Total topics: 108
Indian culture drinks cow piss.
Jewish culture can't be honest with questions.
Catholic Culture is too vanilla.
Protestant culture is party politics disguised as following god.
White culture endures too little pain (an exception for those that have lived around blacks). More pain toughens up your skin.
Asian culture has too many rules. Asian parents would rather produce a child that turns out to be a teacher than a plumber even if the teacher makes less.
Black culture will talk about the need to escape the white man and when Trump offers to ship them back to Africa, they call it racist.
Hispanic culture will have people move to America, not knowing English and not having google translate on standby. If you move to America and don't know English, then we should not deport you over it, but have google translate on you you ignorant nacho taco chimmy changa fresh off the boat Me no speakie.
Atheists think they are free thinkers; really, they say to ask questions and you do it at Fauci and then they think you're a conspiracy theorist. Buddy; atheism is a conspiracy theory that people lied to us about religion to make money.
Satanists tell us to not judge by appearance and then dress in disgusting colors as if they want to be judged by their appearance.
Gay people are against cutting HIV funding because they say it disproportionally harms their community, then they wait 5 days and someone else says that there are too many gay people with HIV in this country and the gays claim it's homophobic.
Men suck because they shame women for having high body counts when they are the reason those women got high body counts.
Women suck because their ideology is so emotional/stupid (synonyms) that they pick a bear over a strange man and they justify it by saying women are emotional/stupid (and then if I call women that, then I'm a sexist).
Nonbinary people suck because they are willing to be gender fluid, but not party fluid; pretty much all of you are as left wing as you can be. Being gender fluid/conformist is a neutral, being party fluid/conformist is not.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
White Mexican women:
- Are obsessed with Native culture despite being white.
- Are very solemn.
- Bitch about racism and percieved microaggessions.
- Despite being white; they are pretty tan for whites.
Mexican women are basically Spanish speaking women from Manitoba.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Understand something about Hitler. Hitler was German, German people have a bad sense of humor. People with a non existent sense of humor are more likely to resolve things like a depression with violence because it's all they know.
Germany had a depression; alright; well so did America. We are funny though; the Germans are not. Therefore, Germany murdered Jews, and America accepted the ones that become refugees.
Laughter on everything helps reduce the odds of a Holocaust happening. You don't see funny people setting up concentration camps. You see assholes doing it.
We need more family guy and south park (as well as an end to the deportations and the killings of Jammals and Tyrones by the cops).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
They are ZLM supporters (Zygote Lives Matter)!
If they think a zygote life is the same as an unborn life and they would rather say, "Unborn lives Matter" for marketing purposes because they internally know ZLM sounds stupid, then from a moral standpoint, they still should use ZLM because they are only being specific.
Lila Rose is a ZLM activist! A zygote's life matters more to Lila Rose than 9 months of a street bitch'es pain.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I have Aspergers. Some people have the bipolar disease.
Why do I hate people with bipolar disorder? The same reason you do.
Claiming Aspergers and Bipolar are all neurodivergent is like claiming Gabriel and Lucifer are all supernatural; we are opposites.
Bipolar people will shoot up and bomb schools. People with Aspergers will engineer the plan to construct a new school.
Bipolar people will say they want to go death con 3 on the Jews for being successful. People with Aspergers see how successful the Jews are and want to copy them with no hatred in their hearts.
Bipolar people are angry; Autistic people are happy.
Bipolar people are the reason why neurodivergent people get a bad rep. Autistics got nothing to do with it.
Bipolar people are crazy lunatics where emotion means everything; Autistic people are robots; highly logical and morally driven; emotions don't play a role.
We are opposites. Treat us like that. I don't want to affiliate with degenerate ticking time bombs.
I hope every bipolar person chooses, voluntarily, to get sterilized. Not forced, but I don't want their genes in society.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Theater majors: The beast is EVIL for refusing to shelter some random stranger!
Me: Are you willing to shelter some random stranger?
Theater majors: NO!
Me: Sounds pretty hypocritical?
Theater majors: NO! Women should get temporarily adopted by men; but not vice versa! Sexism protects women! Life should be harder for a man because men are scary and women are twinks (except they don't actually say that, they just deny that it's sexist because they're cowards).
I would respect it if society was just more open about their sexism towards men. I'm not complaining; but either be upfront about your sexism or eliminate it.
It's possible to treat someone like a man; it's possible to treat someone like a woman; do people say, "Treat like a white" or, "Treat like a black"? No; because society demands identicality and homogeneity for the races; if there is heterogeneity between treating someone like a man vs a woman; then there is sexism at play (which is fine if your upfront so people know the pros and cons of both).
But America is a sexist society (which is fine only if you come as advertised). Women have as easier life; men have a more rewarding life. The best and worst off 5% of people in this world are almost entirely men. Women are like bonds and men are like stocks; women have a more stable life, but men earn more on average.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Show business
In 2024, the Starbucks left preferred bears to strange men.
When they find out that some strange men are black and they ask if they would rather be with a bear or a strange black man, they don't want to come off as racist, so they pick the strange black man. Then you tell them the strange black man shouldn't be treated differently than the strange man (regardless of race) so congratulations JAMMAL; you helped cure the crazy white liberal woman of her mental disease (and also proved why we shouldn't let stupid people vote).
You see a bear in the woods, you mace him before he touches you. If you have that mentality with strange dudes, then you should be executed because you are a public health threat and should be treated like one.
Jammal beats Jennifer. Now to reward Jammal, lets take down all that confederate crap! The black men earned it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
We need to do a full blown Holocaust on the murderer community; we need to genocide every last murderer. Separate them from their children, if their children are traumatized, then that's life; either they lose their parents or we don't arrest murderers. Their children should be traumatized from learning their dad is a murderer.
Either we have to traumatize children by separating them from their father or their father gets away with murder.
I would rather traumatize the kids; their suffering doesn't matter as law and order!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Empathy is for hypocrites.
Hypocrites will say something like, "Save the starving children of color in Gaza" and then never adopt a Gazan child. They will say "racism is bad" and then have np adopting a Ukranian child but would never dare to adopt a Gazan one.
I'm not empathetic towards the Gazan children; IDGAF if they live or die; but at least I'm not a hypocrite.
Hell, I'd want to bring back child slavery; I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't. All my electronics were made by child slaves.
If empathy and hypocrisy are a package deal, then I flat out don't want it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Thank you mods for not letting the Catholic mindset on free speech run this site. I do not wish to deport, murder, or discriminate against Catholics at the workplace; but it's not religion, it's culture.
I discriminate against sensitive people; Catholics can pray to Mary and I don't care. But their extreme concern for agreeableness and forced vanillaness over honesty and common sense is why we have cancel culture in the US.
Catholics need to become more pro free speech (left wing and right wing ones alike). You people are too sensitive. At least with Jews, if it's off work, they have incredibly thick skins and I applaud them for that; Jewish culture is filled with arguing and this means the Jews develop thick skins. If everyone copied the Jews here (especially Jewish men), then it would be very beneficial for free speech in America.
Jews are vanilla out of a desire to survive, I know Jews don't want to be Vanilla. But their desire to steelman and refute should be expanded everywhere in the nation.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Jews and Catholics are both very vanilla at work. The Catholics are puritan about it though (very bad). You offend a Catholic (lets say they are an art major and you say it's easy to get); you might get fired. You offend a Jew (same insult), the Jew doesn't get offended as easily. They know genuinely offensive comments (like saying the Jews drink Christain blood), they won't get too bothered.
But at work, they are both too anti free speech (or if you need this translated into democrat messaging; they aren't as accepting towards minority viewpoints).
They should have a cop mentality here (or African immigrant from some shithole country if you need a democrat group). Cops (from what I've seen) have seen people get shot and killed; they aren't going to be traumatized by trivial stuff.
But if I say that off color comment to a Jew off work, then they don't get mad; they talk about their art major calmly. The Catholic off work is similar to the Jew who is on work.
Cops and African immigrants don't care about meaningless comments; they care about violence; not words.
Back the Black
Back the Blue
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The assaulter should be whipped like 50x.
She is a lesbian that looks like a lesbian; maybe she munches carpets; I don't know. You can't beat someone up for this, especially to the extent where she's in the emergency room over it.
The assaulter should be whipped 50x.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Bill Burr On Lesbian-"All Lesbian Lookalike".. Here, Bill Burr makes a joke about Lesbians.
I do similar stuff with other groups.
The PC police only gets mad when I make jokes like this. Why?
Bill Burr's head is in the right place
Alright; so is mine. Everytime I joke about the Yamaka people, I make sure to emphasize that I hate Hitler, I hate Ye west, and that I'd be fine with the Yamaka people moving to America of their own free will to escape the bombings from Hamas (and I don't care if they have their papers). I want Gazans, Ukranians, Afrikanners, and Congo refugees treated the same way. No anti semite would support Yamaka people moving to their country if they want to move here.
I want Bill Burr style treatment here. So AdaptableRatman; calm the fuck down.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Satanists are contrarians.
Now, don't get me wrong, I respect a little, "Devils Advocate" (get it)? However, Satanists are into these weird kinks, they love having a high body count (which is pretty bad for something they claim to care about, mental health), they look ugly and freaky on purpose.
Satanists are maybe the only religious group that I wouldn't want to be friends with.
Who wants to be friends with someone who looks like this?:
They are very sex positive; homie; I can't be friends with this, let alone friends with benefits!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Atheists will claim they are free thinkers (before the MAGA right co-opted the term). But they usually are progressives and blindly follow pretty much everything the progressive party agrees with just because they label themselves as, "progressive" and it's a feel good label. They fail to realize that no matter what happens in 5 years, society is going to ideologically progress by 5 years, but if we get a lot of right wing policies in that time, then atheists will argue that's regression. In order to regress, we need a way back machine (doesn't exist). If they are parties that the "progressive" (marketing term) supports, then they will fall for it.
Progress is inevitable, but is it going to be left or right wing progress?
Left wing advancement is progress and right wing advancement is regress to the atheist.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Protestants are like, "We interpret the bible for ourselves".
No; not really.
Most of you are either democrat or republican and anytime the bible says something left wing, the democrat protestant says it's god's will and the GOP protestant says it's a metaphor and God didn't mean it literally (vice versa for the right wing aspects of the bible).
Your politics determines how you interpret your religion, and if you do vice versa, then you are a theocrat (a few of the GOP Protestants will own that they are theocrats, but the Democrat Protestants never do and most from both parties don't).
I could tell them, "Both parties are tribalistic" and they will agree with me in the moment, but then go back to their partisan ways.
If the bile says to do X (assuming X doesn't harm others significantly), then the religious person should personally do X and encourage their followers to do X while not forcing X on others. X can be helping the poor or waiting until marriage; it's irrelevant what party it's coded too.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
To decent people, the word, "sheep" is an insult to them as it implies they can't think for themselves.
Catholics take pride in being a sheep. They don't like thinking; they let the pope do their ideological thinking and they blindly accept it without question even if the pope contradicts himself or is hypocritical (selling all you have and giving to the poor while sitting on a golden throne for example).
The pope doesn't prosecute the r@pe that happens in the church. Could you imagine if 4% of a private school's teachers r@ped kids? They would be out of business. The Catholic Church gets away with it and the Catholics don't consider it a deal breaker.
I wouldn't cuss at Catholics over it, I wouldn't disassociate with them over it, and I sure as hell wouldn't want to mass murder them, but I just think they're kind of annoying. They often make horrible arguments (ex: my Dad said everyone is equal (and he said murderers were equal to philanthropists)). He denied it was socialism. Catholics are scared of scary but accurate (and legal) labels.
If you call a Catholic a racist, then they will deny it (as they move away from the Bronx and Brooklyn to get away from the blacks and into the white suburbs).
If you call a Catholic a sexist, then they will deny it while they don't let women become priests.
They can't call a spade a spade and they are often very term nit picky (just like Canadians).
If a Catholic likes Biden and I say Biden has dementia, they say it's false, and I then say he has cognitive decline, then they accuse me of moving the goalposts. Homie; you knew what I was talking about. Don't act dumb. Biden isn't going to take the SAT anytime soon. He shouldn't have been there. You can hate Trump; alright; but at least acknowledge the obvious and don't be term nit picky. It's annoying.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
What sucks about this society is if I were to say, "The JEWS are responsible for .... ", then most people have no idea what the "...." is and they automatically assume it's anti semetic.
If the .... is, "drinking Christian blood", then it IS anti sematic and it should be condemned by everybody. If it's, "creating a very vanilla culture in American society and they should make America less vanilla because vanilla culture is bad for society", then that's not the same as being pro Holocaust at all. It's merely constructive criticism.
Jews do in fact run the media (they earned it, it's not bad to control the media, but they should do a better job). Make the media less vanilla. I get that they are from Germany (where people aren't funny), but it was Hitler (an anti funny German guy) that did the Holocaust, not comedians.
But people jump to conclusions when they're vanilla. It's low IQ behavior and it needs to change. You can listen to anybody without agreeing with what they say.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Elbows up = Low Level Leafs.
Elbows down = Badass Blasting Bald Eagles!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
For example, I do NOT support equality for the pedophile community. This would mean sex with children would be treated equally to sex between adults.
Pedophiles do NOT deserve equal rights.
Fuck Equality!
We need to treat pedophiles as 2nd class citizens because they don't deserve the same sexual freedom as normal people.
Don't view pedos as your equals. They deserve inferior rights to decent society.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
MAGA: Wants to deport brown Mexican undocumented migrants.
Also MAGA: Thinks brown undocumented Mexicans are better than DOCUMENTED dot people from Asia.
There is nothing wrong with being a dot person from Asia, even if you tend to be very dark brown.
Don't deport anybody, whether you are a (nacho taco chimmy changa) or a BavaGita who works in Tech support.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
When these people are happy despite living in a shithole country and despite them being poor and this kid has a much better life and they claim they are diagnosed with depression, then understand that depression is a choice.
Black kids are therefore, much better than white kids because white kids find a reason to be angry; black kids find a reason to be happy. White kids, therefore, should copy the black kids.
This is an example of black privilege; they are just much happier; but the whites can learn from this and be happy too. This means white kids need to get a thick skin. The Jews that run the media got to change their messaging; pills don't solve depression; your personality does.
I am ANTI Hitler, ANTI Ye West; but I think the Jews need to change their messaging. They run the media; they earned it, but they have a lot of power.
With power comes responsibility; the Jews that run the media should become more responsible by telling people to internally develop better personalities instead of selling them pills.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Every single SJW should be (one at a time) claimed by the state, strapped to a chair with rope, hands tied behind their back, and they get put in front of a TV that has South Park on it so they would complain and whine for a while, but eventually, they will laugh and accept the joke.
This thickens up their skin so the left wingers that come out of there end up being more sane. They advocate for Medicare for all or increasing wages instead of getting offended at jokes.
MASDA:
MAke
Social justice warriors
Decent
Again
America has no room for political correctness.
The left needs to copy Andrew Yang; he wants better economic policy in his view and he also can take a joke!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
1. When people say they are willing to die for ANY cause, they have no clue what they're talking about.
2. If your religion calls on you to die for that religion, then you know in advance that you won't be willing to die for your religion, so you should view that religion as crazy.
3. If you view religion as crazy, then you become an atheist.
4. If everyone worldwide willingly becomes an atheist, then you have no more religious wars. If it wasn't for religion, then Israel/Palestine wouldn't be fighting. What would they fight over? If everyone becomes Anglophone (not by genociding the non-Anglophones, but by having non-Anglophones learn English and if they reproduce, then attempt to get their kids to become Anglophones), then wars over language differences are gone.
Homogeneity often prevents massive death and economic wartime waste, helping to pave the way for a one world nation, where wars are no longer required as well as people obtaining unconditional freedom of movement to move to any place they choose. Increased education funding can make sure we don't be replaced by low IQ people because they wouldn't stay low IQ.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
P1: Anyone that wishes to die and has a good reason should be allowed to die (this is why we don't keep elderly people on life support for hundreds of years, so there already is a genocide of people who are like 95 year olds in nursing homes).
P2: A good enough reason to want to die is medical expenses.
P3: Gazans (and many Muslims more broadly) have a reason that they think is good for wanting to die (they want to go to heaven as a martyr). This reason is arguably better than the elderly person's reason.
C1: Genocide is a gift to Muslims who wish to become martyrs.
We should kill anyone who wishes to die become a martyr for their religion; we are doing them a favor. American "Christians" aren't really Christain because they aren't willing to die if God told them to die for their religion. They are atheists with the Christain title. I'd like it if they dropped the title and came as advertised.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Everyone read only the 1st comment here. The 1st is from some woman that claims women's intuition is never wrong.
A lot of stupid people will instinctively blindly accept that this is true with no thought behind it (and the reason is because the word, "woman" gives some level of serotonin in who reads that word in the moment and this is enough to make the stupid majority of this nation agree to it). A woman here thinks that a woman's intuition is never wrong. Imagine if a man says, "A man's intuition is never wrong". We'd think he's some cocky SOB. This woman here is also a cocky SOB.
Why do I call this statement stupid? Read the 2nd comment.
You reference the word, "woman" in a way that makes sense, you could say, "A woman should have the right to end the life of her 4 year old child if she feels it's the correct thing to do and she feels that she can't take of them" (not trying to make this about abortion). Replace "woman" with "man" and other required changes, and this sounds barbaric.
On the flip side, a woman can say, "A woman should have the right to become a pilot" and society reacts exactly the same way as the statement involving 4 year old homicide. If a man says, "A man should have the right to become a pilot", then society is like, "Facts".
A man's words matter; a woman's words right now DON'T.
Now, I am of the opinion that you should be treated like your words and opinions matter if we give you the right to vote.
So women should have to endure 2 options:
- Lose the right to vote. They can become like children that you can legally fuck and they get the privilege of their words not mattering (at the expense of their right to vote).
- Be given equal rights (and responsibilities) to a man. This means they both can vote, but this means if a woman says something, then treat it exactly the same way as if a man said it (so claim, "Facts" if the statement is undeniably accurate, claim, "Hmmm" if the statement might be accurate, and claim, "Bullshit" if the statement is inaccurate) and we should never produce serotonin for when you talk; you can have serotonin and no voting rights like a child or a trichotomy of options and voting rights like adult men right now get.
I think this standard should apply to everyone of all ages. So if you're 5 years old and want the right to vote, then you will get the right to vote (while at the same time, you will be judged by everything that you say because it matters now). If a 5 year old comes out in favor of free homes for all and they have voting rights, then treat them exactly the same way as if a 25 year old with voting rights said it. People should be expected to argue with that person on the streets.
Voting rights are for those with enough of a thick skin to accept the idea that they might be wrong regardless of age or gender and change their beliefs accordingly. Anyone with voting rights should have a lanyard around their neck indicating that they wish for their statements to be judged like a voter.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Any man with integrity picks the man.
Some current thing women will pick the bear. They will say the man rapes them, the bear eats them, and they would (at the end of the day) rather get murdered than raped.
If that's your argument, then say you would rather be in the woods with a bear than a rapist. That I won't agree with (I'd rather get raped than murdered), but at the end of the day, I'm not a murderer, I'm not a rapist, both people are very bad, but I don't know how the female brain works, so I'd be like, "whatever".
I can respect rather being with a bear over a rapist. I cannot respect being with a bear over a generic man.
Calling a man a bear at this point should be like calling a black person the N word. These crazy feminists have ruined it. Go back to advocating against the wage gap, at least then I could respect what you're saying.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Iggers are degenerate and their influence need to be eliminated.
I fucking hate Iggers (and I'm sure the word you guys know is a very similar word, but I dropped the 1st letter because I don't want to make it about race).
Examples of Iggers:
- People that think it's ok for a mentally ill person to commit a mass shooting if it, "gets it out of their system".
- People that would knock the crap out of you for saying, "I support desalination plants".
- Entitled Tate fans that think that it's ok for them to r@pe women.
- Feminists who will claim that strange men are scarier than bears (without mace).
- MAGA trailer trash who will claim that strange undocumented men are scarier than bears (without mace).
- Any transgender that would equate misgendering to homicide.
- Any Matt Walsh supporter that would call transwomen not men, but animals.
- Anyone of any demographic characteristic that would rather be in the woods with a bear than any generically innocent person (assuming no mace).
We need to cure the Igger disease that has impacted this nation.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Trump is a racist (and nobody in MAGA will call it that and denounce Trump being a racist even though it's true)
If White South African refugees can come here, then so can refugees from the Congo and Gaza.
And BTW, this is the bad type of racism. The good type of racism is family guy and south park; but ICE should be abolished with darker immigrants just like it is for white Afrikanners.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The current definition of communism is:
"a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. "
Well, if communists subscribe to this ideology, then how about the state tells them where they can sleep and you work them to their fullest ability (irrespective of their desire to actually complete the work). Basically, they become a slave to the state (which is what their ideology calls for the rest of us), so they should walk their talk until they stop talking their current talk and talk the correct talk (capitalism).
I want abortion banned for all anti abortion women and I want communism for all communists. These statements shouldn't be contraversal.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
If it's expanded, then you get more waste and fraud.
If it's cut, then you get more dead kids.
What do you people prefer? Poll.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Grand wizard 1 (the white man conquored the seas)
Grand Wizard 2 (The Anglo Mile conquored)
Grand Wizard 3 (A true Uncle Ruckus; he's helping the Anglophone man conquor new territory like a good uncle Tom).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Looks like the Jews are running the media and Hollywood pretty well. This song sounds pretty good.
Jews run the banks, the court room, the Hospitals, the news, and Hollywood and they earned that shit! Anytime I see a sucessful Jew, I'm thinking, this person has good media connections. I WANT THOSE! Give them to ME! I don't hate you; I want to COPY you.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The left thinks it's ok, because it's Canada. God forbid Trump do something like this (Because I'm principled, I'm anti deportations regardless). Don't expect the left to be principled though; they'll let Canada get away with xenephobic immigration policies.
They can deny it all they want; but at this point, I think I'd rather have them be honest and admit they're partisan hacks. Just come as advertised. Their mind won't be changed on this because they are emotional people and you can't reason with emotional people (even if they mask their emotion). Just come as advertised.
And if you're going to be emotional and unchangable in your views on Canada, then the internet isn't the right place for you. My mind is unchangable in the annexation of Canada, but I use logical points whereas it seems they don't.
If your brains are in fact emotional, then politics isn't for you as it would make you scared and that's bad for your mental health.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
This is a map of the US precinct by race.
We need more immigrants in the FBA majority precincts (not black, because some black people are immigrants and they're less entitled) so FBAs become the minority in their precincts, so they're less likely to vote in a representetive that is pro reperations (because the majority of every non-FBA racial group is anti reperations according to Pew and FBAs are pro reperations majority).
Representetives (regardless of their party) are less likely to back reperations if their district has a lot of people who hate it.
If you are an FBA and you support reperations, then forget woke; you're just entitled and that needs to be changed. You should not go back into slavery or segregation, you should not be killed; and you should not lose your right to vote, but I don't want pro reperations politicians getting into power and there's nothing immoral about sending immigrant settlers (who have better views on this) into FBA majority precincts so they outvote the FBAs in future elections, making sure that FBAs don't ever get reperations because they would be outvoted.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
DKIG speech is advocating the death penalty for a known innocent group.
I don't see why this speech should be legal. If the left transitions from advocating the banning of hate speech (which is really just GOP speech) into DKIG speech, then they largely get what they want wrt preventing trans groups and similar from getting killed (which even the Matt Walsh types don't want to murder Dylan Mulvaney; they will merely argue Mulvaney is a man). The left is worried that the right wants to murder Dylan Mulvaney at some point in the far future; but if you knip DKIG speech in the but, then you end up preserving the legalization of speech the right actually wants (ie, calling transwomen men).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Anytime someone says, "We should have a conversation about, (insert topic here)", they don't know what they're talking about.
For example, police brutality.
Left winger: We need to have a conversation about George Floyd.
Right winger: Alright; I think George Floyd is a crack addict criminal that raped a bunch of women and he deserved what happened to him.
Left winger: RACIST! FUCK YOU!!
Another example, abortion.
Left winger: We need to have a conversation about abortion.
Right winger: Alright; I think abortion is murder, abortion should be treated as murder, the penalty for murder is death, women that get abortions should be executed for murder; this isn't pro life, but it's anti abortion.
Left winger: MYSOGINIST! FUCK YOU!!
Another example, transgenderism.
Left winger: We need to have a conversation about trans people.
Right winger: Alright; I think transwomen are delusional men that should go back to passing as men. They have a mental illness and they should go to conversion therapy to deal with it. Their chromosomes will always be male; chromosomes are the only thing that matters, any man that dates them is gay, and I'm going to nut to them on Only Fans.
Left winger: TRANSPHOBE! FUCK YOU!!
Me: Hey left winger; what were you expecting? The right winger is going to agree with you?
If so, then you haven't thought it through.
Debating and politics isn't your thing; expanding your political ideology isn't your thing because anytime a right winger inevitibly disagrees with you, you dismiss it as, "hate speech".
This is fine; just like it's fine that engineering isn't Bob Ross'es thing. But Bob Ross doesn't become an engineer; and if dealing with hate speech (aka GOP speech) isn't your thing, then don't engage with right wingers (or really any stranger, because a stranger might be a right winger as well, so why put yourself through the pain of having to deal with their hate speech?).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I want to keep my gun rights and I don't care if 2000 children die from mass shootings a year.
This is not satire, but if it makes you feel uncomfterable, then you should support banning all guns. But I'm not empathetic because I'm autistic, so I won't want to ban all guns.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Yes (but only the good kind of Xenephobe):
The good type of xenophobia:
The bad type of xenophobia:
Overview-rise-power-Adolf-Hitler.jpg (1920×1081) (this guy has a big nose)
If you can't tell the difference, then your IQ is lower than Barack Obama's.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
What doesn't make sense about Canadians who refuse to join the US is they will say, "We want independence because we want Medicare for all (M4A)".
Well, the 10th amendment to the US constitution is states rights; so the Canadian states would be allowed to keep M4A. That part I don't see people address too much.
1 of 2 things are true about M4A:
1. It's a net negative.
2. It's a net positive.
If the former is true, then the Canadian states get rid of the plan one by one. If the ladder is true, then the idea expands to other US states. One of the ideas will lose, but the people are going to win regardless (in addition, good ideas expand faster when they're in one part of the same nation vs when they're in a totally different nation).
Lets say #2 is the correct answer and every state implements M4A on their own. Now, it's CANADIANS who benefit (why? Because many Canadians hate cold Canadian winters and would love to move to a place like California or Hawaii provided these states implement M4A (and the French snowbirds can move to Louisiana to meet a state with a lot of Francophone influence that is warm, and although Louisiana is a conservative state, there are progressive areas in Louisiana).
You also would get more racial diversity in Canada; I mean; American cities have a lot of non-whites compared to Canadian cities; it would significantly improve racial integration.They hate Trump; well, alright; he's not going to be POTUS forever, he may seek a 3rd term (which Canadian PMs have had 3rd terms before and it's fine), but it won't stop him from dying of old age (which is inevitable), if 3rd terms are allowed, then he might run against Obama (see how THAT goes), Canadians love Obama and hate Trump, wouldn't you want to vote for Obama?
Even though I did not vote for Trump and despise the guy, I'm an American living here, I can assure you he's going to be gone eventually. I'll just ride out the storm. Trump has even said I think that he would be fine with running against Obama, so the GOP voter base would fall in line over that, and Obama crushes Trump (and Canadian voters that are now part of the US can be part of that history).Who would do that to America?
The 2 countries that have a bigger population than us aren't English speaking and they're far away. If TX wants independence, then people joke about it. If Canada wants independence, then people cheer it on. The only difference is currently, right now, Canada is it's own country and TX is a state. But borders aren't forever. They change like the wind over the course of history. In 1800, claiming that the German states would ever unify into one was laughable. But the status quo changed and with the exception of Austria and some others, German speaking Europe is it's own country.
The status quo with respect to national borders should be irrelevant.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Would you be willing to have some female you don't know in a different state than where you live get r@ped if that is what it took for you to keep your free speech?
I'd be willing to make that sacrifice; I don't like her getting r@ped, but to be honest, my free speech is more important to me than some faceless female stranger's bodily autonomy. If you disagree, then that's understandable, but then don't call yourself someone who values free speech above all else (because tbh, you don't). And I'm not a free speech absolutist, for example, I would rather never utter my opinion again than get murdered because I value my life more than my voice. If America repealed the 1st amendment, then I wouldn't fight to bring it back because I don't want to die. But am I willing to have other people fight and die for my free speech? Yes, because my life is worth more to me than their lives.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
10 years ago, you say Jews run the media, you get labeled an anti semite by the Jewish media (because then, the Jews wanted secrecy; they wanted to be able to control what people thought in the easy way; without people knowing who ran the media).
But now, I can say the Jews run the media and the Jews aren't going to call it anti sematic. Now, they will call actual Nazi stuff anti sematic (which is correct; Hitler was horrible and everyone should hate him for murdering 10 million people; 60% of which were Jewish), but they will let the, "Jews control the media" fact be known to people (because the Jews now have egos and they want people to know who's in charge, which I can respect because if I had the media power of Jews, then I would want people to know I'm in charge). But when you flee the Holocaust and move to a country to take over the media; you end up very timid. George Soros looks like and acts like a very timid Jew because his family fled the Holocaust. But I think later generation Jews are having big egos when they end up controlling the media. Charismatic people tend to have big egos. And I respect that.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
What I recommend is stop referring to individuals as, "People". Instead, call them, "consumers".
America Fuck Yeah!!!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Both of the following conditions must be accurate for a black person to get deported back to Africa:
- They have to be 50% or more FBA (which most are).
- They have to willingly get deported. If they don't want to get deported, then they don't get deported. Burning their property would and should be illegal, but their consent is required.
Now, you may ask, why would an FBA want to get deported? Because they do research:
Views of reparations for slavery in US vary widely by race and ethnicity | Pew Research Center states that while an overwhelming majority of FBAs support reparations, large majorities of every other racial group are against it. In addition, the following 3 claims are true:
- We are moving further and further away from Jim Crow and slavery; this means support for reparations is expected to drop.
- Most of the immigrants coming here will be Hispanic or Asian. These groups are already majority anti reparations (I mean, they didn't even know slavery happened here that well because they're from somewhere else) and that's going to increase as time goes on. Even the black immigrants are anti reperations.
- FBAs intermarry with non FBAs, and their kid is probably going to be less hardcore reparations than their parents because they are half and half; and then they will probably marry someone who is not FBA majority and their kids are probably going to have an anti reparations mindset.
It is highly unlikely that reparations will ever for a long enough time period gain majority support among the American public. So I think we should deport consenting FBAs who understand that they won't get what they want. Any job they do if they get consensually deported, import an African immigrant to do them.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
How come the American left supports self determination for Canada and not for Crimea? If one consistently backed self determination, then they would not only support Canada being independent, but they would also support Crimea joining Russia (as well as any other areas that wanted to join Russia that are in Ukraine).
If your primary ethos is self determination for national borders, then be consistent with it. But virtually nobody is.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Argument 1: It's the status quo.
Rebuttal 1: Who cares?
A2: Most Canadians want to be independent.
R2: Who cares? Most Crimeans want to join Russia (2014 Crimean status referendum - Wikipedia, UN poll), you guys don't care then. Why care now? No party is consistently pro self-determination.
A3: Canadians like Medicare for all (or insert any alternative policy)!
R3: Once again, who cares? The 10th amendment lets areas keep M4A if they want to keep M4A.
A4: We hate Trump!
R4: Who cares? He's going to be out in 4 years; the supreme court didn't let him have a 3rd term; he might even be dead in 4 years. He's going to be gone one way or the other.
A5: Canadians will never become American! End of story!
R5: Emotional argument. Who cares? Your emotions don't and shouldn't matter; quit being a retarted Karandian (Karen Canadian). You were slapped too little as a child and that needs to change. Stop caring about your feelings; they're irrelevant. Grow a thick skin you fucking pussy! When you base your arguments on emotion, you become hypocritical and you don't care. You even defend the hypocrisy and then accuse MAGA of being hypocritical. Don't be a retard! Don't form ideology based on emotion you fucking spoiled pricks!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Me: Alright; lets make fun of you.
You want humanity to become high IQ so much that you continue to attempt to eliminate the department of education.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Libertarians: I don't think the US should fund Israel because I don't want the US funding other countries, and that is the only reason. I don't care about dead Gazan children; I just want to save money. We should give no foreign aid to Gaza based on the damage we caused Gaza in the past; reparations are horrible. Gazan children don't matter to me; what only matters is reducing the size of the government. If we cared about the Gazan children, then we would support Medicare for all and be like the greens and accept the high taxes needed to save poor children. We will reference children as an excuse to cut war spending, but we don't really care about them is the thing. We just want to save money because at the end of the day, our tax money matters more than poor Gazan children to us.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I don't care if he has kids IF he raises all of them (even if he's a Nazi; you can't ban Nazis from reproducing).
Edit: Musk would ask rando women he didn't know if they wanted to have a child with him. Legal, but he's mentally fucked in the head.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics