Total posts: 3,159
-->
@Vader
By "not being able to help out"
I meant for the second edition.
Created:
-->
@Vader
Yee
Sorry for not being able to help out, I was really busy these past few weeks.
Created:
Posted in:
Stupid me...
How could I forget the masterpiece which was the goodbye speech?
Both RMs and mine XD
JK I’m not allowed to vote for my own thread
And even if I was, it would be too provocative for Bah1’s taste
With that said, I nominate RM’s goodbye thread for my second vote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
On tonight's episode, deet's nurlocs ate bad moss and went insane
If I was born in the 80s I might get that joke
Either that or I lived under a rock for for my entire life
Possibly both lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I went to your link and that's what I found XD
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Make it deathproof and I'll be Groot ;)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Could you plz provide some references for characters (like a Wiki or something) for people who never read the books, seen the show, or watched the movie?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
It’s my hoco week so I was busy.
What's that?
Created:
Posted in:
And just so everyone knows, you can each nominate 3 people, 3 threads, and 3 debates.
In that case, I'll nominate Oromagi, Ramshutu,
and RationalMadman (THE LEGEND)
I'll also nominate this thread:
that's just what I can think of off the top of my head
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
Ohhhhhhhhhhh...Lol. Well, you can't actually nominate a body part lol...If we could, I'd nominate Thett's twink ass and Ram's sexy right lobe...alas...
big oof
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
The dude who was leading the polls in the pre-nomination stage XD
Created:
Posted in:
Ongoing
Speedrace - Marvel Cinematic Universe Heroes
Sign-ups
Lunatic - The Dark Crystal Mafia
In the Hopper
Mharman - Survive the Killers Mafia
Warren
Bsh1
PressF4Respect (Just a Regular Game of Mafia, themeless)
A-R-O-S-E ~ Powders Pow-wow
SupaDudz (High School Life Mafia)
drafterman (Themeless, Random Roles)
Speedrace (You'll Go Crazy MCU)
On Hold
Buddamoose, Virtuoso, Breaking, Discipulus
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I WILL PAY YOU 500 DABS TO GET THE AWARD, lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
BLT:
What is your campaign slogan?
BTT:
Same question
BRT:
Same question
BOT:
Same question
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
We should all be more empathetic towards RM, for he is afflicted with BBB.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I’m not sure which is bigger.I’m fairly sure I know which is less fragile
Oof, it's less obvious than it seems.
Bish has BALLS OF STEEL, while RM's ego is aS tOuGh As SteEL.
Created:
Best Left Wing:
Karl Marx
YEET
Created:
Posted in:
According to the well founded idiom "The Bigger The Better", we should base our HoF decisions physical size. In this case, there are only two viable options for candidates in DART:
B1sh's left test test
and
RM's ego
Question is: which one is bigger?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@A-R-O-S-E
Many complex, much wows
How many DABs is this going for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I love hoodies that aren't produced in a 3rd world sweatshop by underage workers making $1/day, and who pay for our articles of clothing using blood, sweat, and tears.
#truth
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
But B1sh's test test belongs to him, and he shouldn't be envying his own body part.
Unless...
Created:
Posted in:
Hall of Fame Nominations:
- B1sh's left ballsack
- B1sh's other prototype artificial ballsack
- B1sh's other other ballsack
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Created:
-->
@Cogent_Cognizer
Goodbye dude. ;(
I wish you the best in life
Created:
-->
@Athias
It doesn't matter. The point is, if you had solid evidence at hand for the existence of a particular god (regardless of whether it is concrete or abstract), would you use it?This question has already been answered.
Your answer:
Okay, good. Now, if there were evidence to support your proof of said god, would you use it?Depends on the context. If the context demands evidence, then of course.
Would this context demand evidence?What is the context? When you ask for proof of existence, what effect is this evidence to inform? Materialist? Idealist? Or does the distinction not matter at all?
I will explain this to you again. You (as a theist) are trying to prove the existence of your particular god. You find strong, solid evidence (physical artifact, logical proof, etc.) for the existence of your particular god. Would you use said evidence?
If you cannot answer that question in a straightforward way, then let me ask you this: Is it true that the more evidence/proof one has to support their premise, the better (more convincing) their premise will be?
How would you differentiate the abstracts that are valid and the ones that aren't?What is "valid"? (It might be interesting to note that the terms valid and value stem from the same origin.) My point is, these arguments are essentially reduced to disputes over values. I make distinctions based on logical consistency; that does not mean however others accept that standard when parsing their abstracts.
Let me illustrate my point with an example. If an argument contains a logical fallacy (say, circular reasoning), then is it still valid (from a general POV)?
Since you stated that not everyone bases validity on logical consistency, then it follows that not everyone would believe that logical fallacies would invalidate an argument. Is this what you are saying? If so, then what other objective measure do people base abstracts on, that would make an argument with logical fallacies valid?
Something imagined--i.e. conceived by the mind.
So you are saying that mathematics, science, and logic are completely made up. Correct?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
HOw doES IT FeEL LikE tO gEt DaBBeD oN bY RM'S biG BrAin?
Created:
Posted in:
This is why we lynch someone DP1. Even if we lose a townie, it will give us more information about who is and isn't mafia.
Created:
Posted in:
Reasons:
RationalMadman is the most logical person ever, who would never block anyone that proved them wrong. This proves his ego is very stronk.
RationalMadman is the only person to win 100+ debates as of now. This proves his 9000+ IQ big brain.
RationalMadman is the only person to have all medals as of now. This proves his natural superiority to us mortals.
RationalMadman is simply the best person ever. If you disagree then you stupid.
Like if you agree
Created:
-->
@Athias
What is the context? When you ask for proof of existence, what effect is this evidence to inform? Materialist? Idealist? Or does the distinction not matter at all?
It doesn't matter. The point is, if you had solid evidence at hand for the existence of a particular god (regardless of whether it is concrete or abstract), would you use it?
If I were to coach one on presenting an argument for the existence of God, I would inform them to highlight the significance abstracts have in rationalizing existence, and that it's logically dissonant to claim that abstracts, whether "rigorously defined" or "purely imaginative," do not "exist," while using abstracts as a gauge for determining that which exist and that which does not.
How would you differentiate the abstracts that are valid and the ones that aren't?
I would also coach them to point out that since we possess and are possessed by our own minds, we'd have to be able to control for an existence independent of our mind's bias--meaning, you isolate it, and you observe it's behavior. How do you perceive without the influence of your mind?That's the reason I asked you this question, which you've yet to answer: "what is your understanding of physicality without the imaginary concepts which help you rationalize it, i.e. mathematics, science, and logic?"
What do you mean by "imaginary" in this context?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Even if the outcome did have proof, there will be someone who challenges said proof
Created:
-->
@Athias
Would this context demand evidence?
Created:
-->
@Athias
If you were able to prove your particular god existed without resorting to general ontological arguments, would you? That is what I’m trying to get at.Yes.
Okay, good. Now, if there were evidence to support your proof of said god, would you use it?
Created: