Total topics: 2
It's clear that most of this site's users want more relaxed moderation standards. But I'm super libertarian, so I suspect that many wouldn't go as far as I would in relaxing those standards. In order to test that, I thought I'd put my ideal moderation standards out there. Feel free to share your thoughts!
There would be only three cases in which moderators would take action:
1. Harassment of a Specific User
- "harassment" defined as persistent one-sided initiation of conflict
- would not apply to flamewars in which both/all sides are equal participants
- would not apply to insults or slurs in and of themselves
2. Violations of Privacy / Safety
- includes doxxing, as well as serious threats of IRL harm
3. Spamming and Forum Pollution
- might apply to a flamewar if it gets to the point where it's derailing multiple threads
- would justify the creation of rules on where different types of content belong
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Please indicate if you agree, disagree, or have no opinion:
Bsh1 should be replaced as chief mod by someone who has a more lax approach to moderation.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com