The point is that even in a 100% perfect theoretical vacuum of empty space there would still be virtual particles popping in and out of existence creating a vacuum energy.
That's weird, the links work for me, but I'm on mobile so maybe that's why they don't work for you. While the energy fluctuations don't stay long, they do exist, and they do come from seemingly from nothing. Whether or not they "endure" isn't really relevant.
It's my understanding that the relationship between a particle's energy and it's lifespan are interdependent, meaning if a particle has lots of energy it will decay quickly, or if a particle has little energy it will decay slowly. Since quantum fluctuations are changes in vacuum energy, and matter and energy are interchangeable, then this is equal to matter being created spontaneously.
Here are some helpful videos on the subject:
https://youtu.be/Dd0r85dJdaw
https://youtu.be/FBeALt3rxEA
Back in Vietnam and even into the battle of Ramadi, double agent indigenous recruits would be placing markers for mortar strikes inside the american bases.
I'd appreciate it. I guess I should start choosing 30-day voting. Because it seems like nobody notices in two Weeks even though I vote bump all the time.
There are several mechanisms contained within the neo-darwinian synthesis. Naturally selection, genetic drift, mutation, and genetic drift. There also horizontal gene transfer being studied. Are you arguing against all of those?
I read that to mean that a 100 percent perfect vacuum doesn't exists which I agree with. But that's what I was responding to
The point is that even in a 100% perfect theoretical vacuum of empty space there would still be virtual particles popping in and out of existence creating a vacuum energy.
Win or lose, I appreciate your taking the time.
Close enough to 6 I think
Look up the "Casimir effect"
That's weird, the links work for me, but I'm on mobile so maybe that's why they don't work for you. While the energy fluctuations don't stay long, they do exist, and they do come from seemingly from nothing. Whether or not they "endure" isn't really relevant.
It's my understanding that the relationship between a particle's energy and it's lifespan are interdependent, meaning if a particle has lots of energy it will decay quickly, or if a particle has little energy it will decay slowly. Since quantum fluctuations are changes in vacuum energy, and matter and energy are interchangeable, then this is equal to matter being created spontaneously.
Here are some helpful videos on the subject:
https://youtu.be/Dd0r85dJdaw
https://youtu.be/FBeALt3rxEA
Can do
Vote bump
Back in Vietnam and even into the battle of Ramadi, double agent indigenous recruits would be placing markers for mortar strikes inside the american bases.
I'd appreciate it. I guess I should start choosing 30-day voting. Because it seems like nobody notices in two Weeks even though I vote bump all the time.
Please consider voting. It would be a shame to let all this hard work to go to waste.
Vote bump
Anyone plan on voting on this? 3 days left
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
I would like to clarify that I was not trying to call my opponent's character into question or recommend he be deducted conduct.
thank you for voting
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Thank you for this debate.
If it makes you feel any better, i believe the "swallowing spiders in your sleep" thing is an old wives tale.
Vote bump
Vote bump
I'm not worried about you conceding this debate. I may address human evolution specifically or I may not to demonstrate that evolution is true.
Well then let's get it
I'll take this if you let me define evolution as "changes in allele frequencies in reproductive populations over time."
Woops said genetic drift twice
There are several mechanisms contained within the neo-darwinian synthesis. Naturally selection, genetic drift, mutation, and genetic drift. There also horizontal gene transfer being studied. Are you arguing against all of those?
My bad, I meant to say ,"...Gnostic Athiesm doesn't either..." In the final paragraph
Which position are you arguing?
totally understandable
Vote bump
You guys are philosophy buffs. Please consider voting on this.
Thank you for this debate.
Thank you for your vote
Vote bump
Vote bump
vote bump
vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump