This was a good debate but jumped around a lot... and argues the same ole tired god.
I'm interested bc in all of you your good descriptions you didn't including what i would define god as. God is everything, god isn't a who but a platform, it a source where everything comes from, god is an infinite consciousnesses type platform that is everything, this source platform manifests what it knows as corporeal realities in order for these realities to experience, the source platform isn't good or evil it is not a who but everything, therefore, evil is just one manifestation of this platform, so is good, if a reality requires both to be what it is then both are necessary. I'm probably leaving out things but i'll define it that far.
Evidence of it's existence is through us, bc we are all this platform. Therefore, some should be aware of this platform, some should not be... bc remember it's everything. Some should have experiences, some should not... some do have experiences that defy this reality, some have experiences of knowing exact events in the future, some have experiences that defy what should be allowed. These experiences are real and largely ignored by skeptics. Skeptic do not have experience bc that is what they are... they aren't suppose to have them. If they did, they wouldn't be skeptics. As for why don't we all have experiences or remember? Many problems, if you remember as the source platform you wouldn't be able to have your experience... and likely go a little mad being everything simultaneously. Why doesn't everyone experience? Bc then we wouldn't have skeptics, scientists (of certain fields that require to be focused minus worry of spirituality), atheists, etc...
Religion is what a person believes, all religions are known to this platform. Therefore, the person that experiences what they know is likely from that experience.. again the platform is everything. It is infinitely everything. It all comes down to the observer. That's all i can write.
That was the only argument i felt relevant to decide who won and the other arguments were a tie. That's why i only voted on the significance of that one argument. But, whatever... Sorry magic.
I'll try to read it to see if i understand. Numbers just scare me so i didn't read it knowing i'd probably not understand anything if it has to do with math... logic is a different issue so let me see.
This was a good debate but jumped around a lot... and argues the same ole tired god.
I'm interested bc in all of you your good descriptions you didn't including what i would define god as. God is everything, god isn't a who but a platform, it a source where everything comes from, god is an infinite consciousnesses type platform that is everything, this source platform manifests what it knows as corporeal realities in order for these realities to experience, the source platform isn't good or evil it is not a who but everything, therefore, evil is just one manifestation of this platform, so is good, if a reality requires both to be what it is then both are necessary. I'm probably leaving out things but i'll define it that far.
Evidence of it's existence is through us, bc we are all this platform. Therefore, some should be aware of this platform, some should not be... bc remember it's everything. Some should have experiences, some should not... some do have experiences that defy this reality, some have experiences of knowing exact events in the future, some have experiences that defy what should be allowed. These experiences are real and largely ignored by skeptics. Skeptic do not have experience bc that is what they are... they aren't suppose to have them. If they did, they wouldn't be skeptics. As for why don't we all have experiences or remember? Many problems, if you remember as the source platform you wouldn't be able to have your experience... and likely go a little mad being everything simultaneously. Why doesn't everyone experience? Bc then we wouldn't have skeptics, scientists (of certain fields that require to be focused minus worry of spirituality), atheists, etc...
Religion is what a person believes, all religions are known to this platform. Therefore, the person that experiences what they know is likely from that experience.. again the platform is everything. It is infinitely everything. It all comes down to the observer. That's all i can write.
That was the only argument i felt relevant to decide who won and the other arguments were a tie. That's why i only voted on the significance of that one argument. But, whatever... Sorry magic.
I'll try to read it to see if i understand. Numbers just scare me so i didn't read it knowing i'd probably not understand anything if it has to do with math... logic is a different issue so let me see.
I'm not qualified to vote for this debate... but interesting topic.