It is near science in the sentence so 'it' replaces science. Science is not a human is true. Science is science. Therefore, it is a true statement, which is a valid defense.
round 1:
Pro shows how accepting the debate was a mistake
I refute and say Bop as well as evidence
round 2:
Pro says he made a grammar mistake. He further says not noticing that was a mistake (does this mean he wants to give spelling and grammar to me?) Pro half conceded.
I remind Pro it is not my duty to correct your grammar mistakes but to argue against. I successfully argue my claim.
round 3:
Pro says I am doing great (which is one step from saying he concedes). He says Grammarly is unreliable.
Pro uses incorrect logic to show someone else lost the debate therefore I am going to lose.
I show even with another editor, Paperrater, that I made no mistakes. I correctly state that that is incorrect logic.
round 4:
Pro has nothing else to say other than repeating his round 3, which I successfully refuted.
I have nothing to say other than my argument still stands which has not swayed my opinion.
round 5:
Pro has nothing else to say other than repeating his round 1, which I have already refuted multiple times.
I conclude that I have made no mistakes proven by Grammarly and Paperrater and that Pro has not pointed out any mistakes.
Pro used off topic sources while I used sources that are coherent with the debate.
Pro even admitted he made a spelling/grammar mistake while I have made none.
the way the question is phrased mainly guarantees 'this debate will end in a tie'. Based on your win percentages, seldiora cannot infer that "equal oppurtunities" are happening because of rating and win percentages lean towards Intelligence_06 winning.
Imagine...
Round 1 Argument "."
Round 2 Argument "."
It was a "bypass" argument for a debate like this one that I used. Like a "hint" as how to bypass the resolution and still win the argument.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/2366-in-this-debate-con-will-use-at-least-one-word-that-contains-the-letter-e
yay RM's back
lol i was just generating an easily winnable argument (probably not urs) since the resolution is somewhat "flawed"
I support.
Ragnar's argument be like:
It is near science in the sentence so 'it' replaces science. Science is not a human is true. Science is science. Therefore, it is a true statement, which is a valid defense.
It is so easy to argue PRO since all resolution says is "it" so that could be anything. Ragnar pretty much wins.
Thanks!
Thanks for voting!
Thanks all for voting!
Thanks for voting!
Thanks for voting!
hi.
I really want to see how this turns out.
Okay........ i did
Thanks for voting
oh ok did not know that.
Oh sorry I was just trying to provide a summary of the debate for those who did not want to read the whole argument. Can you please delete it?
What is a song battle
Here is a summary of the debate:
round 1:
Pro shows how accepting the debate was a mistake
I refute and say Bop as well as evidence
round 2:
Pro says he made a grammar mistake. He further says not noticing that was a mistake (does this mean he wants to give spelling and grammar to me?) Pro half conceded.
I remind Pro it is not my duty to correct your grammar mistakes but to argue against. I successfully argue my claim.
round 3:
Pro says I am doing great (which is one step from saying he concedes). He says Grammarly is unreliable.
Pro uses incorrect logic to show someone else lost the debate therefore I am going to lose.
I show even with another editor, Paperrater, that I made no mistakes. I correctly state that that is incorrect logic.
round 4:
Pro has nothing else to say other than repeating his round 3, which I successfully refuted.
I have nothing to say other than my argument still stands which has not swayed my opinion.
round 5:
Pro has nothing else to say other than repeating his round 1, which I have already refuted multiple times.
I conclude that I have made no mistakes proven by Grammarly and Paperrater and that Pro has not pointed out any mistakes.
Pro used off topic sources while I used sources that are coherent with the debate.
Pro even admitted he made a spelling/grammar mistake while I have made none.
round 4:
Please vote!!!
Our ratings are different.
That is not logically justified.
what do you mean "what is wrong with this argument"
Erasing memory also means erasing the skills of speech. Whoever the test subject is, they will literally go back to being a baby.
your argument undermines the contender advantage
https://ddo.fandom.com/wiki/Contender_Advantage
How
the way the question is phrased mainly guarantees 'this debate will end in a tie'. Based on your win percentages, seldiora cannot infer that "equal oppurtunities" are happening because of rating and win percentages lean towards Intelligence_06 winning.
Would my new RFD be better than the old one?
Am I able to modify my RFD?
Argument- Con fufilled BoP better than Pro. Con also backs up his evidence with reasoning.
Sources- Con used many sources whereas Pro used none.
Grammar and Conduct- both did well, no forefit.
He could just take his opponent's arguments and re-use them as his own.
Wait, first you argued PRO now you argue CON??????? You just switched sides after you lost an argument?
wait why was my vote reported
please vote! I really appreciate if you do!
Thanks! Please vote!
Hey ragnar can you please vote?
Bullets also contain lead which can poison the body.
Poison + cut is clearly much more harm than just a regular cut.
Don't degrade yourself. You are actually a very great debater.
Vote
I just realized I already refuted your argument but you keep bringing it back up acting like i did not refute it.
Please Vote
You realize that your round 3 argument was already refuted in my round 3? Please look at the 1st time I cited brilliant.org in the round 3.
What exactly is "gold"
you also have not rebutted any of my claims which means you say everything I said is correct.
This guy fails to realize its not n geometric sequence, it is a fractional infinite geometric sequence.
Also 1/10^infinity is so small it is undefinable like the width of a line
Ghandi series are some bank notes used in India. Can you please answer my question?
It is 0.1134 not 31134. And that is a calculator upside down which is not the same as right side up.
Can you please define "not same in every circumstance". Also, nobody says 31134 instead of hello. My argument still stands.
What do you mean "not same in every circumstance"
A number is a number. It is the same value in every equation and every instance of mentioning.
Thanks!