Total votes: 210
Pro ff the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Full Forfeit
" I concede because you are a fucking tryhard who sweats his ass off while debating. You are 15-0 for a reason. Calm down. Why would you accept this debate just to massacre me. You are now longer allowed to my debates. Have a good day AND PEACE"
- Very poor debate conduct by Con, he pretty much conceded the entire debate and insulted Pro at the same time.
At least if you're going to admit defeat, do it nicely and politely.
Also, I might add that Dr.Franklin clearly demonstrated he was a coward who ran away due to Pro clearly outsmarting him.
Dr.Franklin is banning pro from ever participating on their debates again for a VERY poor reason, not because pro demonstrates poor conduct, not because Dr.Franklin doesn't want to waste his time if pro was too ignorant, and not even because of pro ff every single round constantly.
It's because Pro outsmarted him...
Very poor debate conduct on Dr. Franklin's part and very poor reasoning in general.
There're reasons to ban people from participating in your debates, heck I recently just banned Tiwaz.
However, banning someone simply because they're " massacuring " you is just a coward move.
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.
PLAGIARISM:
Pro has plagiarized part of their argument, that's poor conduct!
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro has FF the majority of the rounds in the debate, that's poor conduct!
All other points tied, neither convinced me and both had good spelling and sources.
Countering Bazza's poor vote which doesn't give a good enough justification
I would like to start off by thanking both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT
Pro has FF 2 of the 4 rounds, that's poor conduct.
I'd like for other voters to also consider this when voting as well.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
Neither convinced me of their side as neither exactly had good sources nor analysis to back up their claims. And both had good spelling and grammar.
Meh sparrow's tracks honestly sounded better to my ears.
Full forfeit
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT
Pro has ff the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
I'd like for other voters to consider this when voting
Concession
Countering WolframMagic's poor vote which only analyzes one side.
Until he/she posts a sufficient vote my CVB will stand
I would like to start off by thanking both voters for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro has forfeited the majority of the debate rounds which is a prime example of bad debate conduct
I ask for other voters to please consider this fact when voting in the conduct category as well.
Concession
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
I would like to start this off by stating I dislike sparrow a lot and I think Ragnar is one of the best debaters on this site. I'm going in telling you this because my vote may or may not be controversial.
All of this said I'll begin,
POOR CONDUCT
Con has insulted pro during the debate by stating " As Sparrow is notorious for playing BS semantic games..."
- This is an obvious personal insult made against sparrow which is poor debate conduct and overall obnoxious behavior exhibited by Con.
I ask for other voters to please consider this when voting as well.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Pro has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
Countering RM poor vote which provides no reasoning for his decision.
meh, both were aright, however honestly neither were really all that good.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Pro has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
Concession
Countering Ramshutu's conduct point since ff 1 round shouldn't be used to award a conduct point. If perhaps Con ff the majority of the rounds than that would be considered. But that's not the case.
Until Ramshutu provides to me a just enough reason for Pro to get the conduct point, my CVB still stands.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate, let's begin my analysis.
POOR GRAMMAR:
Con exhibited very poor grammar in this debate.
Some examples of his misspelling and poor wording were,
" You cant cause a war " - Should be spelled can't not cant.
" As i said i believe he was pressured to do the attack" - The I should look like this, not i.
Examples of his poor format were his/her's final round which had poor format since it was very smooshed together which made reading it clearly almost impossible.
All other points tied as I am unable to read Con's arguments amongst these conditions.
Concession
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Pro has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
Concession
Countering Our_Boat_is_Rights vote since he doesn't fully explain how these sites are " conspiracy theorist sites"
Until Our_Boat_is_Right properly explains his vote, my CVB will stand.
Concession
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT
Con has ff the majority of the rounds of the debate which is poor conduct
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
RFD in comments
Countering Ramshutu's poor vote bomb which doesn't explain why RM vote was poor.
Examining RM vote reveals it appears to be just, he explains he liked the impression better which is a probable reason to cast his vote.
Until Ramshutu explains how RM vote is poor, my counter will stand
Countering RationalMadmans poor vote which provides no reasoning on which opponent should win.
Countering RationalMadman's poor vote which provided no good justification for his vote.
Countering Ramshutu's poor bomb, RM provided a decent reason for his vote being the rhyme scheme/flow made by speed race.
Countering Wrick-It-Ralph's poor vote which didn't give a clear enough reason for his vote.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate.
PLAGIARISM
Pro has plagiarized his/her entire argument from the following website:
https://www.debateart.com/debates/692
I ask the other voters to consider this when voting on conduct as well.
Concession
Pro ff the majority of the rounds, ThAtS pOoR CoNdUcT
Full FF on both sides
Pro trolled, that's poor conduct
Full forfeit
Full forfeit
Pro ff the majority of the rounds, ThAtS PoOr CoNdUcT
Pro ff the majority of the rounds, ThAtS PoOr CoNdUcT
Pro ff the majority of the rounds, ThAtS PoOr CoNdUcT