Total posts: 3,556
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
No way, I mean, how could I possibly challenge such brilliant arguments like "stereotyping keeps the majority safe from the minority", and "blacks are violent and dangerous", I'm just not smart enough to counter that with a sound argument backed by facts.Instead of the usual strawmans, how about addressing real arguments. like:1) Censorship keeps the minority far-left safe from the majority.2) Blacks are culturally prone to violence and that violence culture is tolerated because any discussion about poor cultural beliefs about black on black crime, riot culture, fatherless families and gangster life is routinely censored to preserve a toxic culture that can't naturally thrive without censorship (strawmanning away the truth) and endless affirmative apologies.(It's those yeehaw MAGAS who dun it!)
All MAGA has is a culture war, no ideas, no capacity to govern, no principles, no plans, just the culture war. You guys need to defend bigotry and prejudice, because it's all you have, the MAGA Platform is bigotry and prejudice and nothing more. Take away the people you are against, and there's nothing left, no policies, no ideas, no plans, just outrage at the existence of "others", the bad people.
I always ask, and not a single one of you can tell me why these "others" upset you so much. I think it's because you don't know why, you just know that's what you are told to do.
Putin convinced you that Americans are your enemy, and you were stupid enough to believe it, and you don't even know why.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Too bad Ginsberg isn't around to remove the Orangeman for the far-left tribe.
Unfortunately, they didn't put anything in the Constitution about removing a Fascist.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
The SCOTUS is the Deep State.They are known to take bribes from the billionaire class.
It's the best Supreme Court that money can buy.
Created:
Posted in:
You’re clearly not intelligent enough to come back with a sound argument backed by facts.
No way, I mean, how could I possibly challenge such brilliant arguments like "stereotyping keeps the majority safe from the minority", and "blacks are violent and dangerous", I'm just not smart enough to counter that with a sound argument backed by facts.
I told you before, you win and I'm in, you have convinced me that bigotry and prejudice are good, and stereotyping is the best way to go forward. I think my MAGA stereotypes are an accurate portrayal of the Trump base, if I'm wrong, then you should be intelligent enough to come back with a sound argument backed by facts.
Granted, its hard to keep up to speed on the MAGA stereotypes, and sometimes these minority people are going to take offense to things like "Mexicans are rapists" and soldiers that die on the battlefield are "losers and suckers", even the way Trump stereotypes MAGA women "And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything", but those snowflakes that take offense to stereotypes are just minorities rocking the boat.
In the end, I get it, you MAGA people don’t want your boat rocked.
Eeeeehaw!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Soon you can have scrambled eggs for breakfast, or if you are in Alabama, scrambled chickens.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
There is nothing normal with being forced to suppress risk assessments just because in some cults "bigotry and discrimination is evil"
What “risks” are you talking about. I swear, you guys are afraid of everything, there would be no need for “risk assessments” if you would just stop making things up to be afraid of.
It's absolutely normal to discriminate, even if you are bigoted toward MAGAS. It's just more productive if discrimination is based in reality rather than indoctrinated propaganda.
Oh yeah, discrimination is good, democracyis bad, and Trump is the cure.
It keeps the majority safe....lol, no, it just keeps far-left propaganda safe from scrutiny. And the far-left is only about 25% of America. Far from any definition of a majority.
I was quoting Amber, apparently shethinks people “the majority” are the people with an old junk car in the frontyard.
Kids 20 years from now are going to wonder how people willingly engaged in some ridiculous behaviors and beliefs such as promoting people on the basis of the color of their skin and which hole they have sex with. And make no mistake, the modern LBGTQ movement is not at all about acceptance, but about promotion. They are like rainbow colored Jehovah's witnesses, only your house gets burned down if you do not answer the door.
That’s what you are afraid of, you think LGBTQ is contagious? You think one of their “promotions” will make you wake up transgender some day?
I wish you guys could see how utterly mindless your Pavlovian arguments are, the rest of us just see MAGA people drooling whenever they hear Trump ring a bell.
MAGA has martyrdom, grievance and victimhood instead of ideas, you are so obsessed with fighting that you don’t even know, or care, what you are fighting for.
Created:
Posted in:
You’re one sorry sick twisted trolling ignorant libtard.
Goes with the intent and purpose of stereotyping. It keeps the majority safe from the anti-social/normal MAGA Rednecks rocking the boat.
Created:
Posted in:
The superintelligence is already here, and they call it...
...Sidewalker
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Amber
Provide your arguments and explanation.Is there necessarily hatred, bigotry, prejudice involved just for speaking against or having a non acceptance of the L.G.B.T.?Non acceptance of a certain "type" of person is the definition of bigotry and prejudice.And?Where is it written that people, often the overwhelming majority, must "accept" an outlier individual that doesn't conform to the majority's cultural, social, psychological, social-psychological, medical, and law-abiding cultural norms, morals, standards and expectations?
That’s some big ass words for a MAGARedneck. But hey, I see your point,prejudice and bigotry are a good thing, I’m in.
According to you, law abiding people not accepting the "type" of person like criminals, are bigots and prejudice.
WTF, you guys can’t figure out how to use a fucking dictionary, don’t you clowns have enough to throw your bigoted hissy fits about, you disapprove of the definitions of words too?
Well, of course they (we) are!
Not all opposition to others rocking the boat isn't a bad thing.
I’m sorry, but I don’t speak dumb fuckredneck, can you translate that sentence into English please?
“I love the poorly educated” – Donald Trump
Goes with the intent and purpose of stereotyping. It keeps the majority safe from the anti-social/normal minority rocking the boat.
I see, so bigotry and prejudice keep redneckssafe, you go girl, keep your trailer park safe.
It's exactly why Jesse Jackson famously admitted that when he is walking down a street at night and hears footsteps and shallow voices behind him, turning around and seeing it's white people, made him feel safe and free. He knows blacks are violent and dangerous.
And I know the MAGA base is mostly violent anddangerous green teeth rednecks.
Not all, but an offshoot of their community rock the boat within their own community that makes law abiding blacks fear for their safety.
How about your community, are there law-abiding rednecks in the trailer park that fear for the safety of democracy?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
There's a way to love all.Would you like to know how you could start going that way?
Would you like to know how you can stop being so prejudiced?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Why can't you love all people?
Because some of them are immigrants, some are transgender, and some are Democrats.
You gotta hate who Fox News tells you to hate, or you could lose your MAGA card.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Most of them we will never know the name of and more often they are on the side of military and governmentiI love reading Roosevelt's posts because it actually reminds me of what you guys are like. What you secretly think he says because he has no filter.The liberal who mocks the poor, and the working g class. Mocking GP and calling him a substitute teacher as if that is a bad thing or mocking me and saying I work at IHOP .You show me the other side of the liberal hivemind though. The undying loyalty to governments. Literally the same attitude Nazi sympathizers in Germany had
You nailed it.
At our last Vast Conspiracy Convention, we elected Roosevelt to be our official spokesperson.
Man, you are really on top of it..
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
He had plenty of time and still he couldn't do it.Then lets see the audits.
You really think we'd leave evidence like that, of course not, we destroyed the audits with our Jewish Space Lasers.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
He was also a vile racist and a major contributing factor to the trail of tears.
You're half right, yes, Trump is a vile racist, but no, he had nothing to do with the Trail of Tears.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Mail in ballots are sent to registered votersSome of whom have died, or live in parks, or in abandoned lots. Many others are confused as to why they had to cast provisional ballots because the database indicates they had already sent in a mail-ballot.It does take someone of lukewarm intelligence to put the pieces together. Don't worry you have as much time as you need.
Trump ordered his hand-picked Attorney General to force those pieces together if he had to.
He had plenty of time and still he couldn't do it.
It takes a moron to think those pieces go together.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Trump is trying to fix military spending by getting nato countries to spend more money on their own self defense.
Trump said he would reduce the debt as President, he increased the debt by $7.8 Trillion.
He's trying to fix military spending for Putin maybe.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Beware, the Orangeman cometh.
Beware, I'm a 33rd degree Mason, that means I could zap your ass with one of our Jewish Space Lasers any time I want.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
We rotate assignments at the beginning of the month, in March I'm on the mind control ray gun, and with release 4.3 we can penetrate your tin foil hats.
By April, you will both be drag queens, and there is nothing you can do to stop us.
Bwaaahahahahaha.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Key takeaways:1) Businesses rely on rule of law to have a safe and stable place to do business.2) State officials have encouraged rogue judges to torch the rule of law by targeting political rivals such as Trump and Musk for victimless process crimes.3) This sends a signal to all businesses that the "rule of law" only applies to Democrat supporters in those states.4) O' Leary calls these states "loser states"
Damn, we can't get a single vast conspiracy past you, you are taking all the fun out of being a member of the deep state.
And I'm on the "World Domination" committee, and it's my turn to have to report back to Soros.
Gee thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
History, like everything else, is nothing but a vast conspiracy with you at the center, the past is there to fool you, there are tremendous nefarious forces in the shadows and they are all focused all on you.
Only the conspiracy is real, only you are in the know.
It's on you to enlighten us, only you can tell us what is real, only you can tell us the truth, you must lead us out of the darkness.
That's how history works.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Are you using that topic to defend gays and pedophiles in this topic?
Both are your topics, perhaps you can troll yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
This vid says it all regarding math. Or does it? It is a great teaching aid for those not familiar with principles of math.However, I dont see Alan Turings hole, affecting the principle that states, there can only exist five, regular/symmetrical and convex polyhedra of Universe, and only three of those have all equilateral triangular surfaces.Hope others will find time to watch this vid, as I did. Best wishes, as is very informative, with clarity.
I watched it, it's OK at best, but the problem being discussed is fascinating.
First, it's not a hole in math so much as it is the case that math doesn't have a logical foundation to rest upon. The big unresolved question in mathematics is this: just what is the connection between mathematical truth and physical reality, do mathematical objects exist independently of the human mind or not?
There were really only three approaches to the Philosophical Foundations of Mathematics, Hilbert's Formalism, Frege's Logicism, and Brouwer's Intuitionism. Hilbertand Brouwer said mathematical objects are created by the mind, but on the otherside of this, you have Eugene Wigner writing “The Unreasonable Effectiveness ofMathematics in the Natural Sciences” which tells us that there’s got to be moreto mathematics than that.
In the end, and as the video shows, Hilbert’s Formalism fell to Godel’s proof that Formalism isn’t possible by showing that it is provable that you cannot prove the truth of all arithmetic statement within arithmetic, and Turing’s demonstration that you can’t have an effective decision procedure. Gottlob Frege’s Logicism fell to the self-referential paradox, even after Russell tweaked it with the Principia, the attempt to reduce mathematics to logic failed. And we were left dangling with Intuitionism which we intuitively feel cannot be true because the challenge to the law of contradiction left us with nothing to logically work with, and it’s foundational postulate that the truth of a mathematical statement is a subjective claim leaves us with an unacceptable vagueness of the intuitionistic notion of truth. It became clear that Brouwer's Intuitionism has no hope of explaining “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Physical Sciences”.
Godel showed us that the Formalist interpretation of mathematics is not possible, as the Logicist wasn’t, and Intuitionism didn’t stand up to scrutiny. There were only really three horses in the race and none of them won.
In the end we just have to accept that the greatest mathematical minds ever produced have pretty much collectively concluded that we do not understand the connection between mathematics and reality.
Created:
Posted in:
There was a girl in my High School who loved all people, her nickname was "Snatch".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I don't know about you, but personally, I'm prejudiced against "serial rapists" types.don't forget bigoted!I'm sorry if you find my prejudice against "serial rapists" types to be personally offensive.I feel sorry for you. I feel sorry for us all that Double R pretends he needs to explain English to me, but not to you.
Try using a dictionary, that would be a good start.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I don't know about you, but personally, I'm prejudiced against "serial rapists" types.don't forget bigoted!
I'm sorry if you find my prejudice against "serial rapists" types to be personally offensive.
Created:
Posted in:
So anyway how is "serial rapists" not a "type" of person?
Don't be ridiculous, of course "serial rapists" is a "type" of person, why wouldn't it be?
I don't know about you, but personally, I'm prejudiced against "serial rapists" types.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Incoherent much?It's hard to remember how complete your obtuse act is on this site.[Sidewalker] Non acceptance of a certain "type" of person is the definition of bigotry and prejudice.Let "type" = serial rapistsSidewalker statement therefore implies: Non acceptance of serial rapists is the definition of bigotry and prejudice.I thus appeal to absurdity.
LOL, I love you MAGA drama queens, but here's an idea, get a dictionary and look up the definition of bigotry and prejudice, reading a dictionary should not be too obtuse for you.
And if you have trouble grasping the definitions, try reading real slow, maybe read out loud, maybe this will help with comprehension and understanding.
Created:
Posted in:
Is de-prejudice therapy wrong.
Is it wrong to insist on the discrimination.
Particularly to bigots being that they regret the prejudice felt.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Provide your arguments and explanation.Is there necessarily hatred, bigotry, prejudice involved just for speaking against or having a non acceptance of the L.G.B.T.?
Non acceptance of a certain "type" of person is the definition of bigotry and prejudice.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
If you're going to keep this judgement of me, there's no essence in interacting with me.
That's my point, you are not interacting, you are playing some kind of game that you think is clever..
This is a unique issue that you have. I'm not getting this rhetoric from others.
Oh, I see, well please send me your tough shit ticket and I'll punch it for you.
They just interact as appropriate as possible. If you don't believe what I say, why interact with an individual you believe is dishonest?
You don't know what the word "interact" even means, do you?
It is a matter of reciprocity, in this case it would involve something like a dialog, communicating in both directions, you are not interacting, you are simply playing some kind of game that you think is clever.
Don't waste yourself comrade.
Opposing bigotry is not a waste.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Honestly the only way is to bring club-fuls of HS debating students (or even college debating students) in through invitation. Though the relative juvenile population is declining. I really do think I am one of the only chronically online young persons here at this point and even then I wasn't as active as I used to be because I had to write college apps.Though if you are a HS student, here is your chance.
If you can find one of these HS debating students, then by all means, invite them.
Personally, I think there are better sites designed specifically for them, such as National Speech & Debate Association | Connect. Support. Inspire. (speechanddebate.org)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
I like to have all hearts and minds clear.
No you don't, you are obtuse and incoherent by design, you intentionally obscure the issue.
Do you have a problem with what you think, keywords: what you think my stance is?
I have a problem with the fact that you are patently dishonest about what your stance is, you won't answer questions about it and you seem to think being coy is clever or something. All I know about your stance is you are ashamed of it, if not, you would admit to what your stance is.
You make up things and interrogate people regarding the things you make up, in some way you find being dishonest about your "stance" satisfying or something.
It really isn't the least bit clever, and nobody is fooled by it, your bigotry comes through loud and clear.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
How would we "transform this into a bustling practice platform for debating student"?
What changes would make that happen?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
It's not the point.
Because it's pointless.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
" If that is the question, then no, it's not wrong to provide therapy to those who are seeking therapy"Ok very good. This is all the epicenter of this topic really was.All that other stuff you talkin' is imagination running away with you.
So you admit you just made it all up, "de-conversion therapy" isn't really a thing, and the thread is pointless.
Thanks for clarifying.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Now if you can answer the question, is it wrong for those that insist?Without the assumptions and political figures, go ahead and answer appropriately and directly as others have in this thread as well as other topics.If you don't want to or not going to answer the question, just say so .
I still don't know what you are talking about, I still don't know if de-conversion therapy exists anywhere outside of your head, you refuse to explain it, so I don't know what the question is even about.
Is it wrong to insist on therapy for others seeking it to reverse their gender transition?
OK, so you say there are transgender people who have transitioned, and now they are seeking therapy to either deal with it, or to reverse the gender transition. If that is the question, then no, it's not wrong to provide therapy to those who are seeking therapy, why would it be? I would presume that the therapists and doctors that worked with them in the first place would be the best place to start in discussing remorse and possible remedies.
Is there a lot of demand for this sort of therapy? If you didn't just make this all up, can you reference something about it that is more than theoretical, maybe something about it that is out here in the real world. Is there somebody you know of that provides this so-called "de-conversion therapy"?
Also, I presume you are trying to make some point with this thread, what would that point be?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Until you can quote where I said I was upset like you say, you have committed a loaded question fallacy.
That's a good MAGA soldier, deny, deny, deny. With MAGA, dishonesty is the only policy.
De-conversion therapy is trying to fix the transgender regret.The ones that insist on de-conversion therapy are the ones that are helping those that are seeking the help for the therapy.
So you made it up. Please reference something outside of your head that relates to this de-conversion therapy you speak of. Is there a web site for someone that provides it, are there peer reviewed papers about it, white papers, studies, anything in the real world?
Now if you can answer the question, is it wrong for those that insist?Without the assumptions and political figures, go ahead and answer appropriately and directly as others have in this thread as well as other topics.
This cryptic and obtuse thing you do, it's supposed to be a clever way of being dishonest, right?
It's amazing to me what MAGA Morons think is clever.
Created:
Posted in:
Is it wrong to insist on the l.g.b.t.?Particularly to transgenders being that they regret the decisions made .
That's a pretty cryptic post.
What is de-conversion therapy?
Who is doing this "insisting"?
And the question you refuse to answer, why do transgender people upset you?
As far as I can tell, you are upset because your handlers told you to be upset, and you don't actually know why, you are just a good MAGA soldier, upset upon orders to be upset.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.This video cracks me up, haha.I don't know why too much scandal. This is the typical conversation you can have with a close friend in a streetcorner. Isn't this?I obviously understand that democrats use this video as a political weapon. All the same, there is nothing wrong in this chat.
Nope wrong is an understatement, it's heroic among MAGA followers.
I'm sure he can grab you anytime he wants.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Sexual ssault is not necessarily rape. Maybe he walked up to somebody and grabbed them by the pussy.
And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Meanwhile Trump compares himself to the Putin opposition leader who was murdered by Putin.Nevalny stood up to PutinTrump kissed Putin’s ass
Trump promised a dictatorship, he promised retribution, he's gone to the Supreme Court to argue that it should be legal for him to kill political opponents.
Putin is showing us what a Trump presidency would look like.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Trump is going to take all the RNCs money to pay his legal bills.Today was a light day, only $355 million.I guess Trump's gonna have to cut back on the porn stars.
Plus, now they have to go buy another FBI informant for the impeachment inquiry, those perjurers aren't cheap you know.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Trump is going to take all the RNCs money to pay his legal bills.
Today was a light day, only $355 million.
I guess Trump's gonna have to cut back on the porn stars.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Benjamin
I challenge you to give me a single example of a concrete action Elon Musk did that was in any way usefull to society.
Do you really think society gave him all that money for nothing? It certainly wasn't for his personality.
You know what they say, follow the money, whatever it was, society found it useful to the tune of two hundred billion dollars.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Well that makes the GOP Russian, and you should fight to the death to destroy it.
No, it makes Trump and his MAGA followers Russian, pay attention.
Apparently, when the Supreme Court rejected Trumps argument that he should be able to have his political opponents murdered, it didn't apply to his handler, Putin takes out Alexey Navalny, and Trump whines "No fair, if my boss can do it, then why can't I?"
You MAGA Morons need to have a bake sale or something, he needs you suckers to come up with another $355 Million for him today.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I hope all Republicans will sell everything they own and send the money to Trump.
He needs it, today's judgement was for over $300 Million....and he can't do business in New York for three years.
Fortunately, he has a Trump Tower in Moscow coming.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Who would you like to see as an RNC co-chair?Liz Cheney.Actually I am very happy to see the RNC broke and in disarray. Trump has destroyed the Republican Party. It will eventually be gone like the Whig Party.
Trump and the MAGA movement is not Republican, it's the US extension of the United Russia Party.
Created:
Posted in:
Created: