Totally agree with 'more contention wins' being a faulty judgement system. My specialty is decimating 100 points with 2 brutal fundamental attacks etc.
so, I'm not gonna vote as this is something I am so furiously Pro-on and it has affected people in ways that are unforgivable, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I am so utterly Pro on this topic I don't think I can remove mental rage and bias when I read it. Con's case screams 'slave to Illuminati, moron' even though he's just doing his best probably debating the opposite side of what he really thinks.
If you make it explicit in the R1 that this is not Pro/Con min-wage but pro/con that it needs to be substantially increased, I'll accept and run a K in the sense of the counter-plan having other ways of easing expense on the poor, that encourage them to work for it and make use of it.
That's your heart racing with displeasure and fear, mine's pumping my brain full of high IQ pathways of thinking and adrenaline rush for high-quality thrill.
If you want to, you are blocked because you are a trash voter who is an immovable object.
If an enemy is both non-negotiable and non-defeatable, you either need to make it clear you disapprove, or make it blatant that you "approve" (depending how vengeful the being is).
This guy blocked me to abuse weaker prey. I'm both happy I spoke how I did in this debate and proud to be feared by him/her all at once. Teach them that you can make then sadder and angrier than they make you. Until you become truly sadistic without losing yourself, you either end up a pussy or a bully in life. The balance is a rare thing that beasts like me found.
Con is 100% correct but Pro will 100% win. Once you realise how corrupt those up-top are and how easily they will cover up the assassination of anyone they want dead with a 'glitch accident', it will make you sick to your stomach. Until you realise that (and no, you can't prove it as they control search engines and evidence) then you're left in the dark and hope for the best in handing them the reigns.
As you're dedicate to vote on EVERY SINGLE debate, this is only a one-week period and if you're gonna last minute vote against me I'm losing anyway so please put your vote in for or against.
"It is in this type of crisis that the private sector, namely, major oil & energy companies,"
As if that's the only company applicable to capitalism... I'm sad to see you take the exact angle I hoped you would... This will be much easier than I thought.
Brainpower is required to vote. When you say that he can use one verse that's non-violent to win, you're a complete and utter hypocrite to not apply the same to Con under your own flawed BoP outlook.
someone needs to tell it to your fuckign face; you are absolutely oblivious to who has or has not won a debate, you say it's winnable and nitpick 2 fucking words I didn't say that you would say, it's an utter sham of a voter you are.
I realise I didnt directly address the KKK issue. I'll prove that the states they operated in and entire way they think/thought and operated/operate is anti-democrat and other things too.
Honestly this topic is so broad and severe by how much research is required. Like how do I prove other nations will provide it if the US doesn't and how do I prove that Saudi will engineer Israel's decimation among other things if we cut them as allies? I'll post my argument in R2 even if voters hate me for it.
Totally agree with 'more contention wins' being a faulty judgement system. My specialty is decimating 100 points with 2 brutal fundamental attacks etc.
Thanks for the useful feedback.
Did as you said, simple as I could. Pls vote?
so, I'm not gonna vote as this is something I am so furiously Pro-on and it has affected people in ways that are unforgivable, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I am so utterly Pro on this topic I don't think I can remove mental rage and bias when I read it. Con's case screams 'slave to Illuminati, moron' even though he's just doing his best probably debating the opposite side of what he really thinks.
My counterplan will have trade unions being brought back in full, as its main pillar. Fair game is fair, good luck.
God forbid that the death penalty would be killing me!
If you make it explicit in the R1 that this is not Pro/Con min-wage but pro/con that it needs to be substantially increased, I'll accept and run a K in the sense of the counter-plan having other ways of easing expense on the poor, that encourage them to work for it and make use of it.
How will you punish a Zombie?
Please vote if you have time/
I will eat you alive, no fucking doubt.
Gravity Falls.
That's your heart racing with displeasure and fear, mine's pumping my brain full of high IQ pathways of thinking and adrenaline rush for high-quality thrill.
My point is, you made me cry as real as I am trying out for a lead role in this 'movie'. It's not entirely false, and not entirely true.
As evidence of profile as I see it:
https://i.imgur.com/8OItFnM.png
https://i.imgur.com/W4kGXxp.png
lack o' nerves**
Am I trying out for a lead role in that movie?
Just remember what happens to those that make the hero cry, as the story progresses.
If you want to, you are blocked because you are a trash voter who is an immovable object.
If an enemy is both non-negotiable and non-defeatable, you either need to make it clear you disapprove, or make it blatant that you "approve" (depending how vengeful the being is).
This guy blocked me to abuse weaker prey. I'm both happy I spoke how I did in this debate and proud to be feared by him/her all at once. Teach them that you can make then sadder and angrier than they make you. Until you become truly sadistic without losing yourself, you either end up a pussy or a bully in life. The balance is a rare thing that beasts like me found.
For a beginner, that was phenomenal wordplay.
You sure didn't mind giving me a loss vs Alec with your buddies and intimidating me by various means outside of what's allowed or asked for by me.
Why do you only cry like a bitch when people do it to you?
Blamonkey will be king for a few days on my estimation
Con is 100% correct but Pro will 100% win. Once you realise how corrupt those up-top are and how easily they will cover up the assassination of anyone they want dead with a 'glitch accident', it will make you sick to your stomach. Until you realise that (and no, you can't prove it as they control search engines and evidence) then you're left in the dark and hope for the best in handing them the reigns.
As you're dedicate to vote on EVERY SINGLE debate, this is only a one-week period and if you're gonna last minute vote against me I'm losing anyway so please put your vote in for or against.
The hypocrisy in what he's accusing of vs what he's done to me and others is so hilarious and sickening at the same time.
Two links were wron gin my first 'batch':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJijmfUkbtg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9OA5kkxtMQ
I'll fix it in the next Round.
But unless you're breaking alt-account rules, I'm severely confused who you are and how you know me.
Maybe you are Dermot from CD? You wouldn't fear me if you were Brontoraptor and the others I got beef with there are Socialist-sided.
Interesting, 'somebody' has blocked me.
doesn't lack******
"It is in this type of crisis that the private sector, namely, major oil & energy companies,"
As if that's the only company applicable to capitalism... I'm sad to see you take the exact angle I hoped you would... This will be much easier than I thought.
You need to learn how the fuck to reason. 100 points can be countered by 1 if the logic is correct and displayed well in words.
No, they are fucking well not.
Brainpower is required to vote. When you say that he can use one verse that's non-violent to win, you're a complete and utter hypocrite to not apply the same to Con under your own flawed BoP outlook.
someone needs to tell it to your fuckign face; you are absolutely oblivious to who has or has not won a debate, you say it's winnable and nitpick 2 fucking words I didn't say that you would say, it's an utter sham of a voter you are.
In a world where logicians and scientists are defeated by linguistic magicians, we are in the world of bullshit-being-paramount indeed.
pls vote here when you have time, ty in advance.
If whiteflame talked shit about you, you probably deserved it. He's the most reasonable member of the entire DDO main-membership circle.
you are allowed to debate against what you believe
This is not a debate, this is a semantic, tautologous sh**-show of deception.
Isn't Kant's thing just a rip-off of Aristotle's same thing with a different name?
"was struggling and said Osama was" not "was struggling and Osbama as"
I realise I didnt directly address the KKK issue. I'll prove that the states they operated in and entire way they think/thought and operated/operate is anti-democrat and other things too.
Full force smash to the intellectual-ribs is how I like to take on a Republican Party advocate.
I would explain mod action but that would be a coc violation in itself
Keep at it, will enjoy you behind prison bars.
The thing is, you should be happy this isn't IRL, you'd be in prison by now if what you're saying is true.
This debate can use a well-reasoned vote.
Thanks for the vote and feedback.
Transparent cowardice is still cowardice.
Honestly this topic is so broad and severe by how much research is required. Like how do I prove other nations will provide it if the US doesn't and how do I prove that Saudi will engineer Israel's decimation among other things if we cut them as allies? I'll post my argument in R2 even if voters hate me for it.