That illusion is what every single voter gives in every single debate. It is an objective fact that BLM is brilliant and has helped many poor and sidelined individuals, since what they pushed for in society was beneficial to the poor and the segregated.
They have done many good things and the only 'bad things' they can be associated with are rogues saying that they are part of a protest which they have in fact hijacked.
One second, I have explained something wrong about what I quoted from Con vs Pro. I will like to also quote Pro's reply to what Con said. Please let me repost my RFD.
I understand why you like Token considering that the rapper you recommended to someone who doesn't like rap is NF. I would never put him in even my top 20, because to me he is someone who raps but isn't 'rap' or close to the culture or whatever. NF is better than Token in my eyes but both are 'corny' however NF has a more real struggle and I enjoy his content much more despite his tone being annoying.
You like angry rappers and I can understand that is your taste, especially as you like angry/hard rock and stuff. I prefer more 'confident' rappers so to speak. Arrogant rappers who aren't angry are my bread and butter in rap.
It doesn't always have to be deep and political, something like this is dope af for me: https://youtu.be/zXtsGAkyeIo?t=34
Token has jagged flow (which is bad flow) and I don't like the angry/whiny tone of his voice it's even more irritating than Eminem's. That said, I can understand admiring his talent but overall I find him corny, he's very 'upset and passionate' over very little it seems to me. Eminem is actually sick with his bars and puns, Token tends to just spit hard and fast and while his rhyme schemes are interesting he rarely makes me bop along or enjoy his tracks.
A lot of rap is political (more than any genre by far). This is why a lot of it can be irritating, especially to the right-wing as more rap is left-wing supportive than right-wing.
Something like this is pure gold if you're left wing and black: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHqmt-oufow
You won't necessarily relate if you're not but the flow is slick regardless.
It's everywhere. The Abrahamoc religions have a narcissistic God depocted as the sole arbiter of 'true justice' with several sections telling us mortals that we are noone to judge, only he can.
Imabench is strong at building a case, his weakness is in destroying the enemy's case.
Most of his debates consist of very little rebuttal from him to the opponent and far more defense of him towards rebuttals from the opponent.
This is something that isn't easy to take advantage of but if you properly pace yourself and hone in on that his strength is shutting down rebuttals, you will work out how to properly build a case he isn't adept at destroying (which is how I defeated him on this site).
Instinctual is a futile word because instinctive already existed and is more grammatically correct considering that 'distinctive' 'destructive' etc are done by 'ive'.
Did so, what I see is deep sadistic relishing in triggering liberals into frustration and sadness from right wing YouTubers and newspeople. I barely see the same from the Left
Right wingers yell profanities and severely hurtful insults to others far more readily than leftists, outside of rap. No idea where you're inventing these things but I'd like to see the data.
Besides, what you call 'tolerance' is just a word game. I genuinely tolerate Trump supporters and all their hypocrisy and stupidity, what I don't do is admire it or consider it morally valid.
I think they need to have their minds opened up and that they only respond to insults (after all, Trump literally debates by 100% insults 0% logic). So saying 'fuck you for voting Trump' actually is a good thing to do to them, it makes them even pay you some attention and listen to what you have to say.
Yes, I see no issue with me exercising my right to tolerated free speech in saying 'fuck you' to thoss who voted Trump. Are you against the First Amendment?
When Social Democrats and Progressives say that they support tolerance in society, they mean that they want everyone in the society to accept one another and give each other a fair, humane chance to be healthy and prosper. It would make no sense to wholeheartedly 'tolerate' the political factions that act against this outcome. I do tolerate their existence, but I don't need to tolerate their genuine regime.
Tolerating systemic intolerance and segregation is more of an idiotic paradoxical position than the reverse. This becomes very clear wgen you actually understand what tolerance is.
The BoP is to prove they can remain legal while the other is illegal for a sensible reason. Read the debate's description. I met my BoP, ibtelligence 06 is lying
whiteflame isn't an active debater under your definition. I would prove that 'best' has elements to it that you're ignoring and that Oromagi continually takes easy sides on all topics.
What happens when two literally thinkong robots collide? Theg agree on AI demolishing everything u til the universe ends and that therefore cars will go extinct... Lovely logic.
you may think that waiving Round 1 was the right move, I am sorry but you wasted your only chance to dictate where the debate goes and overload me with proactive content. Now, you will be decimated in a swift Round 2 opening when I use your very waiving as proof that Round Earthers are simply ignorant of flat earth theory.
Fauxlaw votes on whims, there's little guaranteed other than that if you stick to decent sourcing he doesn't vote against you for sourcing. He rarely ties points as opposed to the norm of tying most points that all other voters have. I'll vote eventually on this.
I didn't just do that, I even attacked the amoral god as well saying how it can't exist outside of 'everything' it creates. He never once addressed me on that.
My vote is valid.
go ahead and list the contentions, I will explain one by one why they're false and how Pro addressed them.
I did not treat it as a falsism, My RFD was more in-depth than yours.
That illusion is what every single voter gives in every single debate. It is an objective fact that BLM is brilliant and has helped many poor and sidelined individuals, since what they pushed for in society was beneficial to the poor and the segregated.
They have done many good things and the only 'bad things' they can be associated with are rogues saying that they are part of a protest which they have in fact hijacked.
That is how I felt while reading your debate, which was a series of defamation to BLM.
One second, I have explained something wrong about what I quoted from Con vs Pro. I will like to also quote Pro's reply to what Con said. Please let me repost my RFD.
thanks for the compliment, as it came from you.
Make it rated and have a theme/mood and I'll accept.
I meant flexibility of thought, not 'delibility', sigh.
it's not a votebomb, i voted 100% fairly.
bump
Tech is talented but also at times not my cup of tea, I love JMT but that's a bit of an enigma as usually angry rap annoys me.
I understand why you like Token considering that the rapper you recommended to someone who doesn't like rap is NF. I would never put him in even my top 20, because to me he is someone who raps but isn't 'rap' or close to the culture or whatever. NF is better than Token in my eyes but both are 'corny' however NF has a more real struggle and I enjoy his content much more despite his tone being annoying.
You like angry rappers and I can understand that is your taste, especially as you like angry/hard rock and stuff. I prefer more 'confident' rappers so to speak. Arrogant rappers who aren't angry are my bread and butter in rap.
It doesn't always have to be deep and political, something like this is dope af for me: https://youtu.be/zXtsGAkyeIo?t=34
Token has jagged flow (which is bad flow) and I don't like the angry/whiny tone of his voice it's even more irritating than Eminem's. That said, I can understand admiring his talent but overall I find him corny, he's very 'upset and passionate' over very little it seems to me. Eminem is actually sick with his bars and puns, Token tends to just spit hard and fast and while his rhyme schemes are interesting he rarely makes me bop along or enjoy his tracks.
A lot of rap is political (more than any genre by far). This is why a lot of it can be irritating, especially to the right-wing as more rap is left-wing supportive than right-wing.
Something like this is pure gold if you're left wing and black: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHqmt-oufow
You won't necessarily relate if you're not but the flow is slick regardless.
Abrahamic*
It's everywhere. The Abrahamoc religions have a narcissistic God depocted as the sole arbiter of 'true justice' with several sections telling us mortals that we are noone to judge, only he can.
If you cloned me too much, it doesn't matter how evil of a scientist you are, we'd annihilate your construct, break out and take over the world
Imabench is strong at building a case, his weakness is in destroying the enemy's case.
Most of his debates consist of very little rebuttal from him to the opponent and far more defense of him towards rebuttals from the opponent.
This is something that isn't easy to take advantage of but if you properly pace yourself and hone in on that his strength is shutting down rebuttals, you will work out how to properly build a case he isn't adept at destroying (which is how I defeated him on this site).
Instinctual is a futile word because instinctive already existed and is more grammatically correct considering that 'distinctive' 'destructive' etc are done by 'ive'.
explain please?
Sure, whatever you say.
Did so, what I see is deep sadistic relishing in triggering liberals into frustration and sadness from right wing YouTubers and newspeople. I barely see the same from the Left
Right wingers yell profanities and severely hurtful insults to others far more readily than leftists, outside of rap. No idea where you're inventing these things but I'd like to see the data.
No idea where you got the idea that it's exclusively on the left. Trump's entire campaign and debate strategy is what you said the left do.
Besides, what you call 'tolerance' is just a word game. I genuinely tolerate Trump supporters and all their hypocrisy and stupidity, what I don't do is admire it or consider it morally valid.
I think they need to have their minds opened up and that they only respond to insults (after all, Trump literally debates by 100% insults 0% logic). So saying 'fuck you for voting Trump' actually is a good thing to do to them, it makes them even pay you some attention and listen to what you have to say.
I will reason with a Trump supporter but I don't want to waste too much time and energy on the impossible if you catch my drift.
If they're genuinely openminded and I got some time to spare, I'll talk with them about politics.
He will use a different definition of tolerance that means we should tolerate corruption and injustice.
Yes, I see no issue with me exercising my right to tolerated free speech in saying 'fuck you' to thoss who voted Trump. Are you against the First Amendment?
When Social Democrats and Progressives say that they support tolerance in society, they mean that they want everyone in the society to accept one another and give each other a fair, humane chance to be healthy and prosper. It would make no sense to wholeheartedly 'tolerate' the political factions that act against this outcome. I do tolerate their existence, but I don't need to tolerate their genuine regime.
Tolerating systemic intolerance and segregation is more of an idiotic paradoxical position than the reverse. This becomes very clear wgen you actually understand what tolerance is.
As an intelligent person, I can see where he cimes from too; trolling.
You allowed a vote for a literal factual debate that lies about who won. Lmao.
The BoP is to prove they can remain legal while the other is illegal for a sensible reason. Read the debate's description. I met my BoP, ibtelligence 06 is lying
Since you were interested, please take a look if it interests you.
I indeed met my BoP you avoided mentioning my arguments. You also ignored the description of the debate.
Read PM if you want rematch
"Prove what I'm saying is TRUE, NOT FALSE, TRUEEEE."
I love your debating style, very dramatic.
whiteflame isn't an active debater under your definition. I would prove that 'best' has elements to it that you're ignoring and that Oromagi continually takes easy sides on all topics.
What happens when two literally thinkong robots collide? Theg agree on AI demolishing everything u til the universe ends and that therefore cars will go extinct... Lovely logic.
you may think that waiving Round 1 was the right move, I am sorry but you wasted your only chance to dictate where the debate goes and overload me with proactive content. Now, you will be decimated in a swift Round 2 opening when I use your very waiving as proof that Round Earthers are simply ignorant of flat earth theory.
hope you like my rfd
increase char count to 17k and I'll accept. Minimum 17k.
Happy the loss is on his account, he put almost Zero effort into this.
Fauxlaw votes on whims, there's little guaranteed other than that if you stick to decent sourcing he doesn't vote against you for sourcing. He rarely ties points as opposed to the norm of tying most points that all other voters have. I'll vote eventually on this.
I didn't just do that, I even attacked the amoral god as well saying how it can't exist outside of 'everything' it creates. He never once addressed me on that.
you didnt see the vote
don't vote if you didn't read the debate
You just deleted your vote and voted for me while your RFD supports Con.
What do you mean run out of ideas? I did not forfeit the last round.