Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
There are many medium IQ women, you may go 'oh duh there's also many medium IQ men'... Actually, not quite as many at all.
IQ has a fairly large genetic component, and some of the genes involved are x-linked. What that means is that men (at least, men with XY chromosomes) have only one copy of them, whereas women (those with XX) have two. The genetic aspects of intelligence are an interplay of all those genes and they tend to “average out” in the sense that extreme highs and lows of intelligence depend on getting the “best” or “worst” versions of each gene across all the genes and copies.Women, with two X chromosomes, get more copies of some genes, which means they are less likely to get an extreme in either direction. Men only have one copy of some genes, so the chance of an extreme combination is higher. As a result, while the mean IQ for men and women is generally similar, men have a higher standard deviation and so a wider spread of values with more men in the extreme high and extreme low scores, on average.
Men are more diverse than women are in most things other than fashion.
If you even include fashion and focus on fashion that's natural (as in natural hair on face, natural way of toning one's body, natural posture variation) men again have more variation than women. There is something both genetic and social that leads to males growing up more stratified than women and it makes a lot of sense if you think of the role they played while we evolved but why it's maintained in spite of feminism is that women don't have a reason to want to fight it, if anything men might.
So, over time, the need for women to bet the social gel and 'supporters' hasn't reduced, they don't tend to want hyper-specialised roles in anything (I said tend to, not any hard and fast rule here at all). They support 'jack of all trades' type work in a professional setting and the best at any specialty is typically a male, across the board outside of the arts and perhaps live interpretation/translation as these accentuate female lateral thinking intelligence which is able to dip in and out of various subjects at once and such.
I am going to now shift into what the title of this thread is.
The title of this thread is about high value women and high value men. I believe firmly there are more very high value men than very high value women out there and more very low value men that are completely undesirable to all straight women and even gay men than the inverse (low value women).
The reason I believe this is just as true there as with IQ is that men who are unappealing tend to embrace it in ways even the most ardent 'I'm an independent woman, fuck the patriarchy' women don't really branch away from. All women want to feel beautiful, all women want to feel desired (not sexually necessarily but I mean their presence desired). There exist men that have 0 intention at all of feeling desired, they don't lash out in response to it, they just totally lack the care for socialisation altogether.
If you think I'm being unfairly sexist, why is it you can find me plenty of male hermits totally satisfied with their completely solitary life but you probably can find me precisely zero female equivalents?
The reason is that women all actively want to be wanted, so this firstly explains why the extreme 'low value' end tends to 'correct themselves' to some degree with adapting their accent, makeup etc. I am not saying 0% are low value and happy being it, I am saying the percent is severely low and those that are find other ways to be wanted. Since I do believe only males exist that have no desire to be wanted and desired, I think that this means that women who are severely low value even if dedicated to die single and totally satisfied with their sex toys or totally asexual, tend to unintentionally 'correct' their behaviour and looks as their life progresses simply out of an involuntary urge to feel wanted and seen as beautiful.
This, however, does not explain the other end of this sexist idea. Why are there more extremely high value males than the equivalent in females? This is a much harsher truth and if you deny it that's totally fine. I am here to be proven wrong even.
When men are high value, they tend to develop an ego relating to it. Women do the same thing but the problem is this leads to them involuntarily acting less feminine and less high value in a womanly way. If you, for instance, imagine a woman that's super fit, super good looking, has high empathy and despite said empathy is not some humble pushover in the slightest and knows her worth in the dating market, is she going to operate in a feminine or masculine way? Of course, she will operate like a male player does and the problem is even she doesn't mean to do that. She wants to feel in over her head with a man that is too good to be true that grounds her and makes her feel fulfilled being his feminine, supportive nurturer. She wants to have fun with him, let him take the lead and entertain her, guide her and be the light in her life as she tries her best to fuel said flame and enjoy its burn. This is what she wants but to be that and realise she is one of the most desired flame-fuellers around is a major problem.
This problem in human beings stems from the fact that we are one of the only animals, not just mammals but all animal species in the entire animal kingdom other than insects and invertibrae to have more typically expected beauty and desirability from our females than our males. If you think I'm bullshitting, imagine for a moment the typical female of any ethnicity. Now, imagine the typical male of that same ethnicity. You don't need to be very bisexual to realise that the women is almost definitely appealing while the man you imagined was not only harder to imagine but also hard to pinpoint because a lot of things about a guy that is preferred makes him atypical. In contrast, I want you to imagine a female dog (not a pun) of whatever breed you like the most, now imagine a male dog of that same breed. Almost everything in the male will be more defined and easier to pinpoint as striking, majestic, alluring, whereas the female has probably got the more 'background character' look. In humans the typical male is very varied to begin with and the average almost barely exists. Typical females exist within every ethnicity and excluding the variation in skin tone specifically and hair colouring variance, you can generally imagine 'her' with ease because enough females actually try to fit that or end up fitting that.
If I am confusing you on what the fuck I am saying, I want you to stick to very easy species like lions, peacocks or gorillas. In lions and gorillas the males are very defined, the females are very undefined. You can easily imagine a very 'male' gorilla and what that entails, same with lion and in other species it's still true (other than humans) but the females of those species are more close to each other very extremely even. The reason this is important to understand is that while that's true in humans under my theory, what's different is that females try so much more to be beautiful and high value in the first place.
Female donkeys are not fighting hard to impress the males, it's always the other way around. Humans have the competition work both ways around and actually end up with males going after the females that impress them most often enough that the term 'simp' for all other species (except insects and invertibrae) would refer to the females but for humans was aimed at males. In summary, most, not all, women can only be so high value among our species before they push over into being the masculine lion/silverback-gorilla type in their aura rather than the feminine being seeking to fuel the flame that I referred to before. Peacocks, lions and gorillas make it much clearer what exactly I am saying here.
The problem then becomes if you have a very high value woman, only she can bear the child so in polyamory that has 1 apex female and many males, it doesn't work like insects or rats can work, the reason is that our women have 1 child and it's a very demanding process even after the pregnancy. That means only for the sake of 'love' can that operate and if so she's going to have to share the men anyway unless they want to truly swap gender roles or hire babysitters and not really do the parenting. I am not saying relationships revolve around family and children as such but on the basic level of how we make high value mean things for each gender, it does.
A high value male is able to push to be apex more often than the equivalent in female because the way he carries himself, the cockiness, steadfastness, self-assuredness etc. if combined with high enough responsibility and empathy such that he isn't a total jackass but just half a jackass who can tone it down for those he's close to enough of the time, is a masculine beast that the women with chemistry could indeed feel fulfilled by. On the other hand, women that push to be high value and succeed end up carrying themselves in a very masculine way as just described and that instantly values them back towards the mean/median (often enough for it to result in a medium-value majority more severe than in men, not all the time but often enough).
Created:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Sun Tzu, The Art of War, trans. Samuel B. Griffith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963), 77.
Created:
Posted in:
Gay men want to have sex with men because they have penises not because they're feminine or masculine. Just like lesbians are attracted to each other because they don't have penises.
transphobia
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Not a problem for me whatsoever. I know statistically by my own measurements of reads (since I judge by my votes at the end of day periods as some votes are purely reaction tests that I pretend are scumreads) how often I'm correct or not, I've even DMd Wylted a read I have on his ongoing game. I am allowed to say that as I'm not in the game. That read includes both scum and 2 solid townreads I have. I sent the DM in Discord so I can tell you as that PM doxxing rule firstly doesn't cover if you do it offsite and secondly if I myself expose only what I said/sent.
I know the rules to the letter almost and I know there is a major gaping loophole in the rules that let people abuse each other freely in mafia games. I did what I did to prove it, me not being punished for genuinely verbally abusing Pie is something you don't realise is the proof you need to start a revolution that should stem from how put off you are that the mods stood by and allowed it.
That is what I felt too in the past here. They allow bullying in those games, it's wrong. So, rather than focus only on me, realise the bigger problem.
I don't need to play even 1 more game of mafia to know I play it better than others here, I can see how often I towntell, how often I accurately read and such and trust me it's more often than any other user on this website, by far, That2user is second place to me.
As for why I'd want to compete in what Badger offers, I want to see how much of my skill is to do with how my way of playing forces out tells in others and how much of my skill is solely reading capacity where I didn't make the tells happen at a high frequency by my activity.
What you are saying is an actual tournament of sorts, how would that work? Who gets eliminated?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
can't just ban me, I will be polite if there is enforcement for others being rude.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I don't agree with animal abuse, but I do believe that animal are not subject to any rights, because they wouldn't even understand them, if they had them. If animals had rights, and someone took those rights away from them, they wouldn't know, wouldn't care, and couldn't say anything either way.It's the equivalent to reading rights to an animal. It's pointless.
Would you say this about mentally disabled humans and very young children?
Created:
Posted in:
I am willing to participate just to prove objectively how superior my reading is to others here.
I will prefer this to be a long experiment, I am far more edged out when having gotten the sense of the meta of others.
I did not participate in DDO Mafia almost at all, due to being banned. The way I did was offsite a couple times.
Created:
You don't do enough here to diss, what do you want me to exactly rap about against you? We don't really have a severe rivalry.
Created:
There's like 2 things to diss and I don't want to go into either.
The first is your approach to age of consent, the second is that you backed the loser year 1 and that can backfire on me.
I don't have ammo to win the battle even if I ignore that I don't want to dig into you. I also don't know what you want to do really, if you want permission to insult me and make it rhyme you clearly have baggage about me which could be better dealt with either privately or with you stating your issues with me.
I have wanted to clear things up with you and brutal for some time anyway, your 2 votes would have tied that election for instance.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Enlighten us more how much you know about Islam.
As for me, I know full well that they think the disciples are partly lied about and that the Bible is unreliable scripture. They believe they existed, such as Timothy and Matthew, but they do not believe the disciples ever got to write the Bible and instead that their teachings and words were changed over time severely, including event narrations.
Jesus was a somewhat deluded prophet in their eyes who was tricked by others to assume he was the chosen one when really Muhammad would be. Jesus was not supernatural, meaning the curing of the blind man and sharing of the bread had to be lies along with a lot of the rest of the Bible.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
Theme Song:
Yellow Claw, Juyen Sebulba & Sihk - Bassgod (Ft. Rvmengirl) (DYSOMIA Remix)
Theme Character:
Sam Gamgee from LOTR
The loyal Sam consistently serves as a foil to all of the grandeur and earthshaking events that take place in The Lord of the Rings. Some readers may find Sam’s folksy wisdom and extreme devotion to Frodo somewhat cloying, but these traits do allow Tolkien to keep a little bit of the flavor of the Shire with the Fellowship as it moves toward the dark land of Mordor. Sam is much more the typical Hobbit than Frodo, though Sam, too, displays a great curiosity about the world beyond the Shire, especially Elves. Sam is shy and somewhat awkward socially, but he is ferocious in a fight and clever and quick on his feet. His speech consistently has a modest, awestruck tone. Tolkien, for instance, speaks through Sam when he wishes to capture the particular grace of the Elves simply and directly. Sam also serves as a foil for Frodo’s melancholy and fatalism. When Frodo becomes increasingly preoccupied with the great burden of the Ring, he comes to rely more and more on Sam for help. Indeed, throughout even the lowest and most hopeless points of the journey, Sam remains relentlessly pragmatic and optimistic. If it is Frodo’s duty to “carry” the Ring, it is often Sam’s duty to carry Frodo.
I don't know you very well at all, I can't really relate it to the description more.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Theme Song:
Brand X Music - King's Gambit
Theme Character:
Yumeko Jabami (蛇喰 夢子) is the main protagonist of Kakegurui - Compulsive Gambler.
Yumeko is shown to be a very upbeat and charismatic character who consistently attracts the affection or interest of people around her, usually making a big scene. Not only is she able to befriend those who previously disliked her, she is able to catch the attention of the entire student body. She does just that on her very first day of school and manages to continue doing so on nearly a daily basis. Every time she notices an opponent cheating in games, her button gets switched to a bloodthirsty side of her, usually seen when her eyes turn red and she frightens her opponents.
Though she is typically very friendly, she abstains from acting this way when she uses her perceptiveness to expose her classmates' cheating. She is capable of doing this even after only a couple of rounds of gambling, as she is easily able to decipher what strategies and tricks they are using to skew the game in their favor. While doing this, she may unabashedly condemn the other player and their ways, preferring honesty over politeness in such cases.
Despite the disadvantage she faces when others cheat, she does not concede. This is largely due to the fact that she does not seem to experience fear or anxiety from taking risks. In fact, it gives her a thrill. Because of this, she tends to take high-risk bets in gambles, even if she has nothing to rely on but luck. Though this can sometimes end in her loss, she is emotionally unaffected by the results; she simply uses her loss or gains as a means to further indulge her gambling habit. She also wants to make her friends feel the same rush as she does. So while her pushing them into risky gambles might seem irresponsible, she actually means it well.
She seems to be fairly aware of her eccentricities and that her way of gambling doesn't follow normal conduct. As such she rejoices when people support her or encourage her, especially those close to her, greatly valuing their friendship, albeit in her own ways. Despite the obvious joy and pleasure gambling gives her, Yumeko rationally understands that her behavior is immoral and depraved; having admitted that she feels absolutely no remorse or sympathy for the people she has defeated and ruined in a gamble. However despite her lack of remorse of destroying others to feed her gambling addiction, Yumeko has admitted that she instead feels guilty for her inability to sympathize with her victims.
As seen during her first gambles, Yumeko has shown to possess above average and near superhuman levels of senses, memory and observation that only increases her gambling abilities combined with her intelligence. Having been able to easily detect the tiny details within modified cards after only a few glances and apparently tell the difference of a six shooter gun was loaded or not by feeling the small gram weight difference between a unloaded gun and a loaded one.
My description
The risk taker to a whole other level, calculated yet insane to the core, is he trying? Is she there? Is she a tulpa? What is this entity? How to read the Wylted? How to predict its next move?
You cannot, you will never know if he's playing to lose, you will never know if he's planning far ahead of you until the result is revealed and all is too late.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405_2
The law that you were supposed to enforce and uphold disproves you.
There is always a leniency for a panicking person to be arrested bolting and resisting arrest, doesn't mean you need to smash them up immediately or kill them. Simple idea. Not based on race.
Created:
Posted in:
Levels of stupidity and prejudice in this thread surpass my expectations.
The thread's title is clearly semantically defunct anyway, an event cannot be an attraction. As for what happens at these events, be specific to the action and the answer will appear for itself.
It is okay to state that you don't want children exposed to something that isn't specifically pedophilic because of what you think it does to them psychologically and spiritually. That is acceptable for you to claim, at the very least. It is not okay to say because you don't like how those in drag dance and act that they are actually being pedophilic.
It is extremely important to understand the accusation you are making and how utterly serious it is if true. You can oppose the events, you can oppose it allowing people below a certain age and all of that but you are using a very severe word and need to understand what you are really saying.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
I have access to the Bible sure, not everyone does, especially in Islamic nations. They only are allowed to read it as children by acknowledging it is a semi fictional prequel and only Jesus and Mary are the real characters.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Then god is a jackass for not giving everyone fair exposure to the facts.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Tell me, how did countries turn Christian?
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
As plenty of pagan ancestors would tell you, it's truer than you'd believe.
Created:
Illuminati puppet acting out. Don't worry it will be put in line soon.
Yes, I assumed its pronouns are it. In the future they will replace these silly primate public figures with perfectly tame AI.
That will be when they truly have won.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Huge need for it. I knew this stuff already, I also see why it is bs and why it works to traumatise people into obedience and peer pressure.
I actually held back on the insulting, just cut to the main points.
Created:
Lots to say to this, none of it respectful.
Enjoy believing in your chosen fairytale, I sincerely mean that. In the end we all meed some fantasy to cope in life but why Jesus? Simple, there is no reason.
A modern day Jesus would be in an asylum for his schizophrenia.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
See above, forgot to tag you.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
You and sidewalker are truly showing to the highest level of hilarity that you didn't watch her video.
It was an intelligent, eloquent black woman telling others to feel free to speak using AAVE. She challenged the cancellers.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Encouraging mods to violate report anonymity.
Stellar performance.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
It isn't the being prenant that made them happy it was that they are slowly being told not to enjoy being feminine and men being told the same for being masculine.
Women have certain hormones and brain structure that leads to them fulfilling certain roles better more often. I do not mean housewife role itself, I refer to niches, ways of acting etc The fact we are cancelled and scared to say that hurts both genders (or I guess all 7 or who knows how many).
Created:
Posted in:
Let us hear your excuses Ramshutu, for why you were such an inactive, useless member if the website the past 3 years.
Let us hear the excuse for why the only way you know how to interact here is to tear others down while pretending you are exposing them fir doing it.
Entertain us. Good boy. Say something funny. Do not try to say something smart or worthwhile, you have 1 purpose here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
That has nothing to do with Ramshutu and his bratty nonsense.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Are you stupid, TWS and I are totally agreeing with her...
Wow, that was just straight up ignorance start to end.
Created:
Posted in:
Yeah but on another website, you will get the genuine idiots here to just vote for you.
You could say that I am a tomato and so red and they would just vote you.
It is fucking stupid.
Also you have been gone for like 3 fucking years, what is there to diss you werent even around to give me much ammo to diss or use.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
If you had even the remotest genuine concern, you would research what hate speech laws are and what other developed nations than US have already succeeded to result in severe fines, not just social isolation and career loss.
You didn't bother searching how enforcement against cultural appropriation occurs. You are lazy and just here to gaslight and ridicule.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
Wow jacking my logic while not accrediting (or was that a coincidence)
Created:
Posted in:
Your comebacks are so cringe man, try that on any other website and you'll be laughed out the room, only here that cringe shit works because you have guys so absent of wit cheering each other on.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Yeah. You can lose your job for it and have your life ruined. Banned on any social media platform etc
Why would I get someone to do this just to prove it to you lol, thats ridiculous. Nobody would ruin their life just to prove it to you, on demand for a specific cancellable thing.
If you do not know, try it out if you are white, get your life ruined.
Created:
-->
@thett3
You confuse EQ with IQ btw.
Created:
-->
@thett3
I agree with only 1 thing you said, if it is 1 woman and many men it can get really toxic really fast.
I am actually a bit of a misandrist in that sense and have no hesitation to say that men are fucking toxic beings without women.
The worst levels of severe bullying have been done in all boys schools and all male frats, most often.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
And they teach that at school, that Christians are real.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Gay people are real, whether you believe it or not.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Well, for starters. You don't want to love any of these women. You don't want to commit to them. You don't want to let them completely assimilate to your life and be the most intimate person to you.
I will tackle this in two ways, the first will be whataboutism because it is important to realise the flip side.
1. Whataboutism
First what about them gaining from each other? I am confused why you assume they would not be each other's long term wife and best friend. Secondly, even if they are not, the other lets both of us not need to be there 24/7 for the other because that other partner is bonding and handling them while we do something else.
Also there are so many like me that solely go for one because they conform, forever having that urge for more and lying to their partner. I am certain I want this and the urge will not disappear.
2. Committing
So, you are making this specific to me but ignore any nuance. Firstly, I never deceive a partner about it and I am unsure what you would want me to say or do to commit more than I do. I always make sure they are okay with it first and often wait a whole month minimum to ever seek more but I am actually new to fully embracing it. It took years to even be sure I wanted it and that it was so much more than just a threesome fetish.
I totally commit. I chat about everything with my partner, we become each other's best friend and as I am the leader of the dynamic (I am typically the more dominant partner both in and out of sex, it is just how I am) I even make sure she tells me what is upsetting her when I spot clues she is upset about something or hiding things she assumes I do not want to be burdened with.
That said, I am not some angel. I am not in this on a selfless mission, I have needs and I do not mean sex itself. I mean, if she is a bad listener, does not really care for me but just a male partner that happens to be me etc, I am not afraid to breakup and sometimes all is fine but we have no chemistry and passion. I take relationships extremely serious, I do commit and I am there for my partner and demand the reverse. I actually want 2 partners so I am less demanding and shit to 1 who maybe is bad at providing one thing the other does. One may be far better for mt debating, intellectual side and needs, the other for my emotional ones.
They would become each other's partner too. I would truly want them to get along and it being a team.
So. Yeah. You don't actually value any of them. You just want to collect them, like trophies.
This is why i set an upper limit of 2 serious maybe 3. It is not at all a game of that.
And they don't want to love or value you. You're just another item to them. If they loved you, they'd want to commit to you. They'd want to share their life with you and make you their priority. But seeing as they also want to share you, then it really means nothing at all. There's no intimacy, no commitment, no real love.
I have not actually had too much experience specifically with this because I am patient and cautious and discuss a lot already in the first week of a potential gf. So, only rarely have I been beyond 2 weeks in with a partner who indeed as you say was a female player that used me and ditched.
It also somewhat recently (relative to my life) that I took the introspective time to fully, truly know that polyamory is a genuine need in me, a true goal, not an excuse for anything. I actually never have cheated, I have instead had threesome urges that over time I realised were far deeper and poly urges and actually had led to breakups before because I told her I still lusted others and realised it is terrible to keep from people.
You also don't think you are man enough to stick to one woman. You think you need multiple trophies to make you happy. This is a very toxic self image. And it won't lead to happiness. They feel the same way. They'd rather collect endless shallow, meaningless, non-committal relationships rather than find someone worth committing to and having an amazing, personal, intimate life with.
Not sure what this means. You define manhood on monogamy and I am confused what the other part means, I do not go for women who want many others (esp other males) at all and I also dont want many others.
So. Yeah. You all have a low opinion of each other and yourselves in this scenario.
I think you have a super simplistic idea of polyamory.
Created:
-->
@amandragon01
My primary issue would be the double standard. If you can have more than one partner why can't your partners?
Firstly if you are being very specific to me, we would have a wife together eventually. It would ve bisexual for the women.
I genuinely would prefer my wife is not purely hetero but bi/pan. That said, the real question you asked is why can she not walk away? She can. I can too. The matter of her wanting other men rarely comes up. I know there are poly women who always want more and that is not what I go for, I do not engage with them as more than friends at most because I know they are hookup material for me at most in the sexual and intimate department.
The other element is not males but dominance. I would not want a partner, male or female, that was as dominant as me. We would be thorns in each other's sides whereas two submissive partners can viably coexist without much clashing depending on a few things.
Created:
-->
@thett3
Educated and wealthy families almost universally raise their kids in stable two parent households. It’s possible that they’re unenlightened and backwards but I think it’s more likely that it’s just a social model that works
What do you define as a parent?
They tend to use other relatives, a babysitter, a cleaner, a hired tutor and all sorts of staff to not actually be 2 parents but either a single side parent in the permanent babysitter or three at the very least.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
What low opinion of me and my wife or gf is involved?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Minors use that shower.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405_2
I totally agree. Short of the N-word the fact you can be cancelled for enjoying speaking and even dressing a certain way is where cancel culture is actually being purely racist against white people.
If black people dress, walk and talk like white people, nobody says it is racist.
Created:
Posted in:
Anyone with a well functioning brain can see the issue, only Austin and I spoke up about it though.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
The last 2 stanzas from Wylted are plagirised from me:
You look so stupid rn I feel bad for you.
Created: