Total posts: 8,002
-->
@Sidewalker
--> @ShilaGenesis 2:15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden;17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”You've argued that the Genesis story is literal, if that is the case, then please explain the literal physical existence of a "tree of knowledge"?
We all know about the medicinal characteristics found in trees. Chemical found in trees help restore memory, cure cancer, induce a feeling of Ecstasy or spiritual high. The closest we are coming to this tree of knowledge is Marijuana. Unfortunately God blocked access to both the tree of life and knowledge after he banished Adam and Eve from the garden.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
--> @ElliottDid Jesus actually exist or is he a mythological figure.I believe that Jesus was a man that believed himself to be or was led to be believe that he was the rightful heir to the throne of David and king of the Jews and Jerusalem minus the miracles. While I also believe he was a man wrapped in a myth by the early church
You have given your 2 beliefs of Jesus. Since I am new here I am assuming these are your first admissions after reading the case for the Historical Jesus that you now believe.
According to your post #5:
1. I believe that Jesus was a man that believed himself to be or was led to be believe that he was the rightful heir to the throne of David and king of the Jews and Jerusalem minus the miracles.
2. I also believe he was a man wrapped in a myth by the early church.
The objective of this thread was to build a case for the Historical Jesus and to get as many people to accept this simple historical fact.
You have made such an admission here, “ I believe that Jesus was a man that believed himself to be or was led to be believe that he was the rightful heir to the throne of David and king of the Jews and Jerusalem minus the miracles. I also believe he was a man wrapped in a myth by the early church.”
Thank you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Elliott
--> @StephenI believe that Jesus was a man that believed himself to be or was led to be believe that he was the rightful heir to the throne of David and king of the Jews and Jerusalem minus the miracles. While I also believe he was a man wrapped in a myth by the early church.I agree, that’s certainly possible. I personally think there is a real person behind the story but ignoring the miracles I wonder how much of the end result was distorted through oral tradition and the imagination of the gospel writers.There is one thing that makes me think Jesus was a real person and that is his name. A lot of work in the creation of the New Testament involved the fulfilling of Old Testament messianic prophecies. This is one of them and I would think an important one.Isaiah 7:14 “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.”This to me this suggests Jesus existed as a real person and was reasonably well known by the name Jesus, so they were not able to change it to Immanuel.
The objective of this thread was to build a case for the Historical Jesus and to get as many people to accept this simple historical fact.
You have made such an admission here, “ that makes me think Jesus was a real person”. The case for the Historical Jesus has made you think and you went further, you now “think Jesus was a real person” .
Thank you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Elliott
Did Jesus actually exist or is he a mythological figure. Outside of the gospels there is no contemporary evidence and even the gospels were written after the events portrayed and were probably derived from oral tradition.The thing is, it doesn’t matter. Jesus is a god or a god incarnate, he is not totally human because he has powers that make him superhuman and like all gods he exits through belief and belief is all that is necessary for him to exist, and the actual human Jesus or Joshua to give him his real name is unnecessary.Even if some ancient scrolls were discovered that proved Jesus and his life was simply a work of fiction, I don’t think that would influence Christian beliefs one iota.
Jesus' name in Hebrew was “Yeshua” which translates to English as Joshua.
When did Yeshua change to Jesus?
The first time that name was ever used was in June of 1632. Jesus, which is the name used by most English-speaking people today, is an English transliteration of a Germanic adaptation, of a Latin transliteration, of a Greek transliteration of an originally Hebrew name, that is simply Yeshua.
Ehrman, a former fundamentalist Christian turned agnostic atheist, has written numerous books challenging traditional views of the Bible himself. Did Jesus Exist?, however, contains scathing criticism of the "writers, bloggers and Internet junkies who call themselves mythicists". Ehrman says that they do not define what they mean by "myth" and maintains they are really motivated by a desire to denounce religion rather than examine historical evidence.He discusses leading contemporary mythicists by name and dismisses their arguments as "amateurish", "wrong-headed", and "outlandish".
The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are the main sources for the biography of Jesus' life, the teachings and actions attributed to him.
The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca. AD 116),
The first non-Christian writer to talk about Jesus was the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (born Yosef ben Matityahu),who lived around AD 47-100. He referred to Christ in his history of Judaism “Jewish Antiquities” from AD 93. In the book, Jesus comes up twice – once in a curious passage about Jesus’s supposed brother Jamesand in another paragraph that has since been questioned in its authenticity.
There is plenty of evidence Jesus was a historical figure. Even the 2 major religions Islam and Christianity accept Jesus as a historical person. That is 4 billion followers of Islam and Christianity combined accept Jesus as a historical person that existed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
--> @Shila1. What evidence do we have that Jesus was in fact a Historical person?The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are the main sources for the biography of Jesus' life, the teachings and actions attributed to him.None of which are eyewitness accounts. Although I have no actual reason to deny a man, believing himself to be rightful heir to the throne of Jerusalem existed.
The Gospel authors recorded the accounts of eyewitnesses who followed Jesus everywhere in their Gospels and even referenced these eyewitnesses in their titles. Eg. Gospel of Matthew according to Matthew.
The first non-Christian writer to talk about Jesus was the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (born Yosef ben Matityahu),who lived around AD 47-100.This will be the very much debated The Testimonium Flavianum, which other scholars believed was added by the Christian apologist Eusebius. Indeed many modern scholars reject it altogether. And further, Josephus doesn't refer to him as a god.And as it is you that mentions historian Flavius Josephus, he relates to us a very interesting story that causes me to doubt the whole of the crucifixion story and its timing in particular. It may sound very familiar to many readers of the New Testament:And when I was sent by Titus Caesar with Cerealins, and a thousand horsemen, to a certain village called Thecoa, in order to know whether it were a place fit for a camp, as I came back, I saw many captives crucified, and remembered three of them as my former acquaintance. I was very sorry at this in my mind, and went with tears in my eyes to Titus, and told him of them; so he immediately commanded them to be taken down, and to have the greatest care taken of them, in order to their recovery; yet two of them died under the physician's hands, while the third recovered...'The Life' of Flavius Josephus.Two died where one recovered! An interesting coincidence when we read the account of and Joseph of Arimathea from the gospels:“And after this Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus”. John 19:38-42.KJVThe similarities cannot be denied. Isn’t Josephus’ crucifixion story identical to what happened in the case of Jesus’ crucifixion where we are told that there was only one survivor of three and that survivor’s body was asked for by a man we know as a “secret” disciple of Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea?Is it at all possible that historian Flavius Josephus and Joseph of Arimathea are one and the same person regardless of what we are supposed to know of these apparently two different people?? I suggest that you study and research the origins of the names of both historian Flavius Josephus' and Joseph of Arimathea, you may be surprised what you discover.
We are talking about the Historical Jesus. Historian Flavius Josephus wrote about Jesus and the events surrounding his life. Remember Flavius Josephus was an Historian and not a theologian. His accounts covered the historical Jesus.
Were the 12 disciples who followed Jesus historical as well?All cult leaders of the time recruited followers and an inner circle.But I have always found this particular recruitment story more than suspicious. Have you actually read the sequence of events. Well no you haven't because there is no sequence. We are simply asked to believe this in itself was a miracle of sorts. Tell me would you just drop everything leaving your home, employment or business, wife and children simply because a complete stranger, that you know nothing at all about, simply walked up to you and said " follow me" without a by you leave? It makes no sense at all on the face of it does it? But we are asked to suspend simple common sense and believe this is exactly what happened.
Did Paul and Peter start the church in Rome?
Consequently, churches composed of both Jews and Gentiles were formed at Rome. According to Irenaeus, a 2nd-century Church Father, the church at Rome was founded directly by the apostles Peter and Paul.
We have the evidence from Josephus who tells us about the martyrdom of James, the brother of Jesus, who was the leader of the Jerusalem church. Josephus also relates the execution of the apostle James. We also have the evidence of the early church writers. The first important church historian, Eusebius, wrote in the early fourth century.Ah yes, Eusebius again, putting words into the mouth of someone that lived hundreds of years before himself.
We are talking about history which is a study of past events. Past events place Jesus as a historical figure.
Did Jesus claim he was God?No. In fact it appears while everyone around him was speculating who he might be, Jesus seems at pains to avoid the subject and repeatedly refers to himself as"the son of man" i.e very human. He didn't even say that he was the son of god, although, IF he was the rightful heir to the throne of David then he would have also inherited the title -son of god- as other Hebrew kings did before him.
The thread was to first establish the fact Jesus was a historical person , that he existed and left am impression behind.
Today 2 billion Christians believe Jesus is God. All the modern science and research has not diminished the Christian position.
[Jesus said:] “I and the Father are one.”This more than likely means that he and his god are in agreement. Jesus understood the scriptures by all accounts and hadn't come to change them, if the bible is to be believed.If this is not the case then it is a baffling statement that Jesus made here. Because he also says many things that contradict his own statement. Such as here>“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the Son, but the Father only. “ (Matthew 24:36) , clearly showing the two to be separate entities and clearly talking about what he knows and what only his god knows.
Jesus did not want his disciples to get ahead of themselves and for good reasons. More was to come before that dreadful day. We saw the destruction of the Holy Temple and city Jerusalem in 70AD.
It was also time to spread his teachings to the world and not just the Jews to save the Gentiles.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
-> @ShilaJesus, fictional, mythical or otherwise is undeniably a historically recorded character.Whether the accounts of his life and activities are vaguely true or not, is impossible to know.Though I would suggest that most interpretations are embellished and exaggerated, such that we can only regard the biblical tales as myth or fantasy.For instance, would Jesus have been his given name?
Jesus' name in Hebrew was “Yeshua” which translates to English as Joshua.
When did Yeshua change to Jesus?
The first time that name was ever used was in June of 1632. Jesus, which is the name used by most English-speaking people today, is an English transliteration of a Germanic adaptation, of a Latin transliteration, of a Greek transliteration of an originally Hebrew name, that is simply Yeshua.
Ehrman, a former fundamentalist Christian turned agnostic atheist, has written numerous books challenging traditional views of the Bible himself. Did Jesus Exist?, however, contains scathing criticism of the "writers, bloggers and Internet junkies who call themselves mythicists". Ehrman says that they do not define what they mean by "myth" and maintains they are really motivated by a desire to denounce religion rather than examine historical evidence.He discusses leading contemporary mythicists by name and dismisses their arguments as "amateurish", "wrong-headed", and "outlandish".
The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are the main sources for the biography of Jesus' life, the teachings and actions attributed to him.
The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca. AD 116),
The first non-Christian writer to talk about Jesus was the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (born Yosef ben Matityahu),who lived around AD 47-100. He referred to Christ in his history of Judaism “Jewish Antiquities” from AD 93. In the book, Jesus comes up twice – once in a curious passage about Jesus’s supposed brother Jamesand in another paragraph that has since been questioned in its authenticity.
There is plenty of evidence Jesus was a historical figure. Even the 2 major religions Islam and Christianity accept Jesus as a historical person. That is 4 billion followers of Islam and Christianity combined accept Jesus as a historical person that existed.
Created:
--> @Tarikso, FUNCTIONALLY each person needs to figure out FOR THEMSELVES what they believe is "right" and what is "wrong" ?Yes, if what they believe aligns with God.K_Michael: In other words, I can believe whatever I want so long as God says it's right?That's the equivalent of letting a child pick out a candy at the store except they only get the candy bar if they pick the one you decided they should choose. Either the Bible (or whatever informs your flavor of religion) has clear instructions on how you should live your life and you don't get to decide for yourself, or the Bible isn't the word of God.
The Garden of Eden was a candy store. God even declared it so.
Genesis 2:15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden;17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Created:
-->
@coal
--> @ShilaYour guess is as good as mine. I am amazed by his subsequent behaviour. He seems to have some issues to work out though.
We should all be concerned how we react to Russian refugees who still idolize Putin.
Created:
The Five Worst Sports Cities, According To Futures Betting Odds · 5. Chicago · 4. Seattle · 3. Minneapolis/St. Paul · 2. Washington, D.C. · 1. Detroit.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
if determinism holds then whether we blame or punish wrobg-doers is iteself pre-determined, as is the outcome of this debate. 'Que Sera Sera'.Sorry i'm not very motiated by the 'free will' topic anymore. I'm faking it!My primary aim is to expose the underlying mechanisms that inform "how we should act".It appears that most of the identifiable "winners" of recorded history were primarily motivated by unadulterated self-interest (charismatic sociopaths).The law in particular seems to be a thinly veiled cudgel used to intimidate and destroy the challengers of those privileged to wield it.When I was young I thought the law was an unfeeling machine that grinds up anyone who crosses its path regardless of individual talent, wealth, or power.Now I only wish that were true.Ironically, the concepts of "objectivity" and "freewill" make us complacent slaves.
Have you considered the alternatives to "objectivity" and "freewill" that makes us complacent slaves?
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
“The text message suggests that Arizona GOP leaders had no intention of using donations to help pay for the audit effort, despite what it had been telling its supporters in fundraising pleas. In the end, the $6 million audit was bankrolled through a separate fundraising effort by election denier groups, along with $150,000 in initial taxpayer money”“Pitch in to Help Us Finish America’s Audit!” and “Help America’s Audit” were among the dozens of pitches from the party.“The pattern was evident around the country. In total, the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol found that more than $250 million was raised off fraudulent claims that the election was stolen. Trump’s campaign continued to raise money for an “Election Defense Fund” that did not exist. Trump’s PAC has raised more than $100 million, much of it on claims the election was stolen, and he has largely hoarded the money while spending some on candidates and some on his own lawyers”
Americans have been lied to throughout their history. America was built on lies from stealing land from the Native Indians to Black Slavery. From all the wars against communism to wars on Muslims. So paying to continue the big lie is American Democracy. Americans have bought into the system. Trump was very much a part of this system and all the fraud cases against him needs to be defended and Americans know that very well.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
--> @TheMorningsStarI do agree that technology was already diminishing healthy social interaction from a psychological POV, but I feel as if the Covid lockdowns dialed it up to 11. Also, what are your thoughts on the possible long term effects to the immune system via the hygiene hypothesis + lockdowns and over-sanitization?I feel like you watched too much news.Anyway it’s reasonable to assume an overwhelming majority of parents were sane enough to allow their kids to take their masks off at home.the strict mask requirements only lasted for a couple of years. When it comes to mental and immune development, children below the age of 5 would be most effected I would say. TV and smart devices were probably helpful in this circumstance for young kids seeing faces. Though this all just common sense to me.
American children are used to seeing people in masks. In fact they were raised to accept people wearing masks as entertainment. It started with the cowboy bandits, then bank robbers and KKK.
American could understand why Trump refused to wear a mask during Covid pandemic. Trump did not want to look like all the other common criminals. He preferred to hide behind his lawyers.
Getting the entertainment value out of wearing masks will be the bigger challenge. Children know you can do a lot of naughty things if you wear a mask. Now we are forcing them to weak masks and therefore giving them permission to act like all the other mask wearing characters they saw on TV.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
--> @ShilaIt means you don’t know Asian children.I will neither confirm nor deny this. But what relevance does it have as it concerns the subject of this thread?Soon as you advised him, he got banned.Unless I advised him on his posts on the subject of pedophilia, then I don't see how I'm even remotely responsible for his getting banned. I don't know much on the circumstances that lead to his ban, so I won't state much on it.
You were communicating with him just before he got banned. Try to remember what you told him that altered his behaviour so radically?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
--> @ShilaNo one is white.White is just a discriminatory remark made by people who have darker skin
Are you then saying the White Supremacists movement is full of misguided delusional people? That white lives don’t matter because there are no whites. Should we recognized these people as Albinos?
Created:
-->
@coal
--> @Shilabest.korea is a weird
Wonder where he got the God complex? He started out praising communism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bibliobibulimaniac
--> @LemmingI understand it's a confusing question, and that is why I have brought it on here.I have a school assignment which is based around evaluating who was responsible for the Holocaust. I wanted to take a moral approach and analyse that area, and it lead me to that question.While I know it's confusing I have to tie it around responsibility as that is the assignment focus
It had to take both groups, the morally ambiguous and the intense fanatics to justify the extermination of 6 million Jews.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Biden has said many recorded racist comments.That’s a lie. He had gaffs but his statements were not meant to be prejudiced or hurtful or to advance white supremacy.Biden apologized for telling a radio host that black voters torn between voting for him and President Trump “ain’t black,” He was talking to Charlamagne Tha God, a host on “The Breakfast Club,” a nationally syndicated morning show popular with black millennials. It’s likely Republicans never even heard of this guy or black millennials for that matter.Some black people may like the Republican Party but the Party doesn’t like them. Just look at the makeup of the Republican Congress.
Biden worked for President Obama. He is aware of the high standards Blacks set for themselves and others.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
--> @ShilaYou don’t seem to know Asian children.What does that matter?
It means you don’t know Asian children.
We get that from your advice to Best.Korea.You mean your erroneous inference?
Soon as you advised him, he got banned.
Created:
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
-->@Shila@Stephen@TradesecretStephen,In my post #809 above, have you EVER seen such a Bible ignorant and stupid woman that Shila represents, other than Tradesecret? Watch Shila come up with a myriad of Satanic EXCUSES now to not bring forth her 2nd class woman Historical Jesus Thread! She will RUN and HIDE to prevent herself from myself and you, and the membership, in easily making Shila the continued pseudo-christian Bible fool regarding her proposed thread's topic!"The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says." (1 Corinthians 14:34)
You forget it was women that anointed Jesus.
Interesting Holy Bible Facts
Which Woman Anointed Our Lord Jesus Christ With Oil?
In the Holy Gospels, there are different accounts of women who anointed our Lord Jesus Christ with oil. The first one mentioned is in Luke 7:36-50. The second is mentioned in John 12:1-8. The third is mentioned in Mark 14:3-9 also recorded in Matthew 26:6-13.
+When we look closely into these three accounts, we find that they were actually three separate events that occurred on three separate days in three different places by three different women.
In the New Testament, Jesus Christ reveals Himself as our anointed King, Priest, and Prophet. He is God’s Holy and chosen Son, the Messiah. In fact, Messiah, which literally means “anointed one,” is derived from the Hebrew word for “anointed.” Christ (Gr. Christos) means “the anointed one.”
All this was possible because the women anointed Jesus thus fulfilling the prophesies.
Your scriptural ignorance is very telling.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
-> @Shila@ Brother D. ThomasFor your information I was asked by Stephen to start my own thread on the Religion forum. I have been doing research on the historical Jesus and thought it would be a great start to build a case for the historical Jesus so Christians would cease doubting and atheist start believing.Indeed. I encouraged you to do so. And what's more, I am looking forward to it.
I started a thread to build the case for the historical Jesus. It is just the start.
Created:
Posted in:
1. What evidence do we have that Jesus was in fact a Historical person?
The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are the main sources for the biography of Jesus' life, the teachings and actions attributed to him.
The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca. AD 116),
The first non-Christian writer to talk about Jesus was the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (born Yosef ben Matityahu),who lived around AD 47-100. He referred to Christ in his history of Judaism “Jewish Antiquities” from AD 93. In the book, Jesus comes up twice – once in a curious passage about Jesus’s supposed brother Jamesand in another paragraph that has since been questioned in its authenticity.
2. Were the 12 disciples who followed Jesus historical as well?
There is plenty of evidence that the twelve disciples were real people. In fact, no one who knows the evidence can seriously entertain the thought that these men were not real people. We have evidence from both Christian and non-Christian sources that the apostles were real people (I am assuming that by the 12 disciples you mean the 12 apostles). I was watching a video one time by Bart Ehrman, who is an atheist, but also one of the top scholars about things related to the Bible. A fellow atheist who was not well informed tried to tell Ehrman that he did not believe that Paul existed. Ehrman rebuked the man for making atheism look foolish. No serious person could claim that Paul did not exist. It would be like claiming that Cicero did not exist. This is crazy thinking.
We have the evidence from Josephus who tells us about the martyrdom of James, the brother of Jesus, who was the leader of the Jerusalem church. Josephus also relates the execution of the apostle James. We also have the evidence of the early church writers. The first important church historian, Eusebius, wrote in the early fourth century. He tells about all twelve of the apostles, plus Paul, relating where each ministered and how they died. Eusebius quotes his sources, such as second century historian Papias and Irenaeus and other Christian writers. The reliability of Eusebius varies somewhat, but he was a careful scholar and he quoted his sources. Some of the things he tells us about what happened to the twelve may be inaccurate, but what cannot be wrong is that there were twelve apostles. There is no way someone like Eusebius could have gotten the number of apostles wrong. Irenaeus, writing in the second century, tells us that he learned under Polycarp who knew the apostle John personally. Is it possible that Irenaeus got this wrong? I do not think so. If we go back to such books as the Didache and the Letter of Clement to the Romans, both written around the turn of the first century, that there were twelve apostles was assumed. This had been the tradition of the Christian church from the beginning of its existence. Is there any possible motivation for the church to make up the existence of twelve apostles? I cannot think of any.
The Didache, a very early Christian catechism dates from the very late first century. When it was written, some who had known the apostles were still alive, although they would have been quite old. The Didache is also known as “The Lord’s Teaching Through the Twelve Apostles.” The unknown writer of the Didache assumes that there were twelve apostles because it was common knowledge that there were twelve apostles. The people who knew Jesus personally would have known how many apostles there were. It is irrational to believe that there were not twelve apostles of Jesus because every account of Christianity is unanimous on this account, including even Josephus who was not a friend of Christianity.
Did Jesus claim he was God?
Many contemporary New Testament scholars do not believe that Jesus of Nazareth ever actually claimed to be God.
According to C.S.Lewis’s we have three choices.
1. Liar: Jesus knew he wasn’t God, but he said he was;
2. Lunatic: Jesus thought he was God, but he actually wasn’t;
3. Lord: Jesus was who he said he was—God come in the flesh.
Bart Ehrman. This is how he responds to C. S. Lewis’s argument:
Jesus probably never called himself God…. This means that he doesn’t have to be either a liar, a lunatic, or the Lord. He could be a first-century Palestinian Jew who had a message to proclaim other than his own divinity.
There are two occasions on which Jesus is almost stoned to death because of who he claims to be:
The Jews said to him, “…Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died?…Who do you claim to be?”…Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” So they took up stones to throw at him. (John 8:52, 53, 58-59)
[Jesus said:] “I and the Father are one.” The Jews took up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?” The Jews answered him, “We stone you for no good work but for blasphemy; because you, being a man, make yourself God.” (John 10:30-33)
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
--> @ShilaTo debate publicly one needs to be knowledgeable, eloquent and have a certain amount of charisma.
How do I test for Charisma?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
--> @Best.KoreaCartoons are for children. Are you children?Everyone is someone's child. And while anime are cartoons, like any work of fiction, they spark the imagination; they spark interest; they spark emotional entry. Your rationale is flawed. If one were to watch a political show, which is for the most part "fiction," how would that speak to one's age, or as you implied, "maturity," as opposed to watching "Black Lagoon," for those of you who know is an anime with themes which I'm fairly confident most parents would not want their children watching?If you don't like anime/cartoons, then you don't like them. But don't fool yourself into thinking that it's because you're more "mature" than those who do. Your statement in and of itself is a testament to that.
You don’t seem to know Asian children. We get that from your advice to Best.Korea.
Created:
Posted in:
Too bad Trump wasn’t there to pardon him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
--> @ShilaWhen left to one's thoughts the mind opens. What will you see? The true form of what you really are, or the empty shell of what you want to be? Are you afraid? Do you fear Silence?
No mention of fear, isolation or silence in my profile.
Created:
-->
@Athias
--> @coalI am embarrassed for you.So? Relevance? Why do believe it necessary to state to me how you feel, rather than address the contention I provided?I am disinclined to talk in circles.Suit yourself. Have a nice day, sir.
Not sure why you are defending spanking. At the same time respecting assertiveness in the same person.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgim
If the victims are black it's racist. If the shooter is black it's racist. If the shooter and victim is black it's racist. If neither is black it's racist (for leavin them out)
There are over 45,000 gun related deaths in America 2020 data. Blacks are 5 times more likely to be killed by guns. That still leaves 9000 white deaths by guns.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
--> @ShilaI will need to get permission to post a picture of my hymen to both prove I am not a bot and that I am a virgin.That’s nuts
If nuts is what you are looking for, you won’t find any on Shila.
Created:
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
--> @Shila.Shila,YOUR QUOTE IN YOUR UNGODLY POST #803 IN GOING AGAINST JESUS' TRUE WORDS AS YAHWEH GOD INCARNATE: "I am going to start my first thread which is a case for the historical Jesus."What part of the following passages don't you understand as a mere "second class" woman, you Bible fool?!?“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp the authority over the man, but to be in silence.” (Timothy 2:12)“ But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ and the head of the woman in man. For the man is not of the women; but the woman of the man.” (1Corinthians 11: 3,8 )“I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare, whose heart is a trap and whose hands are chains. The man who pleases God will escape her, but the sinner she will ensnare.” (Ecclesiastes 7:26)NEXT SECOND CLASS WOMAN LIKE SHILA THAT GOES DIRECTLY AGAINST JESUS THE CHRIST'S TRUE WORDS WILL BE ...?
You forget it was women that anointed Jesus.
Interesting Holy Bible Facts
Which Woman Anointed Our Lord Jesus Christ With Oil?
In the Holy Gospels, there are different accounts of women who anointed our Lord Jesus Christ with oil. The first one mentioned is in Luke 7:36-50. The second is mentioned in John 12:1-8. The third is mentioned in Mark 14:3-9 also recorded in Matthew 26:6-13.
+When we look closely into these three accounts, we find that they were actually three separate events that occurred on three separate days in three different places by three different women.
In the New Testament, Jesus Christ reveals Himself as our anointed King, Priest, and Prophet. He is God’s Holy and chosen Son, the Messiah. In fact, Messiah, which literally means “anointed one,” is derived from the Hebrew word for “anointed.” Christ (Gr. Christos) means “the anointed one.”
All this was possible because the women anointed Jesus thus fulfilling the prophesies.
Your scriptural ignorance is very telling.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
--> @TheMorningsStarSomehow I find SupaDudzs description more alarm ringing than your own,Wearing face masks doesn't seem that large an issue for development to me, but maybe having seen the face regularly during formative years is something I take for granted,It's not as though 'all people are wearing a mask, family, TV, people are still seen without masks.Also seems to me people still have time to encounter microbes, though maybe not 'as much as they might have had. . .I 'do remember being sick way more when I was young, than as an adult,Though I don't know if that's because children are more susceptible, or if there's a lot of sicknesses we get as a kid, become immune to as adults.
Not sure if you can find a mask to fit your long snout. Take your Covid shots.
Created:
-->
@Elliott
--> @ShilaI will need to get permission to post a picture of my hymen to both prove I am not a bot and that I am a virgin.And equally, I could post a picture to prove that I’m a penguin.
Why, you didn’t get banned for being a penguin. Why do you need to prove it?
Created:
Posted in:
I think the teens in this generation must think our generation has gone nuts and are quite possibly disenfranchised.
Our health officials argued during the entire Covid pandemic wether masks were effective.
We also had president Trump suggest we inject disinfectant, bleach, sunlight, hydroxychloroquine who eventually got Covid along with his wife and son. Only to be replaced by Biden who is 79 and coughs with or without a mask on.
Stats on Covid..
627,903,264 Cases worldwide.
6,564,422 deaths worldwide.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
--> @ShilaShila,YOUR QUOTE: "Because the Gospels are eyewitness accounts ofJesus and his teachings they quote the actual words spoken by Jesus."You are correct, you ungodly woman that is not supposed to be within this Religion forum to begin with! That being biblically said, JESUS SAID: “I tell you that everyone who has will be given more; but the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him. And these enemies of mine who were unwilling for me to rule over them, "bring them here and slay them in front of me." After Jesus had said this, He went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem.….” ( Luke 19:26-28)Yes, the above KILLING statement by our Jesus is relative to His Second Coming. Nevertheless, Jesus promoted His disciples to bring anyone that did not want Jesus to rule over them to KILL these people in front of Jesus, therefore Jesus was an accomplice to this killing act!Shila Bible fool, do we still promote Jesus as an ever loving and forgiving God (1 Timothy 3:15-16) because of what He said in the passage in question? Or, do we just accept that Jesus is a serial killer within the scriptures and admit that we worship an horrific serial killer God of the innocents, like within the Great Flood that He enacted that murdered innocent zygotes, fetus' and babies?Bible fool Shila, when are you going to actually READ the JUDEO-Christian Bible and understand that your position here is to STFU and remain silent towards the man that outright own you and what you do? “But I suffer not a woman to teach, NOR TO USURP THE AUTHORITY OVER THE MAN, but to be in silence.” (Timothy 2:12)NEXT DUMBFOUNDED OF THE BIBLE LIKE THE HELL BOUND WOMAN "SHILA" WILL BE ...?
For your information I was asked by Stephen to start my own thread on the Religion forum. I have been doing research on the historical Jesus and thought it would be a great start to build a case for the historical Jesus so Christians would cease doubting and atheist start believing.
You are a strong critic of biblical scholars, your participation will be greatly appreciated. What say you?
Created:
-->
@Elliott
--> @ShilaWhich part of Shila is a bot that you would like to see and touch to confirm it is not?Which part of Shila would it be possible to see and touch?
I will need to get permission to post a picture of my hymen to both prove I am not a bot and that I am a virgin.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Start your own thread, you may be able to keep up with that.
I am going to start my first thread which is a case for the historical Jesus.
Created:
Posted in:
Thank you all for your support. I am glad to be back and not at all offended that my personality was seen as highly automated. But I did pass the I am not a Robot test at the beginning of my sign on. So it was a bit surprising that was somehow overruled.
But I am back and after I revealed a little more of myself I won over some friends. No damage done.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405
--> @ILikePie5--> @ElliottI wonder if Lemming may be right and Shila could be a chatbot part of the time, and post human comments other parts of the time. Or be intentionally acting like a bot.I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a part time bot/part time real person.Me too. 50/50.
Which part of Shila is a bot that you would like to see and touch to confirm it is not?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
Today, Ukraine seized the strategic town of Lyman, which was an important railway hub for the Russian army. The town fell under the area which Russia claimed to have annexed, and thus which fell under Russia's nuclear umbrella.But of course, there were no consequences for Ukraine taking back its territory.In the grand scheme of things, today's event was insignificant by itself. However, each little victory like this will chip away at something: either Russia's illegitimate claims to Ukrainian territory or Russian national sovereignty itself. Every day where Ukraine gives Putin the finger and advances further and further past his red line in the sand is a good day.
Should Putin lose the Ukraine war. Russia will be charged with the cost of rebuilding all the cities and buildings they destroyed in Ukraine as well as charged with crimes against humanity.
This is what Putin dragged Russia into. Losing is no longer an option for Putin.
Created:
-->
@coal
--> @ShilaYou are trying hard to reason with a 14 year of Korean. Spanking is the only thing that works in Korea. Look what happens when the child is spared the spanking. They go ballistic then nuclear.You are correct. No doubt about that.
Looks like the mods are into spanking too.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
--> @ShilaI only very occasionally debate for fun.I don't have the time to research and debate seriously.
I have never publicly debated. So I am not sure of the outcome.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
--> @ShilaIf Badge is Irish, they were probably raised as a Catholic and therefore will know all about predatory behaviour in the vestry.Just saying.
Badger admitted here:
Badger: I say obscene shit all the time. I don't play at being a college professor on an internet forum so I can scold young boys over PM for kicks. One's an appropriate use of an internet forum. The other is predator behaviour.I didn't ask you for shit, you dopey bitch. I trolled an obnoxious and silly poster.
Badger didn’t ask for her shit. He asked her for nudes. Makes sense since you cannot tell a minors age from just shit alone. Nudes makes the job easier.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
It is none of your business who and when one member engages another or who and when members became agreeable. It appears to me that you simply post for for no other reason but the sake of posting, rendering your posts meaningless and irrelevant to the thread.And you need to learn to read what it is you choose to comment on. The agreement I have with Double_R in this case is that Sidewalker is dishonest.
So you unnecessarily dragged Reverend Tradesecret into your agreement that sidewalker is dishonest.
Read your post:
Yes Double_R, this is right out of the Reverend tradsecret textbook of denial and deceit. And you can expect this kind of deviousness from sidewalker in the future.
Double_R drags several others before agreeing with you.
Double_R starts out with Sidewalker then jump to Ehyeh and end up with Stephen. But the person Double_R ends up agreeing with that Tradesecret is dishonest is Stephen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Just don't want to delete my thoughts.Drummer Hoff, Pvt Pyle, Guard dog, Rabid dog, Hess, Spasm, Control, Intent, Understand, Cog, Laws of Gravity, Beating a cog can change it's shape, Beating a cog in anger, Beating a human can change their shape, beating a human can change other human's shapes, why beat a cog in anger, why beat a human in anger, beating a cog will not change other cogs shapes, Retribution, To the best of your abilities, What happens if succeed, fail, To you, To task, Right time place person, Brain tumor, Psych self improvement and agency, desire for or not revenge an evolutionary trait, We are avatars of our own nature and experiences, If a sliver causes my pain burning the tree that gave it will not remove my pain, Value X more than X leads to X, Death Larsen, Being part of existence our insides are part of nature and nurture, don't watch your legs centipede, Can a choice be made for you, Problem of sets, But to not be my ego screams in defiance, How can anything be valued without an observer, Expected ability of individual, No one there but pieces, Atheism killed meaning by it's method, Sliver came from bark bark from tree Hitler was a piece of bark, What is justice fairness, Chance inside and out occurs that expected outcomes do not result, Psychology depends on will of individual to change except for AA where drinker accepts their weak will or high dependence has left them unable to choose to quit, We identify with and are our parts, Maybe word moral confuses me, S**t happens, Manson, Djinni, Guilt vs Pain, Milgram Experiment, Stanford Prison Experiment, Patty Hearst Stockholm Syndrome, People always have a choice,
Save these thoughts. There are social media textual analyzers that might help you uncover your psychological profile and what makes you in your own words: “Shallow education. A bit rambly. A bit lacking in coherence at times. Generally meh. I'm usually a rather friendly and polite person I'd say, although I do have lapses on occasion.”
I'm from Oregon.
Created:
-->
@Mharman
--> @ShilaNow you seem to be bringing up an argument from another thread into this one. You want to knock my debating skills? Fine then. I challenge you to a debate. A real one, not some forum back-and-forth.The Topic: Higher Elo on DART is Automatically a Sign of Better Debating SkillsYou: ProMe: ConYou should have no problem accepting this debate since you are constantly using users' elo ranking as a means to evaluate them. I'll be setting it up momentarily.
Shouldn’t that be obvious to you the one who wins more debates is the better debater?
Created:
-->
@Mharman
--> @ShilaIt says I have not participated in any debates. It doesn’t say I lost the debates I participated in. In your case you lost the majority of the debates you participated in.Again, because I gave little effort in those debates. Regardless, it is better experience than having no debates on record at all.
Losing 80% of the time need not be a bad experience if you prepare for it.
I have never lost a debate. That works too!
Created:
-->
@Mharman
--> @ILikePie5We weren’t involved in the process.You weren't. I was. I will admit publicly that I was the person who sounded the alarm bells to the mod team, which is the biggest reason for my apology to Shila.
For someone who passes off as unknown in every category still managed to convince the mods some other member was a bot. If your debating skills were better. We might never have figured your true motives.
Created:
-->
@Mharman
--> @ShilaJust checked your win ration is even lower. It’s under 21%That is because I fall into the low effort category. If you're going to try to make that ad hominem attack on me, then you should check your own profile first. Otherwise, it gives me the ability to check yours.According to your profile, you haven't been in any debates yet. Using your own logic, it is reasonable to say that you have even less ground to stand on here.
It says I have not participated in any debates. It doesn’t say I lost the debates I participated in. In your case you lost the majority of the debates you participated in.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Shila is gone, the forums can heal
Are you saying all you guys are sick?
I could have stayed away a little longer if I knew.
Haha
Are you trying to humour me?
Created:
-->
@Mharman
To conclude, having a higher elo doesn't mean you are of higher intelligence, and it doesn't even mean you're a better debater. If you are #1 on the site, it simply means you're the best on the site out of those who put actual effort into it (assuming you aren't a complete noob sniper who can't beat better competition). You could be the best debater on the site period, and you could also be the most intelligent user, but that is not guaranteed.
Just checked your win ration is even lower. It’s under 21%. Why don’t you wait till you got better before offering any advice.
Created: