TWS1405

->@TWS1405

Reparation was only paid to white farmers who gave up slaves. But the slaves themselves were not given reparation.

It will be interesting to see Kevin Hart playing James Bond.

Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg pleaded guilty to all 15 of the charges he faced in the case. 

It was done in Fantastic 4.

Perry White, Superman.

Spiderman in an alternate universe.

Samuel Jackson as Nick Furry.

Peter Mensah as Oenomaus in Spartacus (TV series)

Those are not even black heroes.

--> @Shila

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Anything "Clinton" says is pure dog shit!

Bill Clinton was 2 term president. Hillary was Senator and Secretary of State and First Lady.

Why are White Supremacists big supporters of Trump?

>@TWS1405

Political witch hunt. That is all this BS is. 

It is a waste of time, manpower and taxpayer money. 

The lawsuit goes into great detail to list Trump’s crimes, including the fact that he listed one of his penthouse apartment’s at 33,000 square feet to dramatically over inflate its value when it was closer to 11,000 square feet. His personal attorney for 10 years and man at the center of much of these crimes has gone on the record to explain in detail Trump’s involvement in them and how he runs his organizations generally.

But as usual, with no thought whatsoever, Trump cultists just hand waive it all away by calling it a political witch-hunt. Why am I not surprised?

-->@Avery

TWS is a normal Conservative.

OK, good start, that's what I'm talking about, batshit crazy stuff like that.

Oh so you're one of those people who think normal Conservatives all believe in "batsh*t crazy stuff".

A perfectly reasonable position.

No, I mean you saying TWS is a normal conservative and isn't a white suprmacist, that is batshit crazy

Do you ever go outside?

Do you ever read his posts?

Try going to his website.

It is more common for Hollywood to whitewash POC and no black would want to see any black washing of a white hero.

-->@IwantRooseveltagain

Yes it did. But normal leaders know not to use racist language because it could incite hatred and violence against that group. In this case not only did we see in increase of hate crimes against Chinese Americans, but against all Asian American groups. Nice job Trump!

Any anti-Asian sentiment was precisely because the virus did come from China, not because of what Trump said. Attacks were continuing way into 2021, retard. 

White Supremacists are big supporters of Trump because Trump is a white nationalist  and racist. Trump and his father were sued for racist discrimination against blacks in one of their housing projects. 

@ahiyah

Did the virus not come from China then?

Yes it did. But normal leaders know not to use racist language because it could incite hatred and violence against that group. In this case not only did we see in increase of hate crimes against Chinese Americans, but against all Asian American groups. Nice job Trump!

Understand dummy?

Trump Has Condemned White Supremacists”

Read the article and it’s obvious  Trump is sending signals to the white supremacists that he is on their side.

People on the Left refuse to see it, but instances like this have got more to do with what people don't want, rather than what they do want.

We know that Trump works alongside Jews so you really can't consider him to be anything close to a white supremacist. It would be insane to suggest he supports neo-Nazism.

Regarding other races, all we have to go by is the fact Trump has said he doesn't want illegal immigrants to flood the country. Some Hispanics support him, as do a reasonable number of Black people. 

Let's not forget that in May 2020, Joe Biden said that if you don't vote for him in the election, "you ain't black"...isn't that kind of racist?

TWS1405

Instead of being creative, corporations like Disney are "blackwashing" traditional white characters, to be black like the Little Mermaid. Naturally it is causing backlash. The same as it has been for changing well-established characters like Superman and even 007, James Bond, to be "blackwashed" instead of the obvious solution: create your own new characters and stop ripping off well-established white (or other races) characters. All they are doing is causing further division. It's senseless and unneccesary.

Considering that most if not all of the characters you listed are gleaned from ancient mythologies--especially Ariel and Superman--complaining about the extent to which these figures have been "washed" is an exercise in futility.

->@TWS1405

How does the character's skin color change the essence of the character? I couldn't care less if Ariel or James Bond are played by POC and see no good reason why anyone else should either. Sans objective evidence Mermaids and fictional secret agents come in only light skin tones, there is nothing objectively wrong being done here. 

I'd have to read up on history to have a stronger opinion, about it and conquerors,

well, when you grow up black or latin or asian or arab and you only see pictures of "white jesus" it sort of does a number on you

Boo hoo, they made a fictional character black. Sure, the original story was Danish or whatever, but mermaids definitionally don't live in Denmark, so they can be whatever ethnicity or mix of ethnicities the creators want.

Its like complaining about having black Vulcans in Star Trek. There is no heritage or truth that's being "whitewashed" or "blackwashed."

Personally, I don't care either way. When Idris Elba was cast as Heimdall, I thought it was cool because Idris Elba is cool.

When they cast Johnny Depp as Tanto, I thought it was fine because I like Johnny Depp as an actor.

By comparison, the whitewashing of historical figures such as Jesus Christ is a lot more sinister, to the point that some Christians have used the claim that dark skin is the mark of Cain and/or the curse of Ham as a justification of the slave trade and white supremacy, while ignoring the fact that Jesus was Middle Eastern.

-->@TWS1405

Blackwashing versus whitewashing, just what does this mean? - VOX ATL

Blackwashing – The Burning Platform

Instead of being creative, corporations like Disney are "blackwashing" traditional white characters, to be black like the Little Mermaid. Naturally it is causing backlash. The same as it has been for changing well-established characters like Superman and even 007, James Bond, to be "blackwashed" instead of the obvious solution: create your own new characters and stop ripping off well-established white (or other races) characters. All they are doing is causing further division. It's senseless and unneccesary. 

There are some white heroes that cannot be blackwashed. Eg. Hitler, Trump, Putin, Stalin, Mussolini. Jim Crow.

-->@TWS1405

good news actually. More chaos and division in the country will surely be a good thing.

-->@TWS1405

You’re a well known liar and a white supremacist just like Trump.

>@Stephen

Blackwashing.

It's part of the "reparations" culture.

Revisionist racism.

I am not debating anyone. So there is less reason to know.

Every single time you reply to someone, and consistently respond to them, yes, you ARE debating/discussing with them. Hypocrite.

I am just posting my comments. They are not formal debates.

How many civilians died in Desert Storm?

Civilian deaths resulting from the conflict are estimated at between 100,000 and 200,000.

-->@TWS1405

--> @Shila

->@Avery

--> @Ramshutu

I still don't find your overall case of hardcore skepticism and sky-high bar setting to be reasonable. There are certainly limitations to the poll, of which you've covered, but they're not debilitating enough to render the poll results as merely an expression of perceptions. The poll needs a few reasonable assumptions and a unique interpretation of the results in order to be made valid.

I think I could defend this poll against you in this debate, and thereby show it has more value than merely collecting "perceptions".

When are you available?

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

Classic hypocrisy to ask another to provide information that they themselves have been unwilling to provide (in their profile). *facepalm* 

I am not debating anyone. So there is less reason to know.

@TWS1405

-->@Shila

The military will see a dramatic drop in rape cases as transgenders and LGBT fill the ranks.

TWS1405: Transgenders are less than 0.5-0.8% of the population, and LGBQ are less than 5-8% of the population. Most wouldn’t pass initial medical and psych screenings. So no, there wouldn’t be enough to “fill the ranks.”

Just shows how little you know about the military.

The current transgender and LBTQ population could more than fill every position in the military.

Assuming that the U.S population number published online only takes into account those with a valid U.S citizenship and that there is no exception to the rule that you must be an American to serve in the military, the percent of American citizens who serve in the military is also 0.727%.

->@Avery

--> @Ramshutu

I still don't find your overall case of hardcore skepticism and sky-high bar setting to be reasonable. There are certainly limitations to the poll, of which you've covered, but they're not debilitating enough to render the poll results as merely an expression of perceptions. The poll needs a few reasonable assumptions and a unique interpretation of the results in order to be made valid.

I think I could defend this poll against you in this debate, and thereby show it has more value than merely collecting "perceptions".

When are you available?

Can you provide more information  about yourself so we know you are qualified to debate?

Based on the information you provided wouldn’t even qualify you as a female. No education, no income, no country, no language listed.

• How does the presence of race hoaxes disprove the presence of racism? 
  

• Swatting hoaxes don't disprove the presence of gun violence.  Just as swatting hoaxes are more convincing because of the prevalence of gun violence, race hoaxes are more convincing because of the prevalence of racism.
  
• Because you major premise is false, your conclusion is disproved.
  

>@TWS1405

JFC! Why is it so difficult to do the math on the years of slavery. 1619 to 1965 is 264 years of slavery, NOT 300. 

Apparently it is; as 1619 to 1965 us 346 years, and 1619 to 1865 is 246…

But sure; only 10 generations of slavery in the US, followed by 4 generations of apartheid, a generation and a half of racially targeted policy as opposed to 12 generations of slavery. 4 of apartheid, 1.5 racially impactful policy.

Those 2 generations make all the difference.

The reason why they whine about racism insensately is because they take their freedom for granted and thrive off the victimhood mentality. 

Projection side; and this could blow your mind, perhaps 10 generations of slavery, 4 generations of apartheid, 1.5 of racist policies; and the institutions that have sprung up around all of them; has created a system that still is not balanced, and in the land of the free, where everyone should be equal - people want to correct it.

Not how it works clown.

But you just showed us how we ended up with 41 million blacks. It was 403 years of black slavery and slave procreation.

-->@Ramshutu

You're way off. 

If only there was some reason those woke liberals can find as to why a country that was in large part a white racist ethnostate with a 300 year history of slavery, and 100 year history of overt Apardheid and ethnoterrorism; and is now the cultural driver of western thought talks more about racism than other places…

->@Ramshutu

--> @TWS1405

Of the surviving 11 million Africans brought across the Atlantic, only an estimated 335k were brought to North America whereas the remaining 10.7 million were taken to the Caribbean and South America. Yet to this very day, no one the world over ever hears about racism against blacks except against those blacks in America.  Sure, there is some racism in other places, but it pales in comparison to the racism claimed in America against blacks. 

If only there was some reason those woke liberals can find as to why a country that was in large part a white racist ethnostate with a 300 year history of slavery, and 100 year history of overt Apardheid and ethnoterrorism; and is now the cultural driver of western thought talks more about racism than other places…

Trump won the 2016 elections on his Make America Great Again call to white nationalism and racist unity.

Trump lost 2020 even though his MAGA message was the same because racism carried a cost. It’s called reparation.