERO intention of determining whether the quotes were innocent or not through claiming, he assumes the worst and uses his flimsy stances as catalysts for lynches. I get that claims can be manipulated by mafia, but if you want to go all-in on behavior, have something more convincing, more substantial than "Pie hasn't said "fuck" enough this DP" or "Whiteflame hasn't joined in on this baseless lynch, so let's lynch him!!" Moreover, I believe that claiming smartly allows TOWN to avoid mislynches that fast-track TOWN to a mafia victory.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I actually agree with FT here, confirming you doesn't really earn you town points, mods frequently make this role mafia sided. Behavior =/= role always.
I know it doesn't constitute total confirmation, and that is not what I'm saying. I'm saying any extra confirmation is pro TOWN in utility.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Don't make me explain it to you. So far you, whiteflame and RM are all in the R/whoosh category.
I get that you're saying it was a gambit. But it was a gambit to get Earth lynched with a fake result, and I'm not seeing the utility in RM shutting up about it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Do you lose popular townie in a 2 v 1 situation, or does the game game end MYLO if you aren;t killed by scum? Worth asking, I've seen some mods do the role differently.
Good question, let me ask Supa.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I kind of stopped reading RM's posts after he counter claimed FT, that was pretty downie. His contribution prior to that wasn't that helpful either, though I did town read him for his noobish counter claim of FT.It seems like I am parroting FT here, and admittedly I am
What did you expect him to do? Claim COP several DPs later and be lynched? Go along with a lynch over a result he knew likely to be bullshit? You're not making logical sense here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
You're asking the wrong questions, whiteflame.The character says that I'm a fierce swordswomen, an S class wizard, and that I have "different abilities" due to "different armors and swords" that I can "equip," and fact that my character has multiple sides, at times "tough" and at others "soft."I guess I should clarify that I have multiple abilities, each 1-shot. I'm not solely a "day cop."
OK... so you're JOAT?
Created:
Posted in:
I'm not faking. This is annoying.
Then it's settled. FT lynch.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Regarding FT, the fact that he’s claiming Erza means he’s most likely town. In this series, she’s one of the main 4 characters. She’d be a very risky fake claim to give this early. She’s almost definitely not the day cop (...seriously RM? I wasn’t buying that before the character claim), though I can think of a few fitting roles for her.
FT needs to tell us his genuine role if he was faking. But RM is right: there is NO way we have 2 COPs. And either way FT's approach here smells of trickery.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I counterclaim fourtrouble 100%
This seals the deal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
I recommend Pie's partners bus. There's no saving him now.
I... wha? What's your justification here? You have no evidence.
Let's lynch whiteflame. Disappeared instead of voting Pie.
And now you shift your attention to those who don't buy baseless accusations off the bat?
VTL FourTrouble.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
MC, why'd you claim your role so early?
Confirmation = Better POE prospects for TOWN.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
Look, proving someone's role doesn't tell us anything about alignments. It's a complete waste of time. A benefit for the scum.
huh???? Not at all a benefit for SCUM.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FourTrouble
Your eye is untrained. Please trust.
Explain yourself. To my "untrained eye" it just looks like you're throwing accusations in hopes for a lynch. You need to go in more depth. Keeping a FOS on you
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
It also forces protective role(s) to be on MC tonight when really he's useless to town other than as a leader and no offence but he's not the most expert player to lead out of this cast, not saying that I am.We gain barely anything from proving his role correct, which I would bet will happen as it would be a foolish out to bluff with.
Soooooo... you think I'm not worth confirming because you believe me? Great. But in late game, this gives SCUM the opportunity to say they don't believe me because I was never confirmed. Not to mention that other people might not be so convinced. I'm worth confirming.
I don't need to be protected either. My role isn't extremely useful.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
2. No roles will be given justifications relating to charactersThis is 100% untrue for my role and character, anyone else?
Yes. I have a rather lengthy justification. Supa screwed up
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Why did you out your character and role so instantly? I am just curious of the reason. For all you know Supadudz gave the same power to someone else and your 'proving' goes very wrong. This was listed as a bastard setup, Supadudz only said the theme isn't bastard, not that the roles aren't.
If I can be confirmed, it's worth doing so instantly or people will be asking why I didn't so later on. Being confirmed is pro-town, period
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
isn't your lover a third party role then?
No, Supa explicitely tells me I "win with the TOWN."
If it helps: my justification is that, due to my charm, I'm loved by all in my guild and I'm frequently on the cover of Sorcerer Weekly gaining me global adoration.
For the record, I've never seen Fairy Tail.
Created:
Posted in:
Hi folks. I once again have a confirmable role. I am Mirajane Strauss from Fairy Tail and I'm "LOVED." This allows me one extra vote before I'm lynched. Confirm away
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@gugigor
William Lane Craig is talented. Many dislike the guy, but he's undeniably a fantastic debater.
Same deal with Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson. Those that say these people can't debate well are in denial.
I'll have to think on it a bit to choose someone I truly think is "top level" though...
Created:
Giving your opinion in the comments is not tantamount to "coaching" another user. We're a debate website, not the NSDA.
Created: