In the future check if my opponent is lying before you lie too. I used the Quran so much that it's actually my primary source used for over 50% of citations if you read them.
Since you all three are enabling abusive gang-votes against me that slant the rules in favour of targetted anti-voting I'd at least ask you three to have a better work ethic as voters than as judges of voting in that you vote on this debate especially if you think I have won it. The reason is that there are three guaranteed votes that will slant absolutely anything I said to justify conduct and any source I used to justify source-vote and then will simply refuse to focus on the remainder of arguments and cherry-pick one by me they feel was somewhat defeated by the other side and do the reverse for Pro. These users are MagicAintReal, bifolkal and debatevoter (Alec seems unrelated but does something similar).
Vote moderating is to blame, a maniac with a grudge is a byproduct of a flawed justice system, not something that's enabled or encouraged in a proper one.
If I say in a comments section that I actually believe the opposite and am playing devil's advocate that can't and will never be sufficient reason to vote against me.
I will not try again. The definition of 'intend' is the key to how you'll make this axiomatic and a tautology. That doesn't mean I don't also support the genuine meaning of this resolution.
None of those 3 were Muslim. I am happy for you to vote but I have not addressed that point as I also agree a religion can be peaceful. Islam just happens to have a different end-goal to peace.
Hi guys, I believe my strategy here, of enabling Pro to dictate angles and even some definition stuff, but refusing to budge on BoP and then using my weaker start and Pro's rigid structure against him in R3 isn't bad conduct or fallacious tactics ad Pro still has R3 and R4 to reply toe, but is very good middle-ground baiting and checkmating. Take a read and perhaps vote as well. Thanks in advance, I was nervous of the way I went about this debate but I used the Four-Round amount and my opponents psychology and style to my advantage optimally, I believe.
That aside, tying against you (given our elo difference) will cost me (will reduce) and I also will gain less than I lost vs you in the electronic music battle.
I have lots to lose and lots to make up for here, I put effort in and even prepared for your return making your rebuttals for you and shutting them down. I earned this win and have zero motive to have mercy here and cost myself rating.
You have lost, checkmate and there's no way to counterargue my flawless arguments.
You played dirty as fuck in the people you tagged during my beef and banning on the electronic music first debate. I am not gonna sit here and hand you a win after putting the effort of thinking through all arguements and counterarguments of this.
because there is no way at all an inherent default of the solar system being non-constructed and far too many coincidences and patterns beyond this to imply it was an invented concept either by humans or some alien demigod beings or even God herself.
Not gonna stoop to your level. Can't afford to, given moderation, and you're too easy to bite back harsh given that you never were a remotely relevant debater amongst the vets. Enjoy laughing at me, it's the closest you'll ever get to hurting me in any way; including my debate record, you wannabe Thett.
In the future check if my opponent is lying before you lie too. I used the Quran so much that it's actually my primary source used for over 50% of citations if you read them.
That being said, it's still true that God actively intended it as you implied already.
wow look, you did precisely what I thought you would. xD
You removed the active element of intention meaning that all accidents become intended outcomes by default by God.
Since you all three are enabling abusive gang-votes against me that slant the rules in favour of targetted anti-voting I'd at least ask you three to have a better work ethic as voters than as judges of voting in that you vote on this debate especially if you think I have won it. The reason is that there are three guaranteed votes that will slant absolutely anything I said to justify conduct and any source I used to justify source-vote and then will simply refuse to focus on the remainder of arguments and cherry-pick one by me they feel was somewhat defeated by the other side and do the reverse for Pro. These users are MagicAintReal, bifolkal and debatevoter (Alec seems unrelated but does something similar).
Please vote.
Vote moderating is to blame, a maniac with a grudge is a byproduct of a flawed justice system, not something that's enabled or encouraged in a proper one.
You're excused
I won't need to fight back, soon you'll find another to pick on or you'll get banned from voting. I don't care.
Please do expose the vote mods who enable people like you to vote
Good job, great to see.
Thank you for your advice.
You will fail. I will make sure of it.
It's too late now.
A better analogy would be that you're Rambo and SHE is Rocky Balboa. That is iconic comparison.
Rocky Balboa was a prize-fighter. A showman overall.
He won well and had grit but he was no street fighter.
It definitely is. You have defined it as something much more passive than it usually is.
You've spelled it as 'Southerrn'
If I say in a comments section that I actually believe the opposite and am playing devil's advocate that can't and will never be sufficient reason to vote against me.
I blocked you for several reasons, including how you would vote against me for a comment.
And Islam isn't the people as Pro defined in R2.
It is not a concession. The religion I am referring to isn't Islam.
I will not try again. The definition of 'intend' is the key to how you'll make this axiomatic and a tautology. That doesn't mean I don't also support the genuine meaning of this resolution.
The semantic abuse is likely regarding the word 'intend' but even without that, it's still true.
As a Pagan I fully believe that this is true, especially OT God.
Please challenge me to this on Sunday. I can't debate in the next few days intensely.
None of those 3 were Muslim. I am happy for you to vote but I have not addressed that point as I also agree a religion can be peaceful. Islam just happens to have a different end-goal to peace.
168-174 not 172 sorry
Please see below (my previous comment).
Hi guys, I believe my strategy here, of enabling Pro to dictate angles and even some definition stuff, but refusing to budge on BoP and then using my weaker start and Pro's rigid structure against him in R3 isn't bad conduct or fallacious tactics ad Pro still has R3 and R4 to reply toe, but is very good middle-ground baiting and checkmating. Take a read and perhaps vote as well. Thanks in advance, I was nervous of the way I went about this debate but I used the Four-Round amount and my opponents psychology and style to my advantage optimally, I believe.
Because of how you spoke to me on Hangouts and treat me in general. You friended me under false pretences and I have had enough of it.
>Sick of the elite
>https://kaptur.house.gov/sites/kaptur.house.gov/files/wysiwyg_uploaded/Trump%20Admin%20GS%20Execs.jpg
If you read my R1, I explain how pseudo-democracy is the only time it goes wrong.
That aside, tying against you (given our elo difference) will cost me (will reduce) and I also will gain less than I lost vs you in the electronic music battle.
I have lots to lose and lots to make up for here, I put effort in and even prepared for your return making your rebuttals for you and shutting them down. I earned this win and have zero motive to have mercy here and cost myself rating.
I actually cannot give a single shit more for your inane ramblings about what I am or am not thinking.
You come up with what you want, everyone knows who the irrational madman is between us.
Wylted, you didn't even debate the fucking topic at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfJhMfOPWdE
^ Slight epilepsy warning.
You have lost, checkmate and there's no way to counterargue my flawless arguments.
You played dirty as fuck in the people you tagged during my beef and banning on the electronic music first debate. I am not gonna sit here and hand you a win after putting the effort of thinking through all arguements and counterarguments of this.
No. I won it.
Wylted, I am voting you down on conduct and arguments as is.
because there is no way at all an inherent default of the solar system being non-constructed and far too many coincidences and patterns beyond this to imply it was an invented concept either by humans or some alien demigod beings or even God herself.
Thanks for the brilliant vote.
Do your best. :)
It is designed but to be clear, it's designed by fraudulent organisation of NASA, Roscosmos & Co.
5k chars was why I wasn't more epic in this battle. Thanks for the vote.
It might be
Good response time, ty.
Idk what you think is tied. Enjoy your vote getting removed. I am losing because of that nonsense vote.
You too please
Your duty to vote on this debate is mandatory!!!
Not gonna stoop to your level. Can't afford to, given moderation, and you're too easy to bite back harsh given that you never were a remotely relevant debater amongst the vets. Enjoy laughing at me, it's the closest you'll ever get to hurting me in any way; including my debate record, you wannabe Thett.
I will never understand your taste in music but good that I won! ;) ty for the vote, always honest at least
How do you define 'evidence'? A piece of evidence leading towards a conclusion can be evidence without being conclusive proof in and of itself.