Although I'd like to add that a black hole doesn't suck things up like a vacuum like in hollywood movies. Just things that pass over the event horizon become spaghettified.
Yes it does, but the mosquito stays aloft because the force of it's wings against the air is greater than the force of the gravity pulling it towards a mountain. However, it can't escape earth's gravity, because the force of it's wings aren't enough to carry it out of the gravitational attraction (and atmospheric pressure) of the earth.
Flat Earth HAS to retreat into a conspiracy mindset in order to preserve the belief. If a logical fallacy exists, flat earth has probably committed it.
It is definitely possible to gish gallop someone with sources. You should focus on drilling down hard on a few reliable ones that clearly establish causation, rather than an avalanche of sources that 1) have to be meticulously picked through, and 2) can dilute the point you're trying to make.
I remember seeing a television show many years ago about how some sects of people believed that all the people pre-crucifixion did go to hell, but when Jesus died, he went there personally and removed them so they could go to heaven.
The days of being specifically a striker or a grappler specialist are behind us. The modern MMA fighter wins because they are well rounded. While MMA isn't perfect, it is a fantastic arena to test what techniques work and what don't. However, I would want them to remove the gloves and remove the rounds in favor of just one 25 minute round.
MMA is any combination of techniques from different arts, it isn't a style in itself. An individual developing a particular style of MMA fighting is the natural product of ruthlessly applying epistemology to ones martial art.
There's a difference between a martial artist and a martial arts themed entertainer; and the same difference separates martial arts from martial arts themed entertainment.
I'm really expecting some Machiavellian evidence from The Prince about this topic. He gave several examples in the book, and a bit about the nature of love and fear. I don't want to give arguments so I won't say what specifically.
Lol maximum effort
Thank you for voting
Lol bro, 15 minutes is nothing.
Did you watch the video?
https://youtu.be/BpNxWxSHDoA
Everyone knows that big foot are the "rock apes" of vietnam lol
Alright
"A description of reality is referred to as an "if", and a prescription of reality is known as an "ought". "
Did you mean to say "is" instead of "if"
Ah man
Vote bump
Vote bump
Elo farming?
Though it seems hasty to kill someone because of what they MIGHT do rather than what they DID do, wouldn't you say?
Although I'd like to add that a black hole doesn't suck things up like a vacuum like in hollywood movies. Just things that pass over the event horizon become spaghettified.
Yes it does, but the mosquito stays aloft because the force of it's wings against the air is greater than the force of the gravity pulling it towards a mountain. However, it can't escape earth's gravity, because the force of it's wings aren't enough to carry it out of the gravitational attraction (and atmospheric pressure) of the earth.
What would convince you that the Earth is not flat?
Oh well, maybe eventually you'll change your mind.
Maybe you've finally stopped believing the earth is flat?
Well thanks
Thank you for voting
Vote bump
Not on purpose. I forgot what his vote said
Vote bump
Vote bump
How could I have done better?
Thank you for voting
Vote bump
Ah don't be that way, it's only three rounds and I had to address your new arguments.
You are interested in fighting. Please consider voting
Dear Judges, please take the time to look at and compare our sources, as they are integral to my argument.
Vote bump
Well that makes it not really a moral dilemma then if "magically make everyone get along" is an option
Could you elaborate a little more? Like why are these the only two options?
Flat Earth HAS to retreat into a conspiracy mindset in order to preserve the belief. If a logical fallacy exists, flat earth has probably committed it.
I don't think that's against the rules. Just kind of a general conduct thing most of us do.
It is definitely possible to gish gallop someone with sources. You should focus on drilling down hard on a few reliable ones that clearly establish causation, rather than an avalanche of sources that 1) have to be meticulously picked through, and 2) can dilute the point you're trying to make.
Lol
You'd probably be interested in this
I remember seeing a television show many years ago about how some sects of people believed that all the people pre-crucifixion did go to hell, but when Jesus died, he went there personally and removed them so they could go to heaven.
I'm really having trouble fitting this into character limit. So i'm gonna have to cut out a lot of quotation.
Except Jesus' mom lol
The days of being specifically a striker or a grappler specialist are behind us. The modern MMA fighter wins because they are well rounded. While MMA isn't perfect, it is a fantastic arena to test what techniques work and what don't. However, I would want them to remove the gloves and remove the rounds in favor of just one 25 minute round.
MMA is any combination of techniques from different arts, it isn't a style in itself. An individual developing a particular style of MMA fighting is the natural product of ruthlessly applying epistemology to ones martial art.
Lol to answer your question, the wrestler would throw him on his head.
I hope we can have more martial art debates.
There's a difference between a martial artist and a martial arts themed entertainer; and the same difference separates martial arts from martial arts themed entertainment.
No that's never happened to me. Try contacting a mod maybe.
Sorry for the typos, I speech to texted this this morning.
I'm really expecting some Machiavellian evidence from The Prince about this topic. He gave several examples in the book, and a bit about the nature of love and fear. I don't want to give arguments so I won't say what specifically.
Read The Prince lately?
Thank you for voting.