Outplayz

LSD - Genius is literally the only song i like (smiled) from all rounds... so my vote goes to con.

Winner songs in this came down to lana del rey and NF. NF shot it out of the building bc of one line in the song. Paraphrasing "I can see the tears in my crowds eyes" ... As in he understands the feels other people get from music. That was a deep line and sick beat. I only disliked the choruses/bridges, but they were short so that was cool. Lana was good too, but since this is subjective.. she didn't win this time around. She's a different type of feel that i'm not feeling right now... but a very good pick.

So the way i vote is two fold. Which songs do i save on my Youtube list... and the song crusher method... which song do i blast at full volume.
Although i love nightcore (good one)... didn't save any from pro...

But even if i did... con had the song crusher. I don't think he is going to be too surprised i save the Epilepsy warning song lol... and Crash (full volume baby) ... thanks for that song.

Win goes to con.

I had to vote this on which songs i liked (the one's i saved). And, which one of you had more.

MM: Xtrullor - Ichor (This gave me a wow moment and just might win you this); Tristam - Till It's Over (how many games have i heard this on lol but it's good).

RM: Coyote Kisses (This one is just okay); Halogen - Can't Resist (darn this one was good).

Well shit... this is hard since on its face you guys tie. But, Tristam is just okay to me since i've heard it so many times so it ties with Coyote. It's bw Halogen and Ichor... Halogen is good but there are parts i don't like... there are no parts i don't like on Ichor... so Pro gets the win. Pro has a similar taste to me and i'll do this type of debate with him if he's willing.. i might impress him with some songs. Cool debate idea in any case, the only debate i actually smiled throughout and only type of debate i'd be willing to take part in. Cheers.

The topic of this debate is "should" people order drinks with no ice. Con's arguments are 1) Makes wait time longer for other customers; 2) that warm soda isn't as pleasurable; and 3) that it has more calories ergo being unhealthy. Pros arguments are 1) that we should allow customization bc customers like that option; 2) that you get half of what you asked for; and 3) that it's filthy.

Con's arguments about the taste of it is his weakest argument. Then that the wait times will be longer is better bc that would keep customers away if it's significant enough, and lastly, his argument about obesity is absolutely his strongest argument. Pro says that customization will bring more customers but that can be negated by customers having to wait. So those two equal each other out. Then, getting half of what you ask for with ice "but tastes better" vs. getting more and tastes bad. Those two also negate each other imo. It comes down to the last arguments. That some machines are filthy... vs. it will have more calories and be unhealthy.

Con addresses that pro's source for people putting their hands on the ice are due to it being a dining room type setting. That fast food chains do not have this problem or do some minimally. I feel con is overall correct due to legal troubles for most places if someone gets sick off of a drink. Although it can be a little disgusting, it doesn't even compare to cons strongest argument of excess calories which equals adding to obesity. Obesity kills thousands upon thousands of Americans every year. Primarily due to America's fast food culture. Obesity is an epidemic in American culture. If this debate goes in pro's favor... sometimes you might get a few bacteria on your drink. vs. getting even unhealthier food that has the potential to cause health problems if not death. I do not believe pro addressed this very strong point. All pro did is give anecdotal evidence that he is not fat. That is contrary to all other evidence that the American diet is one of the biggest killers of Americans. So to say "people SHOULD order drinks without ice" is adding to this epidemic. In that, con wins arguments.

In regards to spelling, it's a tie. In regards to sources, it a tie since most of pros sources didn't address the "should" question and i didn't find them convincing other than that. And lastly conduct, i would also give to con. Calling con childish, desperate and saying he is lying and that us, the readers, should see this. I in fact would think the opposite. Never did con give insults to pro, so calling him the above was uncalled for and not deserved. I didn't notice pro lying nor did i notice him being childish or desperate. Conduct to con.

"Without time existing first, how do you know that the universe didn't create your god?"

This is an important point pro did not answer. From a previous round to the last round. Con asks how can you have creation without time. I don't think Pro answered this. The answer is easy... who says there wasn't time before the BB or that time and space were different... but, i didn't see an answer to this question. Probably bc Pro dropped two rounds due to being inattentive to this debate. If you can't keep track of debates do one at a time Pro. It was very frustrating as a reader. Besides the above, con did a good job disproving the definition and their paradoxes which pro concedes at points by putting limitations. I'm going to give Con conduct and arguments. Conduct bc he was attentive and didn't ff. Arguments bc he really didn't get rebuked and the above mentioned.