Sir.Lancelot

Thanks homie!

Would you guys like to judge?

Slainte, greyparrot, Athias, and TWS are reliable votes, however.

Slainte is a very neutral voter.
Greyparrot is a master of History, Economics, and Politics. (Also a neutral voter because they've voted against me before.)
Athias is also a master of this subject.
TWS has some kind of former education on foreign nations, I think? (Also a neutral voter because he judged against me in the past.)

Rational will grudge-vote against me because of some "pixel war."

Is RM even affected by losses or wins?

This happened with our previous debate he conceded, that I won and both our ratings were unaffected.
What is this glitch?

Are you asking for a truce or declaring war?

Make. Up. Your. Mind.

"Lancelot, you can arrange whatever corrupt shit you want to troll me, it tells a lot about you on and off here that you cannot engage honestly in any shape or form to win.
You want war, that is fine.
I will grind wins out eventually, regardless."

Oh pls do.
I love it when people declare war on me.

But FYI, every-time you've made a threat towards me, it has never went your way.
Making empty threats based on weird assumptions won't be any different.

Thanks for the vote, but I wasn't being literal when I said Con conceded.

I meant to say he gave up arguing his case, but your RFD already covered that part. It was a mistake for me to say he conceded.

Could you vote on this since Con technically conceded?

Clever move.

I wondered how voters might react to my Kritik against my own definition.

Thanks for agreeing to this debate, Slainte.
I couldn't find an opponent for jamgiller.

I'll get to voting on this right away!

Why is it unrated?

Thank you!

Do you want to vote on this?

Thanks whiteflame.

Thank you!

Thanks for the vote!

I invented it.

Don’t listen to him.

This debate was just for fun.

Since your specialty/area of interest is politics/economics/policy debates, is this something you would enjoy reading and voting on?

"Betas are not risk-avoidant, deltas are. You don't understand the types. Deltas are the most cowardly, betas will take huge risks for their alpha(s) and allies, willingly."

The definitions were borrowed from a source on the web.
In my argument, I pretty much explained that the definitions for these terms change quite frequently because this typology/spectrum (whatever it is) isn't even a legitimate one.

Horoscopes have more consistency.

You might not enjoy reading through and voting on this one as much because this was a practice debate.

But I can guarantee you will like judging on the one me and Savant are doing currently.

Flow can be understood as the comprehension of the spoken words, whether the rhythm of the raps are smooth sounding, and whether they match the pace or sound of the beat.

Why did I get credits for my vote in this debate?

Thank you!
This subject’s actually kinda fun.

😃

I can't, I'm blocked.
😢😢😢

Thank you for the invite. I will not be voting on any of your rap battles. I clearly don't know enough. Best of luck with it!

Guess I just wanted to see what my limits are.
And it's good practice.

Thanks for your vote!

It's okay, I've done that too.

Neither of you addressed the other side's constructives.
So if we compare them both, the impacts of his case outweighed yours.

Fair enough.
Don't feel pressured to vote if it ain't your thing.

I’ll get to this.

All good!
No rush at all.

Tagging you guys just incase you’re interested.

Would you like to vote on this or would you prefer not to?

You guys had great votes.

Is this a subject you’re interested in?

Thanks for the vote!

I didn't.

I messaged Barney this morning, but he didn't see it until after you posted your round.

I'll have my vote finished by today.
Start thinking about your guys' next topic and post about it on the Tournament Entry thread.

A huge part of competitive debates is being able to take a lot of L’s.

It’s okay.

I chose you for my Tournament because you’re a great debater and an intelligent voter.
That said, I also believe Savant performed better here.

Vote for who you think won.

Thx for the vote!

Con conceded.

Okay.

Devon, look at Con’s formatting for Round 1.

Now compare it to PREZ-Hilton’s formatting in his two Tournament debates.:

1. https://www.debateart.com/debates/4333-w-o-f-tournament-laissez-faire-capitalism-is-more-efficient-than-social-democracy

2. https://www.debateart.com/debates/4391-%5Bwdt%5D-on-balance-the-german-invasion-of-poland-1939-was-justified

What do you notice?
🤔🤔🤔

Only if they're a Skywalker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFog6enc6HE

Incest in movies is definitely a 70's-80's thing... Like Star Wars and Back To The Future. 😂😂😂

What did you think of the resolution?

This one has a month, so no need to rush for it. But would I be able to get a vote on this one? (It's okay if you don't.)

There is a voting setup in the description for first-time voters for rap battles, but you're welcome to vote according to whatever setup you have in mind.

https://www.debateart.com/debates/4604-rap-battle-sirlancelot-vs-rationalmadman

Lyricism- Wordplay, puns, metaphors. Creative lines.

Flow- Whichever lines sound the smoothest and don't go on for too long.

Rhyme- Self-explanatory.

Diss- Quality or quantity of insults. Whoever had the brutal/savager roasts.

(All 7 points go to the winner, but the above 4 qualities are talked about in the RFD.)