Total posts: 866
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Id rather live in any country where it is illegal to say you are fine with genocide or school shootings than a depraved 1st amendment land.
Then you don't have an American brain (you're biologically American, but you identify as some other nationality). Transition into that nationality.
And get off of DART then; you need free speech to comment here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Guns can help reduce the autistic population among us.
I don't care about other autistic people because they're strangers. Autistic people don't care about other autistic people because they're strangers. We're incredibly individualistic and selfish.
Blacks care about other blacks. Latinos care about other Latinos. Jews care about other Jews. Autistic people don't care about other autistic people.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Chris Rock is not on the spectrum, he has Nonverbal Learning Disability (NVLD), he's a comedian, he makes jokes.
I was wrong. Still though; he's peacefully neurodivergent and the main point still stands.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
As a Yemeni, there’s no contest.You don’t measure freedom in lattes or train schedules. You measure it in whether someone can tell you how to live, think, speak, or defend your family and cultural traditions. And in Yemen, no one can, not the state, not the West, and certainly not 10 Downing street.
I'm curious:
- Are you pure, 100% ethnic Yemeni or are you like half white or something (which may explain your pro whiteness)?
- Yemen doesn't have free speech protections. It's a Shariah law country.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Stalin killed 20 million of his own people and Mao killed 30 million of his own people. That's what can happen without the 2nd Amendment.
Yemen has a 2nd amendment; did it protect their country from a tyrannical government? Compare that to the UK (no 2nd amendment).
Would you rather live in the UK or Yemen?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
He talks shit and blames it on Autism all the time
Elon Musk: Autistic and a Nazi. Cuts government spending quickly; doesn't care if people suffer.
Chris Rock: Autistic and hates soft a's (except he actually uses the N word). He doesn't care if it offends blacktivists.
Chris Rock - Black People VS. Niggaz (Bring the Pain 1996). This video was made before Trump came along. Chris Rock says he wishes they would let him join the KKK.
When you go to a KKK rally; pretty much everyone there is autistic. Neurotypical people don't join the KKK because they care what others think about them wrt political ideology.
One autistic guy I met on the internet even said it's fine for a white man to rape a Mexican woman.
Autistic people aren't known for being empathetic or for talking with a filter.
Autistic people are extremely politically incorrect.
So it's funny to me how leftists claim they support the autistic community; when autistic people get power, they act like Chris Rock and Elon Musk because they flat out don't have empathy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
You can try. You know what they say about denial.
What do they say about it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Posts like your OP are exactly why Europe will always be more Christian at its core (not necessarily on paper) than US pretends to be.
I'm not religious, so IDGAF about the bible.
Your values are satanic.
If Satanism happens to agree with me here, then IDGAF. I disagree with Satanism on waiting until marriage, but I 100% agree on gun rights.
Created:
Posted in:
I want to keep my gun rights and I don't care if 2000 children die from mass shootings a year.
This is not satire, but if it makes you feel uncomfterable, then you should support banning all guns. But I'm not empathetic because I'm autistic, so I won't want to ban all guns.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
You are what anyone accuses you of being.
I would deny this claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
And Obama's was about double.
But a lot of people will get offended that aren't that level of stupid.
Nobody with Obama's IQ or higher gets offended at the good type of Xenephobia.
Created:
Posted in:
Yes (but only the good kind of Xenephobe):
The good type of xenophobia:
The bad type of xenophobia:
Overview-rise-power-Adolf-Hitler.jpg (1920×1081) (this guy has a big nose)
If you can't tell the difference, then your IQ is lower than Barack Obama's.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Also I wasnt sassy. I wasnt sarcastic or meaning it as a joke.
Fine; then why can't non Catholics have an opinion on the Pope?
You are posting often like a racist guy, ive seen your posts.
It depends on how you define, "racist".
I believe that we should abolish ICE (pro Hispanic), burn the confederate flag (pro black), end Affirmative Action (pro Asian), and I want to ban DKIL speech and I'm pro Israel (Pro Jew). At the same time, the racial groups are not equal; they should be treated equally under the law, but every race has their pros and cons relative to the other. I believe in busting people's balls for an ethnicity; people can bust my balls over my ethnicity too; IDGAF!
The good type of xenophobia:
The bad type of xenophobia:
If you are not Cath stay out of our Papacy and why I think an african pope is coming.
Why? It's not like either one of us can vote on the new pope. My dialogue about him does not change the Catholic Church election.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Father is fierce, Jesus is sassy.
Does "Turn the other cheek" seem sassy? No; it seems solemn.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
- Sympathy involves feeling sorry or pity for someone.
- Empathy involves understanding and sharing someone’s feelings.
If you share the feelings of a starving African child unconditionally, then you adopt them.
I understand that people suffer; I just don't share in those emotions and I don't care too because then I would turn into acting like a crying homosexual. Hundreds of millions of people suffer very horribly annually. Do I want to share their feelings? Fuck no. That's for the following groups:
- Women
- Gays
- Leftists
- Neurotypical RINOs that don't realize they're leftists.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
If you arent catholic stay out of it.
Was Jesus sassy like this?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
I did. It's one sentence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Too much empathy is not a thing, too much sympathy is.
Then adopt a child from Somalia; if you refuse, then your convinence and life and time matters more to you than the child's life (aka, your empathy is finite).
Created:
Posted in:
@fauxlaw
I do not respond to filth. You are selling filth. Stop it, petulant child.
What a communist!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
I was being curious; your angry response doesn't sound very Jesus like now does it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Exceptions do exist; some Jews aren't into arguing; but you live enough; you notice patterns.
Jews like arguing; Latinos love to party; Whites are Vanilla and ambitious; Jews are extremely vanilla despite their love for arguing, FBAs play basketball (and are woke socialists, especially in Chicago); Italians are direct; the Irish are soft spoken, the Jamaicans are extremely curious; Muslims are so Kneen on claiming Anti Zionism is not anti semetism (until you mention that 85% of Jews are Zionists, then they hate the Jews) and they are extremely peaceful and if you go to a mosque, then then will try and convert you to their religion (only through acceptable means), Indians work at 7/11, every racial group except whites has liberals and conservatives, and they usually aim for ideological consistency (which is why you see few of them run for public office, because ideologically, they are more centrist). Jews are also more centrist, but they actually want power because since they endured the Holocaust when the media was against them, they want to run the media so it's protection from a new Holocaust. Jamaicans are ideologically extremely curious and happy people.
These are general statements; not always true, but you notice patterns.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
There are MANY right wing charity volunteers and philanthropists.
Sure, but how is right wing ideology empathetic?
Take Immigration: If a parent is separated from their child for nothing more than being undocumented, and the child is traumatized from it, then how is it possible for a right winger to claim that being pro ICE is the empathetic position? It's impossible. Empathy is for leftists. There may be some anti abortion charity or something like that, but they care about preventing fetal homicide; they aren't empathetic.
I do not see hypocrisy in my stance.
If you get too much empathy with respect to your ideology, then you end up with wanting to ban desalination plants because you don't want to steal water from fishes due to high amounts of empathy for fishes (yes; as crazy as this stance is, I've met multiple people with this stance).
Too much empathy is a thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
I know you are RM.
Psychopathy is a personality construct characterized by impaired empathy and remorse, along with traits such as boldness, disinhibition, and egocentrism. Individuals with psychopathy often exhibit callousness, manipulation, and superficial charm, which can mask their lack of emotional depth. While psychopathy is not a formal clinical diagnosis, it is frequently associated with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), sharing symptoms like low empathy and high manipulativeness. Understanding psychopathy involves recognizing its complex traits and how they differ from other personality disorders.
I don't do participate in disinhibition.
I usually don't have superficial charm unless I'm at work.
But empathy is for leftists and the majority of the nation has no desire to convert to leftism.
I would also add that thinking empathically/emotionally wrt political ideology leads to massive hypocrisy if done too much. I would rather be callous than a hypocrite.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
I am not a free speech absolutist so this 'dilemma' is not a dilemma for me.
Fine.
RemyBrown, please consider what you are suggesting here. You are supporting sex slave abuse for no just cause at all.
How much are you willing to sacrifice for free speech? If it's nothing, then you don't value free speech. If it's something, then please indicate what it is.
I'm autistic; I don't have empathy for human beings. I only care about people (including my family) to the extent that they are useful to me. The only thing stopping me from murdering and r@ping is I find these activities etremely immoral. But if I see some rando person get murdered or r@ped, then I don't shed a teer for them because they're a stranger.
I don't act on Patheos wrt ideological positions; I only use logic and morality. I'm a Juror 4.
Created:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I am not sure if Canada would lose medicare if it joined USA. I mean, it would join as the state
Trump calls Canada "the 51st state" for marketing purposes. Really, it's more realistic that every province becomes it's own state, but saying, "51st state" is better for marketing than, "10 more states!".
I am not sure if Canada would lose medicare if it joined USA.
Ideally, Trump would let the Canadian states keep M4A if they wanted to keep the policy. In America, fiscal left policies (free college) are largely up to the states; NY has free college for it's residents; Trump didn't stop that (and he shouldn't). I wouldn't even have current provincial boundaries be the definition of states; I think every American state made from Canadian territory should be roughly the same size as a current US state; so expect a lot of state downsizing wrt land size, but they can (and should) keep M4A if they want.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Well, maybe average person doesnt care about free speech much unless its their own speech.
That is a good point. People are extremely selfish whether they have the guts to own it or not.
Created:
-->
@Shila
@TheGreatSunGod
Care to comment? I know you both disagree with me here.
It's optimal to mentally grow and evolve.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I would not give up on all my free speech or all my freedom just to prevent 1 rape.
Alright. I respect the honesty and I agree with this statement.
But you can understand how this statement would turn off virtually every normie?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
My free speech is very important to me. It would be kinda stupid to give up all free speech in a country to prevent one rape.
We're not talking about all free speech for everyone vs preventing one r@pe. We're talking about YOUR free speech (1 individual) vs one female not getting r@ped.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Or are we discussing a scenario where if I dont give up on free speech, a woman gets raped?
This is the correct answer.
Your free speech or a stranger woman's bodily autonomy in the context of r@pe. What takes precedence to you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Not necessarily you. America needs kids to keep up and someone has to make them.
Have the people that make kids be competent and consenting parents. Not me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
What does one thing have to do with the other?
What do you value more? A woman not getting r@ped or your personal free speech?
Just like 2 kids getting killed has nothing to do with your kid getting killed, but you would prefer one group getting killed over the other.
What do you value more? A woman not getting r@ped or your personal free speech? For me, it's my free speech. If that's not the case for you, then you aren't a free speech absolutist and you should come as advertised.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
Alright; so you aren't a free speech absolutist then. Come as advertised.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Banning free speech makes informed choice impossible
Would you be fine with a woman getting r@ped to protect your personal free speech? Yes or no.
Created:
What doesn't make sense about Canadians who refuse to join the US is they will say, "We want independence because we want Medicare for all (M4A)".
Well, the 10th amendment to the US constitution is states rights; so the Canadian states would be allowed to keep M4A. That part I don't see people address too much.
1 of 2 things are true about M4A:
1. It's a net negative.
2. It's a net positive.
If the former is true, then the Canadian states get rid of the plan one by one. If the ladder is true, then the idea expands to other US states. One of the ideas will lose, but the people are going to win regardless (in addition, good ideas expand faster when they're in one part of the same nation vs when they're in a totally different nation).
Lets say #2 is the correct answer and every state implements M4A on their own. Now, it's CANADIANS who benefit (why? Because many Canadians hate cold Canadian winters and would love to move to a place like California or Hawaii provided these states implement M4A (and the French snowbirds can move to Louisiana to meet a state with a lot of Francophone influence that is warm, and although Louisiana is a conservative state, there are progressive areas in Louisiana).
You also would get more racial diversity in Canada; I mean; American cities have a lot of non-whites compared to Canadian cities; it would significantly improve racial integration.They hate Trump; well, alright; he's not going to be POTUS forever, he may seek a 3rd term (which Canadian PMs have had 3rd terms before and it's fine), but it won't stop him from dying of old age (which is inevitable), if 3rd terms are allowed, then he might run against Obama (see how THAT goes), Canadians love Obama and hate Trump, wouldn't you want to vote for Obama?
Even though I did not vote for Trump and despise the guy, I'm an American living here, I can assure you he's going to be gone eventually. I'll just ride out the storm. Trump has even said I think that he would be fine with running against Obama, so the GOP voter base would fall in line over that, and Obama crushes Trump (and Canadian voters that are now part of the US can be part of that history).Who would do that to America?
The 2 countries that have a bigger population than us aren't English speaking and they're far away. If TX wants independence, then people joke about it. If Canada wants independence, then people cheer it on. The only difference is currently, right now, Canada is it's own country and TX is a state. But borders aren't forever. They change like the wind over the course of history. In 1800, claiming that the German states would ever unify into one was laughable. But the status quo changed and with the exception of Austria and some others, German speaking Europe is it's own country.
The status quo with respect to national borders should be irrelevant.
Created:
Posted in:
Would you be willing to have some female you don't know in a different state than where you live get r@ped if that is what it took for you to keep your free speech?
I'd be willing to make that sacrifice; I don't like her getting r@ped, but to be honest, my free speech is more important to me than some faceless female stranger's bodily autonomy. If you disagree, then that's understandable, but then don't call yourself someone who values free speech above all else (because tbh, you don't). And I'm not a free speech absolutist, for example, I would rather never utter my opinion again than get murdered because I value my life more than my voice. If America repealed the 1st amendment, then I wouldn't fight to bring it back because I don't want to die. But am I willing to have other people fight and die for my free speech? Yes, because my life is worth more to me than their lives.
Created:
@ADOL
My claim is not sardonic and if it's not myopic.
Calling Americans "People" is for leftists because the word, "Person" is an emotional term and emotion is for leftists. Libertarians and conservatives (actual ones) refer to them as consumers.
So I'd recommend to become more American, refer to the individuals as consumers. Viewing them as people means they get emotionally coddled (aka leftism).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
The karma will end out only when whiteys and blackies get mixed up. So if I were you I'd be working on it already.
But I don't want mixed kids because kids are too expensive (same is true for white kids).
Created:
Posted in:
@ADOL
If there was an Olympic sport about creating the strongest "nobody asked" vibes, you might win.
That's the case for every DART thread here.
Your collectivism offends me BTW.
I don't care. Collectivism is ok if the collectivism meets one of the 2 following criteria:
- It's accurate.
- It's not disparaging.
Claiming your generic black kid is raised by a single mother meets only criteria 1, so it's fine.
Claiming Asians have slanted eyes meets criteria 1 and 2, so it's fine.
Claiming your generic American Jew eat Kosher meets only criteria 2, so it's fine.
Claiming your generic American Jew drinks Christain blood meets neither criteria, so THEN it's offensive.
Claiming the generic Jews have big egos might meet criteria 1, but certainly criteria 2 (there is nothing wrong with having a big ego), so it's fine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
We both don't like reparations, but most FBAs do (and they aren't changing their minds because they are FBAs with FBA opinions). Hispanics and Asians don't support reparations. I want FBA people to feel racially isolated and scared that they will never get reparations so they have the desire to move out of America and so the inner cities can finally get cleaned up by replacing FBAs with African immigrants so it's not racist.
FBA culture is just trash and I want it out of the country if the FBAs are willing to self deport (but if they don't want to leave, then don't force them too, but verbally encourage them, import more immigrants who are going to be anti reparations, make FBAs feel isolated so they just bail on America). The hood sucks.
Created:
Posted in:
10 years ago, you say Jews run the media, you get labeled an anti semite by the Jewish media (because then, the Jews wanted secrecy; they wanted to be able to control what people thought in the easy way; without people knowing who ran the media).
But now, I can say the Jews run the media and the Jews aren't going to call it anti sematic. Now, they will call actual Nazi stuff anti sematic (which is correct; Hitler was horrible and everyone should hate him for murdering 10 million people; 60% of which were Jewish), but they will let the, "Jews control the media" fact be known to people (because the Jews now have egos and they want people to know who's in charge, which I can respect because if I had the media power of Jews, then I would want people to know I'm in charge). But when you flee the Holocaust and move to a country to take over the media; you end up very timid. George Soros looks like and acts like a very timid Jew because his family fled the Holocaust. But I think later generation Jews are having big egos when they end up controlling the media. Charismatic people tend to have big egos. And I respect that.
Created:
What I recommend is stop referring to individuals as, "People". Instead, call them, "consumers".
America Fuck Yeah!!!
Created:
-->
@Shila
Canada tore down the two Trump towers in Toronto and Vancouver
They vandalized an orange immigrant's home? It sounds kindof racist.
Trump bring a convicted criminal is banned from entering Canada.
No human being is illegal!
Americans cannot need the high standards set by Canada.
It sounds xenophobic to the American community, which, relative to the Canadian colonists, is disproportionally people of color.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Again, there are not many countries who would even possibly agree to accept those refugees.
Why would I care? Who would win in a conflict? America, or Chad? Chad is Chad in name only; America is the real Chad. Would Cameroon beat America? How about the DRC? Madagascar? They like to move it move it, so we can move it move it with these FBAs that we're sending back.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I was thinking of putting them in a French speaking African country to try and get that country to go Anglophone. Use the blacks to linguistically conquer to some extent. If they refuse, then it's irrelevant because the left has been bitching about, "No human being is illegal!".
I'm not ashamed to be a white charismatic man.
Maybe spread them out so they would be the elites in Africa and so they assimilate other people there (because a lot of Africans in French Africa aren't fluent in French).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Alright; my bad.
Why would someone be against encouraging people to leave America?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Not everyone approves of encouraging people to leave America
Not everyone approves of homosexuality being legalized; you won't find 100% approval on any policy and that's par for the course.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Blacks should demand reparations. Slavery is what led to black poverty.
They can demand it, but it won't happen because Hispanics and Asians coming here are going to be anti reparations (honestly, I'm anti reparations; I'm a white man with white opinions). But it's hopeless for FBAs that are pro reparations, so they should just bail on America.
Created:
Posted in:
Both of the following conditions must be accurate for a black person to get deported back to Africa:
- They have to be 50% or more FBA (which most are).
- They have to willingly get deported. If they don't want to get deported, then they don't get deported. Burning their property would and should be illegal, but their consent is required.
Now, you may ask, why would an FBA want to get deported? Because they do research:
Views of reparations for slavery in US vary widely by race and ethnicity | Pew Research Center states that while an overwhelming majority of FBAs support reparations, large majorities of every other racial group are against it. In addition, the following 3 claims are true:
- We are moving further and further away from Jim Crow and slavery; this means support for reparations is expected to drop.
- Most of the immigrants coming here will be Hispanic or Asian. These groups are already majority anti reparations (I mean, they didn't even know slavery happened here that well because they're from somewhere else) and that's going to increase as time goes on. Even the black immigrants are anti reperations.
- FBAs intermarry with non FBAs, and their kid is probably going to be less hardcore reparations than their parents because they are half and half; and then they will probably marry someone who is not FBA majority and their kids are probably going to have an anti reparations mindset.
It is highly unlikely that reparations will ever for a long enough time period gain majority support among the American public. So I think we should deport consenting FBAs who understand that they won't get what they want. Any job they do if they get consensually deported, import an African immigrant to do them.
Created: