I know You asked TheWeakerEdge, but Kantian Theory universalizes maxims of moral action, rather than the action itself to determine if the maxim contradicts itself when universalized. That's why it's opposed to utilitarianism. I'm going to make the distinction as clear as I can when I respond to undefeatable
Universalizing motives of moral action is logically necessary to determine what a universal moral principle would look like
Welcome to the club. I've had to wait almost a month too on the flat earth debate lol
I did make a mistake in the description when I said "moral theory(ies)"
<3
UwU
That comment is why I didn't accept lol
Lol, "convert to atheism"
I know You asked TheWeakerEdge, but Kantian Theory universalizes maxims of moral action, rather than the action itself to determine if the maxim contradicts itself when universalized. That's why it's opposed to utilitarianism. I'm going to make the distinction as clear as I can when I respond to undefeatable
Dont forget man, there's only 12 hours left
#50
Awesome, I hope you can be patient though, because it will take me a few more days to get everything together in a logical flow.
I'm sure I will
Bump
Yeah he is difficult to read. But I've been working on it so we'll see
Thank you for your thoughtful vote
I had the rebuttals in my mind but ya know, can't always post in 3 days
bump
just reminding you. there's only six hours left
"Invincibility lies in the defense, the possibility of victory, in the attack." -Sun Tzu
I pmed it to him before putting it here. But he didn't log in
Woops, meant to vote on this. Had half of it typed out
Just out of curiosity, was this inspired by my flat earth debate?
Riveting discussion
I figure determinism would defeat both arguments
What the heck man
Saw this late. But the point is to make the topic more debate able, not just an easy win bc of some redefinitions.
This will be interesting
You should probably add the word unjustly to the end of your definition of murder
Yeah with murder defined so broadly I don't think you can lose.
I love trolley problems, but the only argument for con given the parameters (since we can't define who is tied to the tracks) is hard utilitarianism
All I said was, if the resolution assumes god, then yeah creatio ex materia is compatible with science.
It's good man sometimes I take the whole two weeks
That's funny, I also thought of the exterminate humanity argument. Definitely watchlist material
Did you quit the site?
Ha, impatient I see
Maybe this time ludolph will get the challenge he's been waiting for
Ah man, I'm sorry this didn't get voted on. I wish I'd seen it earlier in the voting stage
oromagi with the solid rebuttal and fruit inspector comes back swinging, this has been such a good debate.
Dang man, this was looking to be a good debate, and then he just totally quit on you, us the readers, and himself. Free win ig
Feel free man, I'm loaded down rn
Nah man, I think a Kritik approach would be a little too risky with that clause I quoted
"But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up."
I see you trying to bait an easy win lol
This should be a good one. It's interesting seeing everyone's different styles and how they change and evolve.
lol, did i cut it close enough for ya?
It's just you. It's a pretty hotly debated topic
Thank you for your thoughtful vote
I'm sure you did better than you give yourself credit for
I hear ya man. It wasn't directed at you
Impatient vote bump
lol, don't you know it's turtles all the way down?
here we go