Total votes: 210
While both FF the majority of the debate, pro at least provided a decent opening argument.
Since this technically counts as a full forfeit by con, I must award all points to pro.
Both exhibited poor conduct by lobbing passive-aggressive insults at each other and neither had better arguments than the other.
Therefore I must award a tie.
Concession
Pro Forfeited the entire debate, that's poor conduct!
Full forfeit by Con, that's poor conduct!
Pro ff the majority of the debate, that's poor conduct!
Pro ff half of the debate, that's poor conduct!
Con FF the entire debate! That's poor conduct!
Concession
Pro tried to cheat in the comment section by offering explanations, that's poor conduct!
Con FF the majority of the debate, that's poor conduct!
Poor Conduct:
Con FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Con has also insulted pro in the debate with this attack.
" You haven't obliterated anyone, mairj. You just set the argument time for one day so no one has a chance to respond to your bullshit. "
This is a very condescending comment to make and calling his argument " bullshit " is rather rude and poor conduct.
Because of this, I must award the conduct point to Pro.
Namely, I must also award the convincing arguments point to pro since Con never actually makes an argument and instead relies on insults, leaving Pro's argument uncontested.
I'd also like to bring attention to the fact that Con whines about the response time. Con accepted this debate willingly and if he didn't read the debate details that's his fault, not Pro's.
Pro FF the majority of the round! That's POOR conduct!!!
Con FF the majority of the rounds, 2 thirds in fact. That's poor conduct!
Because of the debate being very short I am unable to properly survey the arguments made and must only award a conduct point to Pro.
Pro FF the majority of the debate! That's poor conduct!!!
Pro FF the entire debate! That is poor conduct!
Con FF half of the rounds! That's POOR conduct!!!
Furthermore the debate ( if you can even call it that ) wasn't sufficient enough to give a proper examination of.
Therefore I'll award no further points.
Con FF the entire debate! That's poor conduct!!!
Con FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Pro FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Con ff 3 out of the 5 rounds, that's poor conduct!
Concession
Countering TheGreatGameLord's vote as it only analyzes very parts of the battle and offers a poor analysis.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate that’s poor conduct!
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate that’s poor conduct!
Countering Dr.Franklins vote which is a poor misrepresentation.
Pro FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Concession
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate
PLAGIARISM
Pro plagiarised a part of their argument, that's poor conduct!
Moving right along,
POOR CONDUCT
Pro FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
This prime example of poor conduct as exhibited by pro has destroyed any chance of a coherent debate!
Because of this I must award Con convincing arguments and conduct since they didn't forfeit the majority of the rounds and didn't plagiarise.
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Pro forfeited 3/5 rounds, that's poor conduct!
Not only this but since they FF the majority of the rounds they technically didn't respond to Cons arguments and Con's arguments still stand.
Moving right along,
PLAGIARISM
Pro plagiarized several arguments he made, that's poor conduct!
Concession
I'd like to start off by thanking both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT
Con Forfeited the majority of the rounds leaving the debate unfinished, that's poor conduct!
All other points tied, hardly a coherent debate due to the vast amount of Forfeits.
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro forfeited the majority of the rounds. That's poor conduct!
All other points tied.
Full ff on both sides, hardly a coherent debate, therefore, I award no points to either side.
Full Forfeit, that's bad conduct!
Concession
Full Forfeit, VERY poor conduct on Pro's part.
I'd like to start this debate by thanking both opponents,
POOR CONDUCT:
Con ff the majority of the rounds leaving the entire debate abruptly ended. That's poor conduct!
All other points tied, the debate was so short it's hard to judge which argument is better. Not to mention the fact that Con's argument was mostly incoherent.
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro trolled throughout the entire debate by insulting con, not giving any arguments, and swearing.
This obnoxious behavior has made this debate into an incoherent mess.
All other points tied.
Con FF the entire debate, that's poor conduct!
Full Forfeit
Pro FF the entire debate, that's poor conduct!
I would like to start off by thanking both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con forfeited the majority of the rounds that's poor conduct!
All other points tied, both had relatively good spelling and conduct.
Arguments wise, Pro didn't attempt to make a logical argument at all and instead made lots of generalized statements, a prime example of this was when they said,
" Your opening statement doesn't make much sense. "
And,
" You as well as everyone else may believe what John Smith did was wrong. But without a Super-Naturla All-Knowing God, then there is no way you can PROVE murder is wrong. "
In the end, I was left confused about what the justification was.
And a statement that had no citation which was,
" Your argument for FSM become invalid because the US doesn't recognize Pastafarians as a religion. "
Because of this, I must award conduct and arguments to Con since he actually made a logical argument.