Good luck with your new angle. It will fail and I will disprove myself it need be while turning your case against you while supporting my fourth contention of Round 1 to finish it off.
Before you use that I said 'Islam is peace to achieve war' and that I conceded that it is peace. I will refer to your Nazi analogy and explain how if the aim and purpose of the submission and tranquility is to enable and encourage fierce powers that be, that this is the opposite of peace since you said fighting to achieve peace is actually peace and not war.
suffering and maltreatment are in no way at all objectively evil in and of itself. to a hedonistic capitalist, it's morally right to make others suffer at your pleasure and for the hardworking Christian, suffering and undergoing maltreatment without getting revenge for it is going to be highly moral to do.
Aside from that, you need to prove that any axiom, even that suffering is evil, is objective and not subjective.
I am willing to vote here with detailed critical feedback that I promise no other user can or will do but only if both publicly promise not to salt-vote against me here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/457
Please, I do not need unnecessary beef and will let this be as bsh1 doesn't drag me down in an intentional way on troll debates which I do far more than him so I am not going to be accused of abusive voting.
For the record, I believe supadudz has won this after R1 and I will explain why because there are things bsh1 is doing to his flow and rhyme scheme by repeating the same words and just plain not rhyming at all that become fairly unforgivable to an experienced analyst of rap. He is making very good puns and annihilates supadudz in that but there is a lot more to rap than puns and I think you need to stop listening to Nicki Minaj, the pun-specialist of the rap game and listen to more flow experts etc. Your current style is not as good as you may think but also Supa you make frequent errors in flow despite being truer to rap's unwritten rules than bsh1.
doesn't matter, you have provided 0 objective way to measure an overall better debater. I will just let the voters decide, tagged please observe that Alec just countered me with mentioning other stats but offered 0 way to convert that into an actual 'better debater' capacity in any overall, objective sense.
I am aware bsh1 didn't , on that account, win due to the glitch. If you bring his other account that comes into play and you also need to see what i said about the voting moderation during his rise.
Virtuoso is being somewhat of a dick to you IMO considering that it's clear you're new here and didn't quite catch onto the side switching stuff and whatever but there's not escaping it. Virt sacrifices honour, gains some rating, good for him or bad for him depending which matters more.
In Round 1 Post that Rule 2 was accidentally pasted and I will not troll you by risking posting nothing in Round 3 and saying to give me the conduct point. That's a promise.
Actually I think that if I factor in the brainwashing you have received to believe in monogamy as the default and as a good thing, then sure you're still a good voter overall. Good RFD but for you that's subpar RFD, I've seen you truly follow an argument but you struggled with mine or so I think.
Good luck with your new angle. It will fail and I will disprove myself it need be while turning your case against you while supporting my fourth contention of Round 1 to finish it off.
Before you use that I said 'Islam is peace to achieve war' and that I conceded that it is peace. I will refer to your Nazi analogy and explain how if the aim and purpose of the submission and tranquility is to enable and encourage fierce powers that be, that this is the opposite of peace since you said fighting to achieve peace is actually peace and not war.
Thought he misspelled Mueller as some kind of trap.
wrote 'none of these' not wrong but 'wrote'*******
I believe it's coding (we are in a simulation).
One for the 'epic short debate' hall of fame section that will be made just for me. :)
Liar
Name them
Actually the victor is always on the right side of history.
In fact, if willing, you guys too please.
Would appreciate a vote here.
I am confused how you think that plays into homeostasis. Agony is irrelevant to physical decay.
The vegetable point was extremely significant. Do we value your homeostasis or thr vegetable's... Why is homeostasis objectively right?
Due to the views and ideology* my auto-correct is to blame...
Suffering isn't even homeostasis related.
suffering and maltreatment are in no way at all objectively evil in and of itself. to a hedonistic capitalist, it's morally right to make others suffer at your pleasure and for the hardworking Christian, suffering and undergoing maltreatment without getting revenge for it is going to be highly moral to do.
Aside from that, you need to prove that any axiom, even that suffering is evil, is objective and not subjective.
It's a continuous chain of finite units. Not a stream, the stream is an illusion.
Do not accept this debate. This is genuinely correct.
Both of you need to learn flow and rhyme scheme above all else. PM me for some god tier raps if you want to learn.
Pro but there's a fair share of antiproof that I need to produce.
It was BRAND NEW data. He only beat me because only one biased voter voted on the debate on the environment, there's much more to this than you think.
There's no point reasoning with you on your votes, I've come to learn that.
You're o ly heating me by not voting but do what you want.
He brought new points when I couldn't respond.
We also agree on a few other things, you just don't know my stances too well as they are very context-based/situational.
I don't really think you are correct on your judgements.
Why did my songs irritate you so much?
on DDO this exact side switching can happen. Admittedly there the name alters not just the colour.
I think you are referring to me as Pro?
There is a lot more to say but I'm not going to vote unless there is acceptance to stop a bullshit feud based on it
I am willing to vote here with detailed critical feedback that I promise no other user can or will do but only if both publicly promise not to salt-vote against me here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/457
Please, I do not need unnecessary beef and will let this be as bsh1 doesn't drag me down in an intentional way on troll debates which I do far more than him so I am not going to be accused of abusive voting.
For the record, I believe supadudz has won this after R1 and I will explain why because there are things bsh1 is doing to his flow and rhyme scheme by repeating the same words and just plain not rhyming at all that become fairly unforgivable to an experienced analyst of rap. He is making very good puns and annihilates supadudz in that but there is a lot more to rap than puns and I think you need to stop listening to Nicki Minaj, the pun-specialist of the rap game and listen to more flow experts etc. Your current style is not as good as you may think but also Supa you make frequent errors in flow despite being truer to rap's unwritten rules than bsh1.
doesn't matter, you have provided 0 objective way to measure an overall better debater. I will just let the voters decide, tagged please observe that Alec just countered me with mentioning other stats but offered 0 way to convert that into an actual 'better debater' capacity in any overall, objective sense.
I am aware bsh1 didn't , on that account, win due to the glitch. If you bring his other account that comes into play and you also need to see what i said about the voting moderation during his rise.
Yes it wasn't me you joke of a site investigator.
Proof of something
Here is the debate list next to leaderboard:
https://i.imgur.com/7OjWynC.png
Please Americans search here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtN5BgqZdoE
If Tech N9ne - in my head is unavailable please search it on youtube...
Whatever, I want people to hear god-tier rap, so listen. Vote for or against np.
You want a 2 round debate?! LOL OK
Virtuoso is being somewhat of a dick to you IMO considering that it's clear you're new here and didn't quite catch onto the side switching stuff and whatever but there's not escaping it. Virt sacrifices honour, gains some rating, good for him or bad for him depending which matters more.
That's all to say, life is tough.
Also, clarify that you meant 'than' not 'then' in the Resolution. I will agree with the new spelling and move on with the proper debate we are having.
In Round 1 Post that Rule 2 was accidentally pasted and I will not troll you by risking posting nothing in Round 3 and saying to give me the conduct point. That's a promise.
enjoy
Bless your souls and ears. Seems neither of us repeated our own even though we could!
SHEEEEEET THIS GETTING GOOD SETTLE IN AND RUIN MY RATING (or orgasm from your eardrums and vote for me ;D)
You don't know how deep my roots go but when it comes to internet debating, I got those connex you dont even know boii.
;)
I look forward to Type1 ruining my rating once and for all unless you vote honestly and I do indeed please you all. ;)
This is a much more interesting read than I thought it would be from the topic. Will be voting. :)
Simple and effective, put a smirk on my face too.
Actually I think that if I factor in the brainwashing you have received to believe in monogamy as the default and as a good thing, then sure you're still a good voter overall. Good RFD but for you that's subpar RFD, I've seen you truly follow an argument but you struggled with mine or so I think.