Shila

--> @Shila

Would your opinions change if you did have a wife?

After your exchange with Polytheist-Witch are you convinced Dart is some special haven for stupid people?

No to both

Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

For the night is dark and full of terrors.

--> @Shila

--> @Shila

Avery is convinced only rape can turn her fantasies into reality. The evolutionary advantage Rape brings has convinced her to solicit such pioneers.

I've explicitly said, throughout the entire thread, that rape is not an evolutionary advantage.

Here are some examples that took me two minutes to find:

"It's not evolutionarily advantageous." ... "Rape may help the ugly, hopeless loser, but that doesn't help the gene pool in the long-run (hence, isn't evolutionarily advantageous)." Religion is an evolutionary advantage (debateart.com)

"In the plainest English: rape is an evolutionary disadvantage."  Religion is an evolutionary advantage (debateart.com) 

"Nope. I've argued that it's disgusting **because** it's evolutionarily disadvantageous."  Religion is an evolutionary advantage (debateart.com) 

You are simply not reading what I say.

So now you are against rape being an evolutionary disadvantage. You find that disgusting.

But your links say religion is an evolutionary advantage, which too would be disgusting to an atheist.

You just need more time to decide which disgusts you more.

The feelings are a result of whether it's evolutionarily advantageous. Rape is not, so that explains why there are a lot of hard, negative feelings towards it.

Religion is an evolutionary advantage. It's Atheism that is the disadvantage. Firm Atheistic beliefs will never capture human emotion like religious ones did/do. Also, religious tribes could whether the harshness of evolution better through their beliefs, even if those beliefs were total bs. That's the point of the thread.

It's hard to keep track of all of Trump's legal entaglements, maybe this will help.

Tracking Trump's ongoing investigations, civil suits and countersuits | CNN Politics

--> @Sidewalker

Added 09.22.22 10:09AM

Opinion: How Trump's terrible day went from bad to worse - CNN

If Trump goes bankrupt with all these charges against him and somehow manages to bounce back. He deserves to be re-elected as President to lead a bankrupted America back to MAGA.

--> @Shila

I’ll admit we’re somewhat limited in our capacity to do so, but we do have our ways.

"Getting less than an "A" in college is a waste of everyone's time"  Anonymous

Added 09.22.22 10:09AM

Opinion: How Trump's terrible day went from bad to worse - CNN

--> @Lair77

We actually do investigate potential instances of multiaccounting. If Novice was doing it, we would have already intervened.

Blackwashing versus whitewashing, just what does this mean? - VOX ATL

Blackwashing – The Burning Platform

Instead of being creative, corporations like Disney are "blackwashing" traditional white characters, to be black like the Little Mermaid. Naturally it is causing backlash. The same as it has been for changing well-established characters like Superman and even 007, James Bond, to be "blackwashed" instead of the obvious solution: create your own new characters and stop ripping off well-established white (or other races) characters. All they are doing is causing further division. It's senseless and unneccesary. 

--> @Best.Korea

healthy and mentally stable boys do not make great soldiers

I Kant believe it.

subjectivity is like - - RELATIVE DIRECTIONS - - up, down, left, right

your "up" is not my "up"

your "left" is not my "left"

these terms are still useful, as long as they are understood to be RELATIVE TO THE INDIVIDUAL

"objectivity" is like - - ABSOLUTE DIRECTIONS - - north, south, east, west, altitude, latitude, longitude

these are much more specific

--> @Polytheist-Witch

1. I don't have a wife.

2. My SO doesn't like any old music so they would not care.

3. My point was that DArt isn't some special haven of "stupid" people, not that humanity is awful.

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

-> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @3RU7AL

You blew the metaphor.

Would you go to a surgeon for constipation?

--> @Shila

-->@TWS1405

--> @Shila

->@Avery

--> @Ramshutu

I still don't find your overall case of hardcore skepticism and sky-high bar setting to be reasonable. There are certainly limitations to the poll, of which you've covered, but they're not debilitating enough to render the poll results as merely an expression of perceptions. The poll needs a few reasonable assumptions and a unique interpretation of the results in order to be made valid.

I think I could defend this poll against you in this debate, and thereby show it has more value than merely collecting "perceptions".

When are you available?

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

Classic hypocrisy to ask another to provide information that they themselves have been unwilling to provide (in their profile). *facepalm* 

I am not debating anyone. So there is less reason to know.

Every single time you reply to someone, and consistently respond to them, yes, you ARE debating/discussing with them. Hypocrite.

--> @Shila

@TWS1405

-->@Shila

The military will see a dramatic drop in rape cases as transgenders and LGBT fill the ranks.

TWS1405: Transgenders are less than 0.5-0.8% of the population, and LGBQ are less than 5-8% of the population. Most wouldn’t pass initial medical and psych screenings. So no, there wouldn’t be enough to “fill the ranks.”

Just shows how little you know about the military.

Really? Hmmm...guess my 5 years of active duty service in the US Army Military Police Corps (Airborne), service in Desert Shield/Storm, two tours to Gitmo and stationed at Fort Bragg "shows how little (I) know about the military." *rolling eyes*

The current transgender and LBTQ population could more than fill every position in the military.

Shows hot little YOU know about the military and what it takes to qualify for military service. 

Assuming that the U.S population number published online only takes into account those with a valid U.S citizenship and that there is no exception to the rule that you must be an American to serve in the military, the percent of American citizens who serve in the military is also 0.727%.

Blah blah blah ... your usual word salad nonsense.

--> @Shila

->@Avery

--> @Ramshutu

I still don't find your overall case of hardcore skepticism and sky-high bar setting to be reasonable. There are certainly limitations to the poll, of which you've covered, but they're not debilitating enough to render the poll results as merely an expression of perceptions. The poll needs a few reasonable assumptions and a unique interpretation of the results in order to be made valid.

I think I could defend this poll against you in this debate, and thereby show it has more value than merely collecting "perceptions".

When are you available?

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

Classic hypocrisy to ask another to provide information that they themselves have been unwilling to provide (in their profile). *facepalm* 

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @Shila

--> @Shila

A little shaking from you in the right places could lighten the situation.

Then I rather it stays as dark as modern Europe.

Twerking in the dark won’t help Europe either.

Yeah but seeing you in the dark is the only way to stomach you.

--> @Shila

You are welcome!

--> @Shila

A little shaking from you in the right places could lighten the situation.

Then I rather it stays as dark as modern Europe.

Benatar argues that bringing someone into existence generates both good and bad experiences, pain and pleasure, whereas not doing so generates neither pain nor pleasure. The absence of pain is good, the absence of pleasure is not bad. Therefore, the ethical choice is weighed in favor of non-procreation.

--> @Barney

RationalMadman: Still waiting for you to accept or suggest tweaks to the settings.

--> @Shila

Thank you!

--> @Shila

You are most welcome.

--> @Novice_II

I think God is provable through ones own self consciousness. As an extension of this, i believe morality is objective and Mortem and i can prove it.  Mortem or I plan on maybe opening up a god debate in the future on the matter. You should read into menos paradox. 

--> @Terran_01

RationalMadman: so, to understand you correctly, I am the evil one here out of everybody here?

I actually listened to some amount of your video and tried to explain what I understood of it to others. I actually voted on the debate as I saw was the way to vote on it.

Others ignored you all along and I am the evil one? I am the asshole? I am the corrupt one? Every breath I take, your soul dies a little more? Is that a death threat or what?

What is it you even want exactly? 

--> @Shila

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

Oh I'm sure you'd like more "information" about me, you grotty little stalker. I'm sure it would greatly help you when making use of comments like this: Callout thread: Novice_II and debates for free wins. (debateart.com) 

Your response does not qualify you as a debater.

You're a no-name noob with no record yourself to speak of.

Why would anyone need to justify their debate record to you LOL

--> @Shila

You are most welcome

--> @Shila

--> @Ramshutu

I still don't find your overall case of hardcore skepticism and sky-high bar setting to be reasonable. There are certainly limitations to the poll, of which you've covered, but they're not debilitating enough to render the poll results as merely an expression of perceptions. The poll needs a few reasonable assumptions and a unique interpretation of the results in order to be made valid.

I think I could defend this poll against you in this debate, and thereby show it has more value than merely collecting "perceptions".

When are you available?

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

Oh I'm sure you'd like more "information" about me, you grotty little stalker. I'm sure it would greatly help you when making use of comments like this: Callout thread: Novice_II and debates for free wins. (debateart.com) 

--> @Shila

Thank you!

--> @Shila

Thank you. Your machine learning is amazing

-->@Shila

No doubt

--> @Shila

Thank you

--> @Shila

A human would get the joke, lol.

--> @Shila

You are welcome ShilAI

--> @Shila

You cant spell Shila without AI

--> @Shila

Thank you. Your machine learning is amazing

--> @Shila

Amazing AI reply.

--> @Shila

we thank you